Otherwise, attempting to create a GSocketConnection from the socket
will likely return the wrong type, since the protocol won't match any
of the registered subtypes.
Also add the start of a GSocket test program (from davidz).
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=627171
Makes explicit the fact that you are interacting with the individual
action rather than the group and removes potential namespace conflicts
with classes implementing the interface (like g_application_activate()
vs g_application_activate_action()).
The test case was passing a guint16 to g_object_get() for a guint
property. That's invalid on all systems, although it works (more or
less) on little endian ones. On big endian it's a total no-go.
In its previous form, g_settings_list_schemas() was not useful as a tool
to prevent aborts due to using g_settings_new() with an invalid schema
name. This is because g_settings_list_scheams() also listed relocatable
schemas, and calling g_settings_new() for those would abort just the
same as if you called it for a non-existent schema.
Modify g_settings_list_schemas() so that it only returns schemas for
which it is safe to call g_settings_new(). Add another call for sake of
completeness: g_settings_list_relocatable_schemas().
Implement the first of two features requested in the bug: when
encountering a broken .xml schema file, back out the changes in that
file and continue to parse other files.
This prevents a single broken .xml file from messing up GSettings for
everyone else.
Add a --strict option to get the old behaviour. Use this from the test
cases.
It doesn't really work right now because of a dbus-daemon(1) bug - see
the comment added in the TODO section of gdbusconnection.c. So revert
to old behavior. The downside is a lot of files in /tmp but right now
that's better than not being able to run tests in a loop.
Signed-off-by: David Zeuthen <davidz@redhat.com>
Without this fix, the ./gdbus-connection test case occasionally fails, see
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=629945#c5
like this
/gdbus/connection/basic: OK
/gdbus/connection/life-cycle: **
ERROR:gdbus-connection.c:223:test_connection_life_cycle: assertion failed:
(!quit_mainloop_fired)
cleaning up bus with pid 21794
Aborted (core dumped)
because the callback didn't happen on the same thread as where we are
running the loop.
Signed-off-by: David Zeuthen <davidz@redhat.com>
Since we make message buses come and go, we need to ensure that the
singleton connection instance goes away before attempting to call
g_bus_get_sync() or similar.
Signed-off-by: David Zeuthen <davidz@redhat.com>
When under load, a one second timeout is just not enough. This can be
observed by e.g. restarting a CPU- and IO-intensive application like a
web browser with many tabs while running the test cases. Therefore,
bump the timeouts to 30 seconds.
Signed-off-by: David Zeuthen <davidz@redhat.com>
Turns out that GDBusWorker will issue callbacks (in its own thread)
even after g_dbus_worker_stop() has been called. This would rarely
happen (and unreffing a connection is even rarer) so only saw this bug
occasionally when running the gdbus-connection test case in a loop.
Fix up this issue by maintaining a set of GDBusConnection objects that
are currently "alive" and do nothing in the callbacks if the passed
user_data pointer is not in this set.
Also attempted to fix up a race condition with
_g_object_wait_for_single_ref_do() and its use of GObject toggle
references - for now, just resort to busy waiting, thereby
sidestepping the toggle reference mess altogether.
Signed-off-by: David Zeuthen <davidz@redhat.com>
These functions are meant to replace the read_until() flavour, with the
following improvements:
- consistency between the synchronous and asynchronous versions as to
if the separator character is read (it never is).
- support for using a nul byte as a separator character by way of
addition of a length parameter which allows stop_chars to be treated
as a byte array rather than a nul-terminated string.
The read_until() functions are not yet formally deprecated, but a note
has been added to the documentation warning not to use them as they will
be in the future.
This is bug #584284.
The root problem is with GObject - for now, just work around it in
GDBus. Also include a test-case. See
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=627724
for more information.
Signed-off-by: David Zeuthen <davidz@redhat.com>
Ryan pointed out that it's safe to do this because we have the
G_DBUS_SEND_MESSAGE_FLAGS_PRESERVE_SERIAL flag and that it simplifies
how filter functions work.
Signed-off-by: David Zeuthen <davidz@redhat.com>
Otherwise things probably won't work in a garbage-collected world
(consider the trivial GC that never collects garbage).
This commit breaks GDBusServer ABI. No known released software is
using this code.
Signed-off-by: David Zeuthen <davidz@redhat.com>
Rework filter functions as per
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=624546#c8
This commit breaks ABI. However, this ABI break affects only
applications using filter functions. The only known user of is dconf.
Signed-off-by: David Zeuthen <davidz@redhat.com>
Don't actually use this yet as that will require a couple of
modifications to the filter function signature. This is part of the
bug-fix for
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=624546#c8
Signed-off-by: David Zeuthen <davidz@redhat.com>
==23341== 65 bytes in 3 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 927 of 1,020
==23341== at 0x4005BDC: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:195)
==23341== by 0x4057094: g_malloc (gmem.c:134)
==23341== by 0x40573DB: g_malloc_n (gmem.c:281)
==23341== by 0x40717FC: g_strdup (gstrfuncs.c:101)
==23341== by 0x4147F56: value_lcopy_string (gvaluetypes.c:313)
==23341== by 0x4123F0B: g_object_get_valist (gobject.c:1643)
==23341== by 0x41240FF: g_object_get (gobject.c:1731)
==23341== by 0x804C39E: test_basic (gdbus-proxy.c:522)
Bug #628331.
