2019-05-27 20:50:09 +02:00
|
|
|
/* We are testing some deprecated APIs here */
|
|
|
|
#define GLIB_DISABLE_DEPRECATION_WARNINGS
|
|
|
|
|
Allow registering instance private data during get_type()
For static types, it should be possible to register a private data
structure right when we are registering the type, i.e. from the
get_type() implementation. By allowing this, we can take advantage of
the existing type definition macros to cut down the amount of code
necessary (as well as the knowledge baggage) when creating a new type.
The main issue with this new feature is that it cannot be mixed with the
old idiomatic way of adding private instance data by calling a function
in the middle of the class_init() implementation, as that imposes the
additional constraint of initializing the whole type hierarchy in order
to retrieve the offset of the private data in the GTypeInstance
allocation.
For this reason we are going to follow a two-step process; in the first
step, we are going to introduce the new (semi-private) API to register
the intent to add private instance data from within the get_type()
implementation, and hide it behind a macro; at the same time, the
G_DEFINE_TYPE_EXTENDED macro is going to be modified so that it will
register the private instance data if the macro was used, using a new
(semi-private) function as well. Once we have migrated all our code, we
will make the first new function perform the actual private data
registration, and turn the second new function into a no-op. This should
guarantee a transparent migration of existing code to the new idiomatic
form.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=700035
2013-05-09 23:41:26 +02:00
|
|
|
#include <glib-object.h>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
typedef struct {
|
|
|
|
GObject parent_instance;
|
|
|
|
} TestObject;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
typedef struct {
|
|
|
|
int dummy_0;
|
|
|
|
float dummy_1;
|
|
|
|
} TestObjectPrivate;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
typedef struct {
|
|
|
|
GObjectClass parent_class;
|
|
|
|
} TestObjectClass;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GType test_object_get_type (void);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
G_DEFINE_TYPE_WITH_CODE (TestObject, test_object, G_TYPE_OBJECT,
|
|
|
|
G_ADD_PRIVATE (TestObject))
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static void
|
|
|
|
test_object_class_init (TestObjectClass *klass)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static void
|
|
|
|
test_object_init (TestObject *self)
|
|
|
|
{
|
2013-06-24 16:43:04 +02:00
|
|
|
TestObjectPrivate *priv = test_object_get_instance_private (self);
|
Allow registering instance private data during get_type()
For static types, it should be possible to register a private data
structure right when we are registering the type, i.e. from the
get_type() implementation. By allowing this, we can take advantage of
the existing type definition macros to cut down the amount of code
necessary (as well as the knowledge baggage) when creating a new type.
The main issue with this new feature is that it cannot be mixed with the
old idiomatic way of adding private instance data by calling a function
in the middle of the class_init() implementation, as that imposes the
additional constraint of initializing the whole type hierarchy in order
to retrieve the offset of the private data in the GTypeInstance
allocation.
For this reason we are going to follow a two-step process; in the first
step, we are going to introduce the new (semi-private) API to register
the intent to add private instance data from within the get_type()
implementation, and hide it behind a macro; at the same time, the
G_DEFINE_TYPE_EXTENDED macro is going to be modified so that it will
register the private instance data if the macro was used, using a new
(semi-private) function as well. Once we have migrated all our code, we
will make the first new function perform the actual private data
registration, and turn the second new function into a no-op. This should
guarantee a transparent migration of existing code to the new idiomatic
form.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=700035
2013-05-09 23:41:26 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (g_test_verbose ())
|
2015-05-11 18:03:00 +02:00
|
|
|
g_printerr ("Offset of %sPrivate for type '%s': %d\n",
|
Allow registering instance private data during get_type()
For static types, it should be possible to register a private data
structure right when we are registering the type, i.e. from the
get_type() implementation. By allowing this, we can take advantage of
the existing type definition macros to cut down the amount of code
necessary (as well as the knowledge baggage) when creating a new type.
The main issue with this new feature is that it cannot be mixed with the
old idiomatic way of adding private instance data by calling a function
in the middle of the class_init() implementation, as that imposes the
additional constraint of initializing the whole type hierarchy in order
to retrieve the offset of the private data in the GTypeInstance
allocation.
