From 6da5e6a327e48094f9254cbdc466eb6911df5b5f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Simon McVittie Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2024 11:53:00 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] gvarianttype: Fix typos Saying that a GtkWidget is a GtkWidget is trivially true, but not the point we were trying to make here. Fixes: b5c07063 "docs: Use code for class names in links" Signed-off-by: Simon McVittie --- glib/gvarianttype.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/glib/gvarianttype.c b/glib/gvarianttype.c index 370aee176..3d8c0ae81 100644 --- a/glib/gvarianttype.c +++ b/glib/gvarianttype.c @@ -90,8 +90,8 @@ * non-abstract subtypes may. For example, in GTK, no object that has * the type of [`GtkWidget`](https://docs.gtk.org/gtk4/class.Widget.html) can * exist (since `GtkWidget` is an abstract class), but a [`GtkWindow`](https://docs.gtk.org/gtk4/class.Window.html) - * can certainly be instantiated, and you would say that a `GtkWidget` is a - * `GtkWidget` (since `GtkWidget` is a subclass of `GtkWidget`). + * can certainly be instantiated, and you would say that a `GtkWindow` is a + * `GtkWidget` (since `GtkWindow` is a subclass of `GtkWidget`). * * Two types may not be compared by value; use [method@GLib.VariantType.equal] * or [method@GLib.VariantType.is_subtype_of] May be copied using