This avoids the generated types (e.g. ExampleAnimal, ExampleCat,
ExampleObject and ExampleObjectManagerClient) being referenced in the
core gio docs. This was requested by Matthias.
Signed-off-by: David Zeuthen <davidz@redhat.com>
.. and add a C setter to do this. Also make the C getter return a
reference since the property may be set from another thread. Also
change the constructor to _not_ take a GDBusConnection since this is
something you almost always want to do _after_ creating it. The
API/ABI break is fine as there has never been a GLib release with this
type.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=648959
Signed-off-by: David Zeuthen <davidz@redhat.com>
_GNU_SOURCE must be defined before including any other (system)
header, so defining it in glib-unix.h (and hoping no one has included
anything else before that) is wrong. And the "#define _USE_GNU"
workaround for this problem in gnetworkingprivate.h is even wronger
(and still prone to failure anyway due to single-include guards).
Fix this by defining _GNU_SOURCE in config.h when building against
glibc. In theory this is bad because new releases of glibc may include
symbols that conflict with glib symbols, which could then cause
compile failures. However, most people only see new releases of glibc
when they upgrade their distro, at which point they also generally get
new releases of gcc, which have new warnings/errors to clean up
anyway.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=649201
Specific changes
- Use get_type(), not get_gtype() for the GType function
- so we need to use the lower-case name type_ for properties called type
- Don't return a function pointer, just make the function returned
available instead
- Add (type) annotations in constructors so g-ir-scanner detects them as such
- Add (transfer none) annotations to property getters
- Add (out) annotations to D-Bus method call functions
Signed-off-by: David Zeuthen <davidz@redhat.com>
A fairly typical pattern is to have code that does
foo_set_bar (object, "");
if (some_condition)
{
foo_set_bar (object, "yes");
}
where some_condition is often true every time @object is updated.
With this code, bar is essentially always "yes" but because of how
gdbus-codegen works, useless PropertiesChanged events got scheduled
and sent out. With this patch, we avoid that by always keeping the
original value around and comparing it only when we deem it's time to
send out the ::PropertiesChanged signal (typically in an idle but can
be forced by the user via flush()).
Also add a test case for this.
Signed-off-by: David Zeuthen <davidz@redhat.com>
Older versions of libdbus would let you construct an invalid
DBusMessage, but that's a bug, which will be fixed in 1.4.8/1.5.0.
Instead, construct a valid message of the same length, then replace
substrings in the serialized blob with their invalid counterparts.
Bug: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=646326
Signed-off-by: David Zeuthen <davidz@redhat.com>
... this was causing a GDBus test-case to fail so now that it is
fixed, also reenable the test case.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=631379
Signed-off-by: David Zeuthen <davidz@redhat.com>
And use this for a) documentation purposes; and b) to preserve C ABI
when an interface is extended. See
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=647577#c5
for more details. Also add test cases for this.
Signed-off-by: David Zeuthen <davidz@redhat.com>
Several flaws were pointed out by Shaun McCance. We were
leaking handled arguments, and we were mishandling the last
argument, and we were actually skipping arguments too.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=647031
When using GOption to handle commandlines, we need to disable
the builtin help handling, since it calls exit(). Also mention
this particular pitfall in the docs.
We were getting our length zero, yet NULL-terminated arrays in
a twist in some places. Stop passing around ignored length arguments
at the same time.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=635099
This commit also changes (maintaining compatibility) the way
user-specified default applications are stored (as in, those for which
g_app_info_set_as_default_for_type() has been called.
We now store the default application for a content type in a new group
in the mimeapps.list keyfile, and "Added Associations" tracks only the
applications that have been added by the user, following a
most-recently-used first order.
This is useful in GtkAppChooser-like widgets to pre-select the last used
application when constructing a widget.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=636311
This adds an extension point for TLS connections to gio, with a
gnutls-based implementation in glib-networking.
Full TLS support is still a work in progress; the current API is
missing some features, and parts of it may still be changed before
2.28.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=588189
When interfacing with APIs that expect unix-style async I/O, it is
useful to be able to tell in advance whether a read/write is going to
block. This adds new interfaces GPollableInputStream and
GPollableOutputStream that can be implemented by a GInputStream or
GOutputStream to add _is_readable/_is_writable, _create_source, and
_read_nonblocking/_write_nonblocking methods.
Also, implement for GUnixInput/OutputStream and
GSocketInput/OutputStream
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=634241
Otherwise, attempting to create a GSocketConnection from the socket
will likely return the wrong type, since the protocol won't match any
of the registered subtypes.
Also add the start of a GSocket test program (from davidz).
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=627171
Makes explicit the fact that you are interacting with the individual
action rather than the group and removes potential namespace conflicts
with classes implementing the interface (like g_application_activate()
vs g_application_activate_action()).
The test case was passing a guint16 to g_object_get() for a guint
property. That's invalid on all systems, although it works (more or
less) on little endian ones. On big endian it's a total no-go.
