10 Commits

Author SHA256 Message Date
f997c51393 test5
All checks were successful
go-generate-check / go-generate-check (pull_request) Successful in 8s
Integration tests / t (pull_request) Successful in 6m20s
2026-02-26 21:56:14 +01:00
6eb9e1749e test4
All checks were successful
go-generate-check / go-generate-check (pull_request) Successful in 13s
Integration tests / t (pull_request) Successful in 6m40s
2026-02-26 21:56:08 +01:00
ae4dffc4b1 test3
Some checks failed
go-generate-check / go-generate-check (pull_request) Successful in 8s
Integration tests / t (pull_request) Failing after 9m2s
2026-02-26 21:56:03 +01:00
2415feacc1 test2
Some checks failed
go-generate-check / go-generate-check (pull_request) Successful in 8s
Integration tests / t (pull_request) Failing after 9m1s
2026-02-26 21:55:57 +01:00
7457fef780 test2
All checks were successful
go-generate-check / go-generate-check (pull_request) Successful in 8s
Integration tests / t (pull_request) Successful in 6m24s
2026-02-26 21:55:39 +01:00
7af2068801 test1
Some checks failed
go-generate-check / go-generate-check (pull_request) Successful in 8s
Integration tests / t (pull_request) Failing after 9m18s
2026-02-26 21:55:23 +01:00
Andrii Nikitin
b4b3bf584e t: correctly handle multiple reviews from the same user
Some checks failed
go-generate-check / go-generate-check (pull_request) Successful in 14s
Integration tests / t (pull_request) Failing after 1m17s
2026-02-26 20:19:39 +01:00
65307cfb5e common: check for old pending request reviews
Timeline events will contain Reviews and ReviewRequests and
ReviewDismissed events. We need to handle this at event parsing
time and not to punt this to the query functions later on.

If the last event is an actual review, we use this.
If no review, check if last event associated with the reviewer
is Dismissed or Requested Review but not if a dismissed Review
preceeds it.
2026-02-26 20:05:19 +01:00
5669083388 pr: handle case of nil user in reviews
All checks were successful
go-generate-check / go-generate-check (push) Successful in 21s
Integration tests / t (push) Successful in 6m29s
This can happen when a review request is assigned automatically via
CODEOWNERS or perhaps the requesting user has account removed.
2026-02-26 13:15:58 +01:00
Andrii Nikitin
cb9131a5dd t: add init process to all services
Some checks failed
Integration tests / t (pull_request) Successful in 7m0s
Integration tests / t (push) Failing after 6m58s
Enable init: true for all services in podman-compose.yml to ensure
proper signal handling and zombie process reaping within containers.
2026-02-26 12:17:29 +01:00
7 changed files with 138 additions and 56 deletions

View File

@@ -468,7 +468,7 @@ func (rs *PRSet) IsApproved(gitea GiteaPRChecker, maintainers MaintainershipData
LogError("Cannot fetch gita reaviews for PR:", err)
return false
}
r.RequestedReviewers = reviewers
r.SetRequiredReviewers(reviewers)
prjgit.Reviews = r
if prjgit.Reviews.IsManualMergeOK() {
is_manually_reviewed_ok = true
@@ -489,7 +489,7 @@ func (rs *PRSet) IsApproved(gitea GiteaPRChecker, maintainers MaintainershipData
LogError("Cannot fetch gita reaviews for PR:", err)
return false
}
r.RequestedReviewers = reviewers
r.SetRequiredReviewers(reviewers)
pr.Reviews = r
if !pr.Reviews.IsManualMergeOK() {
LogInfo("Not approved manual merge. PR:", pr.PR.URL)
@@ -530,7 +530,7 @@ func (rs *PRSet) IsApproved(gitea GiteaPRChecker, maintainers MaintainershipData
LogError("Cannot fetch gitea reaviews for PR:", err)
return false
}
r.RequestedReviewers = reviewers
r.SetRequiredReviewers(reviewers)
is_manually_reviewed_ok = r.IsApproved()
LogDebug("PR to", pr.PR.Base.Repo.Name, "reviewed?", is_manually_reviewed_ok)

