mirror of
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/glib.git
synced 2024-10-30 11:06:26 +01:00
47fc75155c
Since upgrading to Debian Bookworm in 13c359536, `clang-format-14` is
what’s available in the CI image.
This should fix the style-check-advisory CI job.
Signed-off-by: Philip Withnall <pwithnall@endlessos.org>
33 lines
1.3 KiB
Bash
Executable File
33 lines
1.3 KiB
Bash
Executable File
#!/bin/bash
|
||
|
||
set -e
|
||
|
||
ancestor_horizon=28 # days (4 weeks)
|
||
|
||
# Wrap everything in a subshell so we can propagate the exit status.
|
||
(
|
||
|
||
source .gitlab-ci/search-common-ancestor.sh
|
||
|
||
git diff -U0 --no-color "${newest_common_ancestor_sha}" | .gitlab-ci/clang-format-diff.py -binary "clang-format-14" -p1
|
||
|
||
)
|
||
exit_status=$?
|
||
|
||
# The style check is not infallible. The clang-format configuration cannot
|
||
# perfectly describe GLib’s coding style: in particular, it cannot align
|
||
# function arguments. The documented coding style for GLib takes priority over
|
||
# clang-format suggestions. Hopefully we can eventually improve clang-format to
|
||
# be configurable enough for our coding style. That’s why this CI check is OK
|
||
# to fail: the idea is that people can look through the output and ignore it if
|
||
# it’s wrong. (That situation can also happen if someone touches pre-existing
|
||
# badly formatted code and it doesn’t make sense to tidy up the wider coding
|
||
# style with the changes they’re making.)
|
||
echo ""
|
||
echo "Note that clang-format output is advisory and cannot always match the GLib coding style, documented at"
|
||
echo " https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gtk/blob/HEAD/docs/CODING-STYLE.md"
|
||
echo "Warnings from this tool can be ignored in favour of the documented coding style,"
|
||
echo "or in favour of matching the style of existing surrounding code."
|
||
|
||
exit ${exit_status}
|