In its previous form, g_settings_list_schemas() was not useful as a tool
to prevent aborts due to using g_settings_new() with an invalid schema
name. This is because g_settings_list_scheams() also listed relocatable
schemas, and calling g_settings_new() for those would abort just the
same as if you called it for a non-existent schema.
Modify g_settings_list_schemas() so that it only returns schemas for
which it is safe to call g_settings_new(). Add another call for sake of
completeness: g_settings_list_relocatable_schemas().
Implement the first of two features requested in the bug: when
encountering a broken .xml schema file, back out the changes in that
file and continue to parse other files.
This prevents a single broken .xml file from messing up GSettings for
everyone else.
Add a --strict option to get the old behaviour. Use this from the test
cases.
It doesn't really work right now because of a dbus-daemon(1) bug - see
the comment added in the TODO section of gdbusconnection.c. So revert
to old behavior. The downside is a lot of files in /tmp but right now
that's better than not being able to run tests in a loop.
Signed-off-by: David Zeuthen <davidz@redhat.com>
Without this fix, the ./gdbus-connection test case occasionally fails, see
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=629945#c5
like this
/gdbus/connection/basic: OK
/gdbus/connection/life-cycle: **
ERROR:gdbus-connection.c:223:test_connection_life_cycle: assertion failed:
(!quit_mainloop_fired)
cleaning up bus with pid 21794
Aborted (core dumped)
because the callback didn't happen on the same thread as where we are
running the loop.
Signed-off-by: David Zeuthen <davidz@redhat.com>
Since we make message buses come and go, we need to ensure that the
singleton connection instance goes away before attempting to call
g_bus_get_sync() or similar.
Signed-off-by: David Zeuthen <davidz@redhat.com>
When under load, a one second timeout is just not enough. This can be
observed by e.g. restarting a CPU- and IO-intensive application like a
web browser with many tabs while running the test cases. Therefore,
bump the timeouts to 30 seconds.
Signed-off-by: David Zeuthen <davidz@redhat.com>
Turns out that GDBusWorker will issue callbacks (in its own thread)
even after g_dbus_worker_stop() has been called. This would rarely
happen (and unreffing a connection is even rarer) so only saw this bug
occasionally when running the gdbus-connection test case in a loop.
Fix up this issue by maintaining a set of GDBusConnection objects that
are currently "alive" and do nothing in the callbacks if the passed
user_data pointer is not in this set.
Also attempted to fix up a race condition with
_g_object_wait_for_single_ref_do() and its use of GObject toggle
references - for now, just resort to busy waiting, thereby
sidestepping the toggle reference mess altogether.
Signed-off-by: David Zeuthen <davidz@redhat.com>
These functions are meant to replace the read_until() flavour, with the
following improvements:
- consistency between the synchronous and asynchronous versions as to
if the separator character is read (it never is).
- support for using a nul byte as a separator character by way of
addition of a length parameter which allows stop_chars to be treated
as a byte array rather than a nul-terminated string.
The read_until() functions are not yet formally deprecated, but a note
has been added to the documentation warning not to use them as they will
be in the future.
This is bug #584284.
The root problem is with GObject - for now, just work around it in
GDBus. Also include a test-case. See
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=627724
for more information.
Signed-off-by: David Zeuthen <davidz@redhat.com>
Ryan pointed out that it's safe to do this because we have the
G_DBUS_SEND_MESSAGE_FLAGS_PRESERVE_SERIAL flag and that it simplifies
how filter functions work.
Signed-off-by: David Zeuthen <davidz@redhat.com>
Otherwise things probably won't work in a garbage-collected world
(consider the trivial GC that never collects garbage).
This commit breaks GDBusServer ABI. No known released software is
using this code.
Signed-off-by: David Zeuthen <davidz@redhat.com>
Rework filter functions as per
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=624546#c8
This commit breaks ABI. However, this ABI break affects only
applications using filter functions. The only known user of is dconf.
Signed-off-by: David Zeuthen <davidz@redhat.com>
Don't actually use this yet as that will require a couple of
modifications to the filter function signature. This is part of the
bug-fix for
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=624546#c8
Signed-off-by: David Zeuthen <davidz@redhat.com>
==23341== 65 bytes in 3 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 927 of 1,020
==23341== at 0x4005BDC: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:195)
==23341== by 0x4057094: g_malloc (gmem.c:134)
==23341== by 0x40573DB: g_malloc_n (gmem.c:281)
==23341== by 0x40717FC: g_strdup (gstrfuncs.c:101)
==23341== by 0x4147F56: value_lcopy_string (gvaluetypes.c:313)
==23341== by 0x4123F0B: g_object_get_valist (gobject.c:1643)
==23341== by 0x41240FF: g_object_get (gobject.c:1731)
==23341== by 0x804C39E: test_basic (gdbus-proxy.c:522)
Bug #628331.
