GCC isn't smart enough to recognise that the assertion on the size of
N_PROPERTIES also affects the assertion on the GParamSpec array access,
so we need to coalesce the two checks into one to avoid an array-bounds
compiler warning.
Install the properties with a mixture of
g_object_class_install_properties and
g_object_class_install_properties, and verify
that finding them still works, regardless of
whether we use string literals or not.
Include the base URI in the `g_test_bug()` calls instead. This resolves
inconsistencies between the old bug base (bugzilla.gnome.org) and the
new bug base (gitlab.gnome.org). It also has the advantage that the URI
passed to `g_test_bug()` is now clickable in the code editor, rather
than being split across two locations.
See https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/glib/-/merge_requests/275#note_303175
Signed-off-by: Philip Withnall <pwithnall@endlessos.org>
gobject/tests/properties.c: In function ‘properties_get_property’:
gobject/tests/properties.c:562:17: error: comparison of integer expressions of different signedness: ‘int’ and ‘long unsigned int’
562 | for (i = 0; i < G_N_ELEMENTS (test_props); i++)
| ^
gobject/tests/properties.c:583:17: error: comparison of integer expressions of different signedness: ‘int’ and ‘long unsigned int’
583 | for (i = 0; i < G_N_ELEMENTS (test_props); i++)
| ^
This was mostly machine generated with the following command:
```
codespell \
--builtin clear,rare,usage \
--skip './po/*' --skip './.git/*' --skip './NEWS*' \
--write-changes .
```
using the latest git version of `codespell` as per [these
instructions](https://github.com/codespell-project/codespell#user-content-updating).
Then I manually checked each change using `git add -p`, made a few
manual fixups and dropped a load of incorrect changes.
There are still some outdated or loaded terms used in GLib, mostly to do
with git branch terminology. They will need to be changed later as part
of a wider migration of git terminology.
If I’ve missed anything, please file an issue!
Signed-off-by: Philip Withnall <withnall@endlessm.com>
We already have the GType with which the GValue should be initialized,
so requiring an initialized GValue is not really necessary, and it
actually complicates code that wraps GObject, by requiring the retrieval
of the GParamSpec in order to get the property type. Additionally, it
introduces a mostly unnecessary g_value_reset().
We already changed g_object_getv() to allow passing uninitialized
GValues, but this fell through the cracks.
Closes: #737
It's unnecessary, and only adds visual noise; we have been fairly
inconsistent in the past, but the semi-colon-less version clearly
dominates in the code base.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=669355
Just like g_object_notify, check for a zero ref_count in
g_object_notify_by_pspec and leave if it is 0.
This allows using functions in ->finalize() that possibly also
notify a property change on the object. Previously,
this resulted in an error from g_object_ref.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=705570
Very many testcases, some GLib tools (resource compiler, etc) and
GApplication were calling g_type_init().
Remove those uses, as they are no longer required.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=686161
Since we added g_object_notify_by_pspec(), an efficient way to install
and notify properties relies on storing the GParamSpec pointers inside
a static arrays, like we do for signal identifiers.
Instead of multiple calls to g_object_class_install_property(), we
should have a single function to take the static array of GParamSpecs
and iterate it.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=626919
Signed-off-by: Emmanuele Bassi <ebassi@linux.intel.com>