For this reason we are going to follow a two-step process; in the first
step, we are going to introduce the new (semi-private) API to register
the intent to add private instance data from within the get_type()
implementation, and hide it behind a macro; at the same time, the
G_DEFINE_TYPE_EXTENDED macro is going to be modified so that it will
register the private instance data if the macro was used, using a new
(semi-private) function as well. Once we have migrated all our code, we
will make the first new function perform the actual private data
registration, and turn the second new function into a no-op. This should
guarantee a transparent migration of existing code to the new idiomatic
form.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=700035
2013-05-09 23:41:26 +02:00
|
|
|
G_OBJECT_TYPE_NAME (self),
|
|
|
|
G_OBJECT_TYPE_NAME (self),
|
|
|
|
TestObject_private_offset);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
priv->dummy_0 = 42;
|
|
|
|
priv->dummy_1 = 3.14159f;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static int
|
|
|
|
test_object_get_dummy_0 (TestObject *self)
|
|
|
|
{
|
2013-06-24 16:43:04 +02:00
|
|
|
TestObjectPrivate *priv = test_object_get_instance_private (self);
|
Allow registering instance private data during get_type()
For static types, it should be possible to register a private data
structure right when we are registering the type, i.e. from the
get_type() implementation. By allowing this, we can take advantage of
the existing type definition macros to cut down the amount of code
necessary (as well as the knowledge baggage) when creating a new type.
The main issue with this new feature is that it cannot be mixed with the
old idiomatic way of adding private instance data by calling a function
in the middle of the class_init() implementation, as that imposes the
additional constraint of initializing the whole type hierarchy in order
to retrieve the offset of the private data in the GTypeInstance
allocation.
For this reason we are going to follow a two-step process; in the first
step, we are going to introduce the new (semi-private) API to register
the intent to add private instance data from within the get_type()
implementation, and hide it behind a macro; at the same time, the
G_DEFINE_TYPE_EXTENDED macro is going to be modified so that it will
register the private instance data if the macro was used, using a new
(semi-private) function as well. Once we have migrated all our code, we
will make the first new function perform the actual private data
registration, and turn the second new function into a no-op. This should
guarantee a transparent migration of existing code to the new idiomatic
form.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=700035
2013-05-09 23:41:26 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return priv->dummy_0;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static float
|
|
|
|
test_object_get_dummy_1 (TestObject *self)
|
|
|
|
{
|
2013-06-24 16:43:04 +02:00
|
|
|
TestObjectPrivate *priv = test_object_get_instance_private (self);
|
Allow registering instance private data during get_type()
For static types, it should be possible to register a private data
structure right when we are registering the type, i.e. from the
get_type() implementation. By allowing this, we can take advantage of
the existing type definition macros to cut down the amount of code
necessary (as well as the knowledge baggage) when creating a new type.
The main issue with this new feature is that it cannot be mixed with the
old idiomatic way of adding private instance data by calling a function
in the middle of the class_init() implementation, as that imposes the
additional constraint of initializing the whole type hierarchy in order
to retrieve the offset of the private data in the GTypeInstance
allocation.
For this reason we are going to follow a two-step process; in the first
step, we are going to introduce the new (semi-private) API to register
the intent to add private instance data from within the get_type()
implementation, and hide it behind a macro; at the same time, the
G_DEFINE_TYPE_EXTENDED macro is going to be modified so that it will
register the private instance data if the macro was used, using a new
(semi-private) function as well. Once we have migrated all our code, we
will make the first new function perform the actual private data
registration, and turn the second new function into a no-op. This should
guarantee a transparent migration of existing code to the new idiomatic
form.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=700035
2013-05-09 23:41:26 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return priv->dummy_1;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
typedef struct {
|
|
|
|
TestObject parent_instance;
|
|
|
|
} TestDerived;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
typedef struct {
|
|
|
|
char *dummy_2;
|
|
|
|
} TestDerivedPrivate;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
typedef struct {
|
|
|
|
TestObjectClass parent_class;
|
|
|
|
} TestDerivedClass;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GType test_derived_get_type (void);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
G_DEFINE_TYPE_WITH_CODE (TestDerived, test_derived, test_object_get_type (),
|
|
|
|
G_ADD_PRIVATE (TestDerived))
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static void
|
|
|
|
test_derived_finalize (GObject *obj)
|
|
|
|
{
|
2013-06-24 16:43:04 +02:00
|
|
|
TestDerivedPrivate *priv = test_derived_get_instance_private ((TestDerived *) obj);
|
Allow registering instance private data during get_type()
For static types, it should be possible to register a private data
structure right when we are registering the type, i.e. from the
get_type() implementation. By allowing this, we can take advantage of
the existing type definition macros to cut down the amount of code
necessary (as well as the knowledge baggage) when creating a new type.
