967 lines
		
	
	
		
			40 KiB
		
	
	
	
		
			ReStructuredText
		
	
	
	
	
	
		
		
			
		
	
	
			967 lines
		
	
	
		
			40 KiB
		
	
	
	
		
			ReStructuredText
		
	
	
	
	
	
|   | This is the design document for multi-process QEMU. It does not
 | ||
|  | necessarily reflect the status of the current implementation, which
 | ||
|  | may lack features or be considerably different from what is described
 | ||
|  | in this document. This document is still useful as a description of
 | ||
|  | the goals and general direction of this feature.
 | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  | Please refer to the following wiki for latest details:
 | ||
|  | https://wiki.qemu.org/Features/MultiProcessQEMU
 | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  | Multi-process QEMU
 | ||
|  | ===================
 | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  | QEMU is often used as the hypervisor for virtual machines running in the
 | ||
|  | Oracle cloud. Since one of the advantages of cloud computing is the
 | ||
|  | ability to run many VMs from different tenants in the same cloud
 | ||
|  | infrastructure, a guest that compromised its hypervisor could
 | ||
|  | potentially use the hypervisor's access privileges to access data it is
 | ||
|  | not authorized for.
 | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  | QEMU can be susceptible to security attacks because it is a large,
 | ||
|  | monolithic program that provides many features to the VMs it services.
 | ||
|  | Many of these features can be configured out of QEMU, but even a reduced
 | ||
|  | configuration QEMU has a large amount of code a guest can potentially
 | ||
|  | attack. Separating QEMU reduces the attack surface by aiding to
 | ||
|  | limit each component in the system to only access the resources that
 | ||
|  | it needs to perform its job.
 | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  | QEMU services
 | ||
|  | -------------
 | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  | QEMU can be broadly described as providing three main services. One is a
 | ||
|  | VM control point, where VMs can be created, migrated, re-configured, and
 | ||
|  | destroyed. A second is to emulate the CPU instructions within the VM,
 | ||
|  | often accelerated by HW virtualization features such as Intel's VT
 | ||
|  | extensions. Finally, it provides IO services to the VM by emulating HW
 | ||
|  | IO devices, such as disk and network devices.
 | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  | A multi-process QEMU
 | ||
|  | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
 | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  | A multi-process QEMU involves separating QEMU services into separate
 | ||
|  | host processes. Each of these processes can be given only the privileges
 | ||
|  | it needs to provide its service, e.g., a disk service could be given
 | ||
|  | access only to the disk images it provides, and not be allowed to
 | ||
|  | access other files, or any network devices. An attacker who compromised
 | ||
|  | this service would not be able to use this exploit to access files or
 | ||
|  | devices beyond what the disk service was given access to.
 | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  | A QEMU control process would remain, but in multi-process mode, will
 | ||
|  | have no direct interfaces to the VM. During VM execution, it would still
 | ||
|  | provide the user interface to hot-plug devices or live migrate the VM.
 | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  | A first step in creating a multi-process QEMU is to separate IO services
 | ||
|  | from the main QEMU program, which would continue to provide CPU
 | ||
|  | emulation. i.e., the control process would also be the CPU emulation
 | ||
|  | process. In a later phase, CPU emulation could be separated from the
 | ||
|  | control process.
 | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  | Separating IO services
 | ||
|  | ----------------------
 | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  | Separating IO services into individual host processes is a good place to
 | ||
|  | begin for a couple of reasons. One is the sheer number of IO devices QEMU
 | ||
|  | can emulate provides a large surface of interfaces which could potentially
 | ||
|  | be exploited, and, indeed, have been a source of exploits in the past.
 | ||
|  | Another is the modular nature of QEMU device emulation code provides
 | ||
|  | interface points where the QEMU functions that perform device emulation
 | ||
|  | can be separated from the QEMU functions that manage the emulation of
 | ||
|  | guest CPU instructions. The devices emulated in the separate process are
 | ||
|  | referred to as remote devices.
 | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  | QEMU device emulation
 | ||
|  | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
 | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  | QEMU uses an object oriented SW architecture for device emulation code.
 | ||
|  | Configured objects are all compiled into the QEMU binary, then objects
 | ||
|  | are instantiated by name when used by the guest VM. For example, the
 | ||
|  | code to emulate a device named "foo" is always present in QEMU, but its
 | ||
|  | instantiation code is only run when the device is included in the target
 | ||
|  | VM. (e.g., via the QEMU command line as *-device foo*)
 | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  | The object model is hierarchical, so device emulation code names its
 | ||
|  | parent object (such as "pci-device" for a PCI device) and QEMU will
 | ||
|  | instantiate a parent object before calling the device's instantiation
 | ||
|  | code.
 | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  | Current separation models
 | ||
|  | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
 | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  | In order to separate the device emulation code from the CPU emulation
 | ||
|  | code, the device object code must run in a different process. There are
 | ||
|  | a couple of existing QEMU features that can run emulation code
 | ||
|  | separately from the main QEMU process. These are examined below.
 | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  | vhost user model
 | ||
|  | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
 | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  | Virtio guest device drivers can be connected to vhost user applications
 | ||
|  | in order to perform their IO operations. This model uses special virtio
 | ||
|  | device drivers in the guest and vhost user device objects in QEMU, but
 | ||
|  | once the QEMU vhost user code has configured the vhost user application,
 | ||
|  | mission-mode IO is performed by the application. The vhost user
 | ||
|  | application is a daemon process that can be contacted via a known UNIX
 | ||
|  | domain socket.
 | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  | vhost socket
 | ||
|  | ''''''''''''
 | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  | As mentioned above, one of the tasks of the vhost device object within
 | ||
|  | QEMU is to contact the vhost application and send it configuration
 | ||
|  | information about this device instance. As part of the configuration
 | ||
|  | process, the application can also be sent other file descriptors over
 | ||
|  | the socket, which then can be used by the vhost user application in