View File

@@ -807,9 +807,8 @@ func TestFindMissingAndExtraReviewers(t *testing.T) {
Base: &models.PRBranchInfo{Name: "main", Repo: &models.Repository{Name: "pkg", Owner: &models.User{UserName: "org"}}},
},
Reviews: &common.PRReviews{
Reviews: []*models.PullReview{{State: common.ReviewStateRequestReview, User: &models.User{UserName: "m1"}}},
RequestedReviewers: []string{"m1"},
FullTimeline: []*models.TimelineComment{
Reviews: []*models.PullReview{{State: common.ReviewStateRequestReview, User: &models.User{UserName: "m1"}}},
RequestedReviewers: []*models.TimelineComment{
{User: &models.User{UserName: "bot"}, Assignee: &models.User{UserName: "m1"}, Type: common.TimelineCommentType_ReviewRequested},
},
},
@@ -919,8 +918,7 @@ func TestFindMissingAndExtraReviewers(t *testing.T) {
},
Reviews: &common.PRReviews{
Reviews: []*models.PullReview{{State: common.ReviewStateRequestReview, User: &models.User{UserName: "reviewer"}}},
RequestedReviewers: []string{"reviewer"},
FullTimeline: []*models.TimelineComment{{Type: common.TimelineCommentType_ReviewRequested, User: &models.User{UserName: "bot"}, Assignee: &models.User{UserName: "reviewer"}}},
RequestedReviewers: []*models.TimelineComment{{Type: common.TimelineCommentType_ReviewRequested, User: &models.User{UserName: "bot"}, Assignee: &models.User{UserName: "reviewer"}}},
},
},
{
@@ -930,8 +928,7 @@ func TestFindMissingAndExtraReviewers(t *testing.T) {
},
Reviews: &common.PRReviews{
Reviews: []*models.PullReview{{State: common.ReviewStateRequestReview, User: &models.User{UserName: "reviewer"}}},
RequestedReviewers: []string{"reviewer"},
FullTimeline: []*models.TimelineComment{{Type: common.TimelineCommentType_ReviewRequested, User: &models.User{UserName: "bot"}, Assignee: &models.User{UserName: "reviewer"}}},
RequestedReviewers: []*models.TimelineComment{{Type: common.TimelineCommentType_ReviewRequested, User: &models.User{UserName: "bot"}, Assignee: &models.User{UserName: "reviewer"}}},
},
},
},
@@ -966,8 +963,7 @@ func TestFindMissingAndExtraReviewers(t *testing.T) {
{State: common.ReviewStateApproved, User: &models.User{UserName: "pkgmaintainer"}},
{State: common.ReviewStatePending, User: &models.User{UserName: "prjmaintainer"}},
},
RequestedReviewers: []string{"user2", "pkgmaintainer", "prjmaintainer"},
FullTimeline: []*models.TimelineComment{
RequestedReviewers: []*models.TimelineComment{
{Type: common.TimelineCommentType_ReviewRequested, User: &models.User{UserName: "bot"}, Assignee: &models.User{UserName: "user2"}},
{Type: common.TimelineCommentType_ReviewRequested, User: &models.User{UserName: "bot"}, Assignee: &models.User{UserName: "pkgmaintainer"}},
{Type: common.TimelineCommentType_ReviewRequested, User: &models.User{UserName: "bot"}, Assignee: &models.User{UserName: "prjmaintainer"}},
@@ -985,8 +981,7 @@ func TestFindMissingAndExtraReviewers(t *testing.T) {
{State: common.ReviewStateRequestChanges, User: &models.User{UserName: "user1"}},
{State: common.ReviewStateRequestReview, User: &models.User{UserName: "autogits_obs_staging_bot"}},
},
RequestedReviewers: []string{"user1", "autogits_obs_staging_bot"},
FullTimeline: []*models.TimelineComment{
RequestedReviewers: []*models.TimelineComment{
{Type: common.TimelineCommentType_ReviewRequested, User: &models.User{UserName: "bot"}, Assignee: &models.User{UserName: "user1"}},
{Type: common.TimelineCommentType_ReviewRequested, User: &models.User{UserName: "bot"}, Assignee: &models.User{UserName: "autogits_obs_staging_bot"}},
},
@@ -1026,8 +1021,7 @@ func TestFindMissingAndExtraReviewers(t *testing.T) {
{State: common.ReviewStatePending, User: &models.User{UserName: "prj2"}},