The main issue with this new feature is that it cannot be mixed with the
old idiomatic way of adding private instance data by calling a function
in the middle of the class_init() implementation, as that imposes the
additional constraint of initializing the whole type hierarchy in order
to retrieve the offset of the private data in the GTypeInstance
allocation.
For this reason we are going to follow a two-step process; in the first
step, we are going to introduce the new (semi-private) API to register
the intent to add private instance data from within the get_type()
implementation, and hide it behind a macro; at the same time, the
G_DEFINE_TYPE_EXTENDED macro is going to be modified so that it will
register the private instance data if the macro was used, using a new
(semi-private) function as well. Once we have migrated all our code, we
will make the first new function perform the actual private data
registration, and turn the second new function into a no-op. This should
guarantee a transparent migration of existing code to the new idiomatic
form.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=700035
2013-05-09 23:41:26 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
g_free (priv->dummy_2);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
G_OBJECT_CLASS (test_derived_parent_class)->finalize (obj);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static void
|
|
|
|
test_derived_class_init (TestDerivedClass *klass)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
G_OBJECT_CLASS (klass)->finalize = test_derived_finalize;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static void
|
|
|
|
test_derived_init (TestDerived *self)
|
|
|
|
{
|
2013-06-24 16:43:04 +02:00
|
|
|
TestDerivedPrivate *priv = test_derived_get_instance_private (self);
|
Allow registering instance private data during get_type()
For static types, it should be possible to register a private data
structure right when we are registering the type, i.e. from the
get_type() implementation. By allowing this, we can take advantage of
the existing type definition macros to cut down the amount of code
necessary (as well as the knowledge baggage) when creating a new type.
The main issue with this new feature is that it cannot be mixed with the
old idiomatic way of adding private instance data by calling a function
in the middle of the class_init() implementation, as that imposes the
additional constraint of initializing the whole type hierarchy in order
to retrieve the offset of the private data in the GTypeInstance
allocation.
For this reason we are going to follow a two-step process; in the first
step, we are going to introduce the new (semi-private) API to register
the intent to add private instance data from within the get_type()
implementation, and hide it behind a macro; at the same time, the
G_DEFINE_TYPE_EXTENDED macro is going to be modified so that it will
register the private instance data if the macro was used, using a new
(semi-private) function as well. Once we have migrated all our code, we
will make the first new function perform the actual private data
registration, and turn the second new function into a no-op. This should
guarantee a transparent migration of existing code to the new idiomatic
form.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=700035
2013-05-09 23:41:26 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (g_test_verbose ())
|
2015-05-11 18:03:00 +02:00
|
|
|
g_printerr ("Offset of %sPrivate for type '%s': %d\n",
|
Allow registering instance private data during get_type()
For static types, it should be possible to register a private data
structure right when we are registering the type, i.e. from the
get_type() implementation. By allowing this, we can take advantage of
the existing type definition macros to cut down the amount of code
necessary (as well as the knowledge baggage) when creating a new type.
The main issue with this new feature is that it cannot be mixed with the
old idiomatic way of adding private instance data by calling a function
in the middle of the class_init() implementation, as that imposes the
additional constraint of initializing the whole type hierarchy in order
to retrieve the offset of the private data in the GTypeInstance
allocation.
