Both GCC and Clang treat this as a hint that the code won’t be reached,
which helps in the cases where they might not have automatically
detected it already.
It doesn’t change any behaviour of the compiled code, other than
allowing the compiler to go off into undefined behaviour.
See
https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-8.3.0/gcc/Other-Builtins.html#index-_005f_005fbuiltin_005funreachable.
Signed-off-by: Philip Withnall <withnall@endlessm.com>
g_assert_*() give more informative failure messages, and aren’t compiled
out when building with G_DISABLE_ASSERT.
Signed-off-by: Philip Withnall <withnall@endlessm.com>
g_assert_*() give more informative failure messages, and aren’t compiled
out when building with G_DISABLE_ASSERT.
Signed-off-by: Philip Withnall <withnall@endlessm.com>
g_assert_*() give more informative failure messages, and aren’t compiled
out when building with G_DISABLE_ASSERT.
Signed-off-by: Philip Withnall <withnall@endlessm.com>
g_assert_*() give more informative failure messages, and aren’t compiled
out when building with G_DISABLE_ASSERT.
Signed-off-by: Philip Withnall <withnall@endlessm.com>
In order to allow GLib itself to be built with G_DISABLE_ASSERT defined,
we need to explicitly undefine it when building the tests, otherwise
g_test_init() turns into an abort.
Signed-off-by: Philip Withnall <withnall@endlessm.com>
Fixes: #1708
Move them next to their definitions, so they’re more likely to be kept
up to date.
This doesn’t modify any of the documentation comments at all.
Signed-off-by: Philip Withnall <withnall@endlessm.com>
Any function which requires g_quark_init() to have been called first
cannot be called before the library constructors have finished running.
In particular, this means that g_quark_from_static_string() or
g_intern_static_string() can’t be used to initialize C++ globals.
Do this, rather than adding a conditional call to g_quark_init() to all
these functions, because such a call was previously removed from the
functions to improve performance (quarks are used a lot in the
implementation of GObject for properties and signals). That’s the reason
why g_quark_init() was originally moved out to a library constructor.
Signed-off-by: Philip Withnall <withnall@endlessm.com>
Fixes: #1177
One test is for _g_win32_subst_pid_and_event().
Two tests for crashing with different exceptions (access violation
and illegal instruction).
And one test for running a debugger.
Install a Vectored Exception Handler[0]. Its sole purpose is to catch
some exceptions (access violations, stack overflows, illegal
instructions and debug breaks - by default, but it can be made to catch
any exception for which a code is known) and run a debugger in response.
This allows W32 glib applications to be run without a debugger,
but at the same time allows a debugger to be attached in case
something happens.
The debugger is run with a new console, unless an environment variable
is set to allow it to inherit the console of the crashing process.
The short list of handleable exceptions is there to ensure that
this handler won't run a debugger to "handle" utility exceptions,
such as the one that is used to communicate thread names to a debugger.
The handler is installed to be called last, and shouldn't interfere
with any user-installed handlers.
There's nothing fancy about the way it runs a debugger (it doesn't even
support unicode in paths), and it deliberately avoids using glib code.
The handler will also print a bit of information about the exception
that it caught, and even more information for well-known exceptions,
such as access violation.
The whole scheme is similar to AeDebug[1] and, in fact, the signal-event
gdb command was originally implemented for this very purpose.
[0]: https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/desktop/debug/vectored-exception-handling
[1]: https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/desktop/debug/configuring-automatic-debugging
At that point in the code, len can only be 0, 1 or 2. The code below is
a no-op if (len == 0), so the condition is pointless.
Remove it, and we should be able to achieve full branch coverage of
gbase64.c.
This should introduce no functional changes.
Signed-off-by: Philip Withnall <withnall@endlessm.com>
While I’m here, we might as well check that we output what the RFC says
we should output.
https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4648#section-10
(We do.)
Signed-off-by: Philip Withnall <withnall@endlessm.com>
Relax a precondition in g_base64_encode_step() to allow this. It’s valid
to base64 encode an empty string, as per RFC 4648.
Similarly for g_base64_decode(), although calling it with a NULL string
has never been allowed. Instead, clarify the case of calling it with an
empty string.
