memory_region_allocate_system_memory() API is going away, so
replace it with memdev allocated MemoryRegion. The later is
initialized by generic code, so board only needs to opt in
to memdev scheme by providing
MachineClass::default_ram_id
and using MachineState::ram instead of manually initializing
RAM memory region.
Signed-off-by: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-Id: <20200219160953.13771-36-imammedo@redhat.com>
If user provided non-sense RAM size, board will complain and
continue running with max RAM size supported.
Also RAM is going to be allocated by generic code, so it won't be
possible for board to fix things up for user.
Make it error message and exit to force user fix CLI,
instead of accepting non-sense CLI values.
Signed-off-by: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20200219160953.13771-35-imammedo@redhat.com>
memory_region_allocate_system_memory() API is going away,
so replace it with memdev allocated MemoryRegion.
The later is initialized by generic code, so board only
needs to opt in to memdev scheme by providing
MachineClass::default_ram_id
and then map memory region provided by
MachineState::ram_memdev
Signed-off-by: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-Id: <20200219160953.13771-34-imammedo@redhat.com>
replace it with memdev allocated MemoryRegion. The later is
initialized by generic code, so board only needs to opt in
to memdev scheme by providing
MachineClass::default_ram_id
and using MachineState::ram instead of manually initializing
RAM memory region.
Signed-off-by: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-Id: <20200219160953.13771-33-imammedo@redhat.com>
memory_region_allocate_system_memory() API is going away, so
replace it with memdev allocated MemoryRegion. The later is
initialized by generic code, so board only needs to opt in
to memdev scheme by providing
MachineClass::default_ram_id
and using MachineState::ram instead of manually initializing
RAM memory region.
Signed-off-by: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-Id: <20200219160953.13771-32-imammedo@redhat.com>
memory_region_allocate_system_memory() API is going away, so
replace it with memdev allocated MemoryRegion. The later is
initialized by generic code, so board only needs to opt in
to memdev scheme by providing
MachineClass::default_ram_id
and using MachineState::ram instead of manually initializing
RAM memory region.
Signed-off-by: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-Id: <20200219160953.13771-31-imammedo@redhat.com>
memory_region_allocate_system_memory() API is going away, so
replace it with memdev allocated MemoryRegion. The later is
initialized by generic code, so board only needs to opt in
to memdev scheme by providing
MachineClass::default_ram_id
and using MachineState::ram instead of manually initializing
RAM memory region.
Signed-off-by: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-Id: <20200219160953.13771-30-imammedo@redhat.com>
memory_region_allocate_system_memory() API is going away, so
replace it with memdev allocated MemoryRegion. The later is
initialized by generic code, so board only needs to opt in
to memdev scheme by providing
MachineClass::default_ram_id
and using MachineState::ram instead of manually initializing
RAM memory region.
PS:
remove no longer needed IMX6Sabrelite
Signed-off-by: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-Id: <20200219160953.13771-29-imammedo@redhat.com>
memory_region_allocate_system_memory() API is going away, so
replace it with memdev allocated MemoryRegion. The later is
initialized by generic code, so board only needs to opt in
to memdev scheme by providing
MachineClass::default_ram_id
and using MachineState::ram instead of manually initializing
RAM memory region.
PS:
while at it add check for user supplied RAM size and error
out if it mismatches board expected value.
Signed-off-by: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20200219160953.13771-28-imammedo@redhat.com>
memory_region_allocate_system_memory() API is going away, so
replace it with memdev allocated MemoryRegion. The later is
initialized by generic code, so board only needs to opt in
to memdev scheme by providing
MachineClass::default_ram_id
and using MachineState::ram instead of manually initializing
RAM memory region.
PS:
while at it add check for user supplied RAM size and error
out if it mismatches board expected value.
Signed-off-by: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20200219160953.13771-27-imammedo@redhat.com>
memory_region_allocate_system_memory() API is going away, so
replace it with memdev allocated MemoryRegion. The later is
initialized by generic code, so board only needs to opt in
to memdev scheme by providing
MachineClass::default_ram_id
and using MachineState::ram instead of manually initializing
RAM memory region.