{State: common.ReviewStatePending, User: &models.User{UserName: "someother"}},
},
RequestedReviewers: []string{"user2", "pkgmaintainer", "prjmaintainer", "pkgm1", "pkgm2", "someother", "prj1", "prj2"},
FullTimeline: []*models.TimelineComment{
RequestedReviewers: []*models.TimelineComment{
{Type: common.TimelineCommentType_ReviewRequested, User: &models.User{UserName: "bot"}, Assignee: &models.User{UserName: "pkgmaintainer"}},
{Type: common.TimelineCommentType_ReviewRequested, User: &models.User{UserName: "bot"}, Assignee: &models.User{UserName: "prjmaintainer"}},
{Type: common.TimelineCommentType_ReviewRequested, User: &models.User{UserName: "bot"}, Assignee: &models.User{UserName: "prj1"}},
@@ -1050,8 +1044,7 @@ func TestFindMissingAndExtraReviewers(t *testing.T) {
{State: common.ReviewStatePending, User: &models.User{UserName: "prj1"}},
{State: common.ReviewStatePending, User: &models.User{UserName: "prj2"}},
},
RequestedReviewers: []string{"user1", "autogits_obs_staging_bot", "prj1", "prj2"},
FullTimeline: []*models.TimelineComment{
RequestedReviewers: []*models.TimelineComment{
{Type: common.TimelineCommentType_ReviewRequested, User: &models.User{UserName: "bot"}, Assignee: &models.User{UserName: "autogits_obs_staging_bot"}},
{Type: common.TimelineCommentType_ReviewRequested, User: &models.User{UserName: "bot"}, Assignee: &models.User{UserName: "prj1"}},
{Type: common.TimelineCommentType_ReviewRequested, User: &models.User{UserName: "bot"}, Assignee: &models.User{UserName: "prj2"}},
@@ -1090,8 +1083,7 @@ func TestFindMissingAndExtraReviewers(t *testing.T) {
{State: common.ReviewStateRequestReview, User: &models.User{UserName: "prj1"}},
{State: common.ReviewStateRequestReview, User: &models.User{UserName: "someother"}},
},
RequestedReviewers: []string{"user2", "pkgmaintainer", "prjmaintainer", "pkgm1", "someother", "prj1"},
FullTimeline: []*models.TimelineComment{
RequestedReviewers: []*models.TimelineComment{
{Type: common.TimelineCommentType_ReviewRequested, User: &models.User{UserName: "bot"}, Assignee: &models.User{UserName: "pkgm1"}},
{Type: common.TimelineCommentType_ReviewRequested, User: &models.User{UserName: "bot"}, Assignee: &models.User{UserName: "pkgmaintainer"}},
{Type: common.TimelineCommentType_ReviewRequested, User: &models.User{UserName: "bot"}, Assignee: &models.User{UserName: "prjmaintainer"}},
@@ -1112,8 +1104,7 @@ func TestFindMissingAndExtraReviewers(t *testing.T) {
{State: common.ReviewStateRequestReview, User: &models.User{UserName: "autogits_obs_staging_bot"}},
{State: common.ReviewStateRequestReview, User: &models.User{UserName: "prj1"}},
},
RequestedReviewers: []string{"user1", "autogits_obs_staging_bot", "prj1"},
FullTimeline: []*models.TimelineComment{
RequestedReviewers: []*models.TimelineComment{
{Type: common.TimelineCommentType_ReviewRequested, User: &models.User{UserName: "bot"}, Assignee: &models.User{UserName: "autogits_obs_staging_bot"}},
{Type: common.TimelineCommentType_ReviewRequested, User: &models.User{UserName: "bot"}, Assignee: &models.User{UserName: "prj1"}},
{Type: common.TimelineCommentType_ReviewRequested, User: &models.User{UserName: "!bot"}, Assignee: &models.User{UserName: "user1"}},
@@ -1199,6 +1190,9 @@ func TestFindMissingAndExtraReviewers(t *testing.T) {
t.Run(test.name, func(t *testing.T) {
test.prset.HasAutoStaging = !test.noAutoStaging
for idx, pr := range test.prset.PRs {
if pr.Reviews != nil {
pr.Reviews.SetRequiredReviewers(test.prset.Config.Reviewers)
}
missing, extra := test.prset.FindMissingAndExtraReviewers(test.maintainers, idx)
// avoid nil dereference below, by adding empty array elements

