We do this to prevent leakage of information, we don't want people
to be able to probe for existing content.
According to RFC 2616, "This status code (404) is commonly used when the server does not
wish to reveal exactly why the request has been refused, or when no other response i
is applicable."
https://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2616.txt
10.4.4 403 Forbidden
The server understood the request, but is refusing to fulfill it.
Authorization will not help and the request SHOULD NOT be repeated.
If the request method was not HEAD and the server wishes to make
public why the request has not been fulfilled, it SHOULD describe the
reason for the refusal in the entity. If the server does not wish to
make this information available to the client, the status code 404
(Not Found) can be used instead.
10.4.5 404 Not Found
The server has not found anything matching the Request-URI. No
indication is given of whether the condition is temporary or
permanent. The 410 (Gone) status code SHOULD be used if the server
knows, through some internally configurable mechanism, that an old
resource is permanently unavailable and has no forwarding address.
This status code is commonly used when the server does not wish to
reveal exactly why the request has been refused, or when no other
response is applicable.
When docker is running through its certificates, it should continue
trying with a new certificate even if it gets back a 404 error code.
Docker-DCO-1.1-Signed-off-by: Dan Walsh <dwalsh@redhat.com> (github: rhatdan)
Add support for pulling signed images from a version 2 registry.
Only official images within the library namespace will be pull from the
new registry and check the build signature.
Signed-off-by: Derek McGowan <derek@mcgstyle.net> (github: dmcgowan)
This introduces Versions for TarSum checksums.
Fixes: https://github.com/docker/docker/issues/7526
It preserves current functionality and abstracts the interface for
future flexibility of hashing algorithms. As a POC, the VersionDev
Tarsum does not include the mtime in the checksum calculation, and would
solve https://github.com/docker/docker/issues/7387 though this is not a
settled Version is subject to change until a version number is assigned.
Signed-off-by: Vincent Batts <vbatts@redhat.com>
Per registry.doRequest, res and client might be nil in case of error
For example, dns resolution errors, /etc/docker/certs.d perms, failed
loading of x509 cert ...
This will make res.StatusCode and res.Body SEGFAULT.
Signed-off-by: Arthur Gautier <baloo@gandi.net>
To avoid conflicting with layer IDs, repository names must
not be tagged with names that collide with hexadecimal strings.
Signed-off-by: Eric Windisch <eric@windisch.us>
The cli interface works similar to other registry related commands:
docker search foo
... searches for foo on the official hub
docker search localhost:5000/foo
... does the same for the private reg at localhost:5000
Signed-off-by: Daniel Menet <membership@sontags.ch>
renaming this struct to more clearly be session, as that is what it
handles.
Splitting out files for easier readability.
Signed-off-by: Vincent Batts <vbatts@redhat.com>
functions to pkg/parsers/kernel, and parsing filters to
pkg/parsers/filter. Adjust imports and package references.
Docker-DCO-1.1-Signed-off-by: Erik Hollensbe <github@hollensbe.org> (github: erikh)
This lets you specify custom client TLS certificates and CA root for a
specific registry hostname. Docker will then verify the registry
against the CA and present the client cert when talking to that
registry. This allows the registry to verify that the client has a
proper key, indicating that the client is allowed to access the
images.
A custom cert is configured by creating a directory in
/etc/docker/certs.d with the same name as the registry hostname. Inside
this directory all *.crt files are added as CA Roots (if none exists,
the system default is used) and pair of files <filename>.key and
<filename>.cert indicate a custom certificate to present to the registry.
If there are multiple certificates each one will be tried in
alphabetical order, proceeding to the next if we get a 403 of 5xx
response.
