When PSTATE.ALLINT is set, an IRQ or FIQ interrupt that is targeted to
ELx, with or without superpriority is masked. As Richard suggested, place
ALLINT bit in PSTATE in env->pstate.
In the pseudocode, AArch64.ExceptionReturn() calls SetPSTATEFromPSR(), which
treats PSTATE.ALLINT as one of the bits which are reinstated from SPSR to
PSTATE regardless of whether this is an illegal exception return or not. So
handle PSTATE.ALLINT the same way as PSTATE.DAIF in the illegal_return exit
path of the exception_return helper. With the change, exception entry and
return are automatically handled.
Signed-off-by: Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20240407081733.3231820-3-ruanjinjie@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
The Big QEMU Lock (BQL) has many names and they are confusing. The
actual QemuMutex variable is called qemu_global_mutex but it's commonly
referred to as the BQL in discussions and some code comments. The
locking APIs, however, are called qemu_mutex_lock_iothread() and
qemu_mutex_unlock_iothread().
The "iothread" name is historic and comes from when the main thread was
split into into KVM vcpu threads and the "iothread" (now called the main
loop thread). I have contributed to the confusion myself by introducing
a separate --object iothread, a separate concept unrelated to the BQL.
The "iothread" name is no longer appropriate for the BQL. Rename the
locking APIs to:
- void bql_lock(void)
- void bql_unlock(void)
- bool bql_locked(void)
There are more APIs with "iothread" in their names. Subsequent patches
will rename them. There are also comments and documentation that will be
updated in later patches.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Paul Durrant <paul@xen.org>
Acked-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@suse.de>
Acked-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw@amazon.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Acked-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Eric Farman <farman@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Harsh Prateek Bora <harshpb@linux.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Hyman Huang <yong.huang@smartx.com>
Reviewed-by: Akihiko Odaki <akihiko.odaki@daynix.com>
Message-id: 20240102153529.486531-2-stefanha@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Most of the registers used by the FEAT_MOPS instructions cannot use
31 as a register field value; this is CONSTRAINED UNPREDICTABLE to
NOP or UNDEF (we UNDEF). However, it is permitted for the "source
value" register for the memset insns SET* to be 31, which (as usual
for most data-processing insns) means it should be the zero register
XZR. We forgot to handle this case, with the effect that trying to
set memory to zero with a "SET* Xd, Xn, XZR" sets the memory to
the value that happens to be in the low byte of SP.
Handle XZR when getting the SET* data value from the register file.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20231030174000.3792225-4-peter.maydell@linaro.org
Implement the SET* instructions which collectively implement a
"memset" operation. These come in a set of three, eg SETP
(prologue), SETM (main), SETE (epilogue), and each of those has
different flavours to indicate whether memory accesses should be
unpriv or non-temporal.
This commit does not include the "memset with tag setting"
SETG* instructions.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20230912140434.1333369-8-peter.maydell@linaro.org
The architecture requires (R_TYTWB) that an attempt to return from EL3
when SCR_EL3.{NSE,NS} are {1,0} is an illegal exception return. (This
enforces that the CPU can't ever be executing below EL3 with the
NSE,NS bits indicating an invalid security state.)
We were missing this check; add it.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20230807150618.101357-1-peter.maydell@linaro.org