==23341== 85 (24 direct, 61 indirect) bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 900 of 971
==23341== at 0x4005BDC: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:195)
==23341== by 0x4057094: g_malloc (gmem.c:134)
==23341== by 0x406F2D6: g_slice_alloc (gslice.c:836)
==23341== by 0x406F31B: g_slice_alloc0 (gslice.c:848)
==23341== by 0x403A751: g_error_new_valist (gerror.c:54)
==23341== by 0x403AAD4: g_set_error (gerror.c:240)
==23341== by 0x420B807: decode_method_reply (gdbusconnection.c:4774)
==23341== by 0x420C2BA: g_dbus_connection_call_sync (gdbusconnection.c:5188)
==23341== by 0x421B7C9: g_dbus_proxy_call_sync (gdbusproxy.c:2477)
==23341== by 0x804BD89: test_bogus_method_return (gdbus-proxy.c:430)
Bug #628331.
==29535== 56 (24 direct, 32 indirect) bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 1,112 of 1,264
==29535== at 0x4005BDC: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:195)
==29535== by 0x4057094: g_malloc (gmem.c:134)
==29535== by 0x406F2D6: g_slice_alloc (gslice.c:836)
==29535== by 0x406F364: g_slice_copy (gslice.c:858)
==29535== by 0x403A9B2: g_error_copy (gerror.c:160)
==29535== by 0x42066D3: initable_init (gdbusconnection.c:2314)
==29535== by 0x41A73E5: g_initable_init (ginitable.c:105)
==29535== by 0x41A7587: g_initable_new_valist (ginitable.c:218)
==29535== by 0x41A742A: g_initable_new (ginitable.c:138)
==29535== by 0x4206DCC: g_dbus_connection_new_for_address_sync (gdbusconnection.c:2585)
==29535== by 0x804D63A: test_nonce_tcp (gdbus-peer.c:1229)
==29535== 107 (24 direct, 83 indirect) bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 1,188 of 1,264
==29535== at 0x4005BDC: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:195)
==29535== by 0x4057094: g_malloc (gmem.c:134)
==29535== by 0x406F2D6: g_slice_alloc (gslice.c:836)
==29535== by 0x406F364: g_slice_copy (gslice.c:858)
==29535== by 0x403A9B2: g_error_copy (gerror.c:160)
==29535== by 0x42066D3: initable_init (gdbusconnection.c:2314)
==29535== by 0x41A73E5: g_initable_init (ginitable.c:105)
==29535== by 0x41A7587: g_initable_new_valist (ginitable.c:218)
==29535== by 0x41A742A: g_initable_new (ginitable.c:138)
==29535== by 0x4206DCC: g_dbus_connection_new_for_address_sync (gdbusconnection.c:2585)
==29535== by 0x804D8E8: test_nonce_tcp (gdbus-peer.c:1259)
==29535== 112 (24 direct, 88 indirect) bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 1,193 of 1,264
==29535== at 0x4005BDC: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:195)
==29535== by 0x4057094: g_malloc (gmem.c:134)
==29535== by 0x406F2D6: g_slice_alloc (gslice.c:836)
==29535== by 0x406F364: g_slice_copy (gslice.c:858)
==29535== by 0x403A9B2: g_error_copy (gerror.c:160)
==29535== by 0x42066D3: initable_init (gdbusconnection.c:2314)
==29535== by 0x41A73E5: g_initable_init (ginitable.c:105)
==29535== by 0x41A7587: g_initable_new_valist (ginitable.c:218)
==29535== by 0x41A742A: g_initable_new (ginitable.c:138)
==29535== by 0x4206DCC: g_dbus_connection_new_for_address_sync (gdbusconnection.c:2585)
==29535== by 0x804D79A: test_nonce_tcp (gdbus-peer.c:1248)
==29535== 73 (24 direct, 49 indirect) bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 1,152 of 1,264
==29535== at 0x4005BDC: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:195)
==29535== by 0x4057094: g_malloc (gmem.c:134)
==29535== by 0x406F2D6: g_slice_alloc (gslice.c:836)
==29535== by 0x406F364: g_slice_copy (gslice.c:858)
==29535== by 0x403A9B2: g_error_copy (gerror.c:160)
==29535== by 0x42066D3: initable_init (gdbusconnection.c:2314)
==29535== by 0x41A73E5: g_initable_init (ginitable.c:105)
==29535== by 0x41A7587: g_initable_new_valist (ginitable.c:218)
==29535== by 0x41A742A: g_initable_new (ginitable.c:138)
==29535== by 0x4206DCC: g_dbus_connection_new_for_address_sync (gdbusconnection.c:2585)
==29535== by 0x804C6CE: test_peer (gdbus-peer.c:803)
Bug #628331.