So, an example setup would be:
/etc/docker/certs.d/
└── localhost
├── client.cert
├── client.key
└── localhost.crt
A simple way to test this setup is to use an apache server to host a
registry. Just copy a registry tree into the apache root, here is an
example one containing the busybox image:
http://people.gnome.org/~alexl/v1.tar.gz
Then add this conf file as /etc/httpd/conf.d/registry.conf:
# This must be in the root context, otherwise it causes a re-negotiation
# which is not supported by the tls implementation in go
SSLVerifyClient optional_no_ca
<Location /v1>
Action cert-protected /cgi-bin/cert.cgi
SetHandler cert-protected
Header set x-docker-registry-version "0.6.2"
SetEnvIf Host (.*) custom_host=$1
Header set X-Docker-Endpoints "%{custom_host}e"
</Location>
And this as /var/www/cgi-bin/cert.cgi
#!/bin/bash
if [ "$HTTPS" != "on" ]; then
echo "Status: 403 Not using SSL"
echo "x-docker-registry-version: 0.6.2"
echo
exit 0
fi
if [ "$SSL_CLIENT_VERIFY" == "NONE" ]; then
echo "Status: 403 Client certificate invalid"
echo "x-docker-registry-version: 0.6.2"
echo
exit 0
fi
echo "Content-length: $(stat --printf='%s' $PATH_TRANSLATED)"
echo "x-docker-registry-version: 0.6.2"
echo "X-Docker-Endpoints: $SERVER_NAME"
echo "X-Docker-Size: 0"
echo
cat $PATH_TRANSLATED
This will return 403 for all accessed to /v1 unless *any* client cert
is presented. Obviously a real implementation would verify more details
about the certificate.
Example client certs can be generated with:
openssl genrsa -out client.key 1024
openssl req -new -x509 -text -key client.key -out client.cert
Docker-DCO-1.1-Signed-off-by: Alexander Larsson <alexl@redhat.com> (github: alexlarsson)
These constants don't need to use time.Duration(). Fixup this file since
it seems to be the only one using this style.
Docker-DCO-1.1-Signed-off-by: Brandon Philips <brandon.philips@coreos.com> (github: philips)
This continues the effort to separate all registry logic from the
deprecated `Server` object.
* 'search' is exposed by `github.com/dotcloud/docker/registry/Service`
* Added proper documentation of Search while I was at it
Docker-DCO-1.1-Signed-off-by: Solomon Hykes <solomon@docker.com> (github: shykes)
This is the first step towards separating the registry subsystem from
the deprecated `Server` object.
* New service `github.com/dotcloud/docker/registry/Service`
* The service is installed by default in `builtins`
* The service only exposes `auth` for now...
* ...Soon to be followed by `pull`, `push` and `search`.
Docker-DCO-1.1-Signed-off-by: Solomon Hykes <solomon@docker.com> (github: shykes)
roll version and standalone information into the _ping. And to support
Headers they are checked after the JSON is loaded (if there is anything
to load). To stay backwards compatible, if the _ping contents are not
able to unmarshal to RegistryInfo, do not stop, but continue with the
same behavior.
Docker-DCO-1.1-Signed-off-by: Vincent Batts <vbatts@redhat.com> (github: vbatts)
For a pull-only, static registry, there only a couple of headers that
need to be optional (that are presently required.
* X-Docker-Registry-Version
* X-Docker-Size
* X-Docker-Endpoints
Docker-DCO-1.1-Signed-off-by: Vincent Batts <vbatts@redhat.com> (github: vbatts)
Since docker uses cookiejar it doesn't need to manage cookies manually
anymore.
Managing cookie was duplicating it.
Docker-DCO-1.1-Signed-off-by: Fabio Falci <fabiofalci@gmail.com> (github: fabiofalci)
- Added an argument to the call() method in order to control the auth sharing
- Enabled it only for search. Pulls and pushes were enabled already.
- Grouped a few variable declarations
Docker-DCO-1.1-Signed-off-by: Roberto Hashioka <roberto.hashioka@docker.com> (github: rogaha)
RequestFactory is no longer a singleton (can be different for different instances of Registry)
Registry now has an indexEndpoint member
Registry methods that needed the indexEndpoint parameter no longer do so
Registry methods will only use token auth where applicable if basic auth is not enabled.