For this reason we are going to follow a two-step process; in the first
step, we are going to introduce the new (semi-private) API to register
the intent to add private instance data from within the get_type()
implementation, and hide it behind a macro; at the same time, the
G_DEFINE_TYPE_EXTENDED macro is going to be modified so that it will
register the private instance data if the macro was used, using a new
(semi-private) function as well. Once we have migrated all our code, we
will make the first new function perform the actual private data
registration, and turn the second new function into a no-op. This should
guarantee a transparent migration of existing code to the new idiomatic
form.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=700035
2013-05-09 23:41:26 +02:00
|
|
|
G_OBJECT_TYPE_NAME (self),
|
|
|
|
G_OBJECT_TYPE_NAME (self),
|
|
|
|
TestDerived_private_offset);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
priv->dummy_2 = g_strdup ("Hello");
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static const char *
|
|
|
|
test_derived_get_dummy_2 (TestDerived *self)
|
|
|
|
{
|
2013-06-24 16:43:04 +02:00
|
|
|
TestDerivedPrivate *priv = test_derived_get_instance_private (self);
|
Allow registering instance private data during get_type()
For static types, it should be possible to register a private data
structure right when we are registering the type, i.e. from the
get_type() implementation. By allowing this, we can take advantage of
the existing type definition macros to cut down the amount of code
necessary (as well as the knowledge baggage) when creating a new type.
The main issue with this new feature is that it cannot be mixed with the
old idiomatic way of adding private instance data by calling a function
in the middle of the class_init() implementation, as that imposes the
additional constraint of initializing the whole type hierarchy in order
to retrieve the offset of the private data in the GTypeInstance
allocation.
For this reason we are going to follow a two-step process; in the first
step, we are going to introduce the new (semi-private) API to register
the intent to add private instance data from within the get_type()
implementation, and hide it behind a macro; at the same time, the
G_DEFINE_TYPE_EXTENDED macro is going to be modified so that it will
register the private instance data if the macro was used, using a new
(semi-private) function as well. Once we have migrated all our code, we
will make the first new function perform the actual private data
registration, and turn the second new function into a no-op. This should
guarantee a transparent migration of existing code to the new idiomatic
form.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=700035
2013-05-09 23:41:26 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return priv->dummy_2;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
typedef struct {
|
|
|
|
TestObject parent_instance;
|
|
|
|
} TestMixed;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
typedef struct {
|
|
|
|
gint dummy_3;
|
|
|
|
} TestMixedPrivate;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
typedef struct {
|
|
|
|
TestObjectClass parent_class;
|
|
|
|
} TestMixedClass;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GType test_mixed_get_type (void);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
G_DEFINE_TYPE (TestMixed, test_mixed, test_object_get_type ())
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static void
|
|
|
|
test_mixed_class_init (TestMixedClass *klass)
|
|
|
|
{
|
2018-05-25 11:06:05 +02:00
|
|
|
G_GNUC_BEGIN_IGNORE_DEPRECATIONS
|
Allow registering instance private data during get_type()
For static types, it should be possible to register a private data
structure right when we are registering the type, i.e. from the
get_type() implementation. By allowing this, we can take advantage of
the existing type definition macros to cut down the amount of code
necessary (as well as the knowledge baggage) when creating a new type.
The main issue with this new feature is that it cannot be mixed with the
old idiomatic way of adding private instance data by calling a function
in the middle of the class_init() implementation, as that imposes the
additional constraint of initializing the whole type hierarchy in order
to retrieve the offset of the private data in the GTypeInstance
allocation.
For this reason we are going to follow a two-step process; in the first
step, we are going to introduce the new (semi-private) API to register
the intent to add private instance data from within the get_type()
implementation, and hide it behind a macro; at the same time, the
G_DEFINE_TYPE_EXTENDED macro is going to be modified so that it will
register the private instance data if the macro was used, using a new
(semi-private) function as well. Once we have migrated all our code, we
will make the first new function perform the actual private data
registration, and turn the second new function into a no-op. This should
guarantee a transparent migration of existing code to the new idiomatic
form.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=700035
2013-05-09 23:41:26 +02:00
|
|
|
g_type_class_add_private (klass, sizeof (TestMixedPrivate));
|
2018-05-25 11:06:05 +02:00
|
|
|
G_GNUC_END_IGNORE_DEPRECATIONS
|
Allow registering instance private data during get_type()
For static types, it should be possible to register a private data
structure right when we are registering the type, i.e. from the
get_type() implementation. By allowing this, we can take advantage of
the existing type definition macros to cut down the amount of code
necessary (as well as the knowledge baggage) when creating a new type.