==23341== 85 (24 direct, 61 indirect) bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 900 of 971
==23341== at 0x4005BDC: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:195)
==23341== by 0x4057094: g_malloc (gmem.c:134)
==23341== by 0x406F2D6: g_slice_alloc (gslice.c:836)
==23341== by 0x406F31B: g_slice_alloc0 (gslice.c:848)
==23341== by 0x403A751: g_error_new_valist (gerror.c:54)
==23341== by 0x403AAD4: g_set_error (gerror.c:240)
==23341== by 0x420B807: decode_method_reply (gdbusconnection.c:4774)
==23341== by 0x420C2BA: g_dbus_connection_call_sync (gdbusconnection.c:5188)
==23341== by 0x421B7C9: g_dbus_proxy_call_sync (gdbusproxy.c:2477)
==23341== by 0x804BD89: test_bogus_method_return (gdbus-proxy.c:430)
Bug #628331.
==29535== 56 (24 direct, 32 indirect) bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 1,112 of 1,264
==29535== at 0x4005BDC: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:195)
==29535== by 0x4057094: g_malloc (gmem.c:134)
==29535== by 0x406F2D6: g_slice_alloc (gslice.c:836)
==29535== by 0x406F364: g_slice_copy (gslice.c:858)
==29535== by 0x403A9B2: g_error_copy (gerror.c:160)
==29535== by 0x42066D3: initable_init (gdbusconnection.c:2314)
==29535== by 0x41A73E5: g_initable_init (ginitable.c:105)
==29535== by 0x41A7587: g_initable_new_valist (ginitable.c:218)
==29535== by 0x41A742A: g_initable_new (ginitable.c:138)
==29535== by 0x4206DCC: g_dbus_connection_new_for_address_sync (gdbusconnection.c:2585)
==29535== by 0x804D63A: test_nonce_tcp (gdbus-peer.c:1229)
==29535== 107 (24 direct, 83 indirect) bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 1,188 of 1,264
==29535== at 0x4005BDC: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:195)
==29535== by 0x4057094: g_malloc (gmem.c:134)
==29535== by 0x406F2D6: g_slice_alloc (gslice.c:836)
==29535== by 0x406F364: g_slice_copy (gslice.c:858)
==29535== by 0x403A9B2: g_error_copy (gerror.c:160)
==29535== by 0x42066D3: initable_init (gdbusconnection.c:2314)
==29535== by 0x41A73E5: g_initable_init (ginitable.c:105)
==29535== by 0x41A7587: g_initable_new_valist (ginitable.c:218)
==29535== by 0x41A742A: g_initable_new (ginitable.c:138)
==29535== by 0x4206DCC: g_dbus_connection_new_for_address_sync (gdbusconnection.c:2585)
==29535== by 0x804D8E8: test_nonce_tcp (gdbus-peer.c:1259)
==29535== 112 (24 direct, 88 indirect) bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 1,193 of 1,264
==29535== at 0x4005BDC: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:195)
==29535== by 0x4057094: g_malloc (gmem.c:134)
==29535== by 0x406F2D6: g_slice_alloc (gslice.c:836)
==29535== by 0x406F364: g_slice_copy (gslice.c:858)
==29535== by 0x403A9B2: g_error_copy (gerror.c:160)
==29535== by 0x42066D3: initable_init (gdbusconnection.c:2314)
==29535== by 0x41A73E5: g_initable_init (ginitable.c:105)
==29535== by 0x41A7587: g_initable_new_valist (ginitable.c:218)
==29535== by 0x41A742A: g_initable_new (ginitable.c:138)
==29535== by 0x4206DCC: g_dbus_connection_new_for_address_sync (gdbusconnection.c:2585)
==29535== by 0x804D79A: test_nonce_tcp (gdbus-peer.c:1248)
==29535== 73 (24 direct, 49 indirect) bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 1,152 of 1,264
==29535== at 0x4005BDC: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:195)
==29535== by 0x4057094: g_malloc (gmem.c:134)
==29535== by 0x406F2D6: g_slice_alloc (gslice.c:836)
==29535== by 0x406F364: g_slice_copy (gslice.c:858)
==29535== by 0x403A9B2: g_error_copy (gerror.c:160)
==29535== by 0x42066D3: initable_init (gdbusconnection.c:2314)
==29535== by 0x41A73E5: g_initable_init (ginitable.c:105)
==29535== by 0x41A7587: g_initable_new_valist (ginitable.c:218)
==29535== by 0x41A742A: g_initable_new (ginitable.c:138)
==29535== by 0x4206DCC: g_dbus_connection_new_for_address_sync (gdbusconnection.c:2585)
==29535== by 0x804C6CE: test_peer (gdbus-peer.c:803)
Bug #628331.