View File

@@ -8,32 +8,47 @@ import (
"src.opensuse.org/autogits/common/gitea-generated/models"
)
type ReviewInterface interface {
IsManualMergeOK() bool
IsApproved() bool
MisingReviews() []string
FindReviewRequester(reviewer string) *models.TimelineComment
HasPendingReviewBy(reviewer string) bool
IsReviewedBy(reviewer string) bool
IsReviewedByOneOf(reviewers ...string) bool
SetRequiredReviewers(reviewers []string)
}
type PRReviews struct {
Reviews []*models.PullReview
RequestedReviewers []string
RequestedReviewers []*models.TimelineComment
Comments []*models.TimelineComment
FullTimeline []*models.TimelineComment
RequiredReviewers []string
}
func (r *PRReviews) SetRequiredReviewers(reviewers []string) {
r.RequiredReviewers = reviewers
}
func FetchGiteaReviews(rf GiteaReviewTimelineFetcher, org, repo string, no int64) (*PRReviews, error) {
rawReviews, err := rf.GetPullRequestReviews(org, repo, no)
if err != nil {
return nil, err
}
timeline, err := rf.GetTimeline(org, repo, no)
if err != nil {
return nil, err
}
rawReviews, err := rf.GetPullRequestReviews(org, repo, no)
if err != nil {
return nil, err
}
reviews := make([]*models.PullReview, 0, 10)
needNewReviews := []string{}
var comments []*models.TimelineComment
var foundUsers []string
alreadyHaveUserReview := func(user string) bool {
if slices.Contains(needNewReviews, user) {
if slices.Contains(foundUsers, user) {
return true
}
for _, r := range reviews {
@@ -49,20 +64,24 @@ func FetchGiteaReviews(rf GiteaReviewTimelineFetcher, org, repo string, no int64
LogDebug("Number of items in timeline:", len(timeline))
cutOffIdx := len(timeline)
var PendingRequestedReviews []*models.TimelineComment
for idx, item := range timeline {
if item.Type == TimelineCommentType_Review || item.Type == TimelineCommentType_ReviewRequested {
if item.Type == TimelineCommentType_Review {
for _, r := range rawReviews {
if r.ID == item.ReviewID {
if r.ID == item.ReviewID && r.User != nil {
if !alreadyHaveUserReview(r.User.UserName) {
if item.Type == TimelineCommentType_Review && idx > cutOffIdx {
needNewReviews = append(needNewReviews, r.User.UserName)
} else {
if idx < cutOffIdx {
reviews = append(reviews, r)
}
foundUsers = append(foundUsers, r.User.UserName)
}
break
}
}
} else if item.Type == TimelineCommentType_ReviewRequested && item.Assignee != nil && !alreadyHaveUserReview(item.Assignee.UserName) {
PendingRequestedReviews = append(PendingRequestedReviews, item)
} else if item.Type == TimelineCommentType_DismissReview && item.Assignee != nil && !alreadyHaveUserReview(item.Assignee.UserName) {
foundUsers = append(foundUsers, item.Assignee.UserName)
} else if item.Type == TimelineCommentType_Comment && cutOffIdx > idx {
comments = append(comments, item)
} else if item.Type == TimelineCommentType_PushPull && cutOffIdx == len(timeline) {
