Mesa/U_Revert-spirv-Implement-OpCopyObject-and-OpCopyLogica.patch
2020-04-03 08:47:54 +00:00

53 lines
2.0 KiB
Diff

From 68f325b256d96dca923f6c7d84bc6faf43911245 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jason Ekstrand <jason@jlekstrand.net>
Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2020 12:40:34 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] Revert "spirv: Implement OpCopyObject and OpCopyLogical as
blind copies"
This reverts commit 7a53e67816ed9baf7d825ed60ee59f0c05f9df48.
---
src/compiler/spirv/spirv_to_nir.c | 26 +++-----------------------
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/compiler/spirv/spirv_to_nir.c b/src/compiler/spirv/spirv_to_nir.c
index a60b1cba1bd..61abc727278 100644
--- a/src/compiler/spirv/spirv_to_nir.c
+++ b/src/compiler/spirv/spirv_to_nir.c
@@ -3553,30 +3553,10 @@ vtn_handle_composite(struct vtn_builder *b, SpvOp opcode,
w + 5, count - 5);
break;
+ case SpvOpCopyLogical:
case SpvOpCopyObject:
- case SpvOpCopyLogical: {
- struct vtn_value *src = vtn_untyped_value(b, w[3]);
- struct vtn_value *dst = vtn_push_value(b, w[2], src->value_type);
- if (opcode == SpvOpCopyObject) {
- vtn_fail_if(dst->type->id != src->type->id,
- "Result Type of OpCopyObject must equal Operand type");
- } else {
- assert(opcode == SpvOpCopyLogical);
- /* The logical type matching rules should guarantee we have exactly
- * the same GLSL type which means that, if it's an SSA value, we
- * don't actually need to clone it; we can just copy it blind.
- */
- vtn_fail_if(dst->type->type != src->type->type,
- "Result Type of OpCopyLogical must logically match "
- "the Operand type");
- }
- struct vtn_value src_copy = *src;
- src_copy.name = dst->name;
- src_copy.decoration = dst->decoration;
- src_copy.type = dst->type;
- *dst = src_copy;
- return;
- }
+ ssa = vtn_composite_copy(b, vtn_ssa_value(b, w[3]));
+ break;
default:
vtn_fail_with_opcode("unknown composite operation", opcode);
--
2.16.4