==6793== 32 (24 direct, 8 indirect) bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 779 of 1,423
==6793== at 0x4005BDC: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:195)
==6793== by 0x4057094: g_malloc (gmem.c:134)
==6793== by 0x406F2D6: g_slice_alloc (gslice.c:836)
==6793== by 0x406F31B: g_slice_alloc0 (gslice.c:848)
==6793== by 0x413D5BB: g_type_create_instance (gtype.c:1867)
==6793== by 0x412372A: g_object_constructor (gobject.c:1482)
==6793== by 0x4122E1D: g_object_newv (gobject.c:1266)
==6793== by 0x4122B93: g_object_new (gobject.c:1178)
==6793== by 0x41DB4F9: g_unix_fd_list_new (gunixfdlist.c:159)
==6793== by 0x804AADD: test_interface_method_call (gdbus-peer.c:172)
Bug #628331.
==4616== 46 (32 direct, 14 indirect) bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 193 of 305
==4616== at 0x4005BDC: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:195)
==4616== by 0x4057094: g_malloc (gmem.c:134)
==4616== by 0x406F2D6: g_slice_alloc (gslice.c:836)
==4616== by 0x406F31B: g_slice_alloc0 (gslice.c:848)
==4616== by 0x413D5BB: g_type_create_instance (gtype.c:1867)
==4616== by 0x412372A: g_object_constructor (gobject.c:1482)
==4616== by 0x4123147: g_object_newv (gobject.c:1347)
==4616== by 0x41236BB: g_object_new_valist (gobject.c:1463)
==4616== by 0x4122BB4: g_object_new (gobject.c:1181)
==4616== by 0x41B2D0F: g_network_address_new (gnetworkaddress.c:262)
==4616== by 0x8048A70: test_basic (network-address.c:10)
Bug #628331.
==14059== 96 bytes in 2 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 520 of 543
==14059== at 0x4005BDC: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:195)
==14059== by 0x4057094: g_malloc (gmem.c:134)
==14059== by 0x406F2D6: g_slice_alloc (gslice.c:836)
==14059== by 0x406F31B: g_slice_alloc0 (gslice.c:848)
==14059== by 0x41385BB: g_type_create_instance (gtype.c:1867)
==14059== by 0x411E72A: g_object_constructor (gobject.c:1482)
==14059== by 0x411DE1D: g_object_newv (gobject.c:1266)
==14059== by 0x411DB93: g_object_new (gobject.c:1178)
==14059== by 0x42296AF: _g_local_file_input_stream_new (glocalfileinputstream.c:152)
==14059== by 0x422281F: g_local_file_read (glocalfile.c:1322)
==14059== by 0x418A8A9: open_read_async_thread (gfile.c:5050)
==14059== by 0x41B71BB: run_in_thread (gsimpleasyncresult.c:853)
==14059== by 0x41A5FBC: io_job_thread (gioscheduler.c:181)
==14059== by 0x407DCDE: g_thread_pool_thread_proxy (gthreadpool.c:314)
==14059== by 0x407C6B0: g_thread_create_proxy (gthread.c:1897)
==14059== by 0x57D918: start_thread (pthread_create.c:301)
==14059== by 0x4C6CBD: clone (clone.S:133)
Bug #628331.
==2464== 80 (16 direct, 64 indirect) bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 515 of 547
==2464== at 0x4005BDC: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:195)
==2464== by 0x4057094: g_malloc (gmem.c:134)
==2464== by 0x406F2D6: g_slice_alloc (gslice.c:836)
==2464== by 0x406F31B: g_slice_alloc0 (gslice.c:848)
==2464== by 0x41385BB: g_type_create_instance (gtype.c:1867)
==2464== by 0x411E72A: g_object_constructor (gobject.c:1482)
==2464== by 0x411DE1D: g_object_newv (gobject.c:1266)
==2464== by 0x411DB93: g_object_new (gobject.c:1178)
==2464== by 0x4220D74: _g_local_file_new (glocalfile.c:310)
==2464== by 0x422C897: g_local_vfs_get_file_for_path (glocalvfs.c:84)
==2464== by 0x41CA91C: g_vfs_get_file_for_path (gvfs.c:94)
==2464== by 0x418C1B6: g_file_new_for_path (gfile.c:5898)
==2464== by 0x8049509: test1_thread (contexts.c:110)
==2464== 80 (16 direct, 64 indirect) bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 516 of 547
==2464== at 0x4005BDC: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:195)
==2464== by 0x4057094: g_malloc (gmem.c:134)
==2464== by 0x406F2D6: g_slice_alloc (gslice.c:836)
==2464== by 0x406F31B: g_slice_alloc0 (gslice.c:848)
==2464== by 0x41385BB: g_type_create_instance (gtype.c:1867)
==2464== by 0x411E72A: g_object_constructor (gobject.c:1482)
==2464== by 0x411DE1D: g_object_newv (gobject.c:1266)
==2464== by 0x411DB93: g_object_new (gobject.c:1178)
==2464== by 0x4220D74: _g_local_file_new (glocalfile.c:310)
==2464== by 0x422C897: g_local_vfs_get_file_for_path (glocalvfs.c:84)
==2464== by 0x41CA91C: g_vfs_get_file_for_path (gvfs.c:94)
==2464== by 0x418C1B6: g_file_new_for_path (gfile.c:5898)
==2464== by 0x804964D: test_context_independence (contexts.c:144)
Bug #628331.
