Both are provided by libm, but `isnan()` is provided as a macro, whereas
`isfinite()` is an actual function, and hence libm has to be available
at runtime. That didn’t trivially work on FreeBSD, resulting in this
refactor.
`isfinite(x)` is equivalent to `!isnan(x) && !isinfinite(x)`. The case
of `x` being (negative or positive) infinity is already handled by the
range checks on the next line, so it’s safe to switch to `isnan()` here.
Signed-off-by: Philip Withnall <pwithnall@endlessos.org>
Rather than parsing the seconds in an ISO 8601 date/time using a pair of
floating point numbers (numerator and denominator), use two integers
instead. This avoids issues around floating point precision, and also
makes it easier to check for potential overflow from overlong inputs.
This last point means that the `isfinite()` check can be removed, as it
was covering the case where a NAN was generated, which isn’t now
possible using integer arithmetic.
Signed-off-by: Philip Withnall <pwithnall@endlessos.org>
NULL is valid return value for the g_unix_mount_get_options function
because mount options are currently provided only by libmount implementation.
However, the gio tool passes the returned value to the g_strescape function
without checking, which produces the following critical warning:
GLib-CRITICAL **: 13:47:15.294: g_strescape: assertion 'source != NULL' failed
Let's add the missing check to prevent the critical warnings.
The fiendish thing about NAN is that it never compares TRUE against
anything, so the limit checks `seconds < 0.0 || seconds >= 60.0` were
never triggering.
oss-fuzz#28473
Signed-off-by: Philip Withnall <pwithnall@endlessos.org>
These might help catch the problem in #2119 earlier on, and provide more
information about its root cause.
They should not affect behaviour in normal application usage.
Signed-off-by: Philip Withnall <pwithnall@endlessos.org>
Helps: #2119
This is technically an API break, as the following assignment may now
raise warnings in user code:
```
gchar *filename = g_osx_app_info_get_filename (app_info);
```
However, from code search it seems like the number of users of that
function is zero.
Signed-off-by: Philip Withnall <pwithnall@endlessos.org>
This command will try to execute a desktop file, before that
it will load the input as a keyfile for checking its existence
and its validity (as a keyfile).
File arguments are allowed after the desktop file.
Closes#54
Signed-off-by: Frederic Martinsons <frederic.martinsons@sigfox.com>
When this is called on the source or target, the weak notify of the
corresponding object is called without the GWeakRef being cleared.
See https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/glib/-/issues/2266 for that issue.
This means that a strong reference to these zombie objects can be
retrieved from the GWeakRefs and the previous assumption that this can't
happen was wrong. Remove the assertion for that accordingly and handle
this case.
Specifically, all signal handlers and weak notifies of the object are
already gone and must not be disconnected/removed a second time, or
otherwise memory corruption would be caused. Instead just set the
GWeakRef to NULL and handle it otherwise as if the GWeakRef didn't give
a strong reference to begin with.
Fixes https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/glib/-/issues/2265
This especially has the effect that any GWeakRefs to the object will not
necessarily be set to NULL yet if called as part of
g_object_run_dispose() and not as part of g_object_unref().
This doesn’t change the behaviour of the code, but should squash some
compiler/static analysis warnings about ‘are you sure you got the
precedence right here?’.
Coverity CID: #1159470
Signed-off-by: Philip Withnall <pwithnall@endlessos.org>
Static analysis of the call to `g_dir_new_from_dirp()` is tricky,
because the call is across library boundaries and indirected through a
vfunc map because it’s private to libglib.
Help the static analyser by adding an assertion about the input and
output values for `g_dir_new_from_dirp()`.
Signed-off-by: Philip Withnall <pwithnall@endlessos.org>
There’s no explicit guarantee that any of these functions are safe to
use on untrusted data, but it does no harm to test them.
Signed-off-by: Philip Withnall <pwithnall@endlessos.org>
It search for attribute trash::orig-path and move the input file to it.
Possibly recreating the directory of orignal path and/or overwritting
the destination.
Closes#2098
Signed-off-by: Frederic Martinsons <frederic.martinsons@sigfox.com>
gobject/tests/value.c: In function ‘test_valuearray_basic’:
gobject/tests/value.c:253:17: error: comparison of integer expressions of different signedness: ‘gint’ {aka ‘int’} and ‘guint’ {aka ‘unsigned int’}
253 | for (i = 0; i < a->n_values - 1; i++)
| ^
gobject/tests/value.c:257:17: error: comparison of integer expressions of different signedness: ‘gint’ {aka ‘int’} and ‘guint’ {aka ‘unsigned int’}
257 | for (i = 0; i < a->n_values; i++)
| ^
The `nameprep()` function in `ghostutils.c` is quite complex, and does a
lot of allocations. This means it can take a long time on long hostnames
(on the order of 10KB long). Hostnames should never be that long,
though, so impose some loose length limits.
oss-fuzz#27371
Signed-off-by: Philip Withnall <pwithnall@endlessos.org>
There were a couple of places where the return value wasn’t checked, and
hence failure could not be noticed.
Coverity CIDs: #1159435, #1159426
Signed-off-by: Philip Withnall <pwithnall@endlessos.org>
It’s possible that GLib will eventually be compiled against a version of
libc which supports `close_range()` (hence `HAVE_CLOSE_RANGE` will be
defined), but then run against an older kernel which doesn’t support it.
In this case, we want to fall back to `fdwalk()`, which should work on
such systems.
This is what cpython does: 3529718925/Python/fileutils.c (L2227)
Spotted by Allison Karlitskaya in !1688.
Signed-off-by: Philip Withnall <pwithnall@endlessos.org>
