Change the ppc440_sdram model to a QOM class derived from the
PPC4xx-dcr-device and name it ppc4xx-sdram-ddr2. This is mostly
modelling the DDR2 SDRAM controller found in the 460EX (used on the
sam460ex board). Newer SoCs (regardless of their PPC core, e.g. 405EX)
may have this controller but we only emulate enough of it for the
sam460ex u-boot firmware.
Signed-off-by: BALATON Zoltan <balaton@eik.bme.hu>
Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Message-Id: <3e82ae575c7c41e464a0082d55ecb4ebcc4d4329.1664021647.git.balaton@eik.bme.hu>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
Change the ppc4xx_sdram model to a QOM class derived from the
PPC4xx-dcr-device and name it ppc4xx-sdram-ddr. This is mostly
modelling the DDR SDRAM controller found in the 440EP (used on the
bamboo board) but also backward compatible with the older DDR
controllers on some 405 SoCs so we also use it for those now. This
likely does not cause problems for guests we run as the new features
are just not accessed but to model 405 SoC accurately some features
may have to be disabled or the model split between 440 and older.
Newer SoCs (regardless of their PPC core, e.g. 405EX) may have an
updated DDR2 SDRAM controller implemented by the ppc440_sdram model
(only partially, enough for the 460EX on the sam460ex) that is not yet
QOM'ified in this patch. That is intended to become ppc4xx-sdram-ddr2
when QOM'ified later.
Signed-off-by: BALATON Zoltan <balaton@eik.bme.hu>
Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Message-Id: <8f820487fc9011343032c422ecdf3e8ee74d8c11.1664021647.git.balaton@eik.bme.hu>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
The do_init parameter of ppc4xx_sdram_init() is used to map memory
regions that is normally done by the firmware by programming the SDRAM
controller. Do this from board code emulating what firmware would do
when booting a kernel directly from -kernel without a firmware so we
can get rid of this do_init hack.
Signed-off-by: BALATON Zoltan <balaton@eik.bme.hu>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
Message-Id: <d6c44c870befa1a075e21f1a59926dcdaff63f6b.1664021647.git.balaton@eik.bme.hu>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
The Device Control Registers (DCR) of on-SoC devices are accessed by
software through the use of the mtdcr and mfdcr instructions. These
are converted in transactions on a side band bus, the DCR bus, which
connects the on-SoC devices to the CPU.
Ideally, we should model these accesses with a DCR namespace and DCR
memory regions but today the DCR handlers are installed in a DCR table
under the CPU. Instead, introduce a little device model wrapper to hold
a CPU link and handle registration of DCR handlers.
The DCR device inherits from SysBus because most of these devices also
have MMIO regions and/or IRQs. Being a SysBusDevice makes things easier
to install the device model in the overall SoC.
Reviewed-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
[balaton: Explicit opaque parameter for dcr callbacks]
Signed-off-by: BALATON Zoltan <balaton@eik.bme.hu>
Message-Id: <9b21bdf55e0a728f093bad299e030d98f302ded0.1660746880.git.balaton@eik.bme.hu>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
Drop the use of ppc4xx_init() and duplicate a bit of code related to
clocks in the SoC realize routine. We will clean that up in the
following patches.
ppc_dcr_init() simply allocates default DCR handlers for the CPU. Maybe
this could be done in model initializer of the CPU families needing it.
Reviewed-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Reviewed-by: BALATON Zoltan <balaton@eik.bme.hu>
Message-Id: <20220809153904.485018-8-clg@kaod.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
memory_region_allocate_system_memory() API is going away, so
replace it with memdev allocated MemoryRegion. The later is
initialized by generic code, so board only needs to opt in
to memdev scheme by providing
MachineClass::default_ram_id
and using MachineState::ram instead of manually initializing
RAM memory region.
Signed-off-by: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: BALATON Zoltan <balaton@eik.bme.hu>
Acked-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Message-Id: <20200219160953.13771-67-imammedo@redhat.com>
If user provided non-sense RAM size, board will complain and
continue running with max RAM size supported or sometimes
crash like this:
%QEMU -M bamboo -m 1
exec.c:1926: find_ram_offset: Assertion `size != 0' failed.
Aborted (core dumped)
Also RAM is going to be allocated by generic code, so it won't be
possible for board to fix things up for user.
Make it error message and exit to force user fix CLI,
instead of accepting non-sense CLI values.
That also fixes crash issue, since wrongly calculated size
isn't used to allocate RAM
Signed-off-by: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: BALATON Zoltan <balaton@eik.bme.hu>
Acked-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Message-Id: <20200219160953.13771-66-imammedo@redhat.com>
To avoid overflow if larger values are added later use ram_addr_t for
the sdram_bank_sizes parameter to match ram_size to which it is compared.
Signed-off-by: BALATON Zoltan <balaton@eik.bme.hu>
Signed-off-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
There is no need to include pci.h in these files.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org>
Signed-off-by: Michael Tokarev <mjt@tls.msk.ru>
Unused function declarations were found using a simple gcc plugin and
manually verified by grepping the sources.
Signed-off-by: Ladi Prosek <lprosek@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Tokarev <mjt@tls.msk.ru>
Header guard symbols should match their file name to make guard
collisions less likely. Offenders found with
scripts/clean-header-guards.pl -vn.
Cleaned up with scripts/clean-header-guards.pl, followed by some
renaming of new guard symbols picked by the script to better ones.
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net>
Many of these should be cleaned up with proper qdev-/QOM-ification.
Right now there are many catch-all headers in include/hw/ARCH depending
on cpu.h, and this makes it necessary to compile these files per-target.
However, fixing this does not belong in these patches.
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
