This works around a Meson bug
(https://github.com/mesonbuild/meson/issues/4668).
If we have a Python test which spawns a built native binary, that binary is
listed in the `depends` argument of the `test()`. On Linux, this results in
the directories containing the built libraries which the binary depends on
being added to the `LD_LIBRARY_PATH` of the test invocation. On Windows,
however, Meson currently doesn’t add those directories to `PATH` (which is
the equivalent of `LD_LIBRARY_PATH`), so we have to do it manually.
This takes the same approach as Christoph Reiter did in
gobject-introspection
(13e8c7ff80/tests/meson.build (L2)).
Signed-off-by: Philip Withnall <pwithnall@gnome.org>
We call g_object_weak_release_all() at two places.
Once right before finalize(). At this point, the object is definitely
going to be destroyed, and the user must no longer resurrect it or
subscribe new weak notifications. In that case, we really want to
notify/release all weak notifications.
However, we also call it from g_object_real_dispose(). During dispose,
the API allows the user to resurrect an object. Granted, that is
probably not something anybody should do, but GObject makes a reasonable
attempt to support that.
A possible place to resurrect (and subscribe new weak notifications) is
when GObject calls g_object_real_dispose().
static void
g_object_real_dispose (GObject *object)
{
g_signal_handlers_destroy (object);
/* GWeakNotify and GClosure can call into user code */
g_object_weak_release_all (object);
closure_array_destroy_all (object);
}
But previously, g_object_weak_release_all() would continue iterating
until there are no more weak notifications left. So while the user can
take a strong reference and resurrect the object, their attempts to
register new weak notifications are thwarted.
Instead, when the loop in g_object_weak_release_all() starts, remember
the initial number of weak notifications, and don't release more than
that. Note that WeakRefStack preserves the order of entries, so by
maintaining the "remaining_to_notify" counter we know when to stop.
Note that this brings also an earlier behavior back, where we would call
g_datalist_id_set_data (&object->qdata, quark_weak_notifies, NULL);
This would take out the entire WeakRefStack at once and notify the weak
notifications registered at the time. But subsequent registrations would
not be released/notified yet.
Previously, at two places (in g_object_real_dispose() and shortly before
finalize()), we would call
g_datalist_id_set_data (&object->qdata, quark_weak_notifies, NULL);
This clears @quark_weak_notifies at once and then invokes all
notifications.
This means, if you were inside a notification callback and called
g_object_weak_unref() on the object for *another* weak-reference, then
an exception failed:
GLib-GObject-FATAL-CRITICAL: g_object_weak_unref_cb: couldn't find weak ref 0x401320(0x16b9fe0)
Granted, maybe inside a GWeakNotify you shouldn't call much of anything
on where_the_object_was. However, unregistering things (like calling
g_object_weak_unref()) should still reasonably work.
Instead, now remove each weak notification one by one and invoke it.
As we now invoke the callbacks in a loop, if a callee registers a new
callback, then that one gets unregistered right away too. Previously,
we would during g_object_real_dispose() only notify the notifications
that were present when the loop starts. This is similar to what happens
in closure_array_destroy_all(). This is a change in behavior, but it
will be fixed in a separate follow-up commit.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/glib/-/issues/1002
g_object_weak_unref() would have done a fast-removal of the entry, which
messes up the order of the weak notifications.
During destruction of the object we emit the weak notifications. They
are emitted in the order in which they were registered (FIFO). Except,
when a g_object_weak_unref() messes up the order. Avoid that and
preserve the order.
Now, do a memmove(), which is O(n). But note that we already track weak
references in a flat array that requires a O(n) linear search. Thus,
g_object_weak_unref() was already O(n) and that didn't change. More
importantly, users are well advised to limit themselves to a reasonably
small number of weak notifications. And for small n, the linear search
and the memmove() is an efficient solution.
This changes behavior from commit [1] most similar to what was before.
The point of g_object_run_dispose() is to break reference cycles to
bring down an object. We don't expect the object to take new references
to keep it alive for longer. We probably also don't expect it to
register new weak references. We also don't expect the dispose() callees
to check g_weak_ref_get() for the object. In that case, this change
makes not difference.
