Commit Graph

9154 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Matthias Clasen
c5049d86f9 Remove redundant header inclusions 2010-09-03 20:34:15 -04:00
Matthias Clasen
96d87da379 Remove redundant header inclusions 2010-09-03 20:30:54 -04:00
Matthias Clasen
3e2f1e3825 Remove redundant header inclusions
and some whitespace cleanup.
2010-09-03 20:27:45 -04:00
Matthias Clasen
8f81ee86ee Remove redundant header inclusions 2010-09-03 20:15:16 -04:00
Matthias Clasen
d95c6b8834 Remove redundant header inclusions 2010-09-03 20:12:09 -04:00
Matthias Clasen
1409bbab67 Remove redundant header inclusions 2010-09-03 20:05:27 -04:00
Matthias Clasen
9471902d4d Remove redundant header inclusions 2010-09-03 20:01:55 -04:00
Matthias Clasen
ebcdbd9555 Remove redundant header inclusions
and clean up some whitespace
2010-09-03 19:49:34 -04:00
Matthias Clasen
9b3fb41a5e Remove redundant header inclusions
and clean up some whitespace
2010-09-03 19:41:49 -04:00
Matthias Clasen
156a3f7195 Whitespace cleanup 2010-09-03 19:38:56 -04:00
Matthias Clasen
8300820f7b Remove redundant header inclusions 2010-09-03 19:37:54 -04:00
Matthias Clasen
5d4ef36f91 Whitespace cleanup 2010-09-03 19:34:28 -04:00
Matthias Clasen
489b780bb9 Remove redundant header inclusions 2010-09-03 19:32:02 -04:00
Matthias Clasen
4e5532ec51 Sort extensions properly
Just taking the difference of the priorities has overflow issues,
as pointed out in bug 623069.
2010-09-03 19:03:34 -04:00
Matthias Clasen
42080449d0 Add a note about size limits of private structures
Also add some assertions to check these limits, instead of
failing silently.  Bug 604479.
2010-09-03 18:11:08 -04:00
Christian Persch
db4fb1b115 Plug a mem leak in the gdbus-proxy test
==23341== 65 bytes in 3 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 927 of 1,020
==23341==    at 0x4005BDC: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:195)
==23341==    by 0x4057094: g_malloc (gmem.c:134)
==23341==    by 0x40573DB: g_malloc_n (gmem.c:281)
==23341==    by 0x40717FC: g_strdup (gstrfuncs.c:101)
==23341==    by 0x4147F56: value_lcopy_string (gvaluetypes.c:313)
==23341==    by 0x4123F0B: g_object_get_valist (gobject.c:1643)
==23341==    by 0x41240FF: g_object_get (gobject.c:1731)
==23341==    by 0x804C39E: test_basic (gdbus-proxy.c:522)

Bug #628331.
2010-09-03 16:05:28 -04:00
Christian Persch
5de1bf4a91 Plug a mem leak in the gdbus-proxy test
==23341== 85 (24 direct, 61 indirect) bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 900 of 971
==23341==    at 0x4005BDC: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:195)
==23341==    by 0x4057094: g_malloc (gmem.c:134)
==23341==    by 0x406F2D6: g_slice_alloc (gslice.c:836)
==23341==    by 0x406F31B: g_slice_alloc0 (gslice.c:848)
==23341==    by 0x403A751: g_error_new_valist (gerror.c:54)
==23341==    by 0x403AAD4: g_set_error (gerror.c:240)
==23341==    by 0x420B807: decode_method_reply (gdbusconnection.c:4774)
==23341==    by 0x420C2BA: g_dbus_connection_call_sync (gdbusconnection.c:5188)
==23341==    by 0x421B7C9: g_dbus_proxy_call_sync (gdbusproxy.c:2477)
==23341==    by 0x804BD89: test_bogus_method_return (gdbus-proxy.c:430)

Bug #628331.
2010-09-03 16:04:29 -04:00
Christian Persch
be33ef85d0 Plug some mem leaks in gdbus-peer test
==29535== 56 (24 direct, 32 indirect) bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 1,112 of 1,264
==29535==    at 0x4005BDC: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:195)
==29535==    by 0x4057094: g_malloc (gmem.c:134)
==29535==    by 0x406F2D6: g_slice_alloc (gslice.c:836)
==29535==    by 0x406F364: g_slice_copy (gslice.c:858)
==29535==    by 0x403A9B2: g_error_copy (gerror.c:160)
==29535==    by 0x42066D3: initable_init (gdbusconnection.c:2314)
==29535==    by 0x41A73E5: g_initable_init (ginitable.c:105)
==29535==    by 0x41A7587: g_initable_new_valist (ginitable.c:218)
==29535==    by 0x41A742A: g_initable_new (ginitable.c:138)
==29535==    by 0x4206DCC: g_dbus_connection_new_for_address_sync (gdbusconnection.c:2585)
==29535==    by 0x804D63A: test_nonce_tcp (gdbus-peer.c:1229)

