The codebase has a bit of a mix of different multiline
comment styles. State a preference for the Linux kernel
style:
    /*
     * Star on the left for each line.
     * Leading slash-star and trailing star-slash
     * each go on a line of their own.
     */
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: John Snow <jsnow@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Message-id: 20180611141716.3813-1-peter.maydell@linaro.org
		
	
		
			
				
	
	
		
			178 lines
		
	
	
		
			6.3 KiB
		
	
	
	
		
			Plaintext
		
	
	
	
	
	
			
		
		
	
	
			178 lines
		
	
	
		
			6.3 KiB
		
	
	
	
		
			Plaintext
		
	
	
	
	
	
| QEMU Coding Style
 | |
| =================
 | |
| 
 | |
| Please use the script checkpatch.pl in the scripts directory to check
 | |
| patches before submitting.
 | |
| 
 | |
| 1. Whitespace
 | |
| 
 | |
| Of course, the most important aspect in any coding style is whitespace.
 | |
| Crusty old coders who have trouble spotting the glasses on their noses
 | |
| can tell the difference between a tab and eight spaces from a distance
 | |
| of approximately fifteen parsecs.  Many a flamewar has been fought and
 | |
| lost on this issue.
 | |
| 
 | |
| QEMU indents are four spaces.  Tabs are never used, except in Makefiles
 | |
| where they have been irreversibly coded into the syntax.
 | |
| Spaces of course are superior to tabs because:
 | |
| 
 | |
|  - You have just one way to specify whitespace, not two.  Ambiguity breeds
 | |
|    mistakes.
 | |
|  - The confusion surrounding 'use tabs to indent, spaces to justify' is gone.
 | |
|  - Tab indents push your code to the right, making your screen seriously
 | |
|    unbalanced.
 | |
|  - Tabs will be rendered incorrectly on editors who are misconfigured not
 | |
|    to use tab stops of eight positions.
 | |
|  - Tabs are rendered badly in patches, causing off-by-one errors in almost
 | |
|    every line.
 | |
|  - It is the QEMU coding style.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Do not leave whitespace dangling off the ends of lines.
 | |
| 
 | |
| 2. Line width
 | |
| 
 | |
| Lines should be 80 characters; try not to make them longer.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Sometimes it is hard to do, especially when dealing with QEMU subsystems
 | |
| that use long function or symbol names.  Even in that case, do not make
 | |
| lines much longer than 80 characters.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Rationale:
 | |
|  - Some people like to tile their 24" screens with a 6x4 matrix of 80x24
 | |
|    xterms and use vi in all of them.  The best way to punish them is to
 | |
|    let them keep doing it.
 | |
|  - Code and especially patches is much more readable if limited to a sane
 | |
|    line length.  Eighty is traditional.
 | |
|  - The four-space indentation makes the most common excuse ("But look
 | |
|    at all that white space on the left!") moot.
 | |
|  - It is the QEMU coding style.
 | |
| 
 | |
| 3. Naming
 | |
| 
 | |
| Variables are lower_case_with_underscores; easy to type and read.  Structured
 | |
| type names are in CamelCase; harder to type but standing out.  Enum type
 | |
| names and function type names should also be in CamelCase.  Scalar type
 | |
| names are lower_case_with_underscores_ending_with_a_t, like the POSIX
 | |
| uint64_t and family.  Note that this last convention contradicts POSIX
 | |
| and is therefore likely to be changed.
 | |
| 
 | |
| When wrapping standard library functions, use the prefix qemu_ to alert
 | |
| readers that they are seeing a wrapped version; otherwise avoid this prefix.
 | |
| 
 | |
| 4. Block structure
 | |
| 
 | |
| Every indented statement is braced; even if the block contains just one
 | |
| statement.  The opening brace is on the line that contains the control
 | |
| flow statement that introduces the new block; the closing brace is on the
 | |
| same line as the else keyword, or on a line by itself if there is no else
 | |
| keyword.  Example:
 | |
| 
 | |
|     if (a == 5) {
 | |
|         printf("a was 5.\n");
 | |
|     } else if (a == 6) {
 | |
|         printf("a was 6.\n");
 | |
|     } else {
 | |
|         printf("a was something else entirely.\n");
 | |
|     }
 | |
| 
 | |
| Note that 'else if' is considered a single statement; otherwise a long if/
