Using G_STRLOC ends up embedding unique strings of the form
__FILE__:__LINE__ in the compiled binary. We can avoid these
by passing __FILE__ and __LINE__ separately when constructing
the warning text.
This probably reduces the size of the binary as __FILE__ is
likely already contained as string otherwise.
Note that for GCC 2.x this changes behavior because G_STRLOC
also contained __PRETTY_FUNCTION__.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=741654
Along the same lines as g_clear_object(), g_set_object() is a
convenience function to update a GObject pointer, handling reference
counting transparently and correctly.
Specifically, it handles the case where a pointer is set to its current
value. If handled naïvely, that could result in the object instance
being finalised. In the following code, that happens when
(my_obj == new_value) and the object has a single reference:
g_clear_object (&my_obj);
my_obj = g_object_ref (new_value);
It also simplifies boilerplate code such as set_property()
implementations, which are otherwise long and boring.
Test cases included.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=741589
Add GOBJECT_DEBUG=instance-count which enables internal accounting
of the number of instances of each GType, and g_type_get_instance_count()
to retrieve the result.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=354457
Not all instances have a TypeNode associated (e.g. GstEvent), so lets check if node is available
before trying to use it.
This crash can be easily reproduced by creating an event with gst_event_new_eos and using
G_IS_OBJECT on the event instance.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=733982
Practically no caller of these functions require atomic behaviour,
but the atomics are much slower than normal operations, which makes
it desirable to get rid of them. We have not done this before because
that would be a break of the ABI.
However, I recently looked into this and it seems that even if the
atomics *are* used for g_clear_* it is not ever safe to use this. The
atomics protects two threads that are racing to free a global/shared
object from freeing the object twice. However, any *user* of the global
object have no protection from the object being freed while in use,
because there is no paired operation the reads and refs the object
as an atomic unit (nor can such an operation be implemented using
purely atomic ops).
So, since nothing could safely have used the atomic aspects of these
functions I consider it acceptable to just remove it.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=733969
Don't emit property deprecation warnings for construct properties that
are being set to their default value during construction, but _do_ emit
them in all cases when the property was explicitly given to
g_object_new().
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=732184
By default G_PARAM_DEPRECATED means absolutely nothing. We only emit a
warning if G_ENABLE_DIAGNOSTIC is set to '1' and then, only on sets.
Turn the logic on its head: emit the warning by default, unless
G_ENABLE_DIAGNOSTIC is set to 0. In order to avoid a torrent of output, only
emit a warning once per property name.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=732184
Used for the commonly used case (in signal emission) where we
initialize and set a GValue for an instance
Includes a fast-path for GObject
Overall makes it 6 times faster than the previous combination
of g_value_init + g_value_set_instance
Makes signal emission around 10% faster
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=731950
These cause a static analyzer to think we're trying to actually handle
them being NULL, which is not the case. They both must not be NULL,
period.
No idea why the code was like this originally.
Reviewed by mclasen on IRC.
GParamSpec has a possibility of user-introduced flags, and we didn't
respect that with the addition of _EXPLICIT_NOTIFY.
Change the documentation for the maximum number of user flags to 10,
just to pick a somewhat random number. The documentation here was never
correct anyway -- it previously claimed that as many as 38 flags were
possible.
Meanwhile, move G_PARAM_EXPLICIT_NOTIFY next to _DEPRECATED in order to
avoid conflicts with low-numbered user flags (which are in use by at
least evolution-data-server).
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=731341
A year ago, we tried to remove support for adding interfaces on
already-initialised types. There were problems with the C++ and C#
bindings at the time, so we added exceptions to give them a bit more
time to catch up.
It's already one cycle after when these exceptions were planned to be
removed, so let's take them out now.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=697229
Leave ourselves a little wiggle room: if people install properties after
initialisation then we reserve the right to handle that in a way that
may not be threadsafe.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=698614
g_type_is_fundamentally_a (see bug 730984) is a new API/ABI and is
marked with a version macro. We should therefore avoid its
unconditional use from G_IS_OBJECT() and G_IS_PARAM_SPEC() which are
APIs that have been around for a long time.
This prevents deprecation warnings from being emitted when these
functions are used with an older GLIB_VERSION_MAX_ALLOWED and also
prevents linking to the new ABI in that case (so that it's possible to
use the resulting binary with an older version of GLib).
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=731335
Add a flag to prevent the automatic emission of the "notify" signal
during g_object_set_property().
If this flag is set then the class must explicitly emit the notify
for themselves. This is already standard practice on most classes, but
we cannot simply remove the existing behaviour because there are surely
many cases where it is needed.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=731200
Construct properties are always set during construction.
It makes no sense to warn about this even if the property
is marked as deprecated; the deprecation warning should
only be issues for explicit uses of the property after
construction.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=730045
- GSubprocessLauncher exists since 2.40, not 2.36
- more logical order for g_markup functions
- fix short description of GMarkup
- GMarkupParser: specify that some parameters are NULL-terminated.
- g_string_new (NULL); is possible.
- other trivial fixes.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=728983
On initialisation, GObject guarantees to zero-fill
class/object/interface structures. Document this so people don’t spend
forever writing:
my_object->priv->some_member = NULL;
my_object->priv->some_other_member = NULL;
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=729167
These did show up in the html. Since symbol names are checked for a
trailing plural s when generating the docs, the links stay functional
after removing these comments.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=728380
Since the type system does not support reloading its data and assumes
that libgobject remains loaded for the lifetime of the process, we
should link libgobject with a flag indicating that it can't be unloaded.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=707298