The main issue with this new feature is that it cannot be mixed with the
old idiomatic way of adding private instance data by calling a function
in the middle of the class_init() implementation, as that imposes the
additional constraint of initializing the whole type hierarchy in order
to retrieve the offset of the private data in the GTypeInstance
allocation.
For this reason we are going to follow a two-step process; in the first
step, we are going to introduce the new (semi-private) API to register
the intent to add private instance data from within the get_type()
implementation, and hide it behind a macro; at the same time, the
G_DEFINE_TYPE_EXTENDED macro is going to be modified so that it will
register the private instance data if the macro was used, using a new
(semi-private) function as well. Once we have migrated all our code, we
will make the first new function perform the actual private data
registration, and turn the second new function into a no-op. This should
guarantee a transparent migration of existing code to the new idiomatic
form.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=700035
2013-05-09 23:41:26 +02:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static void
|
|
|
|
test_mixed_init (TestMixed *self)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
TestMixedPrivate *priv = G_TYPE_INSTANCE_GET_PRIVATE (self, test_mixed_get_type (), TestMixedPrivate);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (g_test_verbose ())
|
2015-05-11 18:03:00 +02:00
|
|
|
g_printerr ("Offset of %sPrivate for type '%s': %d\n",
|
Allow registering instance private data during get_type()
For static types, it should be possible to register a private data
structure right when we are registering the type, i.e. from the
get_type() implementation. By allowing this, we can take advantage of
the existing type definition macros to cut down the amount of code
necessary (as well as the knowledge baggage) when creating a new type.
The main issue with this new feature is that it cannot be mixed with the
old idiomatic way of adding private instance data by calling a function
in the middle of the class_init() implementation, as that imposes the
additional constraint of initializing the whole type hierarchy in order
to retrieve the offset of the private data in the GTypeInstance
allocation.
For this reason we are going to follow a two-step process; in the first
step, we are going to introduce the new (semi-private) API to register
the intent to add private instance data from within the get_type()
implementation, and hide it behind a macro; at the same time, the
G_DEFINE_TYPE_EXTENDED macro is going to be modified so that it will
register the private instance data if the macro was used, using a new
(semi-private) function as well. Once we have migrated all our code, we
will make the first new function perform the actual private data
registration, and turn the second new function into a no-op. This should
guarantee a transparent migration of existing code to the new idiomatic
form.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=700035
2013-05-09 23:41:26 +02:00
|
|
|
G_OBJECT_TYPE_NAME (self),
|
|
|
|
G_OBJECT_TYPE_NAME (self),
|
|
|
|
TestMixed_private_offset);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
priv->dummy_3 = 47;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static gint
|
|
|
|
test_mixed_get_dummy_3 (TestMixed *self)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
TestMixedPrivate *priv = G_TYPE_INSTANCE_GET_PRIVATE (self, test_mixed_get_type (), TestMixedPrivate);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return priv->dummy_3;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
typedef struct {
|
|
|
|
TestMixed parent_instance;
|
|
|
|
} TestMixedDerived;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
typedef struct {
|
|
|
|
gint64 dummy_4;
|
|
|
|
} TestMixedDerivedPrivate;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
typedef struct {
|
|
|
|
TestMixedClass parent_class;
|
|
|
|
} TestMixedDerivedClass;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GType test_mixed_derived_get_type (void);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
G_DEFINE_TYPE_WITH_CODE (TestMixedDerived, test_mixed_derived, test_mixed_get_type (),
|
|
|
|
G_ADD_PRIVATE (TestMixedDerived))
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static void
|
|
|
|
test_mixed_derived_class_init (TestMixedDerivedClass *klass)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static void
|
|
|
|
test_mixed_derived_init (TestMixedDerived *self)
|
|
|
|
{
|
2013-06-24 16:43:04 +02:00
|
|
|
TestMixedDerivedPrivate *priv = test_mixed_derived_get_instance_private (self);
|
Allow registering instance private data during get_type()
For static types, it should be possible to register a private data
structure right when we are registering the type, i.e. from the
get_type() implementation. By allowing this, we can take advantage of
the existing type definition macros to cut down the amount of code
necessary (as well as the knowledge baggage) when creating a new type.
