Andrii Nikitin andriinikitin
  • Joined on 2025-04-08
andriinikitin commented on pull request git-workflow/autogits#171 2026-03-19 11:10:56 +01:00
t-workflow-direct-sync

something is wrong after the merge as I cannot find any actual call to the function:

andriinikitin suggested changes for git-workflow/autogits#171 2026-03-19 11:10:56 +01:00
t-workflow-direct-sync

there are few missing details after merging main

andriinikitin commented on pull request git-workflow/autogits#171 2026-03-19 11:10:56 +01:00
t-workflow-direct-sync

gwf-rabbitmq

andriinikitin commented on pull request git-workflow/autogits#171 2026-03-19 11:10:56 +01:00
t-workflow-direct-sync

gwf-gitea-test

andriinikitin commented on pull request git-workflow/autogits#171 2026-03-19 11:10:56 +01:00
t-workflow-direct-sync

we must add prefix gwf- to the container names after recent changes

andriinikitin commented on pull request git-workflow/autogits#183 2026-03-19 09:54:30 +01:00
t: add TC-MERGE-004

While test_004 verifies that PRs merge when all "merge ok" comments are present, it does not verify the intermediate state where only one of the two package PRs has been approved for merging. To fully satisfy the test plan ("Verify PR is merged only after merge ok is commented on all..."), the test should ideally check that the project PR remains unmerged after the first "merge ok" comment.

andriinikitin suggested changes for git-workflow/autogits#183 2026-03-19 09:54:30 +01:00
t: add TC-MERGE-004

the PR is good, let's address mentioned 3 issues and it should be ready for merge

andriinikitin commented on pull request git-workflow/autogits#183 2026-03-19 09:54:30 +01:00
t: add TC-MERGE-004

as discussed in slack - let's remove autogits_obs_staging_bot, because that bot will compete and damage the test requesting review. I guess reusing "manual-merge" should be fine here

andriinikitin commented on pull request git-workflow/autogits#183 2026-03-19 09:54:30 +01:00
t: add TC-MERGE-004

is {p} undefined?

andriinikitin pushed to pr-cleanup-failed-merge at git-workflow/autogits 2026-03-18 15:07:31 +01:00
4a444d14b2 common: ensure failed merge operations are always aborted
fdda064e0f detect a failed merge in project directory
Compare 2 commits »
andriinikitin created pull request git-workflow/autogits#186 2026-03-18 14:30:25 +01:00
t: Project PRs must go from user with no permissions by default
andriinikitin pushed to t-maintainers-noncollaborators at andriinikitin/autogits 2026-03-18 14:27:15 +01:00
ad682ed99c t: Project PRs must go from user with no permissions by default
fdda064e0f detect a failed merge in project directory
Compare 2 commits »
andriinikitin created branch t-maintainers-noncollaborators in andriinikitin/autogits 2026-03-18 14:27:15 +01:00
45461a966f t: use dynamic object names in pr issue tests
andriinikitin commented on pull request git-workflow/autogits#184 2026-03-17 11:13:14 +01:00
pr: cleanup failed merge

Shouldn't we do merge --abort unconditionally here?

andriinikitin commented on pull request git-workflow/autogits#184 2026-03-17 11:11:28 +01:00
pr: cleanup failed merge

(as was discussed with Jan)

andriinikitin created pull request git-workflow/autogits#184 2026-03-17 11:09:33 +01:00
WIP: pr: cleanup failed merge
andriinikitin pushed to pr-cleanup-failed-merge at git-workflow/autogits 2026-03-17 11:08:58 +01:00
4e9d28b87f common: ensure failed merge operations are always aborted
andriinikitin pushed to pr-cleanup-failed-merge at git-workflow/autogits 2026-03-17 10:32:13 +01:00
1165a6e4b1 common: ensure failed merge operations are always aborted
8dda71c22f detect a failed merge in project directory
Compare 2 commits »
andriinikitin created branch pr-cleanup-failed-merge in git-workflow/autogits 2026-03-17 10:32:13 +01:00