Unlike G_GNUC_... macros, the new G_DEPRECATED[_FOR] are
meant as abstractions that work with different compilers.
Using a new name also lets us restrict it to 'must be placed
before the declaration', which works with more compilers.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=661438
The definitions of _GMutex* and G_STATIC_MUTEX_INIT is now found in
glib/deprecated/gthread.h, and should no longer be in the mainline
code, so remove them from here.
Everything was OK as long as GMutex was backed by pthread_mutex_t on
POSIX. Since this is no longer the case, the ABI of GStaticMutex was
broken.
Fix that up by using pthread_mutex_t directly in the structure. Since
that's potentially incompatible with our GMutex implementation, set
g_thread_use_default_impl to FALSE to cause the fallback code (which
manually allocates a GMutex) to run, even in the case of
already-existing code (without the need for a recompile). This will
cause the pthread_mutex_t part of the struct to be completely ignored.
If the connection to the bus is lost while a method call is ongoing,
the method call does not get cancelled. Instead it just sits around
until it times out.
This is visible here on XO laptops when stopping the display manager
during shutdown. imsettings starts sending a sync message to give up
its bus name (via g_bus_unown_name()), then systemd terminates the
session bus at approximately the same time. imsettings then hangs for
about 20 seconds before timing out the message.
http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dbus/2011-September/014717.html
imsettings behaviour could be improved as described in that thread,
but I think this is a glib bug. I've also come up with the attached
patch which fixes it.
Credits for the bug-fix goes to Daniel Drake <dsd@laptop.org>. The test
case was written by David Zeuthen <zeuthen@gmail.com>.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=660637
Signed-off-by: David Zeuthen <davidz@redhat.com>
Add g_main_context_ref_thread_default(), which always returns a
reffed GMainContext, rather than sometimes returning a (non-reffed)
GMainContext, and sometimes returning NULL. This simplifies the
bookkeeping in any code that needs to keep a reference to the
thread-default context for a while.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=660994
I've seen builds fail with
nm-connection.c:119:691: error: declaration of '_GStaticAssertCompileTimeAssertion_119' shadows a previous local [-Werror=shadow]
because several compile-time assertions ended up on the same
line. __COUNTER__ is meant specifically for the purpose of
constructing identifiers, so use it when available.
enums are stored in v_long but need to be marshalled as signed
integers. On platforms where int is 32 bits, taking the
address of v_long resulted in the wrong 32 bits being marshalled.
So we need to stuff the enum's int-sized value to a temporary
int-sized variable and marshall that instead.
Second, on return, libffi actually returns a pointer to a value
that's sized according to platform conventions, not according to
what the caller requested. ie if ffi_type_sint was requested, the
value can still be a 64-bit sign-extended long on a 64-bit
architecture like PPC64, thus the caller cannot simply cast
the return value as a pointer to the desired type, but must cast
as a pointer to an integral type and then cast to the desired
type to remove any sign extension complications.
For more information on how to correctly handle libffi return
values, see the following bug, specifically comment 35:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=736489
"For 64-bit ABIs that extend integral returns types to 64-bits, libffi always
returns full 64-bit values that you can truncate in the calling code. It's
just the way it is has always been. Please don't change libffi. I'll document
this clearly for the next version (perhaps there is a mention of this, I
haven't looked yet).
The same is true for returning 8-bit values, for instance, on 32-bit systems.
All ABIs extend those results to the full 32-bits so you need to provide a
properly aligned buffer that's big enough to hold the result."
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=659881
