This is an API break, but no third party code should be touching
`GObject.ref_count`, let alone in a way which would be changed by the
removal of the `volatile` qualifier.
Signed-off-by: Philip Withnall <pwithnall@endlessos.org>
Helps: #600
This is an API break, but it should not affect third party code since
that code should not be interacting with the `data` member in a way that
invokes its `volatile` qualifier (such as copying to an intermediate
variable).
Signed-off-by: Philip Withnall <pwithnall@endlessos.org>
Helps: #600
This is technically an API break, but since the type is meant to be
opaque (third party code is not meant to treat it like an integer) it
should not cause problems.
Signed-off-by: Philip Withnall <pwithnall@endlessos.org>
Helps: #600
These variables were already (correctly) accessed atomically. The
`volatile` qualifier doesn’t help with that.
Signed-off-by: Philip Withnall <pwithnall@endlessos.org>
Helps: #600
These variables were already (correctly) accessed atomically. The
`volatile` qualifier doesn’t help with that.
Signed-off-by: Philip Withnall <pwithnall@endlessos.org>
Helps: #600
It’s not necessary and provides no thread safety guarantees.
The `volatile` qualifiers on the function arguments have to be kept, as
they are (unfortunately) part of the API.
Signed-off-by: Philip Withnall <pwithnall@endlessos.org>
Helps: #600
It’s not necessary and provides no thread safety guarantees.
The `volatile` qualifiers on the function arguments have to be kept, as
they are (unfortunately) part of the API.
Signed-off-by: Philip Withnall <pwithnall@endlessos.org>
Helps: #600
And drop the `volatile` qualifier from the variables, as that doesn’t
help with thread safety.
Signed-off-by: Philip Withnall <pwithnall@endlessos.org>
Helps: #600
These variables were already (correctly) accessed atomically. The
`volatile` qualifier doesn’t help with that.
Signed-off-by: Philip Withnall <pwithnall@endlessos.org>
Helps: #600
These variables were already (correctly) accessed atomically. The
`volatile` qualifier doesn’t help with that.
Signed-off-by: Philip Withnall <pwithnall@endlessos.org>
Helps: #600
This should introduce no API changes. The
`g_dbus_error_register_error_domain()` function still (incorrectly) has
a `volatile` argument, but dropping that qualifier would be an API
break.
Signed-off-by: Philip Withnall <pwithnall@endlessos.org>
Helps: #600
This should introduce no API changes; there are public functions
exported by `GDBusConnection` which still have some (incorrectly)
`volatile` arguments, but dropping those qualifiers would be an API
break.
Signed-off-by: Philip Withnall <pwithnall@endlessos.org>
Helps: #600
These variables were already (correctly) accessed atomically. The
`volatile` qualifier doesn’t help with that.
Signed-off-by: Philip Withnall <pwithnall@endlessos.org>
Helps: #600
And drop the `volatile` qualifier from the variables, as that doesn’t
help with thread safety.
Signed-off-by: Philip Withnall <pwithnall@endlessos.org>
Helps: #600
These variables were already (correctly) accessed atomically. The
`volatile` qualifier doesn’t help with that.
Signed-off-by: Philip Withnall <pwithnall@endlessos.org>
Helps: #600
And drop the `volatile` qualifier from the variable, as that doesn’t
help with thread safety.
Signed-off-by: Philip Withnall <pwithnall@endlessos.org>
Helps: #600
And drop the `volatile` qualifier from the variable, as that doesn’t
help with thread safety.
Signed-off-by: Philip Withnall <pwithnall@endlessos.org>
Helps: #600
http://isvolatileusefulwiththreads.in/c/
It’s possible that the variables here are only marked as volatile
because they’re arguments to `g_once_*()`. Those arguments will be
modified in a subsequent commit.
Signed-off-by: Philip Withnall <pwithnall@endlessos.org>
Helps: #600
The previous code consumed a larger additional amount of stack space.
That is because it would allocate the temporary buffer for GValues on
the stack with "g_newa (GValue, 1)" and thus the required stack
space grew with the number of arguments. Granted, this is already
a variadic C function, so the caller already placed that many elements
on the stack. For example, on the stack there are the property names
and the pointers to the arguments, which should amount to roughly
O(n_args * 16) (on 64 bit, with pointers being 8 bytes large).
That is not bad, because it means in the previous version the stack space
would grow linear with the already used stack space. However, a GValue is
an additional 24 bytes (on 64 bit), which probably more than doubles the
required stack space. Let's avoid that, by allocating the temporary list
on the heap after a certain threshold. This probably more than doubles the
number of possible arguments before the stack overflows.
