As we start moving documentation over from gtk-doc to gi-docgen, the
gtk-doc coverage is going to go down and things are going to start
breaking. That’s OK; we don’t need to test it any more.
Signed-off-by: Philip Withnall <pwithnall@endlessos.org>
Helps: #3037
The files here are copied from the docs-gtk-org
branch of gtk.
This adds gi-docgen to the CI Dockerfiles and ensures the new versions
(including the OS upgrades from the previous commit) are used during CI.
Helps: #3037
That means Debian Bookworm and Fedora 37.
Also rework the mingw Dockerfile to be based on the Fedora one, so that
the underlying layers can be shared. This should reduce the disk
consumption of the registry a little.
`.gitlab-ci.yml` has not been updated to use the new images in this
commit, as the images will be modified further in the following commit.
Signed-off-by: Philip Withnall <pwithnall@endlessos.org>
The C standard does not specify whether the underlying type of an enum
is signed or unsigned, and until C23 there was no way to control this
explicitly. GCC appears to make enums unsigned unless there is a
negative value among cases of the enum, in which case it becomes signed.
MSCV appears to make enums signed by default.
A bitfield of an enum type (which is not specificied in the C standard
either) behaves as if it was an instance of a numeric type with a
reduced value range. Specifically, a 'signed int val : 2;' bitfield will
have the possible values of -2, -1, 0, and 1, with the usual wraparound
behavior for the values that don't fit (although this too is
implementation-defined).
This causes the following issue, if we have:
typedef enum
{
G_ZERO,
G_ONE,
G_TWO
} GFoo;
struct _GBar
{
GFoo foo : 2;
};
and then assign bar.foo = G_TWO and read it back, it will have the
expected value of 2 (aka G_TWO) on GCC, but a value of -2 (not matching
any of the enum variants) on MSVC.
There does not seem to be any way to influence signedness of an enum
prior to C23, nor is there a 'unsigned GFoo foo : 2;' syntax. The only
remaining options seems to be never using enums in bitfields, which is
what this change implements.
This corresponds to https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gtk/-/merge_requests/6467
in GTK.
Signed-off-by: Sergey Bugaev <bugaevc@gmail.com>
This triggered a warning from the CHERI compiler since the struct contains
a `void *` but `__attribute__((aligned(8))` reduced alignment to less than
the `void *` alignment (which is 16 for Arm Morello).
Helps: https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/glib/-/issues/2842
If no error with -Werror=sign-conversion, the resulting object file
does not differ from compilation without -Werror=sign-conversion.
So the -Werror argument is now applied directly to string.c and testing.c.
Finally, the currently specific -Werror targets string-macro and
testing-macro are removed.
We can't easily use g_autofd with g_unix_open_pipe, because its
parameter is an array of two fds that both need closing. Add an inline
convenience wrapper providing the obvious semantics.
Signed-off-by: Simon McVittie <smcv@collabora.com>
g_clear_fd() is documented to be async-signal safe whenever the
fd is either negative or valid (which it should be here) and the error
is NULL (which it always is here).
Signed-off-by: Simon McVittie <smcv@collabora.com>
It's not very likely, but there is a small chance that an
incoming signal could disturb the non-blocking read calls in
g_wakeup_acknowledge, leading to a subsequent spurious wake up.
This commit addresses the problem by doing the usual EINTR
loop (which is already present on the write side incidentally)
Previously, this would loop as long as read() got the expected number of
bytes back, which is 8. That means every successful read() of the eventfd
would perform an additional syscall() as a followup.
This is not ideal because eventfd (unless used as an EFD_SEMAPHORE) will
reset the counter as part of the read(). So that means that we either do
an additional throw-away syscall() or potentially race against a producer
generating new events before this change.
Currently the GSourceList has it's own allocation plus a secondary
allocation for the GList which contains it (from GMainContext). Not only
are these a pointer chase, but they are on separate cachelines too. Without
changing the code much we can at least keep things on the same cacheline
so that the pointer chase matters less.
Since the GList becomes embedded in the GSourceList you can use a
g_queue_unlink() directly removing the link without traversing the GList
like was done before.
Furthermore, we can simplify some code with g_queue_push_tail_link()
instead of some extra branching.
I'm not aware of any platforms where this is a problem in practice, but
it's definitely nonportable and doesn't hurt to document it.
I wonder about CHERI....
This should not result in any functional changes, but will eventually
allow glib to be functional on CHERI-enabled systems such as Morello.
Helps: https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/glib/-/issues/2842