 | ||
|  | various ways, some of which are described below.
 | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  | vhost MMIO store acceleration
 | ||
|  | '''''''''''''''''''''''''''''
 | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  | VMs are often run using HW virtualization features via the KVM kernel
 | ||
|  | driver. This driver allows QEMU to accelerate the emulation of guest CPU
 | ||
|  | instructions by running the guest in a virtual HW mode. When the guest
 | ||
|  | executes instructions that cannot be executed by virtual HW mode,
 | ||
|  | execution returns to the KVM driver so it can inform QEMU to emulate the
 | ||
|  | instructions in SW.
 | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  | One of the events that can cause a return to QEMU is when a guest device
 | ||
|  | driver accesses an IO location. QEMU then dispatches the memory
 | ||
|  | operation to the corresponding QEMU device object. In the case of a
 | ||
|  | vhost user device, the memory operation would need to be sent over a
 | ||
|  | socket to the vhost application. This path is accelerated by the QEMU
 | ||
|  | virtio code by setting up an eventfd file descriptor that the vhost
 | ||
|  | application can directly receive MMIO store notifications from the KVM
 | ||
|  | driver, instead of needing them to be sent to the QEMU process first.
 | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  | vhost interrupt acceleration
 | ||
|  | ''''''''''''''''''''''''''''
 | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  | Another optimization used by the vhost application is the ability to
 | ||
|  | directly inject interrupts into the VM via the KVM driver, again,
 | ||
|  | bypassing the need to send the interrupt back to the QEMU process first.
 | ||
|  | The QEMU virtio setup code configures the KVM driver with an eventfd
 | ||
|  | that triggers the device interrupt in the guest when the eventfd is
 | ||
|  | written. This irqfd file descriptor is then passed to the vhost user
 | ||
|  | application program.
 | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  | vhost access to guest memory
 | ||
|  | ''''''''''''''''''''''''''''
 | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  | The vhost application is also allowed to directly access guest memory,
 | ||
|  | instead of needing to send the data as messages to QEMU. This is also
 | ||
|  | done with file descriptors sent to the vhost user application by QEMU.
 | ||
|  | These descriptors can be passed to ``mmap()`` by the vhost application
 | ||
|  | to map the guest address space into the vhost application.
 | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  | IOMMUs introduce another level of complexity, since the address given to
 | ||
|  | the guest virtio device to DMA to or from is not a guest physical
 | ||
|  | address. This case is handled by having vhost code within QEMU register
 | ||
|  | as a listener for IOMMU mapping changes. The vhost application maintains
 | ||
|  | a cache of IOMMMU translations: sending translation requests back to
 | ||
|  | QEMU on cache misses, and in turn receiving flush requests from QEMU
 | ||
|  | when mappings are purged.
 | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  | applicability to device separation
 | ||
|  | ''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''
 | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  | Much of the vhost model can be re-used by separated device emulation. In
 | ||
|  | particular, the ideas of using a socket between QEMU and the device
 | ||
|  | emulation application, using a file descriptor to inject interrupts into
 | ||
|  | the VM via KVM, and allowing the application to ``mmap()`` the guest
 | ||
|  | should be re used.
 | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  | There are, however, some notable differences between how a vhost
 | ||
|  | application works and the needs of separated device emulation. The most
 | ||
|  | basic is that vhost uses custom virtio device drivers which always
 | ||
|  | trigger IO with MMIO stores. A separated device emulation model must
 | ||
|  | work with existing IO device models and guest device drivers. MMIO loads
 | ||
|  | break vhost store acceleration since they are synchronous - guest
 | ||
|  | progress cannot continue until the load has been emulated. By contrast,
 | ||
|  | stores are asynchronous, the guest can continue after the store event
 | ||
|  | has been sent to the vhost application.
 | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  | Another difference is that in the vhost user model, a single daemon can
 | ||
|  | support multiple QEMU instances. This is contrary to the security regime
 | ||
|  | desired, in which the emulation application should only be allowed to
 | ||
|  | access the files or devices the VM it's running on behalf of can access.
 | ||
|  | #### qemu-io model
 | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  | Qemu-io is a test harness used to test changes to the QEMU block backend
 | ||
|  | object code. (e.g., the code that implements disk images for disk driver
 | ||
|  | emulation) Qemu-io is not a device emulation application per se, but it
 | ||
|  | does compile the QEMU block objects into a separate binary from the main
 | ||
|  | QEMU one. This could be useful for disk device emulation, since its
 | ||
|  | emulation applications will need to include the QEMU block objects.
 | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  | New separation model based on proxy objects
 | ||
|  | -------------------------------------------
 | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  | A different model based on proxy objects in the QEMU program
 | ||
|  | communicating with remote emulation programs could provide separation
 | ||
|  | while minimizing the changes needed to the device emulation code. The
 | ||
|  | rest of this section is a discussion of how a proxy object model would
 | ||
|  | work.
 | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  | Remote emulation processes
 | ||
|  | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
 | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  | The remote emulation process will run the QEMU object hierarchy without
 | ||
|  | modification. The device emulation objects will be also be based on the
 | ||
|  | QEMU code, because for anything but the simplest device, it would not be
 | ||
|  | a tractable to re-implement both the object model and the many device
 | ||
|  | backends that QEMU has.
 | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  | The processes will communicate with the QEMU process over UNIX domain
 | ||
|  | sockets. The processes can be executed either as standalone processes,
 | ||
|  | or be executed by QEMU. In both cases, the host backends the emulation
 | ||
|  | processes will provide are specified on its command line, as they would
 | ||
|  | be for QEMU. For example:
 | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  | ::
 | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  |     disk-proc -blockdev driver=file,node-name=file0,filename=disk-file0  \
 | ||
|  |     -blockdev driver=qcow2,node-name=drive0,file=file0
 | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  | would indicate process *disk-proc* uses a qcow2 emulated disk named
 | ||
|  | *file0* as its backend.
 | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  | Emulation processes may emulate more than one guest controller. A common