PS:
while at it add check for user supplied RAM size and error
out if it mismatches board expected value.
Signed-off-by: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-Id: <20200219160953.13771-26-imammedo@redhat.com>
memory_region_allocate_system_memory() API is going away, so
replace it with memdev allocated MemoryRegion. The later is
initialized by generic code, so board only needs to opt in
to memdev scheme by providing
MachineClass::default_ram_id
and using MachineState::ram instead of manually initializing
RAM memory region.
PS:
while at it add check for user supplied RAM size and error
out if it mismatches board expected value.
Signed-off-by: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-Id: <20200219160953.13771-25-imammedo@redhat.com>
memory_region_allocate_system_memory() API is going away, so
replace it with memdev allocated MemoryRegion. The later is
initialized by generic code, so board only needs to opt in
to memdev scheme by providing
MachineClass::default_ram_id
and using MachineState::ram instead of manually initializing
RAM memory region.
PS:
while at it add check for user supplied RAM size and error
out if it mismatches board expected value.
Signed-off-by: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20200219160953.13771-24-imammedo@redhat.com>
memory_region_allocate_system_memory() API is going away, so
replace it with memdev allocated MemoryRegion. The later is
initialized by generic code, so board only needs to opt in
to memdev scheme by providing
MachineClass::default_ram_id
and using MachineState::ram instead of manually initializing
RAM memory region.
PS:
while at it add check for user supplied RAM size and error
out if it mismatches board expected value.
Signed-off-by: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20200219160953.13771-23-imammedo@redhat.com>
memory_region_allocate_system_memory() API is going away, so
replace it with memdev allocated MemoryRegion. The later is
initialized by generic code, so board only needs to opt in
to memdev scheme by providing
MachineClass::default_ram_id
and using MachineState::ram instead of manually initializing
RAM memory region.
PS:
remove no longer needed MCIMX7Sabre
Signed-off-by: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-Id: <20200219160953.13771-22-imammedo@redhat.com>
memory_region_allocate_system_memory() API is going away, so
replace it with memdev allocated MemoryRegion. The later is
initialized by generic code, so board only needs to opt in
to memdev scheme by providing
MachineClass::default_ram_id
and using MachineState::ram instead of manually initializing
RAM memory region.
PS:
remove no longer needed MCIMX6ULEVK
Signed-off-by: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20200219160953.13771-21-imammedo@redhat.com>
memory_region_allocate_system_memory() API is going away, so
replace it with memdev allocated MemoryRegion. The later is
initialized by generic code, so board only needs to opt in
to memdev scheme by providing
MachineClass::default_ram_id
and using MachineState::ram instead of manually initializing
RAM memory region.
Signed-off-by: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Chubb <peter.chubb@data61.csiro.au>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-Id: <20200219160953.13771-20-imammedo@redhat.com>
memory_region_allocate_system_memory() API is going away, so
replace it with memdev allocated MemoryRegion. The later is
initialized by generic code, so board only needs to opt in
to memdev scheme by providing
MachineClass::default_ram_id
and using MachineState::ram instead of manually initializing
RAM memory region.
Signed-off-by: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-Id: <20200219160953.13771-18-imammedo@redhat.com>
memory_region_allocate_system_memory() API is going away, so
replace it with memdev allocated MemoryRegion. The later is
initialized by generic code, so board only needs to opt in
to memdev scheme by providing
MachineClass::default_ram_id
and using MachineState::ram instead of manually initializing
RAM memory region.
Signed-off-by: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-Id: <20200219160953.13771-17-imammedo@redhat.com>
If user provided non-sense RAM size, board will complain and
continue running with max RAM size supported.
Also RAM is going to be allocated by generic code, so it won't be
possible for board to fix things up for user.
Make it error message and exit to force user fix CLI,
instead of accepting non-sense CLI values.