==2429== 49 (24 direct, 25 indirect) bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 276 of 355
==2429== at 0x4005BDC: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:195)
==2429== by 0x4057094: g_malloc (gmem.c:134)
==2429== by 0x406F2D6: g_slice_alloc (gslice.c:836)
==2429== by 0x406F31B: g_slice_alloc0 (gslice.c:848)
==2429== by 0x403A8A6: g_error_new_literal (gerror.c:117)
==2429== by 0x403AC31: g_set_error_literal (gerror.c:314)
==2429== by 0x4175525: g_buffered_input_stream_read_byte (gbufferedinputstream.c:880)
==2429== by 0x804A21A: test_read_byte (buffered-input-stream.c:153)
Bug #628331.
==2428== 256 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 591 of 604
==2428== at 0x4005CD2: realloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:476)
==2428== by 0x40571A5: g_realloc (gmem.c:181)
==2428== by 0x4075287: g_string_maybe_expand (gstring.c:395)
==2428== by 0x40760D8: g_string_insert_c (gstring.c:1049)
==2428== by 0x4074D41: g_string_append_c_inline (gstring.h:153)
==2428== by 0x4075B3C: g_string_append_uri_escaped (gstring.c:822)
==2428== by 0x41A46AC: g_icon_to_string_tokenized (gicon.c:164)
==2428== by 0x41A498F: g_icon_to_string (gicon.c:252)
==2428== by 0x8049E1A: test_g_icon_serialize (g-icon.c:222)
Bug #628331.
==12763== 16,777,215 bytes in 1 blocks are possibly lost in loss record 357 of 357
==12763== at 0x4004F1B: calloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:418)
==12763== by 0x405711D: g_malloc0 (gmem.c:157)
==12763== by 0x8048ED6: test_basic (data-output-stream.c:40)
Bug #628331.
==2426== 45,034 bytes in 4,094 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 358 of 361
==2426== at 0x4005BDC: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:195)
==2426== by 0x4057094: g_malloc (gmem.c:134)
==2426== by 0x40573DB: g_malloc_n (gmem.c:281)
==2426== by 0x4071ABD: g_strconcat (gstrfuncs.c:315)
==2426== by 0x804916A: test_read_lines (data-output-stream.c:83)
Bug #628331.
==12351== 45,045 bytes in 4,095 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 377 of 380
==12351== at 0x4005BDC: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:195)
==12351== by 0x4057094: g_malloc (gmem.c:134)
==12351== by 0x40573DB: g_malloc_n (gmem.c:281)
==12351== by 0x4071ABD: g_strconcat (gstrfuncs.c:315)
==12351== by 0x8049811: test_read_lines (data-input-stream.c:99)
Bug #628331.
==2415== 45,045 bytes in 4,095 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 393 of 399
==2415== at 0x4005BDC: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:195)
==2415== by 0x4057094: g_malloc (gmem.c:134)
==2415== by 0x417FC29: g_data_input_stream_read_line (gdatainputstream.c:797)
==2415== by 0x8049874: test_read_lines (data-input-stream.c:111)
==12088== 360 bytes in 40 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 368 of 381
==12088== at 0x4005BDC: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:195)
==12088== by 0x4057094: g_malloc (gmem.c:134)
==12088== by 0x417FF4C: g_data_input_stream_read_until (gdatainputstream.c:914)
==12088== by 0x8049B6F: test_read_until (data-input-stream.c:182)
Bug #628331.
==2415== 165 (72 direct, 93 indirect) bytes in 3 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 373 of 399
==2415== at 0x4005BDC: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:195)
==2415== by 0x4057094: g_malloc (gmem.c:134)
==2415== by 0x406F2D6: g_slice_alloc (gslice.c:836)
==2415== by 0x406F31B: g_slice_alloc0 (gslice.c:848)
==2415== by 0x403A8A6: g_error_new_literal (gerror.c:117)
==2415== by 0x403AC31: g_set_error_literal (gerror.c:314)
==2415== by 0x417ED29: read_data (gdatainputstream.c:309)
==2415== by 0x417EE9D: g_data_input_stream_read_byte (gdatainputstream.c:344)
==2415== by 0x8049DEC: test_data_array (data-input-stream.c:263)
Bug #628331.
