Instead of using our properties to set a config value which then might
be used to set the resetvec (depending on your timing), let's instead
just set the resetvec directly in the env struct.
This allows us to set the reset vec from the command line with:
-global driver=riscv.hart_array,property=resetvec,value=0x20000400
Signed-off-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org>
Message-Id: <20220914101108.82571-2-alistair.francis@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
While testing some changes to GDB's handling for the RISC-V registers
fcsr, fflags, and frm, I spotted that QEMU includes these registers
twice in the target description it sends to GDB, once in the fpu
feature, and once in the csr feature.
Right now things basically work OK, QEMU maps these registers onto two
different register numbers, e.g. fcsr maps to both 68 and 73, and GDB
can use either of these to access the register.
However, GDB's target descriptions don't really work this way, each
register should appear just once in a target description, mapping the
register name onto the number GDB should use when accessing the
register on the target. Duplicate register names actually result in
duplicate registers on the GDB side, however, as the registers have
the same name, the user can only access one of these registers.
Currently GDB has a hack in place, specifically for RISC-V, to spot
the duplicate copies of these three registers, and hide them from the
user, ensuring the user only ever sees a single copy of each.
In this commit I propose fixing this issue on the QEMU side, and in
the process, simplify the fpu register handling a little.
I think we should, remove fflags, frm, and fcsr from the two (32-bit
and 64-bit) fpu feature xml files. These files will only contain the
32 core floating point register f0 to f31. The fflags, frm, and fcsr
registers will continue to be advertised in the csr feature as they
currently are.
With that change made, I will simplify riscv_gdb_get_fpu and
riscv_gdb_set_fpu, removing the extra handling for the 3 status
registers.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Burgess <aburgess@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
Message-Id: <0fbf2a5b12e3210ff3867d5cf7022b3f3462c9c8.1661934573.git.aburgess@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
The riscv target incorrectly enabled semihosting always, whether the
user asked for it or not. Call semihosting_enabled() passing the
correct value to the is_userspace argument, which fixes this and also
handles the userspace=on argument. Because we do this at translate
time, we no longer need to check the privilege level in
riscv_cpu_do_interrupt().
Note that this is a behaviour change: we used to default to
semihosting being enabled, and now the user must pass
"-semihosting-config enable=on" if they want it.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
Message-Id: <20220822141230.3658237-8-peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Qemu virt machine can support few cache events and cycle/instret counters.
It also supports counter overflow for these events.
Add a DT node so that OpenSBI/Linux kernel is aware of the virt machine
capabilities. There are some dummy nodes added for testing as well.
Acked-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Atish Patra <atish.patra@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Atish Patra <atishp@rivosinc.com>
Message-Id: <20220824221701.41932-5-atishp@rivosinc.com>
Signed-off-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
All the hpmcounters and the fixed counters (CY, IR, TM) can be represented
as a unified counter. Thus, the predicate function doesn't need handle each
case separately.
Simplify the predicate function so that we just handle things differently
between RV32/RV64 and S/HS mode.
Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Atish Patra <atishp@rivosinc.com>
Message-Id: <20220824221701.41932-3-atishp@rivosinc.com>
Signed-off-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
The Sscofpmf ('Ss' for Privileged arch and Supervisor-level extensions,
and 'cofpmf' for Count OverFlow and Privilege Mode Filtering)
extension allows the perf to handle overflow interrupts and filtering
support. This patch provides a framework for programmable
counters to leverage the extension. As the extension doesn't have any
provision for the overflow bit for fixed counters, the fixed events
can also be monitoring using programmable counters. The underlying
counters for cycle and instruction counters are always running. Thus,
a separate timer device is programmed to handle the overflow.
Tested-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
Reviewed-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Atish Patra <atish.patra@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Atish Patra <atishp@rivosinc.com>
Message-Id: <20220824221701.41932-2-atishp@rivosinc.com>
Signed-off-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
vstimecmp CSR allows the guest OS or to program the next guest timer
interrupt directly. Thus, hypervisor no longer need to inject the
timer interrupt to the guest if vstimecmp is used. This was ratified
as a part of the Sstc extension.
Reviewed-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Atish Patra <atishp@rivosinc.com>
Message-Id: <20220824221357.41070-4-atishp@rivosinc.com>
Signed-off-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
Normally, riscv_csrrw_check is called when executing Zicsr instructions.
And we can only do access control for existed CSRs. So the priority of
CSR related check, from highest to lowest, should be as follows:
1) check whether Zicsr is supported: raise RISCV_EXCP_ILLEGAL_INST if not
2) check whether csr is existed: raise RISCV_EXCP_ILLEGAL_INST if not
3) do access control: raise RISCV_EXCP_ILLEGAL_INST or RISCV_EXCP_VIRT_
INSTRUCTION_FAULT if not allowed
The predicates contain parts of function of both 2) and 3), So they need
to be placed in the middle of riscv_csrrw_check
Signed-off-by: Weiwei Li <liweiwei@iscas.ac.cn>
Signed-off-by: Junqiang Wang <wangjunqiang@iscas.ac.cn>
Reviewed-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
Message-Id: <20220803123652.3700-1-liweiwei@iscas.ac.cn>
Signed-off-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
According to v-spec, mask agnostic behavior can be either kept as
undisturbed or set elements' bits to all 1s. To distinguish the
difference of mask policies, QEMU should be able to simulate the mask
agnostic behavior as "set mask elements' bits to all 1s".