Signed-off-by: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20200219160953.13771-16-imammedo@redhat.com>
memory_region_allocate_system_memory() API is going away, so
replace it with memdev allocated MemoryRegion. The later is
initialized by generic code, so board only needs to opt in
to memdev scheme by providing
MachineClass::default_ram_id
and using MachineState::ram instead of manually initializing
RAM memory region.
Signed-off-by: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-Id: <20200219160953.13771-15-imammedo@redhat.com>
memory_region_allocate_system_memory() API is going away, so
replace it with memdev allocated MemoryRegion. The later is
initialized by generic code, so board only needs to opt in
to memdev scheme by providing
MachineClass::default_ram_id
and using MachineState::ram instead of manually initializing
RAM memory region.
PS:
remove no longer needed DigicBoardState
PS2:
while at it add check for user supplied RAM size and error
out if it mismatches board expected value.
Signed-off-by: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20200219160953.13771-14-imammedo@redhat.com>
memory_region_allocate_system_memory() API is going away, so
replace it with memdev allocated MemoryRegion. The later is
initialized by generic code, so board only needs to opt in
to memdev scheme by providing
MachineClass::default_ram_id
and using MachineState::ram instead of manually initializing
RAM memory region.
PS:
While at it, get rid of no longer needed CubieBoardState wrapper.
Signed-off-by: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-Id: <20200219160953.13771-13-imammedo@redhat.com>
memory_region_allocate_system_memory() API is going away, so
replace it with memdev allocated MemoryRegion. The later is
initialized by generic code, so board only needs to opt in
to memdev scheme by providing
MachineClass::default_ram_id
and using MachineState::ram instead of manually initializing
RAM memory region.
PS:
- while at it add check for user supplied RAM size and error
out if it mismatches board expected value.
Signed-off-by: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20200219160953.13771-12-imammedo@redhat.com>
memory_region_allocate_system_memory() API is going away, so
replace it with memdev allocated MemoryRegion. The later is
initialized by generic code, so board only needs to opt in
to memdev scheme by providing
MachineClass::default_ram_id
and using MachineState::ram instead of manually initializing
RAM memory region.
Signed-off-by: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Acked-by: Joel Stanley <joel@jms.id.au>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-Id: <20200219160953.13771-11-imammedo@redhat.com>
It's supposed that SOC will check if "-m" provided
RAM size is valid by setting "ram-size" property and
then board would read back valid (possibly corrected
value) to map RAM MemoryReging with valid size.
It isn't doing so, since check is called only
indirectly from
aspeed_sdmc_reset()->asc->compute_conf()
or much later when guest writes to configuration
register.
So depending on "-m" value QEMU end-ups with a warning
and an invalid MemoryRegion size allocated and mapped.
(examples:
-M ast2500-evb -m 1M
0000000080000000-000000017ffffffe (prio 0, i/o): aspeed-ram-container
0000000080000000-00000000800fffff (prio 0, ram): ram
0000000080100000-00000000bfffffff (prio 0, i/o): max_ram
-M ast2500-evb -m 3G
0000000080000000-000000017ffffffe (prio 0, i/o): aspeed-ram-container
0000000080000000-000000013fffffff (prio 0, ram): ram
[DETECTED OVERFLOW!] 0000000140000000-00000000bfffffff (prio 0, i/o): max_ram
)
On top of that sdmc falls back and reports to guest
"default" size, it thinks machine should have.
This patch makes ram-size check actually work and
changes behavior from a warning later on during
machine reset to error_fatal at the moment SOC.ram-size
is set so user will have to fix RAM size on CLI
to start machine.
It also gets out of the way mutable ram-size logic,
so we could consolidate RAM allocation logic around
pre-allocated hostmem backend (supplied by user or
auto created by generic machine code depending on
supplied -m/mem-path/mem-prealloc options.
Signed-off-by: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-Id: <20200219160953.13771-10-imammedo@redhat.com>
The count of ARM cores is encoded in the board revision. Add a
helper to extract the number of cores, and use it. This will be
helpful when we add the Raspi0/1 that have a single core.
Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org>
Message-id: 20200208165645.15657-14-f4bug@amsat.org
Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
[PMM: tweaked commit message as suggested by Igor]
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
We added a helper to extract the RAM size from the board
revision, and made board_rev a field of RaspiMachineClass.
