Calling g_signal_handlers_block/unblock/disconnect_matched with only G_SIGNAL_MATCH_ID
do not match any handlers and return 0.
Fixes: #2980
Signed-off-by: Przemyslaw Gorszkowski <pgorszkowski@igalia.com>
The use of ‘OR’ in the existing documentation suggests that the matching
is disjunctive, but it’s actually conjunctive. Clarify that in the
documentation and add a test.
Spotted while reviewing
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/glib/-/merge_requests/3376.
Signed-off-by: Philip Withnall <pwithnall@endlessos.org>
The documentation previously implicitly said in a few places that
interfaces are classed, but reading through the implementation of
`GType`, I don’t think they are. If they were, the registration of the
fundamental `G_TYPE_INTERFACE` in `gobject_init()` would specify
`G_TYPE_FLAG_CLASSED`. It only specifies `G_TYPE_FLAG_DERIVABLE`.
I think this makes sense, because you can’t subclass an interface.
Subclassing is a key property of being classed.
Tweak the `GType` tutorial to remove that implicit statement, and expand
the documentation for `G_TYPE_IS_CLASSED`.
Signed-off-by: Philip Withnall <pwithnall@endlessos.org>
Fixes: #252
‘returns TRUE on success’ is misleading for a lot of these macros, as
they are checking whether a type has a certain property. Such a check
could be successful but return `FALSE`, by the normal meaning of the
word ‘success’.
Instead, reword the docs to spell out when `TRUE` will be returned.
Signed-off-by: Philip Withnall <pwithnall@endlessos.org>
They just listed built files. Since the move to Meson, these are all
kept in a separate build directory, not the source tree, so don’t need
to be ignored.
Signed-off-by: Philip Withnall <pwithnall@endlessos.org>
They take too long and time out, and are not particularly useful to run
under valgrind because they aren’t designed to test code coverage.
Signed-off-by: Philip Withnall <pwithnall@endlessos.org>
Since commit 45b5a6c0 GSlice is just a wrapper to g_malloc0/g_free, so
there's no point to use a different implementation for UNIXes vs
windows.
This reverts commit 3b7af4dd5d.
We have to ensure that the memory location is sufficiently aligned to
store any object. This unbreaks the code for CHERI where using gsize
results in values that are only aligned to 8 bytes, but we need 16 byte
alignment for pointers. This is fully API/ABI compatible since amount
of padding before the actual allocation does not change for existing
architectures, only for CHERI.
Helps: https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/glib/-/issues/2842
In all these cases we don't really care about running the test file,
while building and basic execution it is relevant.
Also they don't support TAP at all.
Meson supports tap protocol results parsing, allowing us to track better
the tests that are running (and the ones that are actually skipped) without
manually parsing the test output.
However this also implies that using the verbose mode for a test doesn't
show its output by default (unless there are failures).
This reverts commit da7a31a052. The renaming of parameters implicitly introduced "closure" annotations in the documentation which are wrong on callbacks.
The gobject-introspection build goes through the GLib types when
generating the introspection data for GLib, but it does not include
glib-object.h, otherwise all GObject symbols would end up inside the
GLib namespace. This means we need to import the gobject-visibility.h
header inside glib-types.h. Since the header is guarded by a once
pragma, it doesn't really affect any legitimate user of the C API.
We cannot use `gvisibility_h` for different visibility header files; you
never know when you're going to refer to the variable again, and
projects might end up needing to retrieve the variable contents—like,
for instance, gobject-introspection using glib as a subproject.
This can cause a `NULL` dereference on the next line if there is no
`TypeNode` for `iface_type`, for example if `iface_type ==
G_TYPE_INVALID`.
Unlikely, but possible since this API is public.
Spotted by Coverity.
Signed-off-by: Philip Withnall <pwithnall@endlessos.org>
Coverity CID: #1501602
We can get a "-Wcast-align", if the target type that we cast to ("ct") has a
larger alignment than GTypeInstance.
That can happen on i686 architecture, if the GObject type has larger
alignment than the parent struct (or GObject). Since on i686, embeding
a "long long" or a "long double" in a struct still does not increase
the alignment beyond 4 bytes, this usually only happens when using the
__attribute__() to increase the alignment (or to have a field that has
the alignment increased).
It can happen on x86_64 when having a "long double" field.
The compiler warning is hard to avoid but not very useful, because it purely
operates on the pointer types at compile time. G_TYPE_CHECK_INSTANCE_CAST()
instead asserts (in non-optimized mode) that the pointer really points
to the expected GTypeInstance (and if that's the case, then the alignment
should be suitable already).
This is like in commit ed553e8e30 ('gtype: Eliminate -Wcast-align warnings
with G_TYPE_CHECK_INSTANCE_CAST'). But also fix the optimized code path.
With the unpatched G_TYPE_CHECK_INSTANCE_CAST() macro, the unit test would
now show the problem (with gcc-9.3.1-2.fc30.i686 or
gcc-12.2.1-4.fc37.x86_64):
$ export G_DISABLE_CAST_CHECKS=1
$ export CFLAGS='-Wcast-align=strict'
$ meson build
$ ninja -C build
...
In file included from ../gobject/gobject.h:26,
from ../gobject/gbinding.h:31,
from ../glib/glib-object.h:24,
from ../gobject/tests/objects-refcount1.c:2:
../gobject/tests/objects-refcount1.c: In function ‘my_test_dispose’:
../gobject/gtype.h:2523:42: warning: cast increases required alignment of target type [-Wcast-align]
2523 | # define _G_TYPE_CIC(ip, gt, ct) ((ct*) ip)
| ^
../gobject/gtype.h:517:66: note: in expansion of macro ‘_G_TYPE_CIC’
517 | #define G_TYPE_CHECK_INSTANCE_CAST(instance, g_type, c_type) (_G_TYPE_CIC ((instance), (g_type), c_type))
| ^~~~~~~~~~~
../gobject/tests/objects-refcount1.c:9:37: note: in expansion of macro ‘G_TYPE_CHECK_INSTANCE_CAST’
9 | #define MY_TEST(test) (G_TYPE_CHECK_INSTANCE_CAST ((test), G_TYPE_TEST, GTest))
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
../gobject/tests/objects-refcount1.c:96:10: note: in expansion of macro ‘MY_TEST’
96 | test = MY_TEST (object);
| ^~~~~~~
Instead of a plain reference count check failure that is really hard to
understand, let's be explicit, and warn that manipulating an object's
notification queue during its finalization is not allowed.
When an object is revitalized and a notify callbacks increased the reference
counter of the object, we are calling the toggle notifier twice, while it
should only happen if also the actual reference count value is 1 (after
having been decremented from 2).
If an object gets revitalized during the dispose vfunc, we need to call
toggle refs notifiers only if we had 2 references and if the object has
the toggle references enabled.
This may change in case an object notifier handler changes this status,
so do this check only after we've called the notifiers so that in case
toggle notifications are enabled afterwards we still call the handlers.
We were reading if an object has toggle references even if this was not
really relevant for the current object state, as we only need to notify
when going from 2 to 1 references, so first ensure that this is the case
and then check if we have toggle references enabled in the object.
This is a micro-optimization, for the way flags are defined, but still
an operation we can avoid in most cases.
Even though the check is likely to be relevant if the object is finalized,
it may still give some indication if called while an instance has just lost
the last reference.
So use `g_return_if_fail` for consistency with the rest of the code.
They return floating references, so that should be reflected in the
introspection annotations.
Signed-off-by: Philip Withnall <pwithnall@endlessos.org>