Note that during g_object_run_dispose() the ref count does not yet go to
zero, still we clear GWeakRef. As such, GWeakRef rather tracks when
objects get disposed, instead of when the ref count really goes to zero.
That is intentional (e.g. issue [2]).
But compare to g_object_unref(), where we also clear GWeakRef *before*
calling dispose. That makes more sense, because inside dispose() (and
for example during weak notifications), we probably want to see that
g_weak_ref_get() indicates the object is already disposed. For that
reason, it seems more correct to clear out the GWeakRef before calling
dispose().
Also, the dispose() callees (e.g. the weak notifications) might refuse to
let the object die by intentionally keeping strong references around.
Not sure why they would do that, it is similar to resurrecting an object
during dispose(). But if they do, they might also want to register new
GWeakRef. In that case, we wouldn't want to unset those newly set
GWeakRef unconditionally right after.
In most cases, it shouldn't make a difference. In the case where it
does, this is the more sensible order of doing things.
[1] commit 2952cfd7a7 ('gobject: drop clearing quark_weak_locations from g_object_real_dispose()')
[2] https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/glib/-/issues/2266
We can tighten up the types which are being used, to prevent the
warnings. Not everything in the world has to be a `guint`.
These warnings only showed up on the macOS CI runner.
Signed-off-by: Philip Withnall <pwithnall@gnome.org>
Helps: #3405
Fixing #3405 is going to take a lot of work, so let’s split it up into
pieces and work on them separately. The `gobject/` and `gobject/tests/`
directories now compile cleanly with `-Wsign-conversion` (see the
previous commits), so let’s enable the warning for those directories to
prevent regressions while we continue to work on the other directories.
Signed-off-by: Philip Withnall <pwithnall@gnome.org>
Helps: #3405
There’s a painful inconsistency in the types of the
`g_{test_rand,random,rand}_int{,_range}()` functions, which vary
arbitrarily between `gint32` and `guint32`.
Unfortunately since those functions mention `int` explicitly in the name
(and then some of them return an `unsigned` integer), I don’t see a way
to make the APIs consistent without significant deprecations or
additions.
So, for the moment, to fix various `-Wsign-conversion` warnings, plaster
the tests with casts.
Signed-off-by: Philip Withnall <pwithnall@gnome.org>
Helps: #3405
This fixes a load of -Wsign-conversion warnings. The dest type setter
function is being used (presumably by design?) so there’s sometimes a
type mismatch (signed/unsigned, or size) with the constant value being
used by the test. This just makes the existing implicit casts explicit.
Signed-off-by: Philip Withnall <pwithnall@gnome.org>
Helps: #3405
Fix all the instances where `-Wsign-conversion` was pointing out that
`g_assert_cmpint()` had been used on unsigned inputs, or vice-versa.
Signed-off-by: Philip Withnall <pwithnall@gnome.org>
Helps: #3405
Some tweakings of the time spend during warm up. That mostly matters if
you set very short "--seconds", which can make sense for quickly
checking something. Then the warmup should not take more thatn a certain
percentage of the requested runs.
When we have a constant factor, we still want not to run for more than
10% of the overall test time ... except, we still want to run at least
ESTIMATE_ROUND_TIME_N_RUNS (because we skip the estimation step below).
Also, adjust WARM_UP_ALWAYS_SEC to be only 20% of the test time, for
short test runs.
Also, don't print the messages about "Estimating round time" with a
fixed "--factor".
One test round aims to run for 8msec (TARGET_ROUND_TIME).
As the "--seconds" parameter previously took whole integer numbers, that
meant that we would run at least 125 rounds.
For a quick run, we should also support even faster runs, e.g. to select
only 0.5 seconds.
Historically, there was a verbose mode and a non-verbose mode.