==6793== 32 (24 direct, 8 indirect) bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 779 of 1,423
==6793== at 0x4005BDC: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:195)
==6793== by 0x4057094: g_malloc (gmem.c:134)
==6793== by 0x406F2D6: g_slice_alloc (gslice.c:836)
==6793== by 0x406F31B: g_slice_alloc0 (gslice.c:848)
==6793== by 0x413D5BB: g_type_create_instance (gtype.c:1867)
==6793== by 0x412372A: g_object_constructor (gobject.c:1482)
==6793== by 0x4122E1D: g_object_newv (gobject.c:1266)
==6793== by 0x4122B93: g_object_new (gobject.c:1178)
==6793== by 0x41DB4F9: g_unix_fd_list_new (gunixfdlist.c:159)
==6793== by 0x804AADD: test_interface_method_call (gdbus-peer.c:172)
Bug #628331.
==4616== 46 (32 direct, 14 indirect) bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 193 of 305
==4616== at 0x4005BDC: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:195)
==4616== by 0x4057094: g_malloc (gmem.c:134)
==4616== by 0x406F2D6: g_slice_alloc (gslice.c:836)
==4616== by 0x406F31B: g_slice_alloc0 (gslice.c:848)
==4616== by 0x413D5BB: g_type_create_instance (gtype.c:1867)
==4616== by 0x412372A: g_object_constructor (gobject.c:1482)
==4616== by 0x4123147: g_object_newv (gobject.c:1347)
==4616== by 0x41236BB: g_object_new_valist (gobject.c:1463)
==4616== by 0x4122BB4: g_object_new (gobject.c:1181)
==4616== by 0x41B2D0F: g_network_address_new (gnetworkaddress.c:262)
==4616== by 0x8048A70: test_basic (network-address.c:10)
Bug #628331.
==14059== 96 bytes in 2 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 520 of 543
==14059== at 0x4005BDC: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:195)
==14059== by 0x4057094: g_malloc (gmem.c:134)
==14059== by 0x406F2D6: g_slice_alloc (gslice.c:836)
==14059== by 0x406F31B: g_slice_alloc0 (gslice.c:848)
==14059== by 0x41385BB: g_type_create_instance (gtype.c:1867)
==14059== by 0x411E72A: g_object_constructor (gobject.c:1482)
==14059== by 0x411DE1D: g_object_newv (gobject.c:1266)
==14059== by 0x411DB93: g_object_new (gobject.c:1178)
==14059== by 0x42296AF: _g_local_file_input_stream_new (glocalfileinputstream.c:152)
==14059== by 0x422281F: g_local_file_read (glocalfile.c:1322)
==14059== by 0x418A8A9: open_read_async_thread (gfile.c:5050)
==14059== by 0x41B71BB: run_in_thread (gsimpleasyncresult.c:853)
==14059== by 0x41A5FBC: io_job_thread (gioscheduler.c:181)
==14059== by 0x407DCDE: g_thread_pool_thread_proxy (gthreadpool.c:314)
==14059== by 0x407C6B0: g_thread_create_proxy (gthread.c:1897)
==14059== by 0x57D918: start_thread (pthread_create.c:301)
==14059== by 0x4C6CBD: clone (clone.S:133)
Bug #628331.
==2464== 80 (16 direct, 64 indirect) bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 515 of 547
==2464== at 0x4005BDC: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:195)
==2464== by 0x4057094: g_malloc (gmem.c:134)
==2464== by 0x406F2D6: g_slice_alloc (gslice.c:836)
==2464== by 0x406F31B: g_slice_alloc0 (gslice.c:848)
==2464== by 0x41385BB: g_type_create_instance (gtype.c:1867)
==2464== by 0x411E72A: g_object_constructor (gobject.c:1482)
==2464== by 0x411DE1D: g_object_newv (gobject.c:1266)
==2464== by 0x411DB93: g_object_new (gobject.c:1178)
==2464== by 0x4220D74: _g_local_file_new (glocalfile.c:310)
==2464== by 0x422C897: g_local_vfs_get_file_for_path (glocalvfs.c:84)
==2464== by 0x41CA91C: g_vfs_get_file_for_path (gvfs.c:94)
==2464== by 0x418C1B6: g_file_new_for_path (gfile.c:5898)
==2464== by 0x8049509: test1_thread (contexts.c:110)
==2464== 80 (16 direct, 64 indirect) bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 516 of 547
==2464== at 0x4005BDC: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:195)
==2464== by 0x4057094: g_malloc (gmem.c:134)
==2464== by 0x406F2D6: g_slice_alloc (gslice.c:836)
==2464== by 0x406F31B: g_slice_alloc0 (gslice.c:848)
==2464== by 0x41385BB: g_type_create_instance (gtype.c:1867)
==2464== by 0x411E72A: g_object_constructor (gobject.c:1482)
==2464== by 0x411DE1D: g_object_newv (gobject.c:1266)
==2464== by 0x411DB93: g_object_new (gobject.c:1178)
==2464== by 0x4220D74: _g_local_file_new (glocalfile.c:310)
==2464== by 0x422C897: g_local_vfs_get_file_for_path (glocalvfs.c:84)
==2464== by 0x41CA91C: g_vfs_get_file_for_path (gvfs.c:94)
==2464== by 0x418C1B6: g_file_new_for_path (gfile.c:5898)
==2464== by 0x804964D: test_context_independence (contexts.c:144)
Bug #628331.