The class_init() can now use the helper to extract from the
board revision the board-specific amount of RAM.
Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org>
Message-id: 20200208165645.15657-11-f4bug@amsat.org
Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
The board revision encode the amount of RAM. Add a helper
to extract the RAM size, and use it.
Since the amount of RAM is fixed (it is impossible to physically
modify to have more or less RAM), do not allow sizes different
than the one anounced by the manufacturer.
Acked-by: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org>
Message-id: 20200208165645.15657-5-f4bug@amsat.org
Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Initialize EHCI controllers on AST2600 using the existing
TYPE_PLATFORM_EHCI. After this change, booting ast2600-evb
into Linux successfully instantiates a USB interface after
the necessary changes are made to its devicetree files.
ehci_hcd: USB 2.0 'Enhanced' Host Controller (EHCI) Driver
ehci-platform: EHCI generic platform driver
ehci-platform 1e6a3000.usb: EHCI Host Controller
ehci-platform 1e6a3000.usb: new USB bus registered, assigned bus number 1
ehci-platform 1e6a3000.usb: irq 25, io mem 0x1e6a3000
ehci-platform 1e6a3000.usb: USB 2.0 started, EHCI 1.00
usb usb1: Manufacturer: Linux 5.5.0-09825-ga0802f2d0ef5-dirty ehci_hcd
usb 1-1: new high-speed USB device number 2 using ehci-platform
Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Reviewed-by: Niek Linnenbank <nieklinnenbank@gmail.com>
Message-id: 20200207174548.9087-1-linux@roeck-us.net
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Initialize EHCI controllers on AST2400 and AST2500 using the existing
TYPE_PLATFORM_EHCI. After this change, booting ast2500-evb into Linux
successfully instantiates a USB interface.
ehci-platform 1e6a3000.usb: EHCI Host Controller
ehci-platform 1e6a3000.usb: new USB bus registered, assigned bus number 1
ehci-platform 1e6a3000.usb: irq 21, io mem 0x1e6a3000
ehci-platform 1e6a3000.usb: USB 2.0 started, EHCI 1.00
usb usb1: New USB device found, idVendor=1d6b, idProduct=0002, bcdDevice= 5.05
usb usb1: New USB device strings: Mfr=3, Product=2, SerialNumber=1
usb usb1: Product: EHCI Host Controller
Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Reviewed-by: Joel Stanley <joel@jms.id.au>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Message-id: 20200206183437.3979-1-linux@roeck-us.net
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
The original code defines a named object for the resource template but
then returns the resource template object itself; the resulted output
is like below:
Method (_CRS, 0, NotSerialized) // _CRS: Current Resource Settings
{
Name (RBUF, ResourceTemplate ()
{
WordBusNumber (ResourceProducer, MinFixed, MaxFixed, PosDecode,
0x0000, // Granularity
0x0000, // Range Minimum
0x00FF, // Range Maximum
0x0000, // Translation Offset
0x0100, // Length
,, )
......
})
Return (ResourceTemplate ()
{
WordBusNumber (ResourceProducer, MinFixed, MaxFixed, PosDecode,
0x0000, // Granularity
0x0000, // Range Minimum
0x00FF, // Range Maximum
0x0000, // Translation Offset
0x0100, // Length
,, )
......
})
}
So the named object "RBUF" is actually useless. The more natural way
is to return RBUF instead, or simply drop RBUF definition.
Choose the latter one to simplify the code.
Signed-off-by: Heyi Guo <guoheyi@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Message-id: 20200204014325.16279-7-guoheyi@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
The address field in each _PRT mapping package should be constructed
with high word for device# and low word for function#, so it is wrong
to use bus_no as the high word. The existing code adds a bunch useless
entries with device #s above 31. Enumerate all possible slots
(i.e. PCI_SLOT_MAX) instead.
Signed-off-by: Heyi Guo <guoheyi@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Message-id: 20200204014325.16279-5-guoheyi@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