==29535== 107 (24 direct, 83 indirect) bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 1,188 of 1,264
==29535==    at 0x4005BDC: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:195)
==29535==    by 0x4057094: g_malloc (gmem.c:134)
==29535==    by 0x406F2D6: g_slice_alloc (gslice.c:836)
==29535==    by 0x406F364: g_slice_copy (gslice.c:858)
==29535==    by 0x403A9B2: g_error_copy (gerror.c:160)
==29535==    by 0x42066D3: initable_init (gdbusconnection.c:2314)
==29535==    by 0x41A73E5: g_initable_init (ginitable.c:105)
==29535==    by 0x41A7587: g_initable_new_valist (ginitable.c:218)
==29535==    by 0x41A742A: g_initable_new (ginitable.c:138)
==29535==    by 0x4206DCC: g_dbus_connection_new_for_address_sync (gdbusconnection.c:2585)
==29535==    by 0x804D8E8: test_nonce_tcp (gdbus-peer.c:1259)

==29535== 112 (24 direct, 88 indirect) bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 1,193 of 1,264
==29535==    at 0x4005BDC: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:195)
==29535==    by 0x4057094: g_malloc (gmem.c:134)
==29535==    by 0x406F2D6: g_slice_alloc (gslice.c:836)
==29535==    by 0x406F364: g_slice_copy (gslice.c:858)
==29535==    by 0x403A9B2: g_error_copy (gerror.c:160)
==29535==    by 0x42066D3: initable_init (gdbusconnection.c:2314)
==29535==    by 0x41A73E5: g_initable_init (ginitable.c:105)
==29535==    by 0x41A7587: g_initable_new_valist (ginitable.c:218)
==29535==    by 0x41A742A: g_initable_new (ginitable.c:138)
==29535==    by 0x4206DCC: g_dbus_connection_new_for_address_sync (gdbusconnection.c:2585)
==29535==    by 0x804D79A: test_nonce_tcp (gdbus-peer.c:1248)

==29535== 73 (24 direct, 49 indirect) bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 1,152 of 1,264
==29535==    at 0x4005BDC: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:195)
==29535==    by 0x4057094: g_malloc (gmem.c:134)
==29535==    by 0x406F2D6: g_slice_alloc (gslice.c:836)
==29535==    by 0x406F364: g_slice_copy (gslice.c:858)
==29535==    by 0x403A9B2: g_error_copy (gerror.c:160)
==29535==    by 0x42066D3: initable_init (gdbusconnection.c:2314)
==29535==    by 0x41A73E5: g_initable_init (ginitable.c:105)
==29535==    by 0x41A7587: g_initable_new_valist (ginitable.c:218)
==29535==    by 0x41A742A: g_initable_new (ginitable.c:138)
==29535==    by 0x4206DCC: g_dbus_connection_new_for_address_sync (gdbusconnection.c:2585)
==29535==    by 0x804C6CE: test_peer (gdbus-peer.c:803)

Bug #628331.
2010-09-03 16:03:48 -04:00
Christian Persch
3df5866139 Plug a mem leak in the gdbus-peer test
==6793== 32 (24 direct, 8 indirect) bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 779 of 1,423
==6793==    at 0x4005BDC: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:195)
==6793==    by 0x4057094: g_malloc (gmem.c:134)
==6793==    by 0x406F2D6: g_slice_alloc (gslice.c:836)
==6793==    by 0x406F31B: g_slice_alloc0 (gslice.c:848)
==6793==    by 0x413D5BB: g_type_create_instance (gtype.c:1867)
==6793==    by 0x412372A: g_object_constructor (gobject.c:1482)
==6793==    by 0x4122E1D: g_object_newv (gobject.c:1266)
==6793==    by 0x4122B93: g_object_new (gobject.c:1178)
==6793==    by 0x41DB4F9: g_unix_fd_list_new (gunixfdlist.c:159)
==6793==    by 0x804AADD: test_interface_method_call (gdbus-peer.c:172)

Bug #628331.
2010-09-03 16:02:11 -04:00
Christian Persch
bd2faedefd Plug a mem leak in network-address test
==4616== 46 (32 direct, 14 indirect) bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 193 of 305
==4616==    at 0x4005BDC: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:195)
==4616==    by 0x4057094: g_malloc (gmem.c:134)
==4616==    by 0x406F2D6: g_slice_alloc (gslice.c:836)
==4616==    by 0x406F31B: g_slice_alloc0 (gslice.c:848)
==4616==    by 0x413D5BB: g_type_create_instance (gtype.c:1867)
==4616==    by 0x412372A: g_object_constructor (gobject.c:1482)
==4616==    by 0x4123147: g_object_newv (gobject.c:1347)
==4616==    by 0x41236BB: g_object_new_valist (gobject.c:1463)
==4616==    by 0x4122BB4: g_object_new (gobject.c:1181)
==4616==    by 0x41B2D0F: g_network_address_new (gnetworkaddress.c:262)
==4616==    by 0x8048A70: test_basic (network-address.c:10)

