This should make it a bit easier to find the coverage report, rather
than digging through the job artifacts.
Signed-off-by: Philip Withnall <pwithnall@endlessos.org>
I haven’t tested any of them. This is entirely mechanical. I used
shellcheck 0.7.0 with default options.
Signed-off-by: Philip Withnall <withnall@endlessm.com>
While we can’t add markers to the macro implementations to cause lcov to
ignore them automatically, we can change our lcov configuration to
ignore all calls to them.
See https://github.com/linux-test-project/lcov/issues/44.
This causes all the un-takeable branches and un-reachable assertions to
be ignored by our code coverage, which bumps our statistics:
• Lines: 74.9% → 74.8%
• Functions: 82.3% → 82.3%
• Branches: 53.3% → 64.2%
The rationale is that nobody should be testing programmer error
handling, as g_return_*if_fail() are used to guard against — so it’s not
reasonable to count missed branches like that in code coverage
statistics.
Signed-off-by: Philip Withnall <withnall@endlessm.com>
See comment in !151. Using the "--initial" option of lcov we collect
the coverage of all compiled files and merge them later into the final
report. This way we can see which files are built but never executed
by the test suite.
Because the --initial switch also collects files in the ccache directory
we have to point it to the build directory instead, which in turn breaks
--no-external. Instead of using --no-external in the collection step,
filter out any files not in the source tree in the final coverage job
through a path filter.
Use lcov for both Fedora and MSYS2 to create coverage reports and add a second
ci stage which merges the coverage and creates a html report using genhtml.
In the final stage, which is only run on master, the result is published on
gitlab pages.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=795636
