Where we were already treating GHashTables as sets, modify them to use
the set-specific APIs g_hash_table_add() and g_hash_table_contains(), to
make that usage more obvious and less prone to being broken.
Heavily based on patches by Garrett Regier <garrettregier@gmail.com>.
Signed-off-by: Philip Withnall <withnall@endlessm.com>
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=749371
This was duplicated also in g_object_interface_install_property().
Now, validations specific to classes happen in
validate_and_install_class_property() - specifically, the checks for
the presence of the get_property() and set_property() methods.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=787551
It's unnecessary, and only adds visual noise; we have been fairly
inconsistent in the past, but the semi-colon-less version clearly
dominates in the code base.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=669355
This is going to be checked again by g_object_new_with_properties()
and g_object_new_valist() anyway, so might just as well leave it
to those functions to do the check and only do it once. It doesn't
matter which function emits the critical warning in the end either,
as one has to look at a stack trace to find out what code triggered
it in any case.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=780908
g_object_newv uses a GParameter as argument. Since GParameter
is deprecated due to this type is not introspectible,
g_object_newv is deprecated now.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=709865
g_object_new_with_properties is an alternative to g_object_newv.
The last one, takes an array of GParameter. However, GParameter
is a rarely used type and this type is not introspectible, so
it will not work properly in bindings.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=709865
If we have an input parameter (or return value) we need to use (nullable).
However, if it is an (inout) or (out) parameter, (optional) is sufficient.
It looks like (nullable) could be used for everything according to the
Annotation documentation, but (optional) is more specific.
The C spec leaves conditional evaluation inside a macro expansion as
undefined behaviour. This means we cannot use constructs like:
GOBJECT_IF_DEBUG(OBJECTS, {
...
#ifdef BLAH
...
#endif
...});
Because compilers are entirely justified to ignore the conditional, or,
like in the case of MSVC, error out.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=769504
historically, DEBUG_CODE(gtype.c) and IF_DEBUG(gobject.c, gsignal.c)
macros are used to support debugging messages about object bookkeeping
and signal emission.
DEBUG_CODE has never been used in gtype.c. IF_DEBUG, when used, must be
accompanied by an extra #ifdef G_ENABLE_DEBUG. this is cumbersome.
this patch add a new macro GOBJECT_IF_DEBUG based on DEBUG_CODE as
a replacement for both DEBUG_CODE and IF_DEBUG.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=729914
Add various (nullable) and (optional) annotations which were missing
from a variety of functions. Also port a couple of existing (allow-none)
annotations in the same files to use (nullable) and (optional) as
appropriate instead.
Secondly, add various (not nullable) annotations as needed by the new
default in gobject-introspection of marking gpointers as (nullable). See
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=729660.
This includes adding some stub documentation comments for the
assertion macro error functions, which weren’t previously documented.
The new comments are purely to allow for annotations, and hence are
marked as (skip) to prevent the symbols appearing in the GIR file.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=719966
Keeping these enabled causes too many people to file
bugs against gobject, and not enough people to send
patches to port away from deprecated properties.
Practically no caller of these functions require atomic behaviour,
but the atomics are much slower than normal operations, which makes
it desirable to get rid of them. We have not done this before because
that would be a break of the ABI.
However, I recently looked into this and it seems that even if the
atomics *are* used for g_clear_* it is not ever safe to use this. The
atomics protects two threads that are racing to free a global/shared
object from freeing the object twice. However, any *user* of the global
object have no protection from the object being freed while in use,
because there is no paired operation the reads and refs the object
as an atomic unit (nor can such an operation be implemented using
purely atomic ops).
So, since nothing could safely have used the atomic aspects of these
functions I consider it acceptable to just remove it.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=733969
Don't emit property deprecation warnings for construct properties that
are being set to their default value during construction, but _do_ emit
them in all cases when the property was explicitly given to
g_object_new().
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=732184
By default G_PARAM_DEPRECATED means absolutely nothing. We only emit a
warning if G_ENABLE_DIAGNOSTIC is set to '1' and then, only on sets.
Turn the logic on its head: emit the warning by default, unless
G_ENABLE_DIAGNOSTIC is set to 0. In order to avoid a torrent of output, only
emit a warning once per property name.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=732184
Leave ourselves a little wiggle room: if people install properties after
initialisation then we reserve the right to handle that in a way that
may not be threadsafe.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=698614
Add a flag to prevent the automatic emission of the "notify" signal
during g_object_set_property().
If this flag is set then the class must explicitly emit the notify
for themselves. This is already standard practice on most classes, but
we cannot simply remove the existing behaviour because there are surely
many cases where it is needed.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=731200
Construct properties are always set during construction.
It makes no sense to warn about this even if the property
is marked as deprecated; the deprecation warning should
only be issues for explicit uses of the property after
construction.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=730045
Although returning NULL from constructor is strongly discouraged, some
old libraries need to keep doing it for ABI-compatibility reasons.
Given this, it's rude to forbid finalization from within
constructor(), since it would otherwise work correctly now anyway (and
the critical when returning NULL should discourage any new uses of
returning NULL from constructor()).
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=661576
Since we are no longer using sgml mode, using /* */ to
escape block comments inside examples does not work anymore.
Switch to using line comments with //