==2429== 49 (24 direct, 25 indirect) bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 276 of 355
==2429== at 0x4005BDC: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:195)
==2429== by 0x4057094: g_malloc (gmem.c:134)
==2429== by 0x406F2D6: g_slice_alloc (gslice.c:836)
==2429== by 0x406F31B: g_slice_alloc0 (gslice.c:848)
==2429== by 0x403A8A6: g_error_new_literal (gerror.c:117)
==2429== by 0x403AC31: g_set_error_literal (gerror.c:314)
==2429== by 0x4175525: g_buffered_input_stream_read_byte (gbufferedinputstream.c:880)
==2429== by 0x804A21A: test_read_byte (buffered-input-stream.c:153)
Bug #628331.
==2428== 256 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 591 of 604
==2428== at 0x4005CD2: realloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:476)
==2428== by 0x40571A5: g_realloc (gmem.c:181)
==2428== by 0x4075287: g_string_maybe_expand (gstring.c:395)
==2428== by 0x40760D8: g_string_insert_c (gstring.c:1049)
==2428== by 0x4074D41: g_string_append_c_inline (gstring.h:153)
==2428== by 0x4075B3C: g_string_append_uri_escaped (gstring.c:822)
==2428== by 0x41A46AC: g_icon_to_string_tokenized (gicon.c:164)
==2428== by 0x41A498F: g_icon_to_string (gicon.c:252)
==2428== by 0x8049E1A: test_g_icon_serialize (g-icon.c:222)
Bug #628331.
==12763== 16,777,215 bytes in 1 blocks are possibly lost in loss record 357 of 357
==12763== at 0x4004F1B: calloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:418)
==12763== by 0x405711D: g_malloc0 (gmem.c:157)
==12763== by 0x8048ED6: test_basic (data-output-stream.c:40)
Bug #628331.
==2426== 45,034 bytes in 4,094 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 358 of 361
==2426== at 0x4005BDC: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:195)
==2426== by 0x4057094: g_malloc (gmem.c:134)
==2426== by 0x40573DB: g_malloc_n (gmem.c:281)
==2426== by 0x4071ABD: g_strconcat (gstrfuncs.c:315)
==2426== by 0x804916A: test_read_lines (data-output-stream.c:83)
Bug #628331.
==12351== 45,045 bytes in 4,095 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 377 of 380
==12351== at 0x4005BDC: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:195)
==12351== by 0x4057094: g_malloc (gmem.c:134)
==12351== by 0x40573DB: g_malloc_n (gmem.c:281)
==12351== by 0x4071ABD: g_strconcat (gstrfuncs.c:315)
==12351== by 0x8049811: test_read_lines (data-input-stream.c:99)
Bug #628331.
==2415== 45,045 bytes in 4,095 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 393 of 399
==2415== at 0x4005BDC: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:195)
==2415== by 0x4057094: g_malloc (gmem.c:134)
==2415== by 0x417FC29: g_data_input_stream_read_line (gdatainputstream.c:797)
==2415== by 0x8049874: test_read_lines (data-input-stream.c:111)
==12088== 360 bytes in 40 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 368 of 381
==12088== at 0x4005BDC: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:195)
==12088== by 0x4057094: g_malloc (gmem.c:134)
==12088== by 0x417FF4C: g_data_input_stream_read_until (gdatainputstream.c:914)
==12088== by 0x8049B6F: test_read_until (data-input-stream.c:182)
Bug #628331.
==2415== 165 (72 direct, 93 indirect) bytes in 3 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 373 of 399
==2415== at 0x4005BDC: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:195)
==2415== by 0x4057094: g_malloc (gmem.c:134)
==2415== by 0x406F2D6: g_slice_alloc (gslice.c:836)
==2415== by 0x406F31B: g_slice_alloc0 (gslice.c:848)
==2415== by 0x403A8A6: g_error_new_literal (gerror.c:117)
==2415== by 0x403AC31: g_set_error_literal (gerror.c:314)
==2415== by 0x417ED29: read_data (gdatainputstream.c:309)
==2415== by 0x417EE9D: g_data_input_stream_read_byte (gdatainputstream.c:344)
==2415== by 0x8049DEC: test_data_array (data-input-stream.c:263)
Bug #628331.
==10395== 80 (24 direct, 56 indirect) bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 529 of 561
==10395== at 0x4005BDC: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:195)
==10395== by 0x4057094: g_malloc (gmem.c:134)
==10395== by 0x406F2D6: g_slice_alloc (gslice.c:836)
==10395== by 0x406F31B: g_slice_alloc0 (gslice.c:848)
==10395== by 0x403A751: g_error_new_valist (gerror.c:54)
==10395== by 0x403AAD4: g_set_error (gerror.c:240)
==10395== by 0x4230328: _g_local_file_output_stream_create (glocalfileoutputstream.c:628)
==10395== by 0x4227A04: g_local_file_create_readwrite (glocalfile.c:1388)
==10395== by 0x418974C: g_file_create_readwrite (gfile.c:1784)
==10395== by 0x8049FCD: test_g_file_create_readwrite (readwrite.c:187)
Bug #628331.