This includes a unit test.
Signed-off-by: Philip Withnall <withnall@endlessm.com>
Fixes: #1698
The caller needs to check this themselves in any case, so we might as
well at least follow convention in defining the precondition.
Signed-off-by: Philip Withnall <withnall@endlessm.com>
Previously pattern_coalesce incorrectly concluded that maybe type is not
present when one pattern starts with `M` and other pattern with anything
else than `M` or `m`. This is false when the other pattern is `*`, since
it includes the maybe type.
It's necessary sometimes for installed tests to be able to run with a
custom environment. For example, the gsocketclient-slow test requires an
LD_PRELOADed library to provide a slow connect() (this is to be added in
a followup commit).
Introduce a variable `@env@` into the installed test template, which we
can override as necessary when generating `.test` files, to run tests
prefixed with `/usr/bin/env <LIST OF VARIABLES>`.
As the only test that requires this currently lives in `gio/tests/`, we
are only hooking this up for that directory right now. If other tests in
future require this treatment, then the support can be extended at that
point.
The g_string_insert_len method accepts '-1' for its len parameter,
as a shorthand for strlen(val). Likewise the various convenience
wrappers around it also accept -1. This was not documented, leaving
developers to wonder why len is a gssize, instead of gsize.
Signed-off-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com>
When parsing GVariant text format strings, we do a limited form of type
inference. The algorithm for type inference for nested array child types
is not complete, however (and making it complete, at least with a naive
implementation, would make it O(N^2), which is not worth it) and so some
text format arrays were triggering an assertion failure in the error
handling code.
Fix that by making the error handling code a little more relaxed, in the
knowledge that our type inference algorithm is not complete. See the
comment added to the code.
This includes a test case, provided by oss-fuzz.
oss-fuzz#11578
Signed-off-by: Philip Withnall <withnall@endlessm.com>
And add tests.
There wasn’t actually a bug on x86_64 before, but it was making use of
undefined behaviour, and hence triggering ubsan warnings. Make the code
more explicit, and avoid undefined behaviour.
oss-fuzz#12686
Signed-off-by: Philip Withnall <withnall@endlessm.com>
__func__ is part of the C99 standard.
__FUNCTION__ is another name for __func__. Older versions of GCC
recognize only this name. However, it is not standardized.
For maximum portability, Its recommended to use __func__.
__PRETTY_FUNCTION__ is yet another name for __func__. However, in C++,
__PRETTY_FUNCTION__ contains the type signature of the function as
well as its bare name
http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Function-Names.htmlhttps://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/glib/issues/535
This uses newer methods that support more folders such as Downloads. The
Objective-C code is in a separate file, gosxutils.m.
Based on !85 by Patrick Griffis.
They were changed in 6a2cfde2 to reuse the G_MAXINT values but
parsing nexted macros is currently broken in g-i and results in wrong
values.
Add value annotations for g-i to override the values.
This also moves the annotations to the macro definitions to have
everything g-i uses in one place.
This code was a persistent source of `-fsanitize=thread` errors
when I was trying to use it on OSTree.
The problem is that while I think this code is functionally correct,
we hold a mutex during the writes, but not the reads, and TSAN (IMO
correctly) flags that.
Reading this, I don't see a reason we need a mutex at all. At the
cost of some small code duplication between posix/win32, we can just
pass the data we need down into each implementation. This ends up
being notably cleaner I think than the awkward "lock/unlock to
serialize" dance.
(Minor review changes made by Philip Withnall <withnall@endlessm.com>.)
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/glib/issues/1224
glib/deprecated/gthread-deprecated.c: In function ‘g_static_rec_mutex_init’:
glib/deprecated/gthread-deprecated.c:657:3: error: missing initializer for field ‘depth’ of ‘GStaticRecMutex’ {aka ‘const struct _GStaticRecMutex’} [-Werror=missing-field-initializers]
static const GStaticRecMutex init_mutex = G_STATIC_REC_MUTEX_INIT;
^~~~~~
In file included from glib/deprecated/gthread-deprecated.c:30:
glib/deprecated/gthread.h:161:9: note: ‘depth’ declared here
guint depth;
^~~~~