Bug #628331.
2010-09-03 16:01:10 -04:00
Christian Persch
fa6937603c Plug a mem leak in contexts test
==14059== 96 bytes in 2 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 520 of 543
==14059==    at 0x4005BDC: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:195)
==14059==    by 0x4057094: g_malloc (gmem.c:134)
==14059==    by 0x406F2D6: g_slice_alloc (gslice.c:836)
==14059==    by 0x406F31B: g_slice_alloc0 (gslice.c:848)
==14059==    by 0x41385BB: g_type_create_instance (gtype.c:1867)
==14059==    by 0x411E72A: g_object_constructor (gobject.c:1482)
==14059==    by 0x411DE1D: g_object_newv (gobject.c:1266)
==14059==    by 0x411DB93: g_object_new (gobject.c:1178)
==14059==    by 0x42296AF: _g_local_file_input_stream_new (glocalfileinputstream.c:152)
==14059==    by 0x422281F: g_local_file_read (glocalfile.c:1322)
==14059==    by 0x418A8A9: open_read_async_thread (gfile.c:5050)
==14059==    by 0x41B71BB: run_in_thread (gsimpleasyncresult.c:853)
==14059==    by 0x41A5FBC: io_job_thread (gioscheduler.c:181)
==14059==    by 0x407DCDE: g_thread_pool_thread_proxy (gthreadpool.c:314)
==14059==    by 0x407C6B0: g_thread_create_proxy (gthread.c:1897)
==14059==    by 0x57D918: start_thread (pthread_create.c:301)
==14059==    by 0x4C6CBD: clone (clone.S:133)

Bug #628331.
2010-09-03 16:00:15 -04:00
Christian Persch
60349ecc4d Plug mem leaks in contexts test
==2464== 80 (16 direct, 64 indirect) bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 515 of 547
==2464==    at 0x4005BDC: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:195)
==2464==    by 0x4057094: g_malloc (gmem.c:134)
==2464==    by 0x406F2D6: g_slice_alloc (gslice.c:836)
==2464==    by 0x406F31B: g_slice_alloc0 (gslice.c:848)
==2464==    by 0x41385BB: g_type_create_instance (gtype.c:1867)
==2464==    by 0x411E72A: g_object_constructor (gobject.c:1482)
==2464==    by 0x411DE1D: g_object_newv (gobject.c:1266)
==2464==    by 0x411DB93: g_object_new (gobject.c:1178)
==2464==    by 0x4220D74: _g_local_file_new (glocalfile.c:310)
==2464==    by 0x422C897: g_local_vfs_get_file_for_path (glocalvfs.c:84)
==2464==    by 0x41CA91C: g_vfs_get_file_for_path (gvfs.c:94)
==2464==    by 0x418C1B6: g_file_new_for_path (gfile.c:5898)
==2464==    by 0x8049509: test1_thread (contexts.c:110)

==2464== 80 (16 direct, 64 indirect) bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 516 of 547
==2464==    at 0x4005BDC: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:195)
==2464==    by 0x4057094: g_malloc (gmem.c:134)
==2464==    by 0x406F2D6: g_slice_alloc (gslice.c:836)
==2464==    by 0x406F31B: g_slice_alloc0 (gslice.c:848)
==2464==    by 0x41385BB: g_type_create_instance (gtype.c:1867)
==2464==    by 0x411E72A: g_object_constructor (gobject.c:1482)
==2464==    by 0x411DE1D: g_object_newv (gobject.c:1266)
==2464==    by 0x411DB93: g_object_new (gobject.c:1178)
==2464==    by 0x4220D74: _g_local_file_new (glocalfile.c:310)
==2464==    by 0x422C897: g_local_vfs_get_file_for_path (glocalvfs.c:84)
==2464==    by 0x41CA91C: g_vfs_get_file_for_path (gvfs.c:94)
==2464==    by 0x418C1B6: g_file_new_for_path (gfile.c:5898)
==2464==    by 0x804964D: test_context_independence (contexts.c:144)

Bug #628331.
2010-09-03 15:58:51 -04:00
Christian Persch
e4a6b1dcdc Plug a mem leak in buffered-input-stream test
==2429== 49 (24 direct, 25 indirect) bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 276 of 355
==2429==    at 0x4005BDC: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:195)
==2429==    by 0x4057094: g_malloc (gmem.c:134)
==2429==    by 0x406F2D6: g_slice_alloc (gslice.c:836)
==2429==    by 0x406F31B: g_slice_alloc0 (gslice.c:848)
==2429==    by 0x403A8A6: g_error_new_literal (gerror.c:117)
==2429==    by 0x403AC31: g_set_error_literal (gerror.c:314)
==2429==    by 0x4175525: g_buffered_input_stream_read_byte (gbufferedinputstream.c:880)
==2429==    by 0x804A21A: test_read_byte (buffered-input-stream.c:153)