==8564== 24,000,000 bytes in 6 blocks are possibly lost in loss record 592 of 594
==8564== at 0x4005BDC: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:195)
==8564== by 0x4057094: g_malloc (gmem.c:134)
==8564== by 0x804AA37: test_corruption (converter-stream.c:589)
==8564== by 0x804B05B: test_roundtrip (converter-stream.c:652)
==9459== 25,165,824 bytes in 6 blocks are possibly lost in loss record 593 of 594
==9459== at 0x4005CD2: realloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:476)
==9459== by 0x40571A5: g_realloc (gmem.c:181)
==9459== by 0x41B08A3: array_resize (gmemoryoutputstream.c:501)
==9459== by 0x41B0A5D: g_memory_output_stream_write (gmemoryoutputstream.c:578)
==9459== by 0x41B57EF: g_output_stream_write (goutputstream.c:216)
==9459== by 0x41B591B: g_output_stream_write_all (goutputstream.c:268)
==9459== by 0x417D617: flush_buffer (gconverteroutputstream.c:359)
==9459== by 0x417D958: g_converter_output_stream_write (gconverteroutputstream.c:502)
==9459== by 0x41B5D7F: g_output_stream_real_splice (goutputstream.c:428)
==9459== by 0x41B5C6C: g_output_stream_splice (goutputstream.c:380)
==9459== by 0x804AB10: test_corruption (converter-stream.c:600)
==9785== 25,165,824 bytes in 6 blocks are possibly lost in loss record 592 of 592
==9785== at 0x4005CD2: realloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:476)
==9785== by 0x40571A5: g_realloc (gmem.c:181)
==9785== by 0x41B08A3: array_resize (gmemoryoutputstream.c:501)
==9785== by 0x41B0A5D: g_memory_output_stream_write (gmemoryoutputstream.c:578)
==9785== by 0x41B5D7F: g_output_stream_real_splice (goutputstream.c:428)
==9785== by 0x41B5C6C: g_output_stream_splice (goutputstream.c:380)
==9785== by 0x804ADF1: test_corruption (converter-stream.c:622)
==9785== by 0x804B06C: test_roundtrip (converter-stream.c:652)
Bug #628331.
==7540== 487 (64 direct, 423 indirect) bytes in 2 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 597 of 615
==7540== at 0x4005BDC: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:195)
==7540== by 0x4057094: g_malloc (gmem.c:134)
==7540== by 0x406F2D6: g_slice_alloc (gslice.c:836)
==7540== by 0x406F31B: g_slice_alloc0 (gslice.c:848)
==7540== by 0x413D5BB: g_type_create_instance (gtype.c:1867)
==7540== by 0x412372A: g_object_constructor (gobject.c:1482)
==7540== by 0x4123147: g_object_newv (gobject.c:1347)
==7540== by 0x41236BB: g_object_new_valist (gobject.c:1463)
==7540== by 0x41A756E: g_initable_new_valist (ginitable.c:214)
==7540== by 0x41A743E: g_initable_new (ginitable.c:138)
==7540== by 0x417B67A: g_charset_converter_new (gcharsetconverter.c:215)
==7540== by 0x804B043: test_charset (converter-stream.c:675)
Bug #628331.
==2396== 168 (92 direct, 76 indirect) bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 598 of 625
==2396== at 0x4005BDC: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:195)
==2396== by 0x4057094: g_malloc (gmem.c:134)
==2396== by 0x406F2D6: g_slice_alloc (gslice.c:836)
==2396== by 0x406F31B: g_slice_alloc0 (gslice.c:848)
==2396== by 0x413D5BB: g_type_create_instance (gtype.c:1867)
==2396== by 0x412372A: g_object_constructor (gobject.c:1482)
==2396== by 0x4123147: g_object_newv (gobject.c:1347)
==2396== by 0x41236BB: g_object_new_valist (gobject.c:1463)
==2396== by 0x4122BB4: g_object_new (gobject.c:1181)
==2396== by 0x417C54D: g_converter_input_stream_new (gconverterinputstream.c:204)
==2396== by 0x804A53E: test_compressor (converter-stream.c:484)
Bug #628331.
==2396== 66 (24 direct, 42 indirect) bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 565 of 625
==2396== at 0x4005BDC: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:195)
==2396== by 0x4057094: g_malloc (gmem.c:134)
==2396== by 0x406F2D6: g_slice_alloc (gslice.c:836)
==2396== by 0x406F31B: g_slice_alloc0 (gslice.c:848)
==2396== by 0x403A8A6: g_error_new_literal (gerror.c:117)
==2396== by 0x403AC31: g_set_error_literal (gerror.c:314)
==2396== by 0x417BA38: g_charset_converter_convert (gcharsetconverter.c:344)
==2396== by 0x417BF67: g_converter_convert (gconverter.c:174)
==2396== by 0x417C9EB: g_converter_input_stream_read (gconverterinputstream.c:403)
==2396== by 0x41A7A17: g_input_stream_read (ginputstream.c:204)
==2396== by 0x41A7B43: g_input_stream_read_all (ginputstream.c:256)
==2396== by 0x804B0E4: test_charset (converter-stream.c:682)
Bug #628331.
