We used XML to markup when we should have used our own brand of markdown
instead. This fixes the example being unreadable unless we trimmed the
XML away from it.
For the check "if (error != NULL)" to work as expected, the
create_server() (and create_server_full()) functions need to make
sure to return an error for all the possible failures, but this
might not always be the case.
Catch all the failures by testing for a non-NULL return value if there
was no error.
Similar to 3837b83f, glibc memcpy is declared with the first two
arguments annotated as non-null via an attribute, which results in the
undefined behaviour sanitizer considering it to be UB to pass a null
pointer there (even if we are copying no bytes, and hence not actually
dereferencing the pointer).
Signed-off-by: Simon McVittie <smcv@collabora.com>
This shouldn't make any difference, because this code should only ever
be running in the main context that was thread-default at the time the
task was created, so it should already match the task's context. But
let's make sure, just in case.
They didn’t match the prototype generated by `gdbus-codegen`, which
meant that the FD list was being iterated incorrectly. Secondly, the
document ID list returned by the method was not NULL terminated, which
could lead to reading off the end of the list.
Somehow, neither of these bugs caused problems on Linux, but they did
cause problems on FreeBSD.
Signed-off-by: Philip Withnall <withnall@endlessm.com>
Fixes: #1983
Sadly, I forgot to update the documentation of
g_dtls_connection_handshake() last time I touched
g_tls_connection_handshake().
Let's also drop mention of STARTTLS, since that would use normal TLS,
not DTLS.
By removing the cached global proxy in gdocumentportal.c, we can
re-enable the checks for proper shutdown of the session bus connection
in the dbus-appinfo.c test.
We can't use session_bus_down() in the test since gdocumentportal.c
holds a reference to the session bus connection, preventing it from
being finalised.
As with `g_variant_new()` (or any varargs function which takes integer
literals of differing widths), callers need to be careful to ensure
their integer literals have the right width.
Tweak the documentation for `g_object_new()`, `g_object_set()` and
`g_object_get()` to clarify this. The documentation for `g_object_get()`
shows that it is not subject to the same caveats, since it operates on
pointers.
Signed-off-by: Philip Withnall <withnall@endlessm.com>
Closes: #833
There are some GVfs locations (i.e. google-drive://, recent://), where
G_FILE_ATTRIBUTE_STANDARD_NAME is something tottaly different than
G_FILE_ATTRIBUTE_STANDARD_DISPLAY_NAME. Thus it would be nice to have
an easy way to show the display names. The only way currently to show
the display names is to use --attributes option, which is a bit
cumbersome. Let's add new --show-display-names option.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gvfs/issues/402
While we automatically define cleanup functions for the module, we don't
do it for the module class.
This will allow to manage the ownership of the class when reffing it
without having to cast it to GTypeClass.
g_atomic_pointer_compare_and_exchange() should work with const pointers.
Add a test for that.
It seems clang 9.0.0-2.fc32 does not like this:
../glib/tests/atomic.c:93:9: warning: incompatible pointer types passing 'typeof ((((void *)0))) *' (aka 'void **') to parameter of type 'const char **' [-Wincompatible-pointer-types]
res = g_atomic_pointer_compare_and_exchange (&vp_str, NULL, str);
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
../glib/gatomic.h:192:44: note: expanded from macro 'g_atomic_pointer_compare_and_exchange'
__atomic_compare_exchange_n ((atomic), &gapcae_oldval, (newval), FALSE, __ATOMIC_SEQ_CST, __ATOMIC_SEQ_CST) ? TRUE : FALSE; \
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
../glib/tests/atomic.c:96:9: warning: incompatible pointer types passing 'typeof ((((void *)0))) *' (aka 'void **') to parameter of type 'const char **' [-Wincompatible-pointer-types]
res = g_atomic_pointer_compare_and_exchange (&vp_str_vol, NULL, str);
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
../glib/gatomic.h:192:44: note: expanded from macro 'g_atomic_pointer_compare_and_exchange'
__atomic_compare_exchange_n ((atomic), &gapcae_oldval, (newval), FALSE, __ATOMIC_SEQ_CST, __ATOMIC_SEQ_CST) ? TRUE : FALSE; \
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Note that this clang version already issues various compiler warnings for
this test. This merely adds another case to check.
Eventually g_atomic_pointer_compare_and_exchange() should be fixed to
avoid compiler warnings.
Actually there is a problem. When you try to use g_atomic_pointer_compare_and_exchange()
with const pointers, it is also not working, because the implementation
as a function expects "void *" arguments. As the test also shows. As such,
it's probably not portable to use g_atomic_pointer_compare_and_exchange()
with const pointers at all. However, the macro implementation is (with the right
compiler) fine with that, so it's an easy "mistake" to make.
