The GNetworkMonitor docs were talking about one implementation,
omitting the others. While fixing that, add a bit about implementations
to the GProxyResolver docs too.
When we are inside a sandbox, we want to use the portal
implementation, since it is the only one that has a chance
of working.
This is safe to do, since the portal implementation will
just fail initialization when loaded outside a sandbox.
The flatpak-info file was moved to a different location a while
ago, we should read it from there instead of relying on the
compat symlink. One advantage is that this is a fixed, short
path, we don't have to construct one dynamically.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=781826
Looks like the author started typing one thing, then changed their mind
about how to phrase the sentence, and typed something else.
Signed-off-by: Philip Withnall <philip@tecnocode.co.uk>
Otherwise, we might end up returning TRUE from
g_app_info_launch_default_for_uri but with a set error parameter. This
will lead to confusing results depending on how the caller checks for
errors. Checking error != NULL indicats the call failed but checking the
return value indicates that it succeeded.
There are a few places where commit 18a33f72 replaced valid (nullable)
(optional) annotations with just (optional). That has a different
meaning.
(nullable) (optional) can only be applied to gpointer* parameters, and
means that both the gpointer* and returned gpointer can be NULL. i.e.
The caller can pass in NULL to ignore the return value; and the returned
value can be NULL.
(optional) can be applied to anything* parameters, and means that the
anything* can be NULL. i.e. The caller can pass in NULL to ignore the
return value. The return value cannot be NULL.
Signed-off-by: Philip Withnall <withnall@endlessm.com>
Some annotations I made while trying to debug bug #781847. They
introduce no behavioural changes.
Signed-off-by: Philip Withnall <withnall@endlessm.com>
Compiling with clang 3.8.1-18 (debian, x86_64) I ran across this
error:
gio-tool.c:40:31: error: format string is not a string literal [-Werror,-Wformat-nonliteral]
message = g_strdup_vprintf (format, args);
^~~~~~
gio-tool.c:55:31: error: format string is not a string literal [-Werror,-Wformat-nonliteral]
message = g_strdup_vprintf (format, args);
^~~~~~
2 errors generated.
To fix the first one, related with the function print_error(), this
patch adds to the function prototype a compiler's attribute.
For the second one, since the usage of that function is to print
one string and the format is already provided, the patch simplifies
the function by no receiving variadic arguments.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=781125
It's unnecessary, and only adds visual noise; we have been fairly
inconsistent in the past, but the semi-colon-less version clearly
dominates in the code base.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=669355
The g_drive_is_removable() support was added recently in gio/gvfs
(see Bug 765900 and Bug 765457). It was also added in gvfs-mount,
but we forgot to add it also in gio-tool-mount.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=776169
This patch contains the following changes:
- Print all errors with "gio: " prefix
- Print file uri in error for each tool allowing multiple locations
- Mark all error messages translatable
- Do not leak strings used in error messages
- Always start error messages with capital letter
- Unify some error messages across various tools
- Fix addional/missing new line characters
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=776169
Being able to determine that a certificate chain is invalid is not
considered an error, but success. This might not be obvious at first
due to the way the method is named and described currently. Since we
cannot change the name, let's improve the description and clarify this
aspect of its behaviour.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=780310
g_dbus_proxy_get_cached_property() and
g_dbus_proxy_get_cached_property_names() can both return NULL if the
property cache is empty. Avoid a crash if this situation arises (which
it looks like it could, from reading the code) by gracefully bailing out
on NULL return values.
Coverity issues: #1257044, #1257045https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=741229
socket->priv->timeout is only a guint, and the multiplication is
performed before it’s widened to gint64 to be stored in start_time
(thanks, C). This means any timeout of 50 days or more would overflow.
Fixing this bug makes me feel a real sense of self-worth.
Coverity ID: 1159478
Signed-off-by: Philip Withnall <withnall@endlessm.com>
request_completion is checked several blocks higher in the function.
Spotted by Coverity.
Coverity ID: 1373215
Signed-off-by: Philip Withnall <withnall@endlessm.com>
The previously documented requirements for implementing init() and
init_async() as completely idempotent were really quite hard to achieve,
and brought a lot of pain for very little gain. Many implementations of
GInitable and GAsyncInitable did not actually follow the requirements,
or did not correctly handle concurrent init_async() calls.
Relax those requirements so that classes can decide whether their init()
or init_async() implementations need to be idempotent.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=766660
This is effectively the mc-wait-for-name tool from
telepathy-mission-control; moving it in to gdbus-tool will make it more
widely useful without making people depend on telepathy-mission-control
for no other reason. The code here is reimplemented from scratch to use
GDBus.
It blocks until the specified well-known name is owned by some process
on the bus (which can be the session, system, or any other bus). By
passing --activate, the same (or a different) name can be auto-started
on the bus first.
A timeout can be specified to ensure the process doesn’t block forever.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=745971
This will help us break generic GType deadlocks between people using
GDBus in different threads (which is supported), not just by GType
usage in the GDBus thread.
This should fix the common cases we're seeing in the wild, although I
have some lingering concerns that if someone e.g. referenced
e.g. `G_TYPE_DBUS_AUTH_MECHANISM_SHA1` etc. we'd need to add those
too.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=674885