In non-verbose mode (the default), we would still print two lines:
Running test property-set
Property set per second: 39329344
Later, this was changed to include the test name in the second line, so
we would print:
Running test property-set
property-set: Property set per second: 39329344
But this first line is really just noise, making parsing and reading the
results harder. Hence a "--quiet" mode was added, that only printed one
line per test while keeping the previous default behavior. And all was
good.
Except, unless you want verbose mode, this "Running test" line is still
not very useful and mainly clutters the output.
Supporess it now also in normal mode. It is now only printed in verbose
mode.
This also makes the "--quiet" option do nothing. The option is still
there, maybe we find a future use and we should not break the command
line API by dropping an argument.
g_object_set() optimizes the case where there are no signals connected.
Add a test that sets the property with signals. Obviously, this one is
much slower, since we will freeze and thaw the notifications.
For the test, we actually care to find the fastest test run (and take
"min_elapsed"). That is useful, because that is the run where we
possibly have the least interference from external factors, it was the
run where the CPU solved the problem as fast as it could.
As such, we should not reject the first 5% as additional warm up. If the
first 5% are slower (and part of "warmup"), then they are anyway not
considered. If there is a the fastest run in the first 5 percent, then
we want to take that.
Also note, that the calculation of "avg_elapsed" was wrong, since it
divided by the full "num_rounds" while only summing 95% of the runs.
This is fixed too by now considering all runs.
Fixes: 282d536fd2 ('tests/performance: ensure to always warm up for 2 seconds')
- fix and improve usage output for "performance-run.sh" script.
- add a sleep after compilation. It seems to me, that the first run
usually performs better, which might be because the temperature of the
CPU raises and the CPU gets throttled. Unclear whether that is really
the case, but add a sleep so that all runs start under similar
conditions where the CPU was idle for a moment.
When running the test (without parameters), it estimates a factor for
the run size for each test. That is useful for running a reasonable size
of the test, on different machines.
However, when comparing two runs, it seems important that both runs
share a common factor. Otherwise, the factor is determined differently,
and the test is less comparable. For that there is the "--factor" option
or the GLIB_PERFORMANCE_FACTOR environment variable.
However, the factor option can only set the factors for all tests at the
same time. Optimally, one factor is roughly suitable for all tests, but
it is not, as currently the detected factors on my machine are widely
different
$ ./build/gobject/tests/performance/performance -v > p
$ cat p | sed -n -e 's/^Running test //p' -e 's/.*correction factor //p' | sed 'N;s/\n/ /'
simple-construction 34.78
simple-construction1 145.45
complex-construction 11.08
complex-construction1 20.46
complex-construction2 23.74
finalization 4.74
type-check 37.74
emit-unhandled 5.63
emit-unhandled-empty 49.69
emit-unhandled-generic 7.17
emit-unhandled-generic-empty 50.63
emit-unhandled-args 5.20
emit-handled 3.86
emit-handled-empty 4.01
emit-handled-generic 3.96
emit-handled-generic-empty 7.04
emit-handled-args 3.78
notify-unhandled 52.63
notify-by-pspec-unhandled 156.86
notify-handled 2.55
notify-by-pspec-handled 2.66
property-set 34.63
property-get 32.92
refcount 0.83
refcount-1 2.30
refcount-toggle 1.33
Adjust the base factors with these measurements.
PERFORMANCE_FILE="./gobject/tests/performance/performance.c"
IFS=$'\n'
for LINE in $(cat p | sed -n -e 's/^Running test //p' -e 's/.*correction factor //p' | sed 'N;s/\n/ /') ; do
(
IFS=' '
set -- $LINE
TESTNAME="$1"
FACTOR="$2"
LINENUMBER="$(grep -n "^ \"$TESTNAME\",$" "$PERFORMANCE_FILE" | cut -d: -f1)"
LINENUMBER=$((LINENUMBER + 2))
OLD_FACTOR="$(sed -n "$LINENUMBER s/^ \([0-9]\+\),$/\1/p" "$PERFORMANCE_FILE")"
NEW_FACTOR="$(awk -v factor="$FACTOR" -v old_factor="$OLD_FACTOR" 'BEGIN {print int(factor * old_factor + 0.5)}')"
sed -i "$LINENUMBER s/^ \([0-9]\+\),$/ $NEW_FACTOR,/" "$PERFORMANCE_FILE"
)
done
Afterwards, we get comparable factors:
$ ./build/gobject/tests/performance/performance -v > p2
$ cat p2 | sed -n -e 's/^Running test //p' -e 's/.*correction factor //p' | sed 'N;s/\n/ /'
simple-construction 0.98
simple-construction1 0.75
complex-construction 0.99
complex-construction1 0.96
complex-construction2 1.02
finalization 1.05
type-check 0.98
emit-unhandled 1.01
emit-unhandled-empty 1.10
emit-unhandled-generic 1.03
emit-unhandled-generic-empty 1.07
...