Bug #628331.
2010-09-03 15:57:26 -04:00
Christian Persch
01a19dee68 Plug a mem leak in g-icon test
==2428== 256 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 591 of 604
==2428==    at 0x4005CD2: realloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:476)
==2428==    by 0x40571A5: g_realloc (gmem.c:181)
==2428==    by 0x4075287: g_string_maybe_expand (gstring.c:395)
==2428==    by 0x40760D8: g_string_insert_c (gstring.c:1049)
==2428==    by 0x4074D41: g_string_append_c_inline (gstring.h:153)
==2428==    by 0x4075B3C: g_string_append_uri_escaped (gstring.c:822)
==2428==    by 0x41A46AC: g_icon_to_string_tokenized (gicon.c:164)
==2428==    by 0x41A498F: g_icon_to_string (gicon.c:252)
==2428==    by 0x8049E1A: test_g_icon_serialize (g-icon.c:222)

Bug #628331.
2010-09-03 15:56:23 -04:00
Christian Persch
e8bdd2cb7a Plug a huge mem leak in data-output-stream test
==12763== 16,777,215 bytes in 1 blocks are possibly lost in loss record 357 of 357
==12763==    at 0x4004F1B: calloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:418)
==12763==    by 0x405711D: g_malloc0 (gmem.c:157)
==12763==    by 0x8048ED6: test_basic (data-output-stream.c:40)

Bug #628331.
2010-09-03 15:55:10 -04:00
Christian Persch
05d6fcf88c Plug a mem leak in data-output-stream test
==2426== 45,034 bytes in 4,094 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 358 of 361
==2426==    at 0x4005BDC: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:195)
==2426==    by 0x4057094: g_malloc (gmem.c:134)
==2426==    by 0x40573DB: g_malloc_n (gmem.c:281)
==2426==    by 0x4071ABD: g_strconcat (gstrfuncs.c:315)
==2426==    by 0x804916A: test_read_lines (data-output-stream.c:83)

Bug #628331.
2010-09-03 15:53:56 -04:00
Christian Persch
45331a4640 Plug a mem leak in data-input-stream test
==12351== 45,045 bytes in 4,095 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 377 of 380
==12351==    at 0x4005BDC: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:195)
==12351==    by 0x4057094: g_malloc (gmem.c:134)
==12351==    by 0x40573DB: g_malloc_n (gmem.c:281)
==12351==    by 0x4071ABD: g_strconcat (gstrfuncs.c:315)
==12351==    by 0x8049811: test_read_lines (data-input-stream.c:99)

Bug #628331.
2010-09-03 15:53:05 -04:00
Christian Persch
36c7d95c9c Plug a mem leak in data-input-stream test
==2415== 45,045 bytes in 4,095 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 393 of 399
==2415==    at 0x4005BDC: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:195)
==2415==    by 0x4057094: g_malloc (gmem.c:134)
==2415==    by 0x417FC29: g_data_input_stream_read_line (gdatainputstream.c:797)
==2415==    by 0x8049874: test_read_lines (data-input-stream.c:111)

==12088== 360 bytes in 40 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 368 of 381
==12088==    at 0x4005BDC: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:195)
==12088==    by 0x4057094: g_malloc (gmem.c:134)
==12088==    by 0x417FF4C: g_data_input_stream_read_until (gdatainputstream.c:914)
==12088==    by 0x8049B6F: test_read_until (data-input-stream.c:182)

Bug #628331.
2010-09-03 15:47:38 -04:00
Christian Persch
91e3803596 Plug a mem leak in data-input-stream test
==2415== 165 (72 direct, 93 indirect) bytes in 3 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 373 of 399
==2415==    at 0x4005BDC: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:195)
==2415==    by 0x4057094: g_malloc (gmem.c:134)
==2415==    by 0x406F2D6: g_slice_alloc (gslice.c:836)
==2415==    by 0x406F31B: g_slice_alloc0 (gslice.c:848)
==2415==    by 0x403A8A6: g_error_new_literal (gerror.c:117)
==2415==    by 0x403AC31: g_set_error_literal (gerror.c:314)
==2415==    by 0x417ED29: read_data (gdatainputstream.c:309)
==2415==    by 0x417EE9D: g_data_input_stream_read_byte (gdatainputstream.c:344)
==2415==    by 0x8049DEC: test_data_array (data-input-stream.c:263)

Bug #628331.
2010-09-03 15:45:48 -04:00
Christian Persch
31b15451cf Plug a mem leak in readwrite test
==10395== 80 (24 direct, 56 indirect) bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 529 of 561
==10395==    at 0x4005BDC: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:195)
==10395==    by 0x4057094: g_malloc (gmem.c:134)
==10395==    by 0x406F2D6: g_slice_alloc (gslice.c:836)
==10395==    by 0x406F31B: g_slice_alloc0 (gslice.c:848)
==10395==    by 0x403A751: g_error_new_valist (gerror.c:54)
==10395==    by 0x403AAD4: g_set_error (gerror.c:240)
==10395==    by 0x4230328: _g_local_file_output_stream_create (glocalfileoutputstream.c:628)
==10395==    by 0x4227A04: g_local_file_create_readwrite (glocalfile.c:1388)
==10395==    by 0x418974C: g_file_create_readwrite (gfile.c:1784)
==10395==    by 0x8049FCD: test_g_file_create_readwrite (readwrite.c:187)

