Dealing with GParamSpec is tedious and less efficient than necessary;
property definitions should be able to either directly access a struct
field or specify the accessors pair that control a property. On top of
that, most of the property and accessor definition can be autogenerated
from simple pre-processor directives.
So, here's to you GProperty.
GProperty is a GParamSpec sub-class that encapsulates all the types
inside a single, opaque structure (to avoid leaking out implementation
details); a GProperty can access the structure member holding the value
of the property, or invoke the accessor functions passed to its
constructor. Type safety is maintained through the GType system and
without having to use GValue.
Along with GProperty, this patch introduces a series of macros for
automating the declaration and definition of property accessor functions,
and for automating the collection and lcopy of values without going
through GValue.
GObject will recognize whether a GParamSpec used to set or get
a property is really a GProperty, and thus will shortcircuit most of
the GValue-based marshalled code, preferring the direct C function
and direct argument collection instead of boxing/unboxing of GValues.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=648526
* Represents an immutable reference counted block of memory.
* This is basically the internal glib GBuffer structure exposed,
renamed, and with some additional capabilities.
* The GBytes name comes from python3's immutable 'bytes' type
* GBytes can be safely used as keys in hash tables, and have
functions for doing so: g_bytes_hash, g_bytes_equal
* GByteArray is a mutable form of GBytes, and vice versa. There
are functions for converting from one to the other efficiently:
g_bytes_unref_to_array() and g_byte_array_free_to_bytes()
* Adds g_byte_array_new_take() to support above functions
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=663291
The implementation of GValue is not public or documented. When
allocated on the stack, initializing a GValue is usually done as
documented with:
GValue value = { 0, };
There is lot code around (including WebKit) that added all the missing
fields, resulting in this ugly and non-obvious:
GValue value = { 0, { { 0 } } };
However, this doesn't play nice with -Wmissing-field-initializers for
example. Thus, G_VALUE_INIT.
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=654793http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=577231
Since we added g_object_notify_by_pspec(), an efficient way to install
and notify properties relies on storing the GParamSpec pointers inside
a static arrays, like we do for signal identifiers.
Instead of multiple calls to g_object_class_install_property(), we
should have a single function to take the static array of GParamSpecs
and iterate it.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=626919
Signed-off-by: Emmanuele Bassi <ebassi@linux.intel.com>
Since using the function pointer version muddles the memory management
requirements of language bindings, we should implement a GClosure-based
variant on top of g_object_bind_property_full().
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=622278
GBinding is a simple, opaque object that represents a binding between a
property on a GObject instance (source) and property on another GObject
instance (target).
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=348080
g_object_notify_by_pspec() will emit the "notify" signal on the given
pspec, short-circuiting the hash table lookup needed by
g_object_notify(). The suggested and documented way of using
g_object_notify_by_pspec() is similar to the way of emitting signals
with their ID.
Emission tests (with no handler attached to the notify signal) show a
10-15% speedup over using g_object_notify().
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=615425
