tests/gobject/performance.c: In function ‘find_test’:
tests/gobject/performance.c:1019:17: error: comparison of integer expressions of different signedness: ‘int’ and ‘long unsigned int’
1019 | for (i = 0; i < G_N_ELEMENTS (tests); i++)
| ^
tests/gobject/performance.c: In function ‘main’:
tests/gobject/performance.c:1054:21: error: comparison of integer expressions of different signedness: ‘int’ and ‘long unsigned int’
1054 | for (i = 0; i < G_N_ELEMENTS (tests); i++)
| ^
These variables were already (correctly) accessed atomically. The
`volatile` qualifier doesn’t help with that.
Signed-off-by: Philip Withnall <pwithnall@endlessos.org>
Helps: #600
This was mostly machine generated with the following command:
```
codespell \
--builtin clear,rare,usage \
--skip './po/*' --skip './.git/*' --skip './NEWS*' \
--write-changes .
```
using the latest git version of `codespell` as per [these
instructions](https://github.com/codespell-project/codespell#user-content-updating).
Then I manually checked each change using `git add -p`, made a few
manual fixups and dropped a load of incorrect changes.
There are still some outdated or loaded terms used in GLib, mostly to do
with git branch terminology. They will need to be changed later as part
of a wider migration of git terminology.
If I’ve missed anything, please file an issue!
Signed-off-by: Philip Withnall <withnall@endlessm.com>
gen-casefold-txt.pl and gen-casemap-txt.pl are licensed under GPLv2+, so
they are not touched by this commit.
A lot of *.c files in tests/ don't have a license header.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=776504
It's unnecessary, and only adds visual noise; we have been fairly
inconsistent in the past, but the semi-colon-less version clearly
dominates in the code base.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=669355
Very many testcases, some GLib tools (resource compiler, etc) and
GApplication were calling g_type_init().
Remove those uses, as they are no longer required.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=686161
These are basic performance test for a couple of basic gobject
primitives:
* construction of simple objects. Simple is a bare gobject derived
class with no properties, signals or interfaces.
* construction of complex objects. Complex is a gobject subclass
with construct properties, normal properties, signals, and
implements an interface.
* run-time type check of complex objects
* signal emissions
Lots of care is taken to try to make the results reproducible. Each
test is run for multible "rounds", where we try to make each round be
"not too short" in order to be significant wrt timer accuracy, but
also "not to long" to make the probability of some other random event
happening on the system (interrupts, other process scheduled, etc)
during the round less likely.
The current target round time is 4 msecs, which was picked without
rigour, but seems small wrt e.g. scheduler time.
For each test we then run the calculated round size for 60 seconds,
and then report the performance based on the minimal time of one
round. The model here is that any random stuff that happens during a
round can only slow it down, there is nothing that can make it go
faster, so the minimal time is the best estimate of how fast one round
goes.
The result is not ideal, even on a "idle" system the results vary
from round to round, but the variation seems to be less than 1%.
So, any performance difference reported by this test over 1% is
probably statistically significant.
Additionally the tests can be run with or without threads being
initialized. The script tests/gobject/run-performance.sh makes
it easy to produce a performance report for the current checkout.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=557100