Bug #628331.
2010-09-03 15:44:28 -04:00
Christian Persch
94102a40f7 Plug some huge mem leaks in converter-stream test
==8564== 24,000,000 bytes in 6 blocks are possibly lost in loss record 592 of 594
==8564==    at 0x4005BDC: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:195)
==8564==    by 0x4057094: g_malloc (gmem.c:134)
==8564==    by 0x804AA37: test_corruption (converter-stream.c:589)
==8564==    by 0x804B05B: test_roundtrip (converter-stream.c:652)

==9459== 25,165,824 bytes in 6 blocks are possibly lost in loss record 593 of 594
==9459==    at 0x4005CD2: realloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:476)
==9459==    by 0x40571A5: g_realloc (gmem.c:181)
==9459==    by 0x41B08A3: array_resize (gmemoryoutputstream.c:501)
==9459==    by 0x41B0A5D: g_memory_output_stream_write (gmemoryoutputstream.c:578)
==9459==    by 0x41B57EF: g_output_stream_write (goutputstream.c:216)
==9459==    by 0x41B591B: g_output_stream_write_all (goutputstream.c:268)
==9459==    by 0x417D617: flush_buffer (gconverteroutputstream.c:359)
==9459==    by 0x417D958: g_converter_output_stream_write (gconverteroutputstream.c:502)
==9459==    by 0x41B5D7F: g_output_stream_real_splice (goutputstream.c:428)
==9459==    by 0x41B5C6C: g_output_stream_splice (goutputstream.c:380)
==9459==    by 0x804AB10: test_corruption (converter-stream.c:600)

==9785== 25,165,824 bytes in 6 blocks are possibly lost in loss record 592 of 592
==9785==    at 0x4005CD2: realloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:476)
==9785==    by 0x40571A5: g_realloc (gmem.c:181)
==9785==    by 0x41B08A3: array_resize (gmemoryoutputstream.c:501)
==9785==    by 0x41B0A5D: g_memory_output_stream_write (gmemoryoutputstream.c:578)
==9785==    by 0x41B5D7F: g_output_stream_real_splice (goutputstream.c:428)
==9785==    by 0x41B5C6C: g_output_stream_splice (goutputstream.c:380)
==9785==    by 0x804ADF1: test_corruption (converter-stream.c:622)
==9785==    by 0x804B06C: test_roundtrip (converter-stream.c:652)

Bug #628331.
2010-09-03 15:43:03 -04:00
Christian Persch
24bee1a130 Plug a mem leak in convert-stream test
==7540== 487 (64 direct, 423 indirect) bytes in 2 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 597 of 615
==7540==    at 0x4005BDC: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:195)
==7540==    by 0x4057094: g_malloc (gmem.c:134)
==7540==    by 0x406F2D6: g_slice_alloc (gslice.c:836)
==7540==    by 0x406F31B: g_slice_alloc0 (gslice.c:848)
==7540==    by 0x413D5BB: g_type_create_instance (gtype.c:1867)
==7540==    by 0x412372A: g_object_constructor (gobject.c:1482)
==7540==    by 0x4123147: g_object_newv (gobject.c:1347)
==7540==    by 0x41236BB: g_object_new_valist (gobject.c:1463)
==7540==    by 0x41A756E: g_initable_new_valist (ginitable.c:214)
==7540==    by 0x41A743E: g_initable_new (ginitable.c:138)
==7540==    by 0x417B67A: g_charset_converter_new (gcharsetconverter.c:215)
==7540==    by 0x804B043: test_charset (converter-stream.c:675)

Bug #628331.
2010-09-03 15:40:55 -04:00
Christian Persch
ac8600a14b Plug a mem leak in converter-stream test
==2396== 168 (92 direct, 76 indirect) bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 598 of 625
==2396==    at 0x4005BDC: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:195)
==2396==    by 0x4057094: g_malloc (gmem.c:134)
==2396==    by 0x406F2D6: g_slice_alloc (gslice.c:836)
==2396==    by 0x406F31B: g_slice_alloc0 (gslice.c:848)
==2396==    by 0x413D5BB: g_type_create_instance (gtype.c:1867)
==2396==    by 0x412372A: g_object_constructor (gobject.c:1482)
==2396==    by 0x4123147: g_object_newv (gobject.c:1347)
==2396==    by 0x41236BB: g_object_new_valist (gobject.c:1463)
==2396==    by 0x4122BB4: g_object_new (gobject.c:1181)
==2396==    by 0x417C54D: g_converter_input_stream_new (gconverterinputstream.c:204)
==2396==    by 0x804A53E: test_compressor (converter-stream.c:484)

Bug #628331.
2010-09-03 15:39:58 -04:00
Christian Persch
85179745ac Plug a mem leak in converter-stream test
==2396== 66 (24 direct, 42 indirect) bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 565 of 625
==2396==    at 0x4005BDC: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:195)
==2396==    by 0x4057094: g_malloc (gmem.c:134)
==2396==    by 0x406F2D6: g_slice_alloc (gslice.c:836)
==2396==    by 0x406F31B: g_slice_alloc0 (gslice.c:848)
==2396==    by 0x403A8A6: g_error_new_literal (gerror.c:117)
==2396==    by 0x403AC31: g_set_error_literal (gerror.c:314)
==2396==    by 0x417BA38: g_charset_converter_convert (gcharsetconverter.c:344)
==2396==    by 0x417BF67: g_converter_convert (gconverter.c:174)
==2396==    by 0x417C9EB: g_converter_input_stream_read (gconverterinputstream.c:403)
==2396==    by 0x41A7A17: g_input_stream_read (ginputstream.c:204)
==2396==    by 0x41A7B43: g_input_stream_read_all (ginputstream.c:256)
==2396==    by 0x804B0E4: test_charset (converter-stream.c:682)