 | |
| else if/else if/.../else sequence would need an indent for every else
 | |
| statement.
 | |
| 
 | |
| An exception is the opening brace for a function; for reasons of tradition
 | |
| and clarity it comes on a line by itself:
 | |
| 
 | |
|     void a_function(void)
 | |
|     {
 | |
|         do_something();
 | |
|     }
 | |
| 
 | |
| Rationale: a consistent (except for functions...) bracing style reduces
 | |
| ambiguity and avoids needless churn when lines are added or removed.
 | |
| Furthermore, it is the QEMU coding style.
 | |
| 
 | |
| 5. Declarations
 | |
| 
 | |
| Mixed declarations (interleaving statements and declarations within
 | |
| blocks) are generally not allowed; declarations should be at the beginning
 | |
| of blocks.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Every now and then, an exception is made for declarations inside a
 | |
| #ifdef or #ifndef block: if the code looks nicer, such declarations can
 | |
| be placed at the top of the block even if there are statements above.
 | |
| On the other hand, however, it's often best to move that #ifdef/#ifndef
 | |
| block to a separate function altogether.
 | |
| 
 | |
| 6. Conditional statements
 | |
| 
 | |
| When comparing a variable for (in)equality with a constant, list the
 | |
| constant on the right, as in:
 | |
| 
 | |
| if (a == 1) {
 | |
|     /* Reads like: "If a equals 1" */
 | |
|     do_something();
 | |
| }
 | |
| 
 | |
| Rationale: Yoda conditions (as in 'if (1 == a)') are awkward to read.
 | |
| Besides, good compilers already warn users when '==' is mis-typed as '=',
 | |
| even when the constant is on the right.
 | |
| 
 | |
| 7. Comment style
 | |
| 
 | |
| We use traditional C-style /* */ comments and avoid // comments.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Rationale: The // form is valid in C99, so this is purely a matter of
 | |
| consistency of style. The checkpatch script will warn you about this.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Multiline comment blocks should have a row of stars on the left,
 | |
| and the initial /* and terminating */ both on their own lines:
 | |
|     /*
 | |
|      * like
 | |
|      * this
 | |
|      */
 | |
| This is the same format required by the Linux kernel coding style.
 | |
| 
 | |
| (Some of the existing comments in the codebase use the GNU Coding
 | |
| Standards form which does not have stars on the left, or other
 | |
| variations; avoid these when writing new comments, but don't worry
 | |
| about converting to the preferred form unless you're editing that
 | |
| comment anyway.)
 | |
| 
 | |
| Rationale: Consistency, and ease of visually picking out a multiline
 | |
| comment from the surrounding code.
 | |
| 
 | |
| 8. trace-events style
 | |
| 
 | |
| 8.1 0x prefix
 | |
| 
 | |
| In trace-events files, use a '0x' prefix to specify hex numbers, as in:
 | |
| 
 | |
| some_trace(unsigned x, uint64_t y) "x 0x%x y 0x" PRIx64
 | |
| 
 | |
| An exception is made for groups of numbers that are hexadecimal by
 | |
| convention and separated by the symbols '.', '/', ':', or ' ' (such as
 | |
| PCI bus id):
 | |
| 
 | |
| another_trace(int cssid, int ssid, int dev_num) "bus id: %x.%x.%04x"
 | |
| 
 | |
| However, you can use '0x' for such groups if you want. Anyway, be sure that
 | |
| it is obvious that numbers are in hex, ex.:
 | |
| 
 | |
| data_dump(uint8_t c1, uint8_t c2, uint8_t c3) "bytes (in hex): %02x %02x %02x"
 | |
| 
 | |
| Rationale: hex numbers are hard to read in logs when there is no 0x prefix,
 | |
| especially when (occasionally) the representation doesn't contain any letters
 | |
| and especially in one line with other decimal numbers. Number groups are allowed
 | |
| to not use '0x' because for some things notations like %x.%x.%x are used not
 | |
| only in Qemu. Also dumping raw data bytes with '0x' is less readable.
 | |
| 
 | |
| 8.2 '#' printf flag
 | |
| 
 | |
| Do not use printf flag '#', like '%#x'.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Rationale: there are two ways to add a '0x' prefix to printed number: '0x%...'
 | |
| and '%#...'. For consistency the only one way should be used. Arguments for
 | |
| '0x%' are:
 | |
|  - it is more popular
 | |
|  - '%#' omits the 0x for the value 0 which makes output inconsistent
 |