==10395== 80 (24 direct, 56 indirect) bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 529 of 561
==10395== at 0x4005BDC: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:195)
==10395== by 0x4057094: g_malloc (gmem.c:134)
==10395== by 0x406F2D6: g_slice_alloc (gslice.c:836)
==10395== by 0x406F31B: g_slice_alloc0 (gslice.c:848)
==10395== by 0x403A751: g_error_new_valist (gerror.c:54)
==10395== by 0x403AAD4: g_set_error (gerror.c:240)
==10395== by 0x4230328: _g_local_file_output_stream_create (glocalfileoutputstream.c:628)
==10395== by 0x4227A04: g_local_file_create_readwrite (glocalfile.c:1388)
==10395== by 0x418974C: g_file_create_readwrite (gfile.c:1784)
==10395== by 0x8049FCD: test_g_file_create_readwrite (readwrite.c:187)
Bug #628331.
==8564== 24,000,000 bytes in 6 blocks are possibly lost in loss record 592 of 594
==8564== at 0x4005BDC: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:195)
==8564== by 0x4057094: g_malloc (gmem.c:134)
==8564== by 0x804AA37: test_corruption (converter-stream.c:589)
==8564== by 0x804B05B: test_roundtrip (converter-stream.c:652)
==9459== 25,165,824 bytes in 6 blocks are possibly lost in loss record 593 of 594
==9459== at 0x4005CD2: realloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:476)
==9459== by 0x40571A5: g_realloc (gmem.c:181)
==9459== by 0x41B08A3: array_resize (gmemoryoutputstream.c:501)
==9459== by 0x41B0A5D: g_memory_output_stream_write (gmemoryoutputstream.c:578)
==9459== by 0x41B57EF: g_output_stream_write (goutputstream.c:216)
==9459== by 0x41B591B: g_output_stream_write_all (goutputstream.c:268)
==9459== by 0x417D617: flush_buffer (gconverteroutputstream.c:359)
==9459== by 0x417D958: g_converter_output_stream_write (gconverteroutputstream.c:502)
==9459== by 0x41B5D7F: g_output_stream_real_splice (goutputstream.c:428)
==9459== by 0x41B5C6C: g_output_stream_splice (goutputstream.c:380)
==9459== by 0x804AB10: test_corruption (converter-stream.c:600)
==9785== 25,165,824 bytes in 6 blocks are possibly lost in loss record 592 of 592
==9785== at 0x4005CD2: realloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:476)
==9785== by 0x40571A5: g_realloc (gmem.c:181)
==9785== by 0x41B08A3: array_resize (gmemoryoutputstream.c:501)
==9785== by 0x41B0A5D: g_memory_output_stream_write (gmemoryoutputstream.c:578)
==9785== by 0x41B5D7F: g_output_stream_real_splice (goutputstream.c:428)
==9785== by 0x41B5C6C: g_output_stream_splice (goutputstream.c:380)
==9785== by 0x804ADF1: test_corruption (converter-stream.c:622)
==9785== by 0x804B06C: test_roundtrip (converter-stream.c:652)
Bug #628331.
==7540== 487 (64 direct, 423 indirect) bytes in 2 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 597 of 615
==7540== at 0x4005BDC: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:195)
==7540== by 0x4057094: g_malloc (gmem.c:134)
==7540== by 0x406F2D6: g_slice_alloc (gslice.c:836)
==7540== by 0x406F31B: g_slice_alloc0 (gslice.c:848)
==7540== by 0x413D5BB: g_type_create_instance (gtype.c:1867)
==7540== by 0x412372A: g_object_constructor (gobject.c:1482)
==7540== by 0x4123147: g_object_newv (gobject.c:1347)
==7540== by 0x41236BB: g_object_new_valist (gobject.c:1463)
==7540== by 0x41A756E: g_initable_new_valist (ginitable.c:214)
==7540== by 0x41A743E: g_initable_new (ginitable.c:138)
==7540== by 0x417B67A: g_charset_converter_new (gcharsetconverter.c:215)
==7540== by 0x804B043: test_charset (converter-stream.c:675)
Bug #628331.
==2396== 168 (92 direct, 76 indirect) bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 598 of 625
==2396== at 0x4005BDC: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:195)
==2396== by 0x4057094: g_malloc (gmem.c:134)
==2396== by 0x406F2D6: g_slice_alloc (gslice.c:836)
==2396== by 0x406F31B: g_slice_alloc0 (gslice.c:848)
==2396== by 0x413D5BB: g_type_create_instance (gtype.c:1867)
==2396== by 0x412372A: g_object_constructor (gobject.c:1482)
==2396== by 0x4123147: g_object_newv (gobject.c:1347)
==2396== by 0x41236BB: g_object_new_valist (gobject.c:1463)
==2396== by 0x4122BB4: g_object_new (gobject.c:1181)
==2396== by 0x417C54D: g_converter_input_stream_new (gconverterinputstream.c:204)
==2396== by 0x804A53E: test_compressor (converter-stream.c:484)
Bug #628331.