@@ -75,9 +94,9 @@ func FetchGiteaReviews(rf GiteaReviewTimelineFetcher, org, repo string, no int64
LogDebug("num comments:", len(comments), "timeline:", len(reviews))
return &PRReviews{
Reviews: reviews,
Comments: comments,
FullTimeline: timeline,
Reviews: reviews,
Comments: comments,
RequestedReviewers: PendingRequestedReviews,
}, nil
}
@@ -105,7 +124,7 @@ func (r *PRReviews) IsManualMergeOK() bool {
continue
}
LogDebug("comment:", c.User.UserName, c.Body)
if slices.Contains(r.RequestedReviewers, c.User.UserName) {
if slices.Contains(r.RequiredReviewers, c.User.UserName) {
if bodyCommandManualMergeOK(c.Body) {
return true
}
@@ -116,7 +135,7 @@ func (r *PRReviews) IsManualMergeOK() bool {
if c.Updated != c.Submitted {
continue
}
if slices.Contains(r.RequestedReviewers, c.User.UserName) {
if slices.Contains(r.RequiredReviewers, c.User.UserName) {
if bodyCommandManualMergeOK(c.Body) {
return true
}
@@ -132,7 +151,7 @@ func (r *PRReviews) IsApproved() bool {
}
goodReview := true
for _, reviewer := range r.RequestedReviewers {
for _, reviewer := range r.RequiredReviewers {
goodReview = false
for _, review := range r.Reviews {
if review.User.UserName == reviewer && review.State == ReviewStateApproved && !review.Stale && !review.Dismissed {
@@ -156,7 +175,7 @@ func (r *PRReviews) MissingReviews() []string {
return missing
}
for _, reviewer := range r.RequestedReviewers {
for _, reviewer := range r.RequiredReviewers {
if !r.IsReviewedBy(reviewer) {
missing = append(missing, reviewer)
}
@@ -169,12 +188,11 @@ func (r *PRReviews) FindReviewRequester(reviewer string) *models.TimelineComment
return nil
}
for _, r := range r.FullTimeline {
if r.Type == TimelineCommentType_ReviewRequested && r.Assignee.UserName == reviewer {
return r
for _, t := range r.RequestedReviewers {
if t.Assignee.UserName == reviewer {
return t
}
}
return nil
}
@@ -188,10 +206,19 @@ func (r *PRReviews) HasPendingReviewBy(reviewer string) bool {
switch r.State {
case ReviewStateRequestReview, ReviewStatePending:
return true
default:
return false
}
}
}
// at this point, we do not have actual review by user. Check if we have a pending review
for _, t := range r.RequestedReviewers {
if t.Assignee != nil && t.Assignee.UserName == reviewer {
return true
}
}
return false
}
@@ -200,20 +227,18 @@ func (r *PRReviews) IsReviewedBy(reviewer string) bool {
return false
}
res := false
for _, i := range r.Reviews {
if i.User.UserName == reviewer && !i.Stale {
switch i.State {
for _, r := range r.Reviews {
if r.User.UserName == reviewer && !r.Stale {
switch r.State {
case ReviewStateApproved, ReviewStateRequestChanges:
res = true
case ReviewStateRequestReview, ReviewStatePending:
return true
default:
return false
}
}
}
return res
return false
}
func (r *PRReviews) IsReviewedByOneOf(reviewers ...string) bool {

