We still need two different helpers, since NEON and SVE2 get the
inputs from different locations within the source vector. However,
we can convert both to the same internal form for computation.
The sve2 helper is not used yet, but adding it with this patch
helps illustrate why the neon changes are helpful.
Tested-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20200216214232.4230-5-richard.henderson@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
These instructions shift left or right depending on the sign
of the input, and 7 bits are significant to the shift. This
requires several masks and selects in addition to the actual
shifts to form the complete answer.
That said, the operation is still a small improvement even for
two 64-bit elements -- 13 vector operations instead of 2 * 7
integer operations.
Reviewed-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20200216214232.4230-2-richard.henderson@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
The ACTLR2 and HACTLR2 AArch32 system registers didn't exist in ARMv7
or the original ARMv8. They were later added as optional registers,
whose presence is signaled by the ID_MMFR4.AC2 field. From ARMv8.2
they are mandatory (ie ID_MMFR4.AC2 must be non-zero).
We implemented HACTLR2 in commit 0e0456ab88, but we
incorrectly made it exist for all v8 CPUs, and we didn't implement
ACTLR2 at all.
Sort this out by implementing both registers only when they are
supposed to exist, and setting the ID_MMFR4 bit for -cpu max.
Note that this removes HACTLR2 from our Cortex-A53, -A47 and -A72
CPU models; this is correct, because those CPUs do not implement
this register.
Fixes: 0e0456ab88
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20200214175116.9164-22-peter.maydell@linaro.org
Now we have moved ID_MMFR4 into the ARMISARegisters struct, we
can define and use an isar_feature for the presence of the
ARMv8.2-AA32HPD feature, rather than open-coding the test.
While we're here, correct a comment typo which missed an 'A'
from the feature name.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20200214175116.9164-20-peter.maydell@linaro.org
The isar_feature_aa32_pan and isar_feature_aa32_ats1e1 functions
are supposed to be testing fields in ID_MMFR3; but a cut-and-paste
error meant we were looking at MVFR0 instead.
Fix the functions to look at the right register; this requires
us to move at least id_mmfr3 to the ARMISARegisters struct; we
choose to move all the ID_MMFRn registers for consistency.
Fixes: 3d6ad6bb46
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20200214175116.9164-19-peter.maydell@linaro.org
The LC bit in the PMCR_EL0 register is supposed to be:
* read/write
* RES1 on an AArch64-only implementation
* an architecturally UNKNOWN value on reset
(and use of LC==0 by software is deprecated).
We were implementing it incorrectly as read-only always zero,
though we do have all the code needed to test it and behave
accordingly.
Instead make it a read-write bit which resets to 1 always, which
satisfies all the architectural requirements above.
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20200214175116.9164-18-peter.maydell@linaro.org
The ARMv8.4-PMU extension adds:
* one new required event, STALL
* one new system register PMMIR_EL1
(There are also some more L1-cache related events, but since
we don't implement any cache we don't provide these, in the
same way we don't provide the base-PMUv3 cache events.)
The STALL event "counts every attributable cycle on which no
attributable instruction or operation was sent for execution on this
PE". QEMU doesn't stall in this sense, so this is another
always-reads-zero event.
The PMMIR_EL1 register is a read-only register providing
implementation-specific information about the PMU; currently it has
only one field, SLOTS, which defines behaviour of the STALL_SLOT PMU
event. Since QEMU doesn't implement the STALL_SLOT event, we can
validly make the register read zero.
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20200214175116.9164-15-peter.maydell@linaro.org
The ARMv8.1-PMU extension requires:
* the evtCount field in PMETYPER<n>_EL0 is 16 bits, not 10
* MDCR_EL2.HPMD allows event counting to be disabled at EL2
* two new required events, STALL_FRONTEND and STALL_BACKEND
* ID register bits in ID_AA64DFR0_EL1 and ID_DFR0
We already implement the 16-bit evtCount field and the
HPMD bit, so all that is missing is the two new events:
STALL_FRONTEND
"counts every cycle counted by the CPU_CYCLES event on which no
operation was issued because there are no operations available
to issue to this PE from the frontend"
STALL_BACKEND
"counts every cycle counted by the CPU_CYCLES event on which no
operation was issued because the backend is unable to accept
any available operations from the frontend"
QEMU never stalls in this sense, so our implementation is trivial:
always return a zero count.
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20200214175116.9164-14-peter.maydell@linaro.org
Now we have isar_feature test functions that look at fields in the
ID_AA64DFR0_EL1 and ID_DFR0 ID registers, add the code that reads
these register values from KVM so that the checks behave correctly
when we're using KVM.
No isar_feature function tests ID_AA64DFR1_EL1 or DBGDIDR yet, but we
add it to maintain the invariant that every field in the
ARMISARegisters struct is populated for a KVM CPU and can be relied
on. This requirement isn't actually written down yet, so add a note
to the relevant comment.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20200214175116.9164-13-peter.maydell@linaro.org
The AArch32 DBGDIDR defines properties like the number of
breakpoints, watchpoints and context-matching comparators. On an
AArch64 CPU, the register may not even exist if AArch32 is not
supported at EL1.