==2396== 66 (24 direct, 42 indirect) bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 565 of 625
==2396== at 0x4005BDC: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:195)
==2396== by 0x4057094: g_malloc (gmem.c:134)
==2396== by 0x406F2D6: g_slice_alloc (gslice.c:836)
==2396== by 0x406F31B: g_slice_alloc0 (gslice.c:848)
==2396== by 0x403A8A6: g_error_new_literal (gerror.c:117)
==2396== by 0x403AC31: g_set_error_literal (gerror.c:314)
==2396== by 0x417BA38: g_charset_converter_convert (gcharsetconverter.c:344)
==2396== by 0x417BF67: g_converter_convert (gconverter.c:174)
==2396== by 0x417C9EB: g_converter_input_stream_read (gconverterinputstream.c:403)
==2396== by 0x41A7A17: g_input_stream_read (ginputstream.c:204)
==2396== by 0x41A7B43: g_input_stream_read_all (ginputstream.c:256)
==2396== by 0x804B0E4: test_charset (converter-stream.c:682)
Bug #628331.
==2396== 39 (24 direct, 15 indirect) bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 398 of 625
==2396== at 0x4005BDC: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:195)
==2396== by 0x4057094: g_malloc (gmem.c:134)
==2396== by 0x406F2D6: g_slice_alloc (gslice.c:836)
==2396== by 0x406F31B: g_slice_alloc0 (gslice.c:848)
==2396== by 0x403A8A6: g_error_new_literal (gerror.c:117)
==2396== by 0x403AC31: g_set_error_literal (gerror.c:314)
==2396== by 0x80498F7: g_compressor_converter_convert (converter-stream.c:244)
==2396== by 0x417BF67: g_converter_convert (gconverter.c:174)
==2396== by 0x417CBDE: g_converter_input_stream_read (gconverterinputstream.c:460)
==2396== by 0x41A7A17: g_input_stream_read (ginputstream.c:204)
==2396== by 0x804A832: test_compressor (converter-stream.c:545)
Bug #628331.
==2395== 64 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 381 of 407
==2395== at 0x4005BDC: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:195)
==2395== by 0x4005C66: realloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:476)
==2395== by 0x40571A5: g_realloc (gmem.c:181)
==2395== by 0x401D670: g_ptr_array_maybe_expand (garray.c:968)
==2395== by 0x401DD0B: g_ptr_array_add (garray.c:1225)
==2395== by 0x4199AA9: g_file_info_list_attributes (gfileinfo.c:646)
==2395== by 0x80491CE: test_g_file_info (g-file-info.c:76)
==2395== 132 (64 direct, 68 indirect) bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 396 of 407
==2395== at 0x4005BDC: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:195)
==2395== by 0x4005C66: realloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:476)
==2395== by 0x40571A5: g_realloc (gmem.c:181)
==2395== by 0x401D670: g_ptr_array_maybe_expand (garray.c:968)
==2395== by 0x401DD0B: g_ptr_array_add (garray.c:1225)
==2395== by 0x4199A82: g_file_info_list_attributes (gfileinfo.c:642)
==2395== by 0x80492B7: test_g_file_info (g-file-info.c:86)
Bug #628331.
And use g_assert_[no_]error().
==2392== 49 (24 direct, 25 indirect) bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 451 of 573
==2392== at 0x4005BDC: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:195)
==2392== by 0x4057094: g_malloc (gmem.c:134)
==2392== by 0x406F2D6: g_slice_alloc (gslice.c:836)
==2392== by 0x406F31B: g_slice_alloc0 (gslice.c:848)
==2392== by 0x403A8A6: g_error_new_literal (gerror.c:117)
==2392== by 0x403AC31: g_set_error_literal (gerror.c:314)
==2392== by 0x41B7619: g_output_stream_set_pending (goutputstream.c:1198)
==2392== by 0x41B5799: g_output_stream_write (goutputstream.c:210)
==2392== by 0x41B590B: g_output_stream_write_all (goutputstream.c:268)
==2392== by 0x8049B54: verify_iostream (readwrite.c:110)
Bug #628331.
==2392== 38 (16 direct, 22 indirect) bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 369 of 573
==2392== at 0x4005BDC: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:195)
==2392== by 0x4057094: g_malloc (gmem.c:134)
==2392== by 0x406F2D6: g_slice_alloc (gslice.c:836)
==2392== by 0x406F31B: g_slice_alloc0 (gslice.c:848)
==2392== by 0x413D5BB: g_type_create_instance (gtype.c:1867)
==2392== by 0x412372A: g_object_constructor (gobject.c:1482)
==2392== by 0x4122E1D: g_object_newv (gobject.c:1266)
==2392== by 0x4122B93: g_object_new (gobject.c:1178)
==2392== by 0x4225D74: _g_local_file_new (glocalfile.c:310)
==2392== by 0x4231897: g_local_vfs_get_file_for_path (glocalvfs.c:84)
==2392== by 0x41CF91C: g_vfs_get_file_for_path (gvfs.c:94)
==2392== by 0x41911B6: g_file_new_for_path (gfile.c:5898)
==2392== by 0x804A2B9: test_g_file_replace_readwrite (readwrite.c:235)
Bug #628331.
