2019-11-28 12:44:24 +01:00
|
|
|
|
#!/bin/bash
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020-02-25 12:11:42 +01:00
|
|
|
|
set -e
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020-07-25 01:36:33 +02:00
|
|
|
|
ancestor_horizon=28 # days (4 weeks)
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020-02-25 12:11:42 +01:00
|
|
|
|
# Wrap everything in a subshell so we can propagate the exit status.
|
|
|
|
|
(
|
2019-11-28 12:44:24 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
2020-06-12 15:02:30 +02:00
|
|
|
|
# We need to add a new remote for the upstream target branch, since this script
|
|
|
|
|
# could be running in a personal fork of the repository which has out of date
|
|
|
|
|
# branches.
|
2020-07-25 01:36:33 +02:00
|
|
|
|
#
|
|
|
|
|
# Limit the fetch to a certain date horizon to limit the amount of data we get.
|
|
|
|
|
# If the branch was forked from origin/master before this horizon, it should
|
|
|
|
|
# probably be rebased.
|
2019-11-28 12:44:24 +01:00
|
|
|
|
git remote add upstream https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/glib.git
|
2020-07-25 01:36:33 +02:00
|
|
|
|
git fetch --shallow-since="$(date --date="${ancestor_horizon} days ago" +%Y-%m-%d)" upstream
|
2019-11-28 12:44:24 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# Work out the newest common ancestor between the detached HEAD that this CI job
|
|
|
|
|
# has checked out, and the upstream target branch (which will typically be
|
|
|
|
|
# `upstream/master` or `upstream/glib-2-62`).
|
2020-07-25 01:36:33 +02:00
|
|
|
|
#
|
2019-11-28 12:44:24 +01:00
|
|
|
|
# `${CI_MERGE_REQUEST_TARGET_BRANCH_NAME}` is only defined if we’re running in
|
|
|
|
|
# a merge request pipeline; fall back to `${CI_DEFAULT_BRANCH}` otherwise.
|
2020-02-25 12:46:11 +01:00
|
|
|
|
newest_common_ancestor_sha=$(diff --old-line-format='' --new-line-format='' <(git rev-list --first-parent "upstream/${CI_MERGE_REQUEST_TARGET_BRANCH_NAME:-${CI_DEFAULT_BRANCH}}") <(git rev-list --first-parent HEAD) | head -1)
|
2020-07-25 01:36:33 +02:00
|
|
|
|
if [ -z "${newest_common_ancestor_sha}" ]; then
|
|
|
|
|
echo "Couldn’t find common ancestor with upstream master. This typically"
|
|
|
|
|
echo "happens if you branched from master a long time ago. Please update"
|
|
|
|
|
echo "your clone, rebase, and re-push your branch."
|
|
|
|
|
exit 1
|
|
|
|
|
fi
|
|
|
|
|
|
2019-11-28 12:44:24 +01:00
|
|
|
|
git diff -U0 --no-color "${newest_common_ancestor_sha}" | ./clang-format-diff.py -binary "clang-format-7" -p1
|
2020-01-16 14:48:33 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
2020-02-25 12:11:42 +01:00
|
|
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
exit_status=$?
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020-01-16 14:48:33 +01:00
|
|
|
|
# The style check is not infallible. The clang-format configuration cannot
|
|
|
|
|
# perfectly describe GLib’s coding style: in particular, it cannot align
|
|
|
|
|
# function arguments. The documented coding style for GLib takes priority over
|
|
|
|
|
# clang-format suggestions. Hopefully we can eventually improve clang-format to
|
|
|
|
|
# be configurable enough for our coding style. That’s why this CI check is OK
|
|
|
|
|
# to fail: the idea is that people can look through the output and ignore it if
|
|
|
|
|
# it’s wrong. (That situation can also happen if someone touches pre-existing
|
|
|
|
|
# badly formatted code and it doesn’t make sense to tidy up the wider coding
|
|
|
|
|
# style with the changes they’re making.)
|
|
|
|
|
echo ""
|
|
|
|
|
echo "Note that clang-format output is advisory and cannot always match the GLib coding style, documented at"
|
|
|
|
|
echo " https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gtk/blob/master/docs/CODING-STYLE"
|
|
|
|
|
echo "Warnings from this tool can be ignored in favour of the documented coding style,"
|
|
|
|
|
echo "or in favour of matching the style of existing surrounding code."
|
2020-02-25 12:11:42 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
exit ${exit_status}
|