==2396== 39 (24 direct, 15 indirect) bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 398 of 625
==2396== at 0x4005BDC: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:195)
==2396== by 0x4057094: g_malloc (gmem.c:134)
==2396== by 0x406F2D6: g_slice_alloc (gslice.c:836)
==2396== by 0x406F31B: g_slice_alloc0 (gslice.c:848)
==2396== by 0x403A8A6: g_error_new_literal (gerror.c:117)
==2396== by 0x403AC31: g_set_error_literal (gerror.c:314)
==2396== by 0x80498F7: g_compressor_converter_convert (converter-stream.c:244)
==2396== by 0x417BF67: g_converter_convert (gconverter.c:174)
==2396== by 0x417CBDE: g_converter_input_stream_read (gconverterinputstream.c:460)
==2396== by 0x41A7A17: g_input_stream_read (ginputstream.c:204)
==2396== by 0x804A832: test_compressor (converter-stream.c:545)
Bug #628331.
==2395== 64 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 381 of 407
==2395== at 0x4005BDC: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:195)
==2395== by 0x4005C66: realloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:476)
==2395== by 0x40571A5: g_realloc (gmem.c:181)
==2395== by 0x401D670: g_ptr_array_maybe_expand (garray.c:968)
==2395== by 0x401DD0B: g_ptr_array_add (garray.c:1225)
==2395== by 0x4199AA9: g_file_info_list_attributes (gfileinfo.c:646)
==2395== by 0x80491CE: test_g_file_info (g-file-info.c:76)
==2395== 132 (64 direct, 68 indirect) bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 396 of 407
==2395== at 0x4005BDC: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:195)
==2395== by 0x4005C66: realloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:476)
==2395== by 0x40571A5: g_realloc (gmem.c:181)
==2395== by 0x401D670: g_ptr_array_maybe_expand (garray.c:968)
==2395== by 0x401DD0B: g_ptr_array_add (garray.c:1225)
==2395== by 0x4199A82: g_file_info_list_attributes (gfileinfo.c:642)
==2395== by 0x80492B7: test_g_file_info (g-file-info.c:86)
Bug #628331.
And use g_assert_[no_]error().
==2392== 49 (24 direct, 25 indirect) bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 451 of 573
==2392== at 0x4005BDC: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:195)
==2392== by 0x4057094: g_malloc (gmem.c:134)
==2392== by 0x406F2D6: g_slice_alloc (gslice.c:836)
==2392== by 0x406F31B: g_slice_alloc0 (gslice.c:848)
==2392== by 0x403A8A6: g_error_new_literal (gerror.c:117)
==2392== by 0x403AC31: g_set_error_literal (gerror.c:314)
==2392== by 0x41B7619: g_output_stream_set_pending (goutputstream.c:1198)
==2392== by 0x41B5799: g_output_stream_write (goutputstream.c:210)
==2392== by 0x41B590B: g_output_stream_write_all (goutputstream.c:268)
==2392== by 0x8049B54: verify_iostream (readwrite.c:110)
Bug #628331.
==2392== 38 (16 direct, 22 indirect) bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 369 of 573
==2392== at 0x4005BDC: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:195)
==2392== by 0x4057094: g_malloc (gmem.c:134)
==2392== by 0x406F2D6: g_slice_alloc (gslice.c:836)
==2392== by 0x406F31B: g_slice_alloc0 (gslice.c:848)
==2392== by 0x413D5BB: g_type_create_instance (gtype.c:1867)
==2392== by 0x412372A: g_object_constructor (gobject.c:1482)
==2392== by 0x4122E1D: g_object_newv (gobject.c:1266)
==2392== by 0x4122B93: g_object_new (gobject.c:1178)
==2392== by 0x4225D74: _g_local_file_new (glocalfile.c:310)
==2392== by 0x4231897: g_local_vfs_get_file_for_path (glocalvfs.c:84)
==2392== by 0x41CF91C: g_vfs_get_file_for_path (gvfs.c:94)
==2392== by 0x41911B6: g_file_new_for_path (gfile.c:5898)
==2392== by 0x804A2B9: test_g_file_replace_readwrite (readwrite.c:235)
Bug #628331.
==2392== 38 (16 direct, 22 indirect) bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 368 of 573
==2392== at 0x4005BDC: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:195)
==2392== by 0x4057094: g_malloc (gmem.c:134)
==2392== by 0x406F2D6: g_slice_alloc (gslice.c:836)
==2392== by 0x406F31B: g_slice_alloc0 (gslice.c:848)
==2392== by 0x413D5BB: g_type_create_instance (gtype.c:1867)
==2392== by 0x412372A: g_object_constructor (gobject.c:1482)
==2392== by 0x4122E1D: g_object_newv (gobject.c:1266)
==2392== by 0x4122B93: g_object_new (gobject.c:1178)
==2392== by 0x4225D74: _g_local_file_new (glocalfile.c:310)
==2392== by 0x4231897: g_local_vfs_get_file_for_path (glocalvfs.c:84)
==2392== by 0x41CF91C: g_vfs_get_file_for_path (gvfs.c:94)
==2392== by 0x41911B6: g_file_new_for_path (gfile.c:5898)
==2392== by 0x8049F23: test_g_file_create_readwrite (readwrite.c:183)
Bug #628331.