The main issue with this new feature is that it cannot be mixed with the
old idiomatic way of adding private instance data by calling a function
in the middle of the class_init() implementation, as that imposes the
additional constraint of initializing the whole type hierarchy in order
to retrieve the offset of the private data in the GTypeInstance
allocation.
For this reason we are going to follow a two-step process; in the first
step, we are going to introduce the new (semi-private) API to register
the intent to add private instance data from within the get_type()
implementation, and hide it behind a macro; at the same time, the
G_DEFINE_TYPE_EXTENDED macro is going to be modified so that it will
register the private instance data if the macro was used, using a new
(semi-private) function as well. Once we have migrated all our code, we
will make the first new function perform the actual private data
registration, and turn the second new function into a no-op. This should
guarantee a transparent migration of existing code to the new idiomatic
form.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=700035
2013-05-09 23:41:26 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (g_test_verbose ())
|
2015-05-11 18:03:00 +02:00
|
|
|
g_printerr ("Offset of %sPrivate for type '%s': %d\n",
|
Allow registering instance private data during get_type()
For static types, it should be possible to register a private data
structure right when we are registering the type, i.e. from the
get_type() implementation. By allowing this, we can take advantage of
the existing type definition macros to cut down the amount of code
necessary (as well as the knowledge baggage) when creating a new type.
The main issue with this new feature is that it cannot be mixed with the
old idiomatic way of adding private instance data by calling a function
in the middle of the class_init() implementation, as that imposes the
additional constraint of initializing the whole type hierarchy in order
to retrieve the offset of the private data in the GTypeInstance
allocation.
For this reason we are going to follow a two-step process; in the first
step, we are going to introduce the new (semi-private) API to register
the intent to add private instance data from within the get_type()
implementation, and hide it behind a macro; at the same time, the
G_DEFINE_TYPE_EXTENDED macro is going to be modified so that it will
register the private instance data if the macro was used, using a new
(semi-private) function as well. Once we have migrated all our code, we
will make the first new function perform the actual private data
registration, and turn the second new function into a no-op. This should
guarantee a transparent migration of existing code to the new idiomatic
form.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=700035
2013-05-09 23:41:26 +02:00
|
|
|
G_OBJECT_TYPE_NAME (self),
|
|
|
|
G_OBJECT_TYPE_NAME (self),
|
|
|
|
TestMixedDerived_private_offset);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
priv->dummy_4 = g_get_monotonic_time ();
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static gint64
|
|
|
|
test_mixed_derived_get_dummy_4 (TestMixedDerived *self)
|
|
|
|
{
|
2013-06-24 16:43:04 +02:00
|
|
|
TestMixedDerivedPrivate *priv = test_mixed_derived_get_instance_private (self);
|
Allow registering instance private data during get_type()
For static types, it should be possible to register a private data
structure right when we are registering the type, i.e. from the
get_type() implementation. By allowing this, we can take advantage of
the existing type definition macros to cut down the amount of code
necessary (as well as the knowledge baggage) when creating a new type.
The main issue with this new feature is that it cannot be mixed with the
old idiomatic way of adding private instance data by calling a function
in the middle of the class_init() implementation, as that imposes the
additional constraint of initializing the whole type hierarchy in order
to retrieve the offset of the private data in the GTypeInstance
allocation.
For this reason we are going to follow a two-step process; in the first
step, we are going to introduce the new (semi-private) API to register
the intent to add private instance data from within the get_type()
implementation, and hide it behind a macro; at the same time, the
G_DEFINE_TYPE_EXTENDED macro is going to be modified so that it will
register the private instance data if the macro was used, using a new
(semi-private) function as well. Once we have migrated all our code, we
will make the first new function perform the actual private data
registration, and turn the second new function into a no-op. This should
guarantee a transparent migration of existing code to the new idiomatic
form.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=700035
2013-05-09 23:41:26 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return priv->dummy_4;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static void
|
|
|
|
private_instance (void)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
TestObject *obj = g_object_new (test_object_get_type (), NULL);
|
2013-11-29 03:58:48 +01:00
|
|
|
gpointer class;
|
|
|
|
gint offset;
|
Allow registering instance private data during get_type()
For static types, it should be possible to register a private data
structure right when we are registering the type, i.e. from the
get_type() implementation. By allowing this, we can take advantage of
the existing type definition macros to cut down the amount of code
necessary (as well as the knowledge baggage) when creating a new type.