 | ||
|  | configuration might be to put all controllers of the same device class
 | ||
|  | (e.g., disk, network, etc.) in a single process, so that all backends of
 | ||
|  | the same type can be managed by a single QMP monitor.
 | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  | communication with QEMU
 | ||
|  | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
 | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  | The first argument to the remote emulation process will be a Unix domain
 | ||
|  | socket that connects with the Proxy object. This is a required argument.
 | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  | ::
 | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  |     disk-proc <socket number> <backend list>
 | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  | remote process QMP monitor
 | ||
|  | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
 | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  | Remote emulation processes can be monitored via QMP, similar to QEMU
 | ||
|  | itself. The QMP monitor socket is specified the same as for a QEMU
 | ||
|  | process:
 | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  | ::
 | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  |     disk-proc -qmp unix:/tmp/disk-mon,server
 | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  | can be monitored over the UNIX socket path */tmp/disk-mon*.
 | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  | QEMU command line
 | ||
|  | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
 | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  | Each remote device emulated in a remote process on the host is
 | ||
|  | represented as a *-device* of type *pci-proxy-dev*. A socket
 | ||
|  | sub-option to this option specifies the Unix socket that connects
 | ||
|  | to the remote process. An *id* sub-option is required, and it should
 | ||
|  | be the same id as used in the remote process.
 | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  | ::
 | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  |     qemu-system-x86_64 ... -device pci-proxy-dev,id=lsi0,socket=3
 | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  | can be used to add a device emulated in a remote process
 | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  | QEMU management of remote processes
 | ||
|  | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
 | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  | QEMU is not aware of the type of type of the remote PCI device. It is
 | ||
|  | a pass through device as far as QEMU is concerned.
 | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  | communication with emulation process
 | ||
|  | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
 | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  | primary channel
 | ||
|  | '''''''''''''''
 | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  | The primary channel (referred to as com in the code) is used to bootstrap
 | ||
|  | the remote process. It is also used to pass on device-agnostic commands
 | ||
|  | like reset.
 | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  | per-device channels
 | ||
|  | '''''''''''''''''''
 | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  | Each remote device communicates with QEMU using a dedicated communication
 | ||
|  | channel. The proxy object sets up this channel using the primary
 | ||
|  | channel during its initialization.
 | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  | QEMU device proxy objects
 | ||
|  | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
 | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  | QEMU has an object model based on sub-classes inherited from the
 | ||
|  | "object" super-class. The sub-classes that are of interest here are the
 | ||
|  | "device" and "bus" sub-classes whose child sub-classes make up the
 | ||
|  | device tree of a QEMU emulated system.
 | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  | The proxy object model will use device proxy objects to replace the
 | ||
|  | device emulation code within the QEMU process. These objects will live
 | ||
|  | in the same place in the object and bus hierarchies as the objects they
 | ||
|  | replace. i.e., the proxy object for an LSI SCSI controller will be a
 | ||
|  | sub-class of the "pci-device" class, and will have the same PCI bus
 | ||
|  | parent and the same SCSI bus child objects as the LSI controller object
 | ||
|  | it replaces.
 | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  | It is worth noting that the same proxy object is used to mediate with
 | ||
|  | all types of remote PCI devices.
 | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  | object initialization
 | ||
|  | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
 | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  | The Proxy device objects are initialized in the exact same manner in
 | ||
|  | which any other QEMU device would be initialized.
 | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  | In addition, the Proxy objects perform the following two tasks:
 | ||
|  | - Parses the "socket" sub option and connects to the remote process
 | ||
|  | using this channel
 | ||
|  | - Uses the "id" sub-option to connect to the emulated device on the
 | ||
|  | separate process
 | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  | class\_init
 | ||
|  | '''''''''''
 | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  | The ``class_init()`` method of a proxy object will, in general behave
 | ||
|  | similarly to the object it replaces, including setting any static
 | ||
|  | properties and methods needed by the proxy.
 | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  | instance\_init / realize
 | ||
|  | ''''''''''''''''''''''''
 | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  | The ``instance_init()`` and ``realize()`` functions would only need to
 | ||
|  | perform tasks related to being a proxy, such are registering its own
 | ||
|  | MMIO handlers, or creating a child bus that other proxy devices can be
 | ||
|  | attached to later.
 | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  | Other tasks will be device-specific. For example, PCI device objects
 | ||
|  | will initialize the PCI config space in order to make a valid PCI device
 | ||
|  | tree within the QEMU process.
 | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  | address space registration
 | ||
|  | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
 | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  | Most devices are driven by guest device driver accesses to IO addresses
 | ||
|  | or ports. The QEMU device emulation code uses QEMU's memory region
 | ||
|  | function calls (such as ``memory_region_init_io()``) to add callback
 | ||
|  | functions that QEMU will invoke when the guest accesses the device's
 | ||
|  | areas of the IO address space. When a guest driver does access the
 | ||
|  | device, the VM will exit HW virtualization mode and return to QEMU,
 | ||
|  | which will then lookup and execute the corresponding callback function.
 | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  | A proxy object would need to mirror the memory region calls the actual
 | ||
|  | device emulator would perform in its initialization code, but with its
 | ||
|  | own callbacks. When invoked by QEMU as a result of a guest IO operation,
 | ||