==2392== 38 (16 direct, 22 indirect) bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 367 of 573
==2392== at 0x4005BDC: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:195)
==2392== by 0x4057094: g_malloc (gmem.c:134)
==2392== by 0x406F2D6: g_slice_alloc (gslice.c:836)
==2392== by 0x406F31B: g_slice_alloc0 (gslice.c:848)
==2392== by 0x413D5BB: g_type_create_instance (gtype.c:1867)
==2392== by 0x412372A: g_object_constructor (gobject.c:1482)
==2392== by 0x4122E1D: g_object_newv (gobject.c:1266)
==2392== by 0x4122B93: g_object_new (gobject.c:1178)
==2392== by 0x4225D74: _g_local_file_new (glocalfile.c:310)
==2392== by 0x4231897: g_local_vfs_get_file_for_path (glocalvfs.c:84)
==2392== by 0x41CF91C: g_vfs_get_file_for_path (gvfs.c:94)
==2392== by 0x41911B6: g_file_new_for_path (gfile.c:5898)
==2392== by 0x8049E30: test_g_file_open_readwrite (readwrite.c:153)
Bug #628331.
==2389== 84 (44 direct, 40 indirect) bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 299 of 315
==2389== at 0x4005BDC: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:195)
==2389== by 0x4057094: g_malloc (gmem.c:134)
==2389== by 0x406F2D6: g_slice_alloc (gslice.c:836)
==2389== by 0x406F31B: g_slice_alloc0 (gslice.c:848)
==2389== by 0x413D5BB: g_type_create_instance (gtype.c:1867)
==2389== by 0x412372A: g_object_constructor (gobject.c:1482)
==2389== by 0x4122E1D: g_object_newv (gobject.c:1266)
==2389== by 0x4122B93: g_object_new (gobject.c:1178)
==2389== by 0x41AF54C: g_memory_input_stream_new (gmemoryinputstream.c:199)
==2389== by 0x8048BD1: test_read_chunks (memory-input-stream.c:40)
Bug #628331.
==2389== 59 (24 direct, 35 indirect) bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 290 of 315
==2389== at 0x4005BDC: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:195)
==2389== by 0x4057094: g_malloc (gmem.c:134)
==2389== by 0x406F2D6: g_slice_alloc (gslice.c:836)
==2389== by 0x406F31B: g_slice_alloc0 (gslice.c:848)
==2389== by 0x403A8A6: g_error_new_literal (gerror.c:117)
==2389== by 0x403AC31: g_set_error_literal (gerror.c:314)
==2389== by 0x41AFD15: g_memory_input_stream_truncate (gmemoryinputstream.c:517)
==2389== by 0x41BAC0F: g_seekable_truncate (gseekable.c:174)
==2389== by 0x8049595: test_truncate (memory-input-stream.c:123)
Bug #628331.
==2530== 13 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 373 of 681
==2530== at 0x4005BDC: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:195)
==2530== by 0x4057094: g_malloc (gmem.c:134)
==2530== by 0x40573DB: g_malloc_n (gmem.c:281)
==2530== by 0x40717FC: g_strdup (gstrfuncs.c:101)
==2530== by 0x4147F56: value_lcopy_string (gvaluetypes.c:313)
==2530== by 0x4123F0B: g_object_get_valist (gobject.c:1643)
==2530== by 0x41240FF: g_object_get (gobject.c:1731)
==2530== by 0x804A4BA: test_basic (gsettings.c:28)
Bug #628331.
Allow modifying a GDBusMessage in a filter function and also add tests
for this. This breaks API but leaves ABI (almost) intact - at least
dconf's GSettings backend (the only big user I know of) will keep
working.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=624546
Signed-off-by: David Zeuthen <davidz@redhat.com>
==26538== 145 (24 direct, 121 indirect) bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 765 of 790
==26538== at 0x4005BDC: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:195)
==26538== by 0x405233C: g_malloc (gmem.c:134)
==26538== by 0x406A57E: g_slice_alloc (gslice.c:836)
==26538== by 0x406A60C: g_slice_copy (gslice.c:858)
==26538== by 0x4035C5A: g_error_copy (gerror.c:160)
==26538== by 0x41B6387: g_simple_async_result_set_from_error (gsimpleasyncresult.c:638)
==26538== by 0x41FCDEB: g_dbus_connection_call_done (gdbusconnection.c:4808)
==26538== by 0x41B682E: g_simple_async_result_complete (gsimpleasyncresult.c:762)
==26538== by 0x41B686A: complete_in_idle_cb (gsimpleasyncresult.c:772)
==26538== by 0x404DA7C: g_idle_dispatch (gmain.c:4224)
==26538== by 0x4049FCD: g_main_dispatch (gmain.c:2119)
==26538== by 0x404B2C1: g_main_context_dispatch (gmain.c:2672)
==26538== by 0x404B716: g_main_context_iterate (gmain.c:2750)
==26538== by 0x404BE7F: g_main_loop_run (gmain.c:2958)
==26538== by 0x804B5CC: test_connection_send (gdbus-connection.c:407)
==26538== by 0x4073D04: test_case_run (gtestutils.c:1174)
Bug #627187.