Of course, this measurement was taken in my setup. But I think it
brings the base factors into a comparable range for most users.
Also, the commit message shows an ugly script how you can re-generate
this for your own purposes.
Move the factor inside the PerformanceTest structure, so it can be
programatically accessed.
More importantly, the number is now expressed directly beside the test
setup (the PerformanceTest structure), all at one place.
Also, each test now gets a separate factor.
This change will be useful in the next commit. So far there is no
notable change in behavior.
Despite assigning the function to a variable, gcc can still detect that
the function never changes and most of the test code is optimized out.
Initialize it somewhere, where the compiler cannot prove that this
function pointer is always set to the same value.
We could also make the pointer volatile, but this approach seems
preferable to me.
During "as-installed" testing, we should search the GIR_DIR for GIR XML,
instead of hard-coding that it is `${prefix}/share/gir-1.0`. This is
not the case on at least Debian, in order to make it possible to
install more than one architecture's flavour of `GLib-2.0.gir`,
which contains some architecture-specific `#define`s.
Also search GOBJECT_INTROSPECTION_DATADIR/GIR_SUFFIX (in practice
something like `/usr/share/gir-1.0` in all cases) to accommodate
distributions like Debian that move the architecture-independent
majority of GIR XML into /usr/share to avoid duplication, leaving
only the architecture-specific minority of files like `GLib-2.0.gir`
in the GIR_DIR.
Signed-off-by: Simon McVittie <smcv@collabora.com>
We were reusing the same logic everywhere, while we can just reuse an
unique class to base our tests on that avoids having to copy-and-paste
code for no good reason
Add some basic support for having glib-tests-only python libraries that
can be shared across the various projects, so that we don't have to
maintain multiple copies of them.
It’s a false positive, but points to a slightly unnecessary use of a
global variable to store something which could be computed per-test.
scan-build thought that arrays of size `n_handlers` could have
uninitialised values accessed in them if `n_handlers` were to change
value part-way through a test (which it didn’t).
Signed-off-by: Philip Withnall <pwithnall@gnome.org>
It’s deprecated, but I was modifying it anyway and it didn’t have any
coverage, so let’s add a simple test (as suggested by Michael
Catanzaro).
Signed-off-by: Philip Withnall <pwithnall@gnome.org>
If we enable `-Wfloat-conversion`, these warn about a possible loss of
precision due to an implicit conversion from `double` to some other
numeric type.
The warning is correct: there is a possible loss of precision here. In
these instances, we don’t care, as the floating point arithmetic is
being done to do some imprecise scaling or imprecise timing. A loss of
precision is not a problem.
So, add an explicit cast to squash the warning.
Signed-off-by: Philip Withnall <pwithnall@gnome.org>
Helps: #3405
The tests were using a lot of signed `int`s when actually the values
being handled were always non-negative. Use `unsigned int` consistently
throughout.
Take the opportunity to move declarations of loop iterator variables
into the loops.
This introduces no functional changes.
Signed-off-by: Philip Withnall <pwithnall@gnome.org>
Helps: #3405
There were various places where (signed or unsigned) integer assertions
were being used to compare `double` or `float` values, resulting in an
implicit integer conversion.
This causes a warning when building with `-Wfloat-conversion`.