|  | they will forward the operation to the device emulation process.
 | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  | PCI config space
 | ||
|  | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
 | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  | PCI devices also have a configuration space that can be accessed by the
 | ||
|  | guest driver. Guest accesses to this space is not handled by the device
 | ||
|  | emulation object, but by its PCI parent object. Much of this space is
 | ||
|  | read-only, but certain registers (especially BAR and MSI-related ones)
 | ||
|  | need to be propagated to the emulation process.
 | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  | PCI parent proxy
 | ||
|  | ''''''''''''''''
 | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  | One way to propagate guest PCI config accesses is to create a
 | ||
|  | "pci-device-proxy" class that can serve as the parent of a PCI device
 | ||
|  | proxy object. This class's parent would be "pci-device" and it would
 | ||
|  | override the PCI parent's ``config_read()`` and ``config_write()``
 | ||
|  | methods with ones that forward these operations to the emulation
 | ||
|  | program.
 | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  | interrupt receipt
 | ||
|  | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
 | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  | A proxy for a device that generates interrupts will need to create a
 | ||
|  | socket to receive interrupt indications from the emulation process. An
 | ||
|  | incoming interrupt indication would then be sent up to its bus parent to
 | ||
|  | be injected into the guest. For example, a PCI device object may use
 | ||
|  | ``pci_set_irq()``.
 | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  | live migration
 | ||
|  | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
 | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  | The proxy will register to save and restore any *vmstate* it needs over
 | ||
|  | a live migration event. The device proxy does not need to manage the
 | ||
|  | remote device's *vmstate*; that will be handled by the remote process
 | ||
|  | proxy (see below).
 | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  | QEMU remote device operation
 | ||
|  | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
 | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  | Generic device operations, such as DMA, will be performed by the remote
 | ||
|  | process proxy by sending messages to the remote process.
 | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  | DMA operations
 | ||
|  | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
 | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  | DMA operations would be handled much like vhost applications do. One of
 | ||
|  | the initial messages sent to the emulation process is a guest memory
 | ||
|  | table. Each entry in this table consists of a file descriptor and size
 | ||
|  | that the emulation process can ``mmap()`` to directly access guest
 | ||
|  | memory, similar to ``vhost_user_set_mem_table()``. Note guest memory
 | ||
|  | must be backed by file descriptors, such as when QEMU is given the
 | ||
|  | *-mem-path* command line option.
 | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  | IOMMU operations
 | ||
|  | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
 | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  | When the emulated system includes an IOMMU, the remote process proxy in
 | ||
|  | QEMU will need to create a socket for IOMMU requests from the emulation
 | ||
|  | process. It will handle those requests with an
 | ||
|  | ``address_space_get_iotlb_entry()`` call. In order to handle IOMMU
 | ||
|  | unmaps, the remote process proxy will also register as a listener on the
 | ||
|  | device's DMA address space. When an IOMMU memory region is created
 | ||
|  | within the DMA address space, an IOMMU notifier for unmaps will be added
 | ||
|  | to the memory region that will forward unmaps to the emulation process
 | ||
|  | over the IOMMU socket.
 | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  | device hot-plug via QMP
 | ||
|  | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
 | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  | An QMP "device\_add" command can add a device emulated by a remote
 | ||
|  | process. It will also have "rid" option to the command, just as the
 | ||
|  | *-device* command line option does. The remote process may either be one
 | ||
|  | started at QEMU startup, or be one added by the "add-process" QMP
 | ||
|  | command described above. In either case, the remote process proxy will
 | ||
|  | forward the new device's JSON description to the corresponding emulation
 | ||
|  | process.
 | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  | live migration
 | ||
|  | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
 | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  | The remote process proxy will also register for live migration
 | ||
|  | notifications with ``vmstate_register()``. When called to save state,
 | ||
|  | the proxy will send the remote process a secondary socket file
 | ||
|  | descriptor to save the remote process's device *vmstate* over. The
 | ||
|  | incoming byte stream length and data will be saved as the proxy's
 | ||
|  | *vmstate*. When the proxy is resumed on its new host, this *vmstate*
 | ||
|  | will be extracted, and a secondary socket file descriptor will be sent
 | ||
|  | to the new remote process through which it receives the *vmstate* in
 | ||
|  | order to restore the devices there.
 | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  | device emulation in remote process
 | ||
|  | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
 | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  | The parts of QEMU that the emulation program will need include the
 | ||
|  | object model; the memory emulation objects; the device emulation objects
 | ||
|  | of the targeted device, and any dependent devices; and, the device's
 | ||
|  | backends. It will also need code to setup the machine environment,
 | ||
|  | handle requests from the QEMU process, and route machine-level requests
 | ||
|  | (such as interrupts or IOMMU mappings) back to the QEMU process.
 | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  | initialization
 | ||
|  | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
 | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  | The process initialization sequence will follow the same sequence
 | ||
|  | followed by QEMU. It will first initialize the backend objects, then
 | ||
|  | device emulation objects. The JSON descriptions sent by the QEMU process
 | ||
|  | will drive which objects need to be created.
 | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  | -  address spaces
 | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  | Before the device objects are created, the initial address spaces and
 | ||
|  | memory regions must be configured with ``memory_map_init()``. This
 | ||
|  | creates a RAM memory region object (*system\_memory*) and an IO memory
 | ||
|  | region object (*system\_io*).
 | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  | -  RAM
 | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  | RAM memory region creation will follow how ``pc_memory_init()`` creates
 | ||
|  | them, but must use ``memory_region_init_ram_from_fd()`` instead of