There are multiple possibility for agnostic elements according to
v-spec. The main intent of this patch-set tries to add option that
can distinguish between mask policies. Setting agnostic elements to
all 1s allows QEMU to express this.
This commit adds option 'rvv_ma_all_1s' is added to enable the
behavior, it is default as disabled.
Signed-off-by: eop Chen <eop.chen@sifive.com>
Reviewed-by: Frank Chang <frank.chang@sifive.com>
Reviewed-by: Weiwei Li <liweiwei@iscas.ac.cn>
Reviewed-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
Message-Id: <165570784143.17634.35095816584573691-10@git.sr.ht>
Signed-off-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
According to v-spec, mask agnostic behavior can be either kept as
undisturbed or set elements' bits to all 1s. To distinguish the
difference of mask policies, QEMU should be able to simulate the mask
agnostic behavior as "set mask elements' bits to all 1s".
There are multiple possibility for agnostic elements according to
v-spec. The main intent of this patch-set tries to add option that
can distinguish between mask policies. Setting agnostic elements to
all 1s allows QEMU to express this.
This is the first commit regarding the optional mask agnostic
behavior. Follow-up commits will add this optional behavior
for all rvv instructions.
Signed-off-by: eop Chen <eop.chen@sifive.com>
Reviewed-by: Frank Chang <frank.chang@sifive.com>
Reviewed-by: Weiwei Li <liweiwei@iscas.ac.cn>
Reviewed-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
Message-Id: <165570784143.17634.35095816584573691-1@git.sr.ht>
Signed-off-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
Just add 1 to the effective privledge level when in HS mode, then reuse
the check of 'effective_priv < csr_priv' in riscv_csrrw_check to replace
the privilege level related check in hmode. Then, hmode will only check
whether H extension is supported.
When accessing Hypervior CSRs:
1) If accessing from M privilege level, the check of
'effective_priv< csr_priv' passes, returns hmode(...) which will return
RISCV_EXCP_ILLEGAL_INST when H extension is not supported and return
RISCV_EXCP_NONE otherwise.
2) If accessing from HS privilege level, effective_priv will add 1,
the check passes and also returns hmode(...) too.
3) If accessing from VS/VU privilege level, the check fails, and
returns RISCV_EXCP_VIRT_INSTRUCTION_FAULT
4) If accessing from U privilege level, the check fails, and returns
RISCV_EXCP_ILLEGAL_INST
Signed-off-by: Weiwei Li <liweiwei@iscas.ac.cn>
Signed-off-by: Junqiang Wang <wangjunqiang@iscas.ac.cn>
Reviewed-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com>
Message-Id: <20220718130955.11899-7-liweiwei@iscas.ac.cn>
Signed-off-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
Pass these along to translator_loop -- pc may be used instead
of tb->pc, and host_pc is currently unused. Adjust all targets
at one time.
Acked-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
Acked-by: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com>
Tested-by: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
We got to talking about how Zmmul and M interact with each other
https://github.com/riscv/riscv-isa-manual/issues/869 , and it turns out
that QEMU's behavior is slightly wrong: having Zmmul and M is a legal
combination, it just means that the multiplication instructions are
supported even when M is disabled at runtime via misa.
This just stops overriding M from Zmmul, with that the other checks for
the multiplication instructions work as per the ISA.
Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com>
Reviewed-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
Message-Id: <20220714180033.22385-1-palmer@rivosinc.com>
Signed-off-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
The latest AIA draft v0.3.0 defines a relatively simpler scheme for
default priority assignments where:
1) local interrupts 24 to 31 and 48 to 63 are reserved for custom use
and have implementation specific default priority.
2) remaining local interrupts 0 to 23 and 32 to 47 have a recommended
(not mandatory) priority assignments.
We update the default priority table and hviprio mapping as-per above.
Signed-off-by: Anup Patel <apatel@ventanamicro.com>
Reviewed-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
Message-Id: <20220616031543.953776-3-apatel@ventanamicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
Based on architecture review committee feedback, the [m|s|vs]seteienum,
[m|s|vs]clreienum, [m|s|vs]seteipnum, and [m|s|vs]clreipnum CSRs are
removed in the latest AIA draft v0.3.0 specification.
(Refer, https://github.com/riscv/riscv-aia/releases/tag/0.3.0-draft.31)
These CSRs were mostly for software convenience and software can always
use [m|s|vs]iselect and [m|s|vs]ireg CSRs to update the IMSIC interrupt
file bits.
We update the IMSIC CSR emulation as-per above to match the latest AIA
draft specification.
Signed-off-by: Anup Patel <apatel@ventanamicro.com>
Reviewed-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
Message-Id: <20220616031543.953776-2-apatel@ventanamicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
The riscv_cpu_realize() sets priv spec version to v1.12 when it is
when "env->priv_ver == 0" (i.e. default v1.10) because the enum
value of priv spec v1.10 is zero.
Due to above issue, the sifive_u machine will see priv spec v1.12
instead of priv spec v1.10.
To fix this issue, we set latest priv spec version (i.e. v1.12)
for base rv64/rv32 cpu and riscv_cpu_realize() will override priv
spec version only when "cpu->cfg.priv_spec != NULL".
Fixes: 7100fe6c24 ("target/riscv: Enable privileged spec version 1.12")
Signed-off-by: Anup Patel <apatel@ventanamicro.com>
Reviewed-by: Frank Chang <frank.chang@sifive.com>
Reviewed-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Atish Patra <atishp@rivosinc.com>
Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
Message-Id: <20220611080107.391981-2-apatel@ventanamicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