Also, previously the heap allocated "params" array only grew one element
per iteration. Of course, it is likely that libc anyway reallocates
the buffers by growing the space exponentially. So realloc(ptr, 1)
probably does not O() scale worse than doubling the buffer sizes ourselves.
However, it seems clearer to keep track of the allocated sizes ourself, and
only call realloc() when we determine that we are out of space.
Especially because we need to update the value pointers on reallocation.
Note that we now require a heap allocation both for the "params" and the
"values" list. Theoretically that could be combined by using one buffer
for both. But that would make the code more complicated.
Now we pre-allocate buffers for 16 elements on the stack. That
is (16 * (16 + 24) bytes (or 640 bytes) on the stack. I think that
is still acceptable.
These tests were originally written using the output directly from a
fuzzer which had triggered the bugs we’re testing for. However, that
means they’re liable to no longer test what they’re intended to test if
the `GDBusMessage` parsing code is changed to (for example) check for
certain errors earlier in future.
It’s better to only have one invalidity in each binary blob, so change
the test messages to all be valid apart from the specific thing they’re
testing for.
The changes were based on reading the D-Bus specification directly:
https://dbus.freedesktop.org/doc/dbus-specification.html
During these changes I found one problem in
`test_message_parse_deep_header_nesting()` where it wasn’t actually
nesting variants in the header deeply enough to trigger the bug it was
supposed to be testing for. Fixed that.
Signed-off-by: Philip Withnall <pwithnall@endlessos.org>
Fixes: #1963
Two out of three callers pass the count argument from a variable
of type guint. And the third is currently an always positive gint.
We should use the correct integer type that matches the type as it
used otherwise.
Add a new variant of `g_time_zone_new()` which returns `NULL` on
failure to load a timezone, rather than silently returning UTC.
Signed-off-by: Philip Withnall <pwithnall@endlessos.org>
Fixes: #553
In file included from glib/glib.h:86,
from glib/tests/uri.c:25:
glib/gtestutils.h:134:96: error: comparison of integer expressions of different signedness: ‘gint’ {aka ‘int’} and ‘GConvertError’
134 | if (!err || (err)->domain != dom || (err)->code != c) \
| ^~
glib/tests/uri.c:182:9: note: in expansion of macro ‘g_assert_error’
182 | g_assert_error (error, G_CONVERT_ERROR, file_to_uri_tests[i].expected_error);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
glib/gtestutils.h:134:96: error: comparison of integer expressions of different signedness: ‘gint’ {aka ‘int’} and ‘GConvertError’
134 | if (!err || (err)->domain != dom || (err)->code != c) \
| ^~
glib/tests/uri.c:220:9: note: in expansion of macro ‘g_assert_error’
220 | g_assert_error (error, G_CONVERT_ERROR, file_from_uri_tests[i].expected_error);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
glib/tests/uri.c: In function ‘test_uri_parsing_absolute’:
glib/gtestutils.h:134:96: error: comparison of integer expressions of different signedness: ‘gint’ {aka ‘int’} and ‘GUriError’
134 | if (!err || (err)->domain != dom || (err)->code != c) \
| ^~
glib/tests/uri.c:790:11: note: in expansion of macro ‘g_assert_error’
790 | g_assert_error (error, G_URI_ERROR, test->expected_error_code);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
In file included from glib/glibconfig.h:9,
from glib/gtypes.h:32,
from glib/galloca.h:32,
from glib/glib.h:30,
from glib/tests/uri.c:25:
glib/tests/uri.c: In function ‘test_uri_iter_params’:
glib/tests/uri.c:1495:51: error: comparison of integer expressions of different signedness: ‘gssize’ {aka ‘const long int’} and ‘long unsigned int’
1495 | params_tests[i].expected_n_params <= G_N_ELEMENTS (params_tests[i].expected_param_key_values) / 2);
| ^~
glib/gmacros.h:941:25: note: in definition of macro ‘G_LIKELY’