 | ||
|  | ``memory_region_allocate_system_memory()``. The file descriptors needed
 | ||
|  | will be supplied by the guest memory table from above. Those RAM regions
 | ||
|  | would then be added to the *system\_memory* memory region with
 | ||
|  | ``memory_region_add_subregion()``.
 | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  | -  PCI
 | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  | IO initialization will be driven by the JSON descriptions sent from the
 | ||
|  | QEMU process. For a PCI device, a PCI bus will need to be created with
 | ||
|  | ``pci_root_bus_new()``, and a PCI memory region will need to be created
 | ||
|  | and added to the *system\_memory* memory region with
 | ||
|  | ``memory_region_add_subregion_overlap()``. The overlap version is
 | ||
|  | required for architectures where PCI memory overlaps with RAM memory.
 | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  | MMIO handling
 | ||
|  | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^
 | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  | The device emulation objects will use ``memory_region_init_io()`` to
 | ||
|  | install their MMIO handlers, and ``pci_register_bar()`` to associate
 | ||
|  | those handlers with a PCI BAR, as they do within QEMU currently.
 | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  | In order to use ``address_space_rw()`` in the emulation process to
 | ||
|  | handle MMIO requests from QEMU, the PCI physical addresses must be the
 | ||
|  | same in the QEMU process and the device emulation process. In order to
 | ||
|  | accomplish that, guest BAR programming must also be forwarded from QEMU
 | ||
|  | to the emulation process.
 | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  | interrupt injection
 | ||
|  | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
 | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  | When device emulation wants to inject an interrupt into the VM, the
 | ||
|  | request climbs the device's bus object hierarchy until the point where a
 | ||
|  | bus object knows how to signal the interrupt to the guest. The details
 | ||
|  | depend on the type of interrupt being raised.
 | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  | -  PCI pin interrupts
 | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  | On x86 systems, there is an emulated IOAPIC object attached to the root
 | ||
|  | PCI bus object, and the root PCI object forwards interrupt requests to
 | ||
|  | it. The IOAPIC object, in turn, calls the KVM driver to inject the
 | ||
|  | corresponding interrupt into the VM. The simplest way to handle this in
 | ||
|  | an emulation process would be to setup the root PCI bus driver (via
 | ||
|  | ``pci_bus_irqs()``) to send a interrupt request back to the QEMU
 | ||
|  | process, and have the device proxy object reflect it up the PCI tree
 | ||
|  | there.
 | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  | -  PCI MSI/X interrupts
 | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  | PCI MSI/X interrupts are implemented in HW as DMA writes to a
 | ||
|  | CPU-specific PCI address. In QEMU on x86, a KVM APIC object receives
 | ||
|  | these DMA writes, then calls into the KVM driver to inject the interrupt
 | ||
|  | into the VM. A simple emulation process implementation would be to send
 | ||
|  | the MSI DMA address from QEMU as a message at initialization, then
 | ||
|  | install an address space handler at that address which forwards the MSI
 | ||
|  | message back to QEMU.
 | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  | DMA operations
 | ||
|  | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
 | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  | When a emulation object wants to DMA into or out of guest memory, it
 | ||
|  | first must use dma\_memory\_map() to convert the DMA address to a local
 | ||
|  | virtual address. The emulation process memory region objects setup above
 | ||
|  | will be used to translate the DMA address to a local virtual address the
 | ||
|  | device emulation code can access.
 | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  | IOMMU
 | ||
|  | ^^^^^
 | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  | When an IOMMU is in use in QEMU, DMA translation uses IOMMU memory
 | ||
|  | regions to translate the DMA address to a guest physical address before
 | ||
|  | that physical address can be translated to a local virtual address. The
 | ||
|  | emulation process will need similar functionality.
 | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  | -  IOTLB cache
 | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  | The emulation process will maintain a cache of recent IOMMU translations
 | ||
|  | (the IOTLB). When the translate() callback of an IOMMU memory region is
 | ||
|  | invoked, the IOTLB cache will be searched for an entry that will map the
 | ||
|  | DMA address to a guest PA. On a cache miss, a message will be sent back
 | ||
|  | to QEMU requesting the corresponding translation entry, which be both be
 | ||
|  | used to return a guest address and be added to the cache.
 | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  | -  IOTLB purge
 | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  | The IOMMU emulation will also need to act on unmap requests from QEMU.
 | ||
|  | These happen when the guest IOMMU driver purges an entry from the
 | ||
|  | guest's translation table.
 | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  | live migration
 | ||
|  | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
 | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  | When a remote process receives a live migration indication from QEMU, it
 | ||
|  | will set up a channel using the received file descriptor with
 | ||
|  | ``qio_channel_socket_new_fd()``. This channel will be used to create a
 | ||
|  | *QEMUfile* that can be passed to ``qemu_save_device_state()`` to send
 | ||
|  | the process's device state back to QEMU. This method will be reversed on
 | ||
|  | restore - the channel will be passed to ``qemu_loadvm_state()`` to
 | ||
|  | restore the device state.
 | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  | Accelerating device emulation
 | ||
|  | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
 | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  | The messages that are required to be sent between QEMU and the emulation
 | ||
|  | process can add considerable latency to IO operations. The optimizations
 | ||
|  | described below attempt to ameliorate this effect by allowing the
 | ||
|  | emulation process to communicate directly with the kernel KVM driver.
 | ||
|  | The KVM file descriptors created would be passed to the emulation process
 | ||
|  | via initialization messages, much like the guest memory table is done.
 | ||
|  | #### MMIO acceleration
 | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  | Vhost user applications can receive guest virtio driver stores directly
 | ||
|  | from KVM. The issue with the eventfd mechanism used by vhost user is
 | ||
|  | that it does not pass any data with the event indication, so it cannot
 | ||
|  | handle guest loads or guest stores that carry store data. This concept
 | ||
|  | could, however, be expanded to cover more cases.
 | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  | The expanded idea would require a new type of KVM device:
 | ||