Bug #628331.
2010-09-03 15:39:07 -04:00
Christian Persch
7ec414229b Plug a mem leak in converter-stream test
==2396== 39 (24 direct, 15 indirect) bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 398 of 625
==2396==    at 0x4005BDC: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:195)
==2396==    by 0x4057094: g_malloc (gmem.c:134)
==2396==    by 0x406F2D6: g_slice_alloc (gslice.c:836)
==2396==    by 0x406F31B: g_slice_alloc0 (gslice.c:848)
==2396==    by 0x403A8A6: g_error_new_literal (gerror.c:117)
==2396==    by 0x403AC31: g_set_error_literal (gerror.c:314)
==2396==    by 0x80498F7: g_compressor_converter_convert (converter-stream.c:244)
==2396==    by 0x417BF67: g_converter_convert (gconverter.c:174)
==2396==    by 0x417CBDE: g_converter_input_stream_read (gconverterinputstream.c:460)
==2396==    by 0x41A7A17: g_input_stream_read (ginputstream.c:204)
==2396==    by 0x804A832: test_compressor (converter-stream.c:545)

Bug #628331.
2010-09-03 15:37:56 -04:00
Christian Persch
d5d277dccf Plug a mem leak in g-file-info test
==2395== 64 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 381 of 407
==2395==    at 0x4005BDC: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:195)
==2395==    by 0x4005C66: realloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:476)
==2395==    by 0x40571A5: g_realloc (gmem.c:181)
==2395==    by 0x401D670: g_ptr_array_maybe_expand (garray.c:968)
==2395==    by 0x401DD0B: g_ptr_array_add (garray.c:1225)
==2395==    by 0x4199AA9: g_file_info_list_attributes (gfileinfo.c:646)
==2395==    by 0x80491CE: test_g_file_info (g-file-info.c:76)

==2395== 132 (64 direct, 68 indirect) bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 396 of 407
==2395==    at 0x4005BDC: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:195)
==2395==    by 0x4005C66: realloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:476)
==2395==    by 0x40571A5: g_realloc (gmem.c:181)
==2395==    by 0x401D670: g_ptr_array_maybe_expand (garray.c:968)
==2395==    by 0x401DD0B: g_ptr_array_add (garray.c:1225)
==2395==    by 0x4199A82: g_file_info_list_attributes (gfileinfo.c:642)
==2395==    by 0x80492B7: test_g_file_info (g-file-info.c:86)

Bug #628331.
2010-09-03 15:37:08 -04:00
Christian Persch
35e101fa0a Plug a mem leak in the readwrite test
And use g_assert_[no_]error().

==2392== 49 (24 direct, 25 indirect) bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 451 of 573
==2392==    at 0x4005BDC: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:195)
==2392==    by 0x4057094: g_malloc (gmem.c:134)
==2392==    by 0x406F2D6: g_slice_alloc (gslice.c:836)
==2392==    by 0x406F31B: g_slice_alloc0 (gslice.c:848)
==2392==    by 0x403A8A6: g_error_new_literal (gerror.c:117)
==2392==    by 0x403AC31: g_set_error_literal (gerror.c:314)
==2392==    by 0x41B7619: g_output_stream_set_pending (goutputstream.c:1198)
==2392==    by 0x41B5799: g_output_stream_write (goutputstream.c:210)
==2392==    by 0x41B590B: g_output_stream_write_all (goutputstream.c:268)
==2392==    by 0x8049B54: verify_iostream (readwrite.c:110)

Bug #628331.
2010-09-03 15:35:44 -04:00
Christian Persch
93d85ade57 Plug a mem leak in the readwrite test
==2392== 38 (16 direct, 22 indirect) bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 369 of 573
==2392==    at 0x4005BDC: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:195)
==2392==    by 0x4057094: g_malloc (gmem.c:134)
==2392==    by 0x406F2D6: g_slice_alloc (gslice.c:836)
==2392==    by 0x406F31B: g_slice_alloc0 (gslice.c:848)
==2392==    by 0x413D5BB: g_type_create_instance (gtype.c:1867)
==2392==    by 0x412372A: g_object_constructor (gobject.c:1482)
==2392==    by 0x4122E1D: g_object_newv (gobject.c:1266)
==2392==    by 0x4122B93: g_object_new (gobject.c:1178)
==2392==    by 0x4225D74: _g_local_file_new (glocalfile.c:310)
==2392==    by 0x4231897: g_local_vfs_get_file_for_path (glocalvfs.c:84)
==2392==    by 0x41CF91C: g_vfs_get_file_for_path (gvfs.c:94)
==2392==    by 0x41911B6: g_file_new_for_path (gfile.c:5898)
==2392==    by 0x804A2B9: test_g_file_replace_readwrite (readwrite.c:235)

