These calls cause race warnings from tsan, but are not a thread safety
problem, because we can only ever observe single bit changes: all
modifications to the GSource.flags field are done with a lock held; all
reads are of independent fields, so no intermediate state can ever be
observed. This assumes that a non-atomic read will consistently give us
an old value or a new value.
In any case, these g_source_is_destroyed() calls can happen from any
thread, and the state could be changed from another thread immediately
after the call returns; so the checks are pointless. In addition,
calling g_source_set_ready_time() or g_source_destroy() on a destroyed
source is not a problem.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=778049
If we have an input parameter (or return value) we need to use (nullable).
However, if it is an (inout) or (out) parameter, (optional) is sufficient.
It looks like (nullable) could be used for everything according to the
Annotation documentation, but (optional) is more specific.
When using this API, I wasn't sure what the cancellable does. I think
it's generally desirable to kill the subprocess if the wait operation is
cancelled, since in this case the application is no longer interested by
the subprocess.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=732704
- g_subprocess_launcher_spawn() and spawnv(): there is no other way
AFAIK to create a GSubprocess from a launcher. So these
functions are not "convenience helper".
- annotate optional arguments for g_shell_parse_argv().
- other trivial fix
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=732357
On the splice for stdout or stderr completing, GSubprocess calls
_slice_finish() to collect the result.
We assume that a zero return value here means failure, but in fact this
function returns a gssize -- the number of bytes transferred, or -1 for
an error.
This causes GSubprocess to mistakenly think that it has an error when it
actually just has an empty buffer (as would be the case when collecting
stderr from a successful command).
Check for -1 instead of FALSE to detect the error.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=724916
Over many years of writing code interacting with subprocesses, a pattern
that comes up a lot is to run a child and get its output as UTF-8, to
put inside a JSON document or render in a GtkTextBuffer, etc.
It's very important to validate at the boundaries, and not say deep
inside Pango.
We could do this a bit more efficiently if done in a streaming fashion,
but realistically this should be OK for now.
We weren't closing the streams after we were done reading or writing,
which is kind of essential. The easy way to fix this is to just use
g_output_stream_splice() to a GMemoryOutputStream rather than
hand-rolling it. This results in a substantial reduction of code
complexity.
A second serious issue is that we were marking the task as complete when
the process exits, but that's racy - there could still be data to read
from stdout. Fix this by just refcounting outstanding operations.
This code, not surprisingly, looks a lot like the "multi" test.
Next, because processes output binary data, I'd be forced to annotate
the char*/length pairs as (array) (element-type uint8). But rather than
doing that, it's *far* simpler to just use GBytes.
We need a version of this that actually validates as UTF-8, that will be
in the next patch.
There are a number of nice things this class brings:
0) Has a race-free termination API on all platforms (on UNIX, calls to
kill() and waitpid() are coordinated as not to cause problems).
1) Operates in terms of G{Input,Output}Stream, not file descriptors
2) Standard GIO-style async API for wait() with cancellation
3) Makes some simple cases easy, like synchronously spawning a
process with an argument list
4) Makes hard cases possible, like asynchronously running a process
with stdout/stderr merged, output directly to a file path
Much rewriting and code review from Ryan Lortie <desrt@desrt.ca>
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=672102