941 | #define G_LIKELY(expr) (expr)
| ^~~~
glib/tests/uri.c:1494:7: note: in expansion of macro ‘g_assert’
1494 | g_assert (params_tests[i].expected_n_params < 0 ||
| ^~~~~~~~
glib/tests/uri.c: In function ‘test_uri_parse_params’:
glib/tests/uri.c:1562:51: error: comparison of integer expressions of different signedness: ‘gssize’ {aka ‘const long int’} and ‘long unsigned int’
1562 | params_tests[i].expected_n_params <= G_N_ELEMENTS (params_tests[i].expected_param_key_values) / 2);
| ^~
glib/gmacros.h:941:25: note: in definition of macro ‘G_LIKELY’
941 | #define G_LIKELY(expr) (expr)
| ^~~~
glib/tests/uri.c:1561:7: note: in expansion of macro ‘g_assert’
1561 | g_assert (params_tests[i].expected_n_params < 0 ||
| ^~~~~~~~
glib/tests/uri.c: In function ‘run_file_to_uri_tests’:
glib/tests/uri.c:172:17: error: comparison of integer expressions of different signedness: ‘int’ and ‘long unsigned int’
172 | for (i = 0; i < G_N_ELEMENTS (file_to_uri_tests); i++)
| ^
glib/tests/uri.c: In function ‘run_file_from_uri_tests’:
glib/tests/uri.c:197:17: error: comparison of integer expressions of different signedness: ‘int’ and ‘long unsigned int’
197 | for (i = 0; i < G_N_ELEMENTS (file_from_uri_tests); i++)
| ^
glib/tests/uri.c: In function ‘run_file_roundtrip_tests’:
glib/tests/uri.c:276:17: error: comparison of integer expressions of different signedness: ‘int’ and ‘long unsigned int’
276 | for (i = 0; i < G_N_ELEMENTS (file_to_uri_tests); i++)
| ^
glib/tests/uri.c: In function ‘test_uri_parse_params’:
glib/tests/uri.c:1594:25: error: comparison of integer expressions of different signedness: ‘gsize’ {aka ‘long unsigned int’} and ‘gssize’ {aka ‘const long int’}
1594 | for (j = 0; j < params_tests[i].expected_n_params; j += 2)
| ^
glib/tests/timer.c: In function ‘test_timeval_from_iso8601’:
glib/tests/timer.c:220:17: error: comparison of integer expressions of different signedness: ‘gint’ {aka ‘int’} and ‘long unsigned int’
220 | for (i = 0; i < G_N_ELEMENTS (tests); i++)
| ^
glib/tests/timer.c: In function ‘test_timeval_to_iso8601’:
glib/tests/timer.c:260:17: error: comparison of integer expressions of different signedness: ‘gint’ {aka ‘int’} and ‘long unsigned int’
260 | for (i = 0; i < G_N_ELEMENTS (tests); i++)
| ^
This commit is the unmodified results of running
```
black $(git ls-files '*.py')
```
with black version 19.10b0. See #2046.
Signed-off-by: Philip Withnall <pwithnall@endlessos.org>
glib/tests/shell.c: In function ‘main’:
glib/tests/shell.c:194:17: error: comparison of integer expressions of different signedness: ‘gint’ {aka ‘int’} and ‘long unsigned int’
194 | for (i = 0; i < G_N_ELEMENTS (cmdline_tests); i++)
| ^
glib/tests/shell.c:201:17: error: comparison of integer expressions of different signedness: ‘gint’ {aka ‘int’} and ‘long unsigned int’
201 | for (i = 0; i < G_N_ELEMENTS (quote_tests); i++)
| ^
glib/tests/shell.c:208:17: error: comparison of integer expressions of different signedness: ‘gint’ {aka ‘int’} and ‘long unsigned int’
208 | for (i = 0; i < G_N_ELEMENTS (unquote_tests); i++)
| ^
glib/tests/slice.c: In function ‘test_allocate’:
glib/tests/slice.c:146:17: error: comparison of integer expressions of different signedness: ‘gint’ {aka ‘int’} and ‘long unsigned int’
146 | for (i = 0; i < G_N_ELEMENTS(threads); i++)
| ^
glib/tests/slice.c:149:17: error: comparison of integer expressions of different signedness: ‘gint’ {aka ‘int’} and ‘long unsigned int’
149 | for (i = 0; i < G_N_ELEMENTS(threads); i++)
| ^
glib/tests/spawn-singlethread.c: In function ‘test_spawn_async_with_fds’:
glib/tests/spawn-singlethread.c:204:17: error: comparison of integer expressions of different signedness: ‘int’ and ‘long unsigned int’
204 | for (i = 0; i < G_N_ELEMENTS (tests); i++)
| ^
glib/guri.c: In function ‘should_normalize_empty_path’:
glib/guri.c:756:17: error: comparison of integer expressions of different signedness: ‘int’ and ‘long unsigned int’
756 | for (i = 0; i < G_N_ELEMENTS (schemes); ++i)
| ^