Bug #628331.
2010-09-03 15:34:12 -04:00
Christian Persch
9fba7a43be Plug a mem leak in the readwrite test
==2392== 38 (16 direct, 22 indirect) bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 368 of 573
==2392==    at 0x4005BDC: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:195)
==2392==    by 0x4057094: g_malloc (gmem.c:134)
==2392==    by 0x406F2D6: g_slice_alloc (gslice.c:836)
==2392==    by 0x406F31B: g_slice_alloc0 (gslice.c:848)
==2392==    by 0x413D5BB: g_type_create_instance (gtype.c:1867)
==2392==    by 0x412372A: g_object_constructor (gobject.c:1482)
==2392==    by 0x4122E1D: g_object_newv (gobject.c:1266)
==2392==    by 0x4122B93: g_object_new (gobject.c:1178)
==2392==    by 0x4225D74: _g_local_file_new (glocalfile.c:310)
==2392==    by 0x4231897: g_local_vfs_get_file_for_path (glocalvfs.c:84)
==2392==    by 0x41CF91C: g_vfs_get_file_for_path (gvfs.c:94)
==2392==    by 0x41911B6: g_file_new_for_path (gfile.c:5898)
==2392==    by 0x8049F23: test_g_file_create_readwrite (readwrite.c:183)

Bug #628331.
2010-09-03 15:33:28 -04:00
Christian Persch
e481bf8bf6 Plug a mem leak in the readwrite test
==2392== 38 (16 direct, 22 indirect) bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 367 of 573
==2392==    at 0x4005BDC: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:195)
==2392==    by 0x4057094: g_malloc (gmem.c:134)
==2392==    by 0x406F2D6: g_slice_alloc (gslice.c:836)
==2392==    by 0x406F31B: g_slice_alloc0 (gslice.c:848)
==2392==    by 0x413D5BB: g_type_create_instance (gtype.c:1867)
==2392==    by 0x412372A: g_object_constructor (gobject.c:1482)
==2392==    by 0x4122E1D: g_object_newv (gobject.c:1266)
==2392==    by 0x4122B93: g_object_new (gobject.c:1178)
==2392==    by 0x4225D74: _g_local_file_new (glocalfile.c:310)
==2392==    by 0x4231897: g_local_vfs_get_file_for_path (glocalvfs.c:84)
==2392==    by 0x41CF91C: g_vfs_get_file_for_path (gvfs.c:94)
==2392==    by 0x41911B6: g_file_new_for_path (gfile.c:5898)
==2392==    by 0x8049E30: test_g_file_open_readwrite (readwrite.c:153)

Bug #628331.
2010-09-03 15:32:32 -04:00
Christian Persch
689b054b6e Plug a mem leak in the memory-input-stream test
==2389== 84 (44 direct, 40 indirect) bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 299 of 315
==2389==    at 0x4005BDC: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:195)
==2389==    by 0x4057094: g_malloc (gmem.c:134)
==2389==    by 0x406F2D6: g_slice_alloc (gslice.c:836)
==2389==    by 0x406F31B: g_slice_alloc0 (gslice.c:848)
==2389==    by 0x413D5BB: g_type_create_instance (gtype.c:1867)
==2389==    by 0x412372A: g_object_constructor (gobject.c:1482)
==2389==    by 0x4122E1D: g_object_newv (gobject.c:1266)
==2389==    by 0x4122B93: g_object_new (gobject.c:1178)
==2389==    by 0x41AF54C: g_memory_input_stream_new (gmemoryinputstream.c:199)
==2389==    by 0x8048BD1: test_read_chunks (memory-input-stream.c:40)

Bug #628331.
2010-09-03 15:31:37 -04:00
Christian Persch
53ae72b926 Plug a mem leak in the memory-input-stream test
==2389== 59 (24 direct, 35 indirect) bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 290 of 315
==2389==    at 0x4005BDC: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:195)
==2389==    by 0x4057094: g_malloc (gmem.c:134)
==2389==    by 0x406F2D6: g_slice_alloc (gslice.c:836)
==2389==    by 0x406F31B: g_slice_alloc0 (gslice.c:848)
==2389==    by 0x403A8A6: g_error_new_literal (gerror.c:117)
==2389==    by 0x403AC31: g_set_error_literal (gerror.c:314)
==2389==    by 0x41AFD15: g_memory_input_stream_truncate (gmemoryinputstream.c:517)
==2389==    by 0x41BAC0F: g_seekable_truncate (gseekable.c:174)
==2389==    by 0x8049595: test_truncate (memory-input-stream.c:123)

Bug #628331.
2010-09-03 15:30:47 -04:00
Christian Persch
6320b04fe9 Plug a mem leak in gsettings test
==2530== 13 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 373 of 681
==2530==    at 0x4005BDC: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:195)
==2530==    by 0x4057094: g_malloc (gmem.c:134)
==2530==    by 0x40573DB: g_malloc_n (gmem.c:281)
==2530==    by 0x40717FC: g_strdup (gstrfuncs.c:101)
==2530==    by 0x4147F56: value_lcopy_string (gvaluetypes.c:313)
==2530==    by 0x4123F0B: g_object_get_valist (gobject.c:1643)
==2530==    by 0x41240FF: g_object_get (gobject.c:1731)
==2530==    by 0x804A4BA: test_basic (gsettings.c:28)

Bug #628331.
2010-09-03 15:29:51 -04:00
Christian Persch
e8fc3ba3d0 Plug a mem leak
Don't leak the ptr arrays in the map_sender_unique_name_to_signal_data_array
hash table.

