This means that the top of the documentation can link forward to this
important section, and random people on the internet can link directly
to it on developer.gnome.org.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=743011
The API design here is a bit awkward — the in/out flags argument should
actually have been an in flags argument and an out msg_flags argument.
Clarify that a bit in the documentation.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=751924
_wstat32i64() doesn't exist in msvcrt.dll. This doesn't cause a problem
on 32-bit Windows because mingw-w64 #defines _wstat32i64 to _wstati64,
but on 64-bit Windows we get a link error.
In addition, _wstat32i64() takes a struct _stat32i64 *, but
GLocalFileStat is #defined to struct _stati64, which is not the same
type on 64-bit Windows.
Fix by using _wstati64().
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=749161
Update the notes that this is also used for Visual Studio 2015 support,
and correct the MSVC_VER_LONG for MSVC 2015, which is 14, not 2015.
Also add a note that this can be used for other projects that have
Visual Studio build support.
Add a note stating that this script can be copied for use to replace
strings in files when necessary, such as replacing autotools variables
in non-autotools builds, such as Visual Studio builds.
List the files that are generated in the process to generate the
glib-install property sheets, so that we can use that list as a
depedency, as well as deleting those files in one shot after the
property sheet is generated, so we don't need to worry about those
in 'make distclean' or so.
This reverts commit 662bf991c0. It is not
a straight up revert because the old commit involved various long since
removed ChangeLog files and we'd end up mudding the patch.
The system_header GCC pragma is breaking warnings in the various
g_return_* macros; GCC stopped warning when using a macro with a return
value in a function that returns void, as well as when using a macro
with no return value in a function that has a non-void return value.
Suppressing this kind of warnings is not a good idea.
Other compilers are unaffected, even ones like Clang with a GCC
compatibility layer.
Given the fact that the original commit was added 14 years ago as a
workaround in the old days of GTK+ 1.2, I think it's safe to drop it.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=753310
This will not catch the case where we fail in libffi and always use 0.
In fact, be a real annoying person and use (1 << 31) as a flags value to
test signedness, too.
Also update the testcase to actually use flags everywhere and ot uint.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=754882
Keeping these enabled causes too many people to file
bugs against gobject, and not enough people to send
patches to port away from deprecated properties.
This is almost always what you want, because if you're using this you
want to know if any "custom code" (i.e. not the default class closure)
is going to be run if you emit this signal.
I looked at all the existing uses of this and they were all broken in the
presence of g_signal_override_class_closure().
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=754986
For all test cases where the text length is given as -1, also
call g_utf8_validate() with the actual string length to exercise
the known-length case. Unknown-length and known-length validation
use different code paths, but most of the tests only exercised with
unknown-length parameter.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=754924
A recent change permitted some characters from range 0x80-0xbf as
would-be valid sequence starters for length 2, as long as
continuation characters were OK.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=738504
This code is used in the property notification path, so it
better be fast. This commit removes a g_return_if_fail check and
treats the common case of just a single data element better.