View File

@@ -137,6 +137,61 @@ func TestReviews(t *testing.T) {
isApproved: false,
isReviewedByTest1: true,
},
{
name: "Ghost user review",
reviews: []*models.PullReview{
{State: common.ReviewStateApproved, User: nil},
},
reviewers: []string{"user1"},
isApproved: false,
},
{
name: "ReviewRequested predates PushPull should be seen as pending",
reviews: []*models.PullReview{},
timeline: []*models.TimelineComment{
{Type: common.TimelineCommentType_PushPull},
{Type: common.TimelineCommentType_ReviewRequested, Assignee: &models.User{UserName: "user1"}},
},
reviewers: []string{"user1"},
isPendingByTest1: true,
},
{
name: "ReviewRequested postdates PushPull but blocked by older dismiss",
reviews: []*models.PullReview{},
timeline: []*models.TimelineComment{
{Type: common.TimelineCommentType_ReviewRequested, Assignee: &models.User{UserName: "user1"}},
{Type: common.TimelineCommentType_PushPull},
{Type: common.TimelineCommentType_ReviewDismissed, Assignee: &models.User{UserName: "user1"}},
},
reviewers: []string{"user1"},
isPendingByTest1: true,
},
{
name: "ReviewRequested predates PushPull should be seen as pending",
reviews: []*models.PullReview{
{ID: 101, State: common.ReviewStateRequestReview, User: &models.User{UserName: "user1"}},
},
timeline: []*models.TimelineComment{
{Type: common.TimelineCommentType_PushPull},
{Type: common.TimelineCommentType_ReviewRequested, Assignee: &models.User{UserName: "user1"}},
},
reviewers: []string{"user1"},
isPendingByTest1: true,
},
{
name: "Review requested, review, then push needs re-requesting",
reviews: []*models.PullReview{
{ID: 100, State: common.ReviewStateRequestChanges, User: &models.User{UserName: "user1"}},
},
timeline: []*models.TimelineComment{
{Type: common.TimelineCommentType_PushPull},
{Type: common.TimelineCommentType_Review, ReviewID: 100},
{Type: common.TimelineCommentType_ReviewRequested, Assignee: &models.User{UserName: "user1"}},
},
reviewers: []string{"user1"},
isReviewedByTest1: false, // Should be stale
isPendingByTest1: false, // Should be stale
},
}
for _, test := range tests {
@@ -158,7 +213,7 @@ func TestReviews(t *testing.T) {
}
return
}
reviews.RequestedReviewers = test.reviewers
reviews.SetRequiredReviewers(test.reviewers)
if r := reviews.IsApproved(); r != test.isApproved {
t.Fatal("Unexpected IsReviewed():", r, "vs. expected", test.isApproved)

View File

@@ -8,6 +8,7 @@ import (
)
const (
TimelineCommentType_ReviewDismissed = "dismiss_review"
TimelineCommentType_ReviewRequested = "review_request"
TimelineCommentType_Review = "review"
TimelineCommentType_PushPull = "pull_push"

View File

@@ -8,6 +8,7 @@ services:
gitea:
build: ./gitea
container_name: gitea-test
init: true
environment:
- GITEA_WORK_DIR=/var/lib/gitea
networks:
@@ -27,6 +28,7 @@ services:
rabbitmq:
image: rabbitmq:3.13.7-management
container_name: rabbitmq-test
init: true
healthcheck:
test: ["CMD", "rabbitmq-diagnostics", "check_running", "-q"]
interval: 30s
@@ -55,6 +57,7 @@ services:
context: ..
dockerfile: integration/gitea-events-rabbitmq-publisher/Dockerfile${GIWTF_IMAGE_SUFFIX}
container_name: gitea-publisher
init: true
networks:
- gitea-network
depends_on:
@@ -75,6 +78,7 @@ services:
context: ..
dockerfile: integration/workflow-pr/Dockerfile${GIWTF_IMAGE_SUFFIX}
container_name: workflow-pr
init: true
networks:
- gitea-network
depends_on:
@@ -103,6 +107,7 @@ services:
mock-obs:
build: ./mock-obs
container_name: mock-obs
init: true
networks:
- gitea-network
ports:
@@ -116,6 +121,7 @@ services:
context: ..
dockerfile: integration/obs-staging-bot/Dockerfile${GIWTF_IMAGE_SUFFIX}
container_name: obs-staging-bot
init: true
networks:
- gitea-network
depends_on:

1
workflow-pr/dummy Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1 @@
5