This makes calls to g_signal_connect_data() and g_signal_connect_object()
with default flags more self-documenting.
Signed-off-by: Simon McVittie <smcv@collabora.com>
Add SPDX license (but not copyright) headers to all files which follow a
certain pattern in their existing non-machine-readable header comment.
This commit was entirely generated using the command:
```
git ls-files gio/*.[ch] | xargs perl -0777 -pi -e 's/\n \*\n \* This library is free software; you can redistribute it and\/or\n \* modify it under the terms of the GNU Lesser General Public/\n \*\n \* SPDX-License-Identifier: LGPL-2.1-or-later\n \*\n \* This library is free software; you can redistribute it and\/or\n \* modify it under the terms of the GNU Lesser General Public/igs'
```
Signed-off-by: Philip Withnall <pwithnall@endlessos.org>
Helps: #1415
On Unix platforms, wait() and friends yield an integer that encodes
how the process exited. Confusingly, this is usually not the same as
the integer passed to exit() or returned from main(): conceptually it's
an integer encoding of this tagged union:
enum { EXITED, SIGNALLED, ... } tag;
union {
int exit_status; /* if EXITED */
struct {
int terminating_signal;
bool core_dumped;
} terminating_signal; /* if SIGNALLED */
...
} detail;
Meanwhile, on Windows, wait statuses and exit statuses are
interchangeable.
I find that it's clearer what is going on if we are consistent about
referring to the result of wait() as a "wait status", and the value
passed to exit() as an "exit status".
GSubprocess already gets this right: g_subprocess_get_status() returns
the wait status, while g_subprocess_get_exit_status() genuinely returns
the exit status. However, the GSpawn family of APIs has tended to
conflate the two.
Confusingly, g_spawn_check_exit_status() has always checked a wait
status, and it would not be correct to pass an exit status to it; so
let's deprecate it in favour of g_spawn_check_wait_status(), which
does the same thing that g_spawn_check_exit_status() always did.
Code that needs backwards-compatibility with older GLib can use:
#if !GLIB_CHECK_VERSION(2, 69, 0)
#define g_spawn_check_wait_status(x) (g_spawn_check_exit_status (x))
#endif
Signed-off-by: Simon McVittie <smcv@collabora.com>
This improves performance by eliminating the use of a
`GSpawnChildSetupFunc` in the common case (since that setup code has now
moved into `g_spawn*()` itself), and enables the use of the fix to avoid
the child error reporting FD being overwritten by target FD mappings,
introduced via `g_spawn_async_with_pipes_and_fds()`.
It reworks how the source/target FD mapping is stored within
`GSubprocessLauncher` to match what `g_spawn*()` uses. The two
approaches are equivalent.
Signed-off-by: Philip Withnall <pwithnall@endlessos.org>
Fixes: #2097
gio/gsubprocess.c: In function ‘initable_init’:
gio/gsubprocess.c:587:26: error: comparison of integer expressions of different signedness: ‘gint’ {aka ‘int’} and ‘long unsigned int’
587 | g_assert (0 < s && s < sizeof self->identifier);
| ^
gio/gsubprocess.c: In function ‘child_setup’:
gio/gsubprocess.c:271:56: error: comparison of integer expressions of different signedness: ‘gint’ {aka ‘int’} and ‘guint’ {aka ‘unsigned int’}
271 | if (child_data->fds[i] != -1 && child_data->fds[i] != i)
| ^~
Previously it was considered a programming error to call these on
subprocesses created without the correct flags, but for bindings this
distinction is difficult to handle automatically.
Returning NULL instead does not cause any inconsistent behaviour and
simplifies the API.
It turns out that our async write operation implementation is broken
on non-O_NONBLOCK pipes, because the default async write
implementation calls write() after poll() said there were some
space. However, the semantics of pipes is that unless O_NONBLOCK is set
then the write *will* block if the passed in write count is larger than
the available space.
This caused a deadlock in https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/glib/-/issues/2182
due to the loop-back of the app stdout to the parent, but even without such
a deadlock it is a problem that we may block the mainloop at all.
In the particular case of g_subprocess_communicate() we have full
control of the pipes after starting the app, so it is safe to enable
O_NONBLOCK (i.e. we can ensure all the code using the fd after this can handle
non-blocking mode).