|  | *KVM\_DEV\_TYPE\_USER*. This device has two file descriptors: a master
 | ||
|  | descriptor that QEMU can use for configuration, and a slave descriptor
 | ||
|  | that the emulation process can use to receive MMIO notifications. QEMU
 | ||
|  | would create both descriptors using the KVM driver, and pass the slave
 | ||
|  | descriptor to the emulation process via an initialization message.
 | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  | data structures
 | ||
|  | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
 | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  | -  guest physical range
 | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  | The guest physical range structure describes the address range that a
 | ||
|  | device will respond to. It includes the base and length of the range, as
 | ||
|  | well as which bus the range resides on (e.g., on an x86machine, it can
 | ||
|  | specify whether the range refers to memory or IO addresses).
 | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  | A device can have multiple physical address ranges it responds to (e.g.,
 | ||
|  | a PCI device can have multiple BARs), so the structure will also include
 | ||
|  | an enumerated identifier to specify which of the device's ranges is
 | ||
|  | being referred to.
 | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  | +--------+----------------------------+
 | ||
|  | | Name   | Description                |
 | ||
|  | +========+============================+
 | ||
|  | | addr   | range base address         |
 | ||
|  | +--------+----------------------------+
 | ||
|  | | len    | range length               |
 | ||
|  | +--------+----------------------------+
 | ||
|  | | bus    | addr type (memory or IO)   |
 | ||
|  | +--------+----------------------------+
 | ||
|  | | id     | range ID (e.g., PCI BAR)   |
 | ||
|  | +--------+----------------------------+
 | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  | -  MMIO request structure
 | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  | This structure describes an MMIO operation. It includes which guest
 | ||
|  | physical range the MMIO was within, the offset within that range, the
 | ||
|  | MMIO type (e.g., load or store), and its length and data. It also
 | ||
|  | includes a sequence number that can be used to reply to the MMIO, and
 | ||
|  | the CPU that issued the MMIO.
 | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  | +----------+------------------------+
 | ||
|  | | Name     | Description            |
 | ||
|  | +==========+========================+
 | ||
|  | | rid      | range MMIO is within   |
 | ||
|  | +----------+------------------------+
 | ||
|  | | offset   | offset withing *rid*   |
 | ||
|  | +----------+------------------------+
 | ||
|  | | type     | e.g., load or store    |
 | ||
|  | +----------+------------------------+
 | ||
|  | | len      | MMIO length            |
 | ||
|  | +----------+------------------------+
 | ||
|  | | data     | store data             |
 | ||
|  | +----------+------------------------+
 | ||
|  | | seq      | sequence ID            |
 | ||
|  | +----------+------------------------+
 | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  | -  MMIO request queues
 | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  | MMIO request queues are FIFO arrays of MMIO request structures. There
 | ||
|  | are two queues: pending queue is for MMIOs that haven't been read by the
 | ||
|  | emulation program, and the sent queue is for MMIOs that haven't been
 | ||
|  | acknowledged. The main use of the second queue is to validate MMIO
 | ||
|  | replies from the emulation program.
 | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  | -  scoreboard
 | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  | Each CPU in the VM is emulated in QEMU by a separate thread, so multiple
 | ||
|  | MMIOs may be waiting to be consumed by an emulation program and multiple
 | ||
|  | threads may be waiting for MMIO replies. The scoreboard would contain a
 | ||
|  | wait queue and sequence number for the per-CPU threads, allowing them to
 | ||
|  | be individually woken when the MMIO reply is received from the emulation
 | ||
|  | program. It also tracks the number of posted MMIO stores to the device
 | ||
|  | that haven't been replied to, in order to satisfy the PCI constraint
 | ||
|  | that a load to a device will not complete until all previous stores to
 | ||
|  | that device have been completed.
 | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  | -  device shadow memory
 | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  | Some MMIO loads do not have device side-effects. These MMIOs can be
 | ||
|  | completed without sending a MMIO request to the emulation program if the
 | ||
|  | emulation program shares a shadow image of the device's memory image
 | ||
|  | with the KVM driver.
 | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  | The emulation program will ask the KVM driver to allocate memory for the
 | ||
|  | shadow image, and will then use ``mmap()`` to directly access it. The
 | ||
|  | emulation program can control KVM access to the shadow image by sending
 | ||
|  | KVM an access map telling it which areas of the image have no
 | ||
|  | side-effects (and can be completed immediately), and which require a
 | ||
|  | MMIO request to the emulation program. The access map can also inform
 | ||
|  | the KVM drive which size accesses are allowed to the image.
 | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  | master descriptor
 | ||
|  | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
 | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  | The master descriptor is used by QEMU to configure the new KVM device.
 | ||
|  | The descriptor would be returned by the KVM driver when QEMU issues a
 | ||
|  | *KVM\_CREATE\_DEVICE* ``ioctl()`` with a *KVM\_DEV\_TYPE\_USER* type.
 | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  | KVM\_DEV\_TYPE\_USER device ops
 | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  | The *KVM\_DEV\_TYPE\_USER* operations vector will be registered by a
 | ||
|  | ``kvm_register_device_ops()`` call when the KVM system in initialized by
 | ||
|  | ``kvm_init()``. These device ops are called by the KVM driver when QEMU
 | ||
|  | executes certain ``ioctl()`` operations on its KVM file descriptor. They
 | ||
|  | include:
 | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  | -  create
 | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  | This routine is called when QEMU issues a *KVM\_CREATE\_DEVICE*
 | ||
|  | ``ioctl()`` on its per-VM file descriptor. It will allocate and
 | ||
|  | initialize a KVM user device specific data structure, and assign the
 | ||
|  | *kvm\_device* private field to it.
 | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  | -  ioctl
 | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  | This routine is invoked when QEMU issues an ``ioctl()`` on the master
 | ||
|  | descriptor. The ``ioctl()`` commands supported are defined by the KVM
 | ||
|  | device type. *KVM\_DEV\_TYPE\_USER* ones will need several commands:
 | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  | *KVM\_DEV\_USER\_SLAVE\_FD* creates the slave file descriptor that will
 | ||
|  | be passed to the device emulation program. Only one slave can be created
 | ||
|  | by each master descriptor. The file operations performed by this
 | ||
|  | descriptor are described below.
 | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  | The *KVM\_DEV\_USER\_PA\_RANGE* command configures a guest physical
 | ||
|  | address range that the slave descriptor will receive MMIO notifications
 | ||
|  | for. The range is specified by a guest physical range structure
 | ||
|  | argument. For buses that assign addresses to devices dynamically, this
 | ||
|  | command can be executed while the guest is running, such as the case
 | ||
|  | when a guest changes a device's PCI BAR registers.
 | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  | *KVM\_DEV\_USER\_PA\_RANGE* will use ``kvm_io_bus_register_dev()`` to
 | ||
|  | register *kvm\_io\_device\_ops* callbacks to be invoked when the guest
 | ||
|  | performs a MMIO operation within the range. When a range is changed,
 | ||
|  | ``kvm_io_bus_unregister_dev()`` is used to remove the previous
 | ||
|  | instantiation.
 | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  | *KVM\_DEV\_USER\_TIMEOUT* will configure a timeout value that specifies
 | ||
|  | how long KVM will wait for the emulation process to respond to a MMIO
 | ||
|  | indication.
 | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  | -  destroy
 | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  | This routine is called when the VM instance is destroyed. It will need
 | ||
|  | to destroy the slave descriptor; and free any memory allocated by the
 | ||
|  | driver, as well as the *kvm\_device* structure itself.
 | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  | slave descriptor
 | ||
|  | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
 | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  | The slave descriptor will have its own file operations vector, which
 | ||
|  | responds to system calls on the descriptor performed by the device
 | ||
|  | emulation program.
 | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  | -  read
 | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  | A read returns any pending MMIO requests from the KVM driver as MMIO
 | ||
|  | request structures. Multiple structures can be returned if there are
 | ||
|  | multiple MMIO operations pending. The MMIO requests are moved from the
 | ||
|  | pending queue to the sent queue, and if there are threads waiting for
 | ||
|  | space in the pending to add new MMIO operations, they will be woken
 | ||
|  | here.
 | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  | -  write
 | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  | A write also consists of a set of MMIO requests. They are compared to
 | ||
|  | the MMIO requests in the sent queue. Matches are removed from the sent
 | ||
|  | queue, and any threads waiting for the reply are woken. If a store is
 | ||
|  | removed, then the number of posted stores in the per-CPU scoreboard is
 | ||
|  | decremented. When the number is zero, and a non side-effect load was
 | ||
|  | waiting for posted stores to complete, the load is continued.
 | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  | -  ioctl
 | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  | There are several ioctl()s that can be performed on the slave
 | ||
|  | descriptor.
 | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  | A *KVM\_DEV\_USER\_SHADOW\_SIZE* ``ioctl()`` causes the KVM driver to
 | ||
|  | allocate memory for the shadow image. This memory can later be
 | ||
|  | ``mmap()``\ ed by the emulation process to share the emulation's view of
 | ||
|  | device memory with the KVM driver.
 | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  | A *KVM\_DEV\_USER\_SHADOW\_CTRL* ``ioctl()`` controls access to the
 | ||
|  | shadow image. It will send the KVM driver a shadow control map, which
 | ||
|  | specifies which areas of the image can complete guest loads without
 | ||
|  | sending the load request to the emulation program. It will also specify
 | ||
|  | the size of load operations that are allowed.
 | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  | -  poll
 | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  | An emulation program will use the ``poll()`` call with a *POLLIN* flag
 | ||
|  | to determine if there are MMIO requests waiting to be read. It will
 | ||
|  | return if the pending MMIO request queue is not empty.
 | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  | -  mmap
 | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  | This call allows the emulation program to directly access the shadow
 | ||
|  | image allocated by the KVM driver. As device emulation updates device
 | ||
|  | memory, changes with no side-effects will be reflected in the shadow,
 | ||
|  | and the KVM driver can satisfy guest loads from the shadow image without
 | ||
|  | needing to wait for the emulation program.
 | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  | kvm\_io\_device ops
 | ||
|  | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
 | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  | Each KVM per-CPU thread can handle MMIO operation on behalf of the guest
 | ||
|  | VM. KVM will use the MMIO's guest physical address to search for a
 | ||
|  | matching *kvm\_io\_device* to see if the MMIO can be handled by the KVM
 | ||
|  | driver instead of exiting back to QEMU. If a match is found, the
 | ||
|  | corresponding callback will be invoked.
 | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  | -  read
 | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  | This callback is invoked when the guest performs a load to the device.
 | ||
|  | Loads with side-effects must be handled synchronously, with the KVM
 | ||
|  | driver putting the QEMU thread to sleep waiting for the emulation
 | ||
|  | process reply before re-starting the guest. Loads that do not have
 | ||
|  | side-effects may be optimized by satisfying them from the shadow image,
 | ||
|  | if there are no outstanding stores to the device by this CPU. PCI memory
 | ||
|  | ordering demands that a load cannot complete before all older stores to
 | ||
|  | the same device have been completed.
 | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  | -  write
 | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  | Stores can be handled asynchronously unless the pending MMIO request
 | ||
|  | queue is full. In this case, the QEMU thread must sleep waiting for
 | ||
|  | space in the queue. Stores will increment the number of posted stores in
 | ||
|  | the per-CPU scoreboard, in order to implement the PCI ordering
 | ||
|  | constraint above.
 | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  | interrupt acceleration
 | ||
|  | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
 | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  | This performance optimization would work much like a vhost user
 | ||
|  | application does, where the QEMU process sets up *eventfds* that cause
 | ||
|  | the device's corresponding interrupt to be triggered by the KVM driver.
 | ||
|  | These irq file descriptors are sent to the emulation process at
 | ||
|  | initialization, and are used when the emulation code raises a device
 | ||
|  | interrupt.
 | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  | intx acceleration
 | ||
|  | '''''''''''''''''
 | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  | Traditional PCI pin interrupts are level based, so, in addition to an
 | ||
|  | irq file descriptor, a re-sampling file descriptor needs to be sent to
 | ||