Improve the specificity of the tests by using the most-specific numeric
assertions through all `param` tests.
For the conversion tests, this means using the assertion function
associated with the target type, not the source type.
Signed-off-by: Philip Withnall <pwithnall@gnome.org>
Helps: #3405
As spotted by `-Wfloat-conversion`. Doubles which could not be
accurately represented as floats may have erroneously failed bounds
validation.
Signed-off-by: Philip Withnall <pwithnall@gnome.org>
Helps: #3405
Bumping the reference count from 1 to 2 (and back) is more expensive,
due to the check for toggle notifications.
We have a performance test already that hits that code path. Avoid that
for he "property-{get,set}" tests, so we avoid the known overhead and
test more relevant parts.
Despite all the efforts, there still seems to be a lot of noise in the
performance measurement. Especially, the first iterations seem to run
faster. Maybe that is because the kernel didn't yet determine that the
process is CPU bound and is less likely to schedule it out Or maybe it's
because burning the cycles heats up the CPU and it gets throttled after
a while. It's unclear why, and it's even unclear whether this really
happens. But from my observations, it seems to do.
Hence, more warm up.
- the first time we enter the test, ensure that we keep the CPU busy for
at 2 seconds. This additional warm up (WARM_UP_ALWAYS_SEC) is
global, and not per test.
- for each test, ignore the first 5% of the runs. It seems those tend to
run faster, thus skewing the results.
- if the user specifies a "--factor", the warm up operations are the
same and independent from external factors (such as time
measurements).
Note that this matters the most, when you want to run the executable
twice in a row and compare the results.
By default, the test estimates a run factor for each test. This means,
if you run performance under `perf`, the results are not comparable,
as the run time depends on the estimated factor.
Add an option, to set a fixed factor.
Of course, there is only one factor argument for all tests. Quite
possibly, you would want to run each test individually with a factor
appropriate for the test. On the other hand, all tests should be tuned
so that the same factor gives a similar test duration. So this may not
be a concern, or the tests should be adjusted. In any case, the option
is most useful when running only one test explicitly.
You can get a suitable factor by running the test once with "--verbose".
Another use case is if you run the benchmark under valgrind. Valgrind
slows down the run so much, that the estimated factor would be quite
off. As a result, the chosen code paths are different from the real run.
By setting the factor, the timing measurements don't affect the executed
code.
The default output is annoyingly verbose. You see
Running test simple-construction
simple-construction: Millions of constructed objects per second: 33.498
Running test simple-construction1
simple-construction1: Millions of constructed objects per second: 142.493
Running test complex-construction
complex-construction: Millions of constructed objects per second: 14.304
Running test complex-construction1
...
where the "Running test" lines just clutter the output. In fact so much
so, that my terminal fills up and I don't see the output of all tests in
one page. The "Running test" line is not so useful, because I mostly
care about the test result, and that line already contains the test
name.
Add an option to silence this.
Previously, the result lines are not unique, for example
Running test simple-construction
Millions of constructed objects per second: 27.629
Running test simple-construction1
Millions of constructed objects per second: 151.879
...
That is undesirable, because we might want to parse the test results
with a script, and that's easier when the line is unique.
Change to:
Running test simple-construction
simple-construction: Millions of constructed objects per second: 27.629
Running test simple-construction1
simple-construction1: Millions of constructed objects per second: 151.879
...
On a fast laptop, this test currently takes about 7s to run, which is a
significant portion of the overall test suite time.
On a slower CI machine, especially running the test under valgrind, the
test can time out.
There’s no need to always run so many iterations: we run the tests under
CI so often that it’s likely a failure will eventually be hit (if there
is a bug) even with fewer iterations. We also now run the tests once a
week with `-m slow`, so the original iteration count will also still be
used then.
Signed-off-by: Philip Withnall <pwithnall@gnome.org>
It’s more helpful to always register the test, even if it’s normally
skipped, since then the skip is recorded in the test logs so people can
see what’s ‘missing’ from them.
Signed-off-by: Philip Withnall <pwithnall@gnome.org>