==2392== 38 (16 direct, 22 indirect) bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 368 of 573
==2392== at 0x4005BDC: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:195)
==2392== by 0x4057094: g_malloc (gmem.c:134)
==2392== by 0x406F2D6: g_slice_alloc (gslice.c:836)
==2392== by 0x406F31B: g_slice_alloc0 (gslice.c:848)
==2392== by 0x413D5BB: g_type_create_instance (gtype.c:1867)
==2392== by 0x412372A: g_object_constructor (gobject.c:1482)
==2392== by 0x4122E1D: g_object_newv (gobject.c:1266)
==2392== by 0x4122B93: g_object_new (gobject.c:1178)
==2392== by 0x4225D74: _g_local_file_new (glocalfile.c:310)
==2392== by 0x4231897: g_local_vfs_get_file_for_path (glocalvfs.c:84)
==2392== by 0x41CF91C: g_vfs_get_file_for_path (gvfs.c:94)
==2392== by 0x41911B6: g_file_new_for_path (gfile.c:5898)
==2392== by 0x8049F23: test_g_file_create_readwrite (readwrite.c:183)
Bug #628331.
==2392== 38 (16 direct, 22 indirect) bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 367 of 573
==2392== at 0x4005BDC: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:195)
==2392== by 0x4057094: g_malloc (gmem.c:134)
==2392== by 0x406F2D6: g_slice_alloc (gslice.c:836)
==2392== by 0x406F31B: g_slice_alloc0 (gslice.c:848)
==2392== by 0x413D5BB: g_type_create_instance (gtype.c:1867)
==2392== by 0x412372A: g_object_constructor (gobject.c:1482)
==2392== by 0x4122E1D: g_object_newv (gobject.c:1266)
==2392== by 0x4122B93: g_object_new (gobject.c:1178)
==2392== by 0x4225D74: _g_local_file_new (glocalfile.c:310)
==2392== by 0x4231897: g_local_vfs_get_file_for_path (glocalvfs.c:84)
==2392== by 0x41CF91C: g_vfs_get_file_for_path (gvfs.c:94)
==2392== by 0x41911B6: g_file_new_for_path (gfile.c:5898)
==2392== by 0x8049E30: test_g_file_open_readwrite (readwrite.c:153)
Bug #628331.
==2389== 84 (44 direct, 40 indirect) bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 299 of 315
==2389== at 0x4005BDC: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:195)
==2389== by 0x4057094: g_malloc (gmem.c:134)
==2389== by 0x406F2D6: g_slice_alloc (gslice.c:836)
==2389== by 0x406F31B: g_slice_alloc0 (gslice.c:848)
==2389== by 0x413D5BB: g_type_create_instance (gtype.c:1867)
==2389== by 0x412372A: g_object_constructor (gobject.c:1482)
==2389== by 0x4122E1D: g_object_newv (gobject.c:1266)
==2389== by 0x4122B93: g_object_new (gobject.c:1178)
==2389== by 0x41AF54C: g_memory_input_stream_new (gmemoryinputstream.c:199)
==2389== by 0x8048BD1: test_read_chunks (memory-input-stream.c:40)
Bug #628331.
==2389== 59 (24 direct, 35 indirect) bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 290 of 315
==2389== at 0x4005BDC: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:195)
==2389== by 0x4057094: g_malloc (gmem.c:134)
==2389== by 0x406F2D6: g_slice_alloc (gslice.c:836)
==2389== by 0x406F31B: g_slice_alloc0 (gslice.c:848)
==2389== by 0x403A8A6: g_error_new_literal (gerror.c:117)
==2389== by 0x403AC31: g_set_error_literal (gerror.c:314)
==2389== by 0x41AFD15: g_memory_input_stream_truncate (gmemoryinputstream.c:517)
==2389== by 0x41BAC0F: g_seekable_truncate (gseekable.c:174)
==2389== by 0x8049595: test_truncate (memory-input-stream.c:123)
Bug #628331.
==2530== 13 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 373 of 681
==2530== at 0x4005BDC: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:195)
==2530== by 0x4057094: g_malloc (gmem.c:134)
==2530== by 0x40573DB: g_malloc_n (gmem.c:281)
==2530== by 0x40717FC: g_strdup (gstrfuncs.c:101)
==2530== by 0x4147F56: value_lcopy_string (gvaluetypes.c:313)
==2530== by 0x4123F0B: g_object_get_valist (gobject.c:1643)
==2530== by 0x41240FF: g_object_get (gobject.c:1731)
==2530== by 0x804A4BA: test_basic (gsettings.c:28)
Bug #628331.
Allow modifying a GDBusMessage in a filter function and also add tests
for this. This breaks API but leaves ABI (almost) intact - at least
dconf's GSettings backend (the only big user I know of) will keep
working.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=624546
Signed-off-by: David Zeuthen <davidz@redhat.com>