|  | the emulation program. This second file descriptor allows multiple
 | ||
|  | devices sharing an irq to be notified when the interrupt has been
 | ||
|  | acknowledged by the guest, so they can re-trigger the interrupt if their
 | ||
|  | device has not de-asserted its interrupt.
 | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  | intx irq descriptor
 | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  | The irq descriptors are created by the proxy object
 | ||
|  | ``using event_notifier_init()`` to create the irq and re-sampling
 | ||
|  | *eventds*, and ``kvm_vm_ioctl(KVM_IRQFD)`` to bind them to an interrupt.
 | ||
|  | The interrupt route can be found with
 | ||
|  | ``pci_device_route_intx_to_irq()``.
 | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  | intx routing changes
 | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  | Intx routing can be changed when the guest programs the APIC the device
 | ||
|  | pin is connected to. The proxy object in QEMU will use
 | ||
|  | ``pci_device_set_intx_routing_notifier()`` to be informed of any guest
 | ||
|  | changes to the route. This handler will broadly follow the VFIO
 | ||
|  | interrupt logic to change the route: de-assigning the existing irq
 | ||
|  | descriptor from its route, then assigning it the new route. (see
 | ||
|  | ``vfio_intx_update()``)
 | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  | MSI/X acceleration
 | ||
|  | ''''''''''''''''''
 | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  | MSI/X interrupts are sent as DMA transactions to the host. The interrupt
 | ||
|  | data contains a vector that is programmed by the guest, A device may have
 | ||
|  | multiple MSI interrupts associated with it, so multiple irq descriptors
 | ||
|  | may need to be sent to the emulation program.
 | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  | MSI/X irq descriptor
 | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  | This case will also follow the VFIO example. For each MSI/X interrupt,
 | ||
|  | an *eventfd* is created, a virtual interrupt is allocated by
 | ||
|  | ``kvm_irqchip_add_msi_route()``, and the virtual interrupt is bound to
 | ||
|  | the eventfd with ``kvm_irqchip_add_irqfd_notifier()``.
 | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  | MSI/X config space changes
 | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  | The guest may dynamically update several MSI-related tables in the
 | ||
|  | device's PCI config space. These include per-MSI interrupt enables and
 | ||
|  | vector data. Additionally, MSIX tables exist in device memory space, not
 | ||
|  | config space. Much like the BAR case above, the proxy object must look
 | ||
|  | at guest config space programming to keep the MSI interrupt state
 | ||
|  | consistent between QEMU and the emulation program.
 | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  | --------------
 | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  | Disaggregated CPU emulation
 | ||
|  | ---------------------------
 | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  | After IO services have been disaggregated, a second phase would be to
 | ||
|  | separate a process to handle CPU instruction emulation from the main
 | ||
|  | QEMU control function. There are no object separation points for this
 | ||
|  | code, so the first task would be to create one.
 | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  | Host access controls
 | ||
|  | --------------------
 | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  | Separating QEMU relies on the host OS's access restriction mechanisms to
 | ||
|  | enforce that the differing processes can only access the objects they
 | ||
|  | are entitled to. There are a couple types of mechanisms usually provided
 | ||
|  | by general purpose OSs.
 | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  | Discretionary access control
 | ||
|  | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
 | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  | Discretionary access control allows each user to control who can access
 | ||
|  | their files. In Linux, this type of control is usually too coarse for
 | ||
|  | QEMU separation, since it only provides three separate access controls:
 | ||
|  | one for the same user ID, the second for users IDs with the same group
 | ||
|  | ID, and the third for all other user IDs. Each device instance would
 | ||
|  | need a separate user ID to provide access control, which is likely to be
 | ||
|  | unwieldy for dynamically created VMs.
 | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  | Mandatory access control
 | ||
|  | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
 | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  | Mandatory access control allows the OS to add an additional set of
 | ||
|  | controls on top of discretionary access for the OS to control. It also
 | ||
|  | adds other attributes to processes and files such as types, roles, and
 | ||
|  | categories, and can establish rules for how processes and files can
 | ||
|  | interact.
 | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  | Type enforcement
 | ||
|  | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
 | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  | Type enforcement assigns a *type* attribute to processes and files, and
 | ||
|  | allows rules to be written on what operations a process with a given
 | ||
|  | type can perform on a file with a given type. QEMU separation could take
 | ||
|  | advantage of type enforcement by running the emulation processes with
 | ||
|  | different types, both from the main QEMU process, and from the emulation
 | ||
|  | processes of different classes of devices.
 | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  | For example, guest disk images and disk emulation processes could have
 | ||
|  | types separate from the main QEMU process and non-disk emulation
 | ||
|  | processes, and the type rules could prevent processes other than disk
 | ||
|  | emulation ones from accessing guest disk images. Similarly, network
 | ||
|  | emulation processes can have a type separate from the main QEMU process
 | ||
|  | and non-network emulation process, and only that type can access the
 | ||
|  | host tun/tap device used to provide guest networking.
 | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  | Category enforcement
 | ||
|  | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
 | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  | Category enforcement assigns a set of numbers within a given range to
 | ||
|  | the process or file. The process is granted access to the file if the
 | ||
|  | process's set is a superset of the file's set. This enforcement can be
 | ||
|  | used to separate multiple instances of devices in the same class.
 | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  | For example, if there are multiple disk devices provides to a guest,
 | ||
|  | each device emulation process could be provisioned with a separate
 | ||
|  | category. The different device emulation processes would not be able to
 | ||
|  | access each other's backing disk images.
 | ||
|  | 
 | ||
|  | Alternatively, categories could be used in lieu of the type enforcement
 | ||
|  | scheme described above. In this scenario, different categories would be
 | ||
|  | used to prevent device emulation processes in different classes from
 | ||
|  | accessing resources assigned to other classes.
 |