systemd/job-avoid-recursion-when-cancelling.patch

49 lines
2.0 KiB
Diff
Raw Normal View History

From 1abc85b8d026a2d72442b0edaee5213d0ee73c1f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Michal Schmidt <mschmidt@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2012 02:31:49 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] job: avoid recursion into transaction code from job
cancelation
I hit an "assert(j->installed)" failure in transaction_apply(). Looking
into the backtrace I saw what happened:
1. The system was booting. var.mount/start was an installed job.
2. I pressed Ctrl+Alt+Del.
3. reboot.target was going to be isolated.
4. transaction_apply() proceeded to install a var.mount/stop job.
5. job_install() canceled the conflicting start job.
6. Depending jobs ended recursively with JOB_DEPENDENCY, among them was
local-fs.target/start.
7. Its OnFailure action triggered - emergency.target was now going to be
isolated.
8. We recursed back into transaction_apply() where the half-installed
var.mount/stop job confused us.
Recursing from job installation back into the transaction code cannot be
a good idea. Avoid the problem by canceling the conflicting job
non-recursively in job_install(). I don't think we'll miss anything by
not recursing here. After all, we are called from transaction_apply().
We will not be installing just this one job, but all jobs from a
transaction. All requirement dependencies will be included in it and
will be installed separately. Every transaction job will get a chance
to cancel its own conflicting installed job.
---
src/core/job.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/src/core/job.c b/src/core/job.c
index cb5674b..f08b8cb 100644
--- a/src/core/job.c
+++ b/src/core/job.c
@@ -180,7 +180,7 @@ Job* job_install(Job *j) {
if (uj) {
if (j->type != JOB_NOP && job_type_is_conflicting(uj->type, j->type))
- job_finish_and_invalidate(uj, JOB_CANCELED, true);
+ job_finish_and_invalidate(uj, JOB_CANCELED, false);
else {
/* not conflicting, i.e. mergeable */
--
1.7.10.4