==25403== 49 (24 direct, 25 indirect) bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 603 of 787
==25403== at 0x4005BDC: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:195)
==25403== by 0x405233C: g_malloc (gmem.c:134)
==25403== by 0x406A57E: g_slice_alloc (gslice.c:836)
==25403== by 0x406A5C3: g_slice_alloc0 (gslice.c:848)
==25403== by 0x4035B4E: g_error_new_literal (gerror.c:117)
==25403== by 0x4035ED9: g_set_error_literal (gerror.c:314)
==25403== by 0x41F6434: g_dbus_connection_close_sync (gdbusconnection.c:1284)
==25403== by 0x804A861: test_connection_life_cycle (gdbus-connection.c:158)
==25403== by 0x4073D04: test_case_run (gtestutils.c:1174)
==25403== by 0x4073FC2: g_test_run_suite_internal (gtestutils.c:1223)
==25403== by 0x4074077: g_test_run_suite_internal (gtestutils.c:1233)
==25403== by 0x4074077: g_test_run_suite_internal (gtestutils.c:1233)
==25403== by 0x40741FB: g_test_run_suite (gtestutils.c:1274)
==25403== by 0x40733E5: g_test_run (gtestutils.c:877)
==25403== by 0x804DC92: main (gdbus-connection.c:1024)
Bug #627187.
Add GZlibCompressor:file-info property. If it contains a non-NULL
GFileInfo, and the compressor is in GZIP mode, the filename and
modification time from the file info are written to the GZIP header
in the output data.
Add GZlibDeompressor:file-info property. If the decompressor is in GZIP
mode, and the GZIP data contains a GZIP header, the filename and
modification time are read from it, stored in a GFileInfo, and the
file-info property is notified.
Bug #617691.
If sending a lot of data and/or the other peer is not reading it, then
socket buffers can overflow. This is communicated from the kernel by
returning EAGAIN. In GIO, it is modelled by g_output_stream_write()
and g_socket_send_message() returning G_IO_ERROR_WOULD_BLOCK.
It is also problematic that that we're using synchronous IO in the
shared GDBus IO thread. It means that one GDBusConnection can lock up
others.
It turns out that by porting from g_output_stream_write() to
g_output_stream_write_async() we fix the EAGAIN issue. For GSocket, we
still need to handle things manually (by creating a GSource) as
g_socket_send_message() is used.
We check the new behavior in Michael's producer/consumer test case (at
/gdbus/overflow in gdbus-peer.c) added in the last commit.
Also add a test case that sends and receives a 20 MiB message.
Also add a new `transport' G_DBUS_DEBUG option so it is easy to
inspect partial writes:
$ G_DBUS_DEBUG=transport ./gdbus-connection -p /gdbus/connection/large_message
[...]
========================================================================
GDBus-debug:Transport:
>>>> WROTE 128000 bytes of message with serial 4 and
size 20971669 from offset 0 on a GSocketOutputStream
========================================================================
GDBus-debug:Transport:
>>>> WROTE 128000 bytes of message with serial 4 and
size 20971669 from offset 128000 on a GSocketOutputStream
========================================================================
GDBus-debug:Transport:
>>>> WROTE 128000 bytes of message with serial 4 and
size 20971669 from offset 256000 on a GSocketOutputStream
[...]
========================================================================
GDBus-debug:Transport:
>>>> WROTE 43669 bytes of message with serial 4 and
size 20971669 from offset 20928000 on a GSocketOutputStream
[...]
========================================================================
GDBus-debug:Transport:
<<<< READ 16 bytes of message with serial 3 and
size 20971620 to offset 0 from a GSocketInputStream
========================================================================
GDBus-debug:Transport:
<<<< READ 15984 bytes of message with serial 3 and
size 20971620 to offset 16 from a GSocketInputStream
========================================================================
GDBus-debug:Transport:
<<<< READ 16000 bytes of message with serial 3 and
size 20971620 to offset 16000 from a GSocketInputStream
[...]
========================================================================
GDBus-debug:Transport:
<<<< READ 144000 bytes of message with serial 3 and
size 20971620 to offset 20720000 from a GSocketInputStream
========================================================================
GDBus-debug:Transport:
<<<< READ 107620 bytes of message with serial 3 and
size 20971620 to offset 20864000 from a GSocketInputStream
OK
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=626748
Signed-off-by: David Zeuthen <davidz@redhat.com>
GSocket has a timeout flag now, but when using GSocketClient there was
no way to set the timeout until after connecting (or failing). Fix
that by adding a timeout property to GSocketClient.
The GClosure API is a bit funky (and badly documented), and requires
you to set a marshaller on the closure, and the marshaller has an
implicit 'this' argument, and the caller is reponsible for unsetting
the values after invoking the closure.
I've added some calls of the _with_closures variants to the
gdbus-names test now.