The main issue with this new feature is that it cannot be mixed with the
old idiomatic way of adding private instance data by calling a function
in the middle of the class_init() implementation, as that imposes the
additional constraint of initializing the whole type hierarchy in order
to retrieve the offset of the private data in the GTypeInstance
allocation.
For this reason we are going to follow a two-step process; in the first
step, we are going to introduce the new (semi-private) API to register
the intent to add private instance data from within the get_type()
implementation, and hide it behind a macro; at the same time, the
G_DEFINE_TYPE_EXTENDED macro is going to be modified so that it will
register the private instance data if the macro was used, using a new
(semi-private) function as well. Once we have migrated all our code, we
will make the first new function perform the actual private data
registration, and turn the second new function into a no-op. This should
guarantee a transparent migration of existing code to the new idiomatic
form.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=700035
2013-05-09 23:41:26 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
g_assert_cmpint (test_object_get_dummy_0 (obj), ==, 42);
|
|
|
|
g_assert_cmpfloat (test_object_get_dummy_1 (obj), ==, 3.14159f);
|
|
|
|
|
2013-11-29 03:58:48 +01:00
|
|
|
class = g_type_class_ref (test_object_get_type ());
|
|
|
|
offset = g_type_class_get_instance_private_offset (class);
|
|
|
|
g_type_class_unref (class);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
g_assert (offset == TestObject_private_offset);
|
|
|
|
|
Allow registering instance private data during get_type()
For static types, it should be possible to register a private data
structure right when we are registering the type, i.e. from the
get_type() implementation. By allowing this, we can take advantage of
the existing type definition macros to cut down the amount of code
necessary (as well as the knowledge baggage) when creating a new type.
The main issue with this new feature is that it cannot be mixed with the
old idiomatic way of adding private instance data by calling a function
in the middle of the class_init() implementation, as that imposes the
additional constraint of initializing the whole type hierarchy in order
to retrieve the offset of the private data in the GTypeInstance
allocation.
For this reason we are going to follow a two-step process; in the first
step, we are going to introduce the new (semi-private) API to register
the intent to add private instance data from within the get_type()
implementation, and hide it behind a macro; at the same time, the
G_DEFINE_TYPE_EXTENDED macro is going to be modified so that it will
register the private instance data if the macro was used, using a new
(semi-private) function as well. Once we have migrated all our code, we
will make the first new function perform the actual private data
registration, and turn the second new function into a no-op. This should
guarantee a transparent migration of existing code to the new idiomatic
form.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=700035
2013-05-09 23:41:26 +02:00
|
|
|
g_object_unref (obj);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static void
|
|
|
|
private_derived_instance (void)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
TestDerived *obj = g_object_new (test_derived_get_type (), NULL);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
g_assert_cmpstr (test_derived_get_dummy_2 (obj), ==, "Hello");
|
|
|
|
g_assert_cmpint (test_object_get_dummy_0 ((TestObject *) obj), ==, 42);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
g_object_unref (obj);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static void
|
|
|
|
private_mixed_derived_instance (void)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
TestMixedDerived *derived = g_object_new (test_mixed_derived_get_type (), NULL);
|
|
|
|
TestMixed *mixed = g_object_new (test_mixed_get_type (), NULL);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
g_assert_cmpint (test_mixed_get_dummy_3 (mixed), ==, 47);
|
|
|
|
g_assert (test_mixed_derived_get_dummy_4 (derived) <= g_get_monotonic_time ());
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
g_object_unref (derived);
|
|
|
|
g_object_unref (mixed);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
int
|
|
|
|
main (int argc,
|
|
|
|
char *argv[])
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
g_test_init (&argc, &argv, NULL);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
g_test_add_func ("/private/instance", private_instance);
|
|
|
|
g_test_add_func ("/private/derived-instance", private_derived_instance);
|
|
|
|
g_test_add_func ("/private/mixed-derived-instance", private_mixed_derived_instance);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return g_test_run ();
|
|
|
|
}
|