This fixes https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/glib/-/issues/2182
Instead of sometimes returning a non-NULL buffer, always return NULL.
However, keep the documentation as explicitly returning undefined values
on failure, so that we can change the behaviour in future if needed.
The return values weren’t defined for failure before, so were
implicitly returning undefined values.
Signed-off-by: Philip Withnall <withnall@endlessm.com>
The source callback for a GCancellable should have the cancellable itself
as first argument.
This was not the case, and when this code was hit, we were instead trying
to treat the pointer as a CommunicateState reference and thus wrongly
deferencing it, causing a memory error and a crash.
If calling g_subprocess_communicate() on a GSubprocess with no
stdout/stderr pipe, a critical warning would be emitted from
g_memory_output_stream_steal_as_bytes(), as it would be called on a NULL
output stream.
Fix that, improve the relevant GIR annotations, and expand the unit
tests to cover it (and various other combinations of flags).
Signed-off-by: Philip Withnall <withnall@endlessm.com>
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=793331
See bug #786456 for a detailed analysis of the situation which can cause
this (in summary, if a g_subprocess_wait_async() call is cancelled on a
GSubprocess which is already known to be dead).
The problem was that the GCancellable callback handler was
unconditionally returning a result for the GTask for
g_subprocess_wait_async(), even if that GTask had already returned a
result and the callback was being invoked after the GTask had been
removed from the pending_waits list.
Fix that by checking whether the GTask is still in the pending_waits
list before returning a result for it.
Thanks to Will Thompson for some very useful unit tests which reproduce
this (which will be pushed in the following commit).
Signed-off-by: Philip Withnall <withnall@endlessm.com>
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=786456
Prevent the situation where errno is set by function A, then function B
is called (which is typically _(), but could be anything else) and it
overwrites errno, then errno is checked by the caller.
errno is a horrific API, and we need to be careful to save its value as
soon as a function call (which might set it) returns. i.e. Follow the
pattern:
int errsv, ret;
ret = some_call_which_might_set_errno ();
errsv = errno;
if (ret < 0)
puts (strerror (errsv));
This patch implements that pattern throughout GLib. There might be a few
places in the test code which still use errno directly. They should be
ported as necessary. It doesn’t modify all the call sites like this:
if (some_call_which_might_set_errno () && errno == ESOMETHING)
since the refactoring involved is probably more harmful than beneficial
there. It does, however, refactor other call sites regardless of whether
they were originally buggy.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=785577
It's unnecessary, and only adds visual noise; we have been fairly
inconsistent in the past, but the semi-colon-less version clearly
dominates in the code base.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=669355
These calls cause race warnings from tsan, but are not a thread safety
problem, because we can only ever observe single bit changes: all
modifications to the GSource.flags field are done with a lock held; all
reads are of independent fields, so no intermediate state can ever be
observed. This assumes that a non-atomic read will consistently give us
an old value or a new value.
In any case, these g_source_is_destroyed() calls can happen from any
thread, and the state could be changed from another thread immediately
after the call returns; so the checks are pointless. In addition,
calling g_source_set_ready_time() or g_source_destroy() on a destroyed
source is not a problem.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=778049
If we have an input parameter (or return value) we need to use (nullable).
However, if it is an (inout) or (out) parameter, (optional) is sufficient.
It looks like (nullable) could be used for everything according to the
Annotation documentation, but (optional) is more specific.
When using this API, I wasn't sure what the cancellable does. I think
it's generally desirable to kill the subprocess if the wait operation is
cancelled, since in this case the application is no longer interested by
the subprocess.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=732704
- g_subprocess_launcher_spawn() and spawnv(): there is no other way
AFAIK to create a GSubprocess from a launcher. So these
functions are not "convenience helper".
- annotate optional arguments for g_shell_parse_argv().
- other trivial fix
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=732357
On the splice for stdout or stderr completing, GSubprocess calls
_slice_finish() to collect the result.
We assume that a zero return value here means failure, but in fact this
function returns a gssize -- the number of bytes transferred, or -1 for
an error.
This causes GSubprocess to mistakenly think that it has an error when it
actually just has an empty buffer (as would be the case when collecting
stderr from a successful command).
Check for -1 instead of FALSE to detect the error.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=724916