==23440== 84 (20 direct, 64 indirect) bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 920 of 993
==23440==    at 0x4005BDC: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:195)
==23440==    by 0x4057094: g_malloc (gmem.c:134)
==23440==    by 0x406F2D6: g_slice_alloc (gslice.c:836)
==23440==    by 0x401D2D0: g_ptr_array_sized_new (garray.c:799)
==23440==    by 0x401D2AC: g_ptr_array_new (garray.c:783)
==23440==    by 0x420834A: g_dbus_connection_signal_subscribe (gdbusconnection.c:3084)

Bug #628436.
2010-09-03 15:19:22 -04:00
Christian Persch
8795f52aae Plug a mem leak
==31063== 98 (24 direct, 74 indirect) bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 946 of 1,136
==31063==    at 0x4005BDC: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:195)
==31063==    by 0x4057094: g_malloc (gmem.c:134)
==31063==    by 0x406F2D6: g_slice_alloc (gslice.c:836)
==31063==    by 0x4092383: g_variant_get_child_value (gvariant-core.c:847)
==31063==    by 0x408BE9E: g_variant_get_variant (gvariant.c:709)
==31063==    by 0x40903F5: g_variant_valist_get_nnp (gvariant.c:3767)
==31063==    by 0x40907A9: g_variant_valist_get_leaf (gvariant.c:3884)
==31063==    by 0x4090D10: g_variant_valist_get (gvariant.c:4065)
==31063==    by 0x4090E59: g_variant_valist_get (gvariant.c:4100)
==31063==    by 0x40911B6: g_variant_get_va (gvariant.c:4296)
==31063==    by 0x40910BC: g_variant_get (gvariant.c:4248)
==31063==    by 0x4208DAF: invoke_set_property_in_idle_cb (gdbusconnection.c:3676)

Bug #628346.
2010-09-03 15:16:47 -04:00
Christian Persch
1f49f3fa34 Plug a mem leak
... and use g_error_matches().

==29535== 1,360 (408 direct, 952 indirect) bytes in 17 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 1,252 of 1,264
==29535==    at 0x4005BDC: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:195)
==29535==    by 0x4057094: g_malloc (gmem.c:134)
==29535==    by 0x406F2D6: g_slice_alloc (gslice.c:836)
==29535==    by 0x406F31B: g_slice_alloc0 (gslice.c:848)
==29535==    by 0x403A751: g_error_new_valist (gerror.c:54)
==29535==    by 0x403AAD4: g_set_error (gerror.c:240)
==29535==    by 0x41C06C8: g_socket_send_message (gsocket.c:2967)
==29535==    by 0x421CB64: write_message_continue_writing (gdbusprivate.c:958)
==29535==    by 0x421CE2A: write_message_async (gdbusprivate.c:1049)
==29535==    by 0x421D4DD: maybe_write_next_message (gdbusprivate.c:1291)
==29535==    by 0x421D26B: message_written (gdbusprivate.c:1187)
==29535==    by 0x421D322: write_message_cb (gdbusprivate.c:1216)

Bug #628345.
2010-09-03 15:03:24 -04:00
Matthias Clasen
c75429d0a0 Make ordering for overridden interface properties consistent
g_object_class_list_properties tries to sort the returned list of
paramspecs by 'type depth' and param_id. But all the overridden
interface properties have a param_id of 0, so they come out in
a random order.

Bug 628253.
2010-09-03 14:54:22 -04:00
Tor Lillqvist
6ddef375c8 Recuce DLL hijack risk on Windows
Don't call LoadLibrary() on shell32.dll or kernel32.dll. kernel32.dll
is always loaded. Shell32.dll is also already loaded as glib links to
functions in it. So just call GetModuleHandle() on them.

For mlang.dll in win_iconv.c and winhttp.dll in gwinhttpvfs.c, always
try loading them from a complete path, from the Windows system
directory.

Use the "tool help" API to enumerate modules in gmodule-win32.c. It is
present in all Windows versions since Windows 2000, which is all we
support anyway. Thus no need to look that API up dynamically. Just
link to it normally. We can bin the fallback code that attempts to use
the psapi API.
2010-09-02 22:36:47 +03:00
Kjartan Maraas
54c51c73c6 Updated Norwegian bokmål translation 2010-09-02 11:56:09 +02:00
noch
b4d3acf9be Modified Armenian translation - po file 2010-09-02 12:35:41 +05:00