Currently we hard-code use of DBGDIDR to identify the number of
breakpoints etc; this works for all our TCG CPUs, but will break if
we ever add an AArch64-only CPU. We also have an assert() that the
AArch32 and AArch64 registers match, which currently works only by
luck for KVM because we don't populate either of these ID registers
from the KVM vCPU and so they are both zero.
Clean this up so we have functions for finding the number
of breakpoints, watchpoints and context comparators which look
in the appropriate ID register.
This allows us to drop the "check that AArch64 and AArch32 agree
on the number of breakpoints etc" asserts:
* we no longer look at the AArch32 versions unless that's the
right place to be looking
* it's valid to have a CPU (eg AArch64-only) where they don't match
* we shouldn't have been asserting the validity of ID registers
in a codepath used with KVM anyway
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20200214175116.9164-11-peter.maydell@linaro.org
Add the 64-bit version of the "is this a v8.1 PMUv3?"
ID register check function, and the _any_ version that
checks for either AArch32 or AArch64 support. We'll use
this in a later commit.
We don't (yet) do any isar_feature checks on ID_AA64DFR1_EL1,
but we move id_aa64dfr1 into the ARMISARegisters struct with
id_aa64dfr0, for consistency.
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20200214175116.9164-10-peter.maydell@linaro.org
Instead of open-coding a check on the ID_DFR0 PerfMon ID register
field, create a standardly-named isar_feature for "does AArch32 have
a v8.1 PMUv3" and use it.
This entails moving the id_dfr0 field into the ARMISARegisters struct.
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20200214175116.9164-9-peter.maydell@linaro.org
Pull the code that defines the various PMU registers out
into its own function, matching the pattern we have
already for the debug registers.
Apart from one style fix to a multi-line comment, this
is purely movement of code with no changes to it.
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20200214175116.9164-6-peter.maydell@linaro.org
Our current usage of the isar_feature feature tests almost always
uses an _aa32_ test when the code path is known to be AArch32
specific and an _aa64_ test when the code path is known to be
AArch64 specific. There is just one exception: in the vfp_set_fpscr
helper we check aa64_fp16 to determine whether the FZ16 bit in
the FP(S)CR exists, but this code is also used for AArch32.
There are other places in future where we're likely to want
a general "does this feature exist for either AArch32 or
AArch64" check (typically where architecturally the feature exists
for both CPU states if it exists at all, but the CPU might be
AArch32-only or AArch64-only, and so only have one set of ID
registers).
Introduce a new category of isar_feature_* functions:
isar_feature_any_foo() should be tested when what we want to
know is "does this feature exist for either AArch32 or AArch64",
and always returns the logical OR of isar_feature_aa32_foo()
and isar_feature_aa64_foo().
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20200214175116.9164-4-peter.maydell@linaro.org
Enforce a convention that an isar_feature function that tests a
32-bit ID register always has _aa32_ in its name, and one that
tests a 64-bit ID register always has _aa64_ in its name.
We already follow this except for three cases: thumb_div,
arm_div and jazelle, which all need _aa32_ adding.
(As noted in the comment, isar_feature_aa32_fp16_arith()
is an exception in that it currently tests ID_AA64PFR0_EL1,
but will switch to MVFR1 once we've properly implemented
FP16 for AArch32.)
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20200214175116.9164-2-peter.maydell@linaro.org
For the purpose of rebuild_hflags_a64, we do not need to compute
all of the va parameters, only tbi. Moreover, we can compute them
in a form that is more useful to storing in hflags.
This eliminates the need for aa64_va_parameter_both, so fold that
in to aa64_va_parameter. The remaining calls to aa64_va_parameter
are in get_phys_addr_lpae and in pauth_helper.c.
This reduces the total cpu consumption of aa64_va_parameter in a
kernel boot plus a kvm guest kernel boot from 3% to 0.5%.
Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20200216194343.21331-5-richard.henderson@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
The ARMv8.1-VMID16 extension extends the VMID from 8 bits to 16 bits:
* the ID_AA64MMFR1_EL1.VMIDBits field specifies whether the VMID is
8 or 16 bits
* the VMID field in VTTBR_EL2 is extended to 16 bits
* VTCR_EL2.VS lets the guest specify whether to use the full 16 bits,
or use the backwards-compatible 8 bits
For QEMU implementing this is trivial:
* we do not track VMIDs in TLB entries, so we never use the VMID field
* we treat any write to VTTBR_EL2, not just a change to the VMID field
bits, as a "possible VMID change" that causes us to throw away TLB
entries, so that code doesn't need changing
* we allow the guest to read/write the VTCR_EL2.VS bit already
So all that's missing is the ID register part: report that we support
VMID16 in our 'max' CPU.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20200210120146.17631-1-peter.maydell@linaro.org
