pool/doomsday
SHA256
17
0
Fork 2
Code Issues Pull Requests 1 Activity

Add package in leap-16.0 #1

Manually merged
jengelh merged 2 commits from new-in-leap-16.0 into leap-16.0 2026-02-07 13:29:53 +01:00
Conversation 17 Commits 2 Files Changed 3 +82 -2
eroca commented 2026-01-20 14:53:03 +01:00
Owner
Copy Link

This empty PR enables the review process. Please review the full sources from the newly created branch.

This empty PR enables the review process. Please review the full sources from the newly created branch.
eroca added 1 commit 2026-01-20 14:53:04 +01:00
Add package in leap-16.0 8e44287d58
eroca added 1 commit 2026-01-20 14:53:04 +01:00
Add package in leap-16.0 8e44287d58
eroca requested review from legaldb 2026-01-20 14:53:05 +01:00
autogits_workflow_pr_bot requested review from maintenance-release-review 2026-01-20 14:53:29 +01:00
autogits_workflow_pr_bot requested review from opensuse-review 2026-01-20 14:53:30 +01:00
eroca commented 2026-01-20 14:53:52 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

Requested on https://progress.opensuse.org/issues/195083

Requested on https://progress.opensuse.org/issues/195083
opensuse-review commented 2026-01-20 14:58:19 +01:00
Member
Copy Link

Review by opensuse-review represents a group of reviewers: alarrosa, anag, atartamo, bigironman, darix, dimstar, dmach, jdsn, jengelh, mcalabkova, mstrigl, nkrapp, oertel, RBrownSUSE, simotek, smithfarm .

Do not use standard review interface to review on behalf of the group.
To accept the review on behalf of the group, create the following comment: @opensuse-review: approve.
To request changes on behalf of the group, create the following comment: @opensuse-review: decline followed with lines justifying the decision.
Future edits of the comments are ignored, a new comment is required to change the review state.

Submitter is member of this review group, hence they are excluded from being one of the reviewers here

Review by opensuse-review represents a group of reviewers: alarrosa, anag, atartamo, bigironman, darix, dimstar, dmach, jdsn, jengelh, mcalabkova, mstrigl, nkrapp, oertel, RBrownSUSE, simotek, smithfarm . Do **not** use standard review interface to review on behalf of the group. To accept the review on behalf of the group, create the following comment: `@opensuse-review: approve`. To request changes on behalf of the group, create the following comment: `@opensuse-review: decline` followed with lines justifying the decision. Future edits of the comments are ignored, a new comment is required to change the review state. Submitter is member of this review group, hence they are excluded from being one of the reviewers here
maintenance-release-review commented 2026-01-20 14:59:39 +01:00
First-time contributor
Copy Link

Review by maintenance-release-review represents a group of reviewers: abergmann, amattiazzo, bfilho, cmatos, crazybyte, emanuelecappello, gsonnu, maintenance-robot, mauriziogalli, mbozicevic, mimi_vx, mschnitzer, msmeissn, pluskalm, rfrohl, slemke .

Do not use standard review interface to review on behalf of the group.
To accept the review on behalf of the group, create the following comment: @maintenance-release-review: approve.
To request changes on behalf of the group, create the following comment: @maintenance-release-review: decline followed with lines justifying the decision.
Future edits of the comments are ignored, a new comment is required to change the review state.

Review by maintenance-release-review represents a group of reviewers: abergmann, amattiazzo, bfilho, cmatos, crazybyte, emanuelecappello, gsonnu, maintenance-robot, mauriziogalli, mbozicevic, mimi_vx, mschnitzer, msmeissn, pluskalm, rfrohl, slemke . Do **not** use standard review interface to review on behalf of the group. To accept the review on behalf of the group, create the following comment: `@maintenance-release-review: approve`. To request changes on behalf of the group, create the following comment: `@maintenance-release-review: decline` followed with lines justifying the decision. Future edits of the comments are ignored, a new comment is required to change the review state.
legaldb commented 2026-01-20 15:07:47 +01:00
Member
Copy Link

Legal reviewed as acceptable:

Accepted because of no significant difference (440559)
Legal reviewed as [acceptable](https://legaldb.suse.de/reviews/details/498771): ``` Accepted because of no significant difference (440559) ```
report.md
4.5 KiB
legaldb approved these changes 2026-01-20 15:07:48 +01:00
Dismissed
rfrohl commented 2026-01-26 21:12:41 +01:00
First-time contributor
Copy Link

@eroca I think there is something wrong in the sources, see [0]:

broken: ERROR:root:the _scmsync.obsinfo file must not be part of the git repository

Might also be me, but for products/PackageHub!356 the build worked.

[0] https://build.opensuse.org/project/show/openSUSE:Backports:SLE-16.0:PullRequest:357

@eroca I think there is something wrong in the sources, see [0]: > broken: ERROR:root:the _scmsync.obsinfo file must not be part of the git repository Might also be me, but for products/PackageHub!356 the build worked. [0] https://build.opensuse.org/project/show/openSUSE:Backports:SLE-16.0:PullRequest:357
eroca force-pushed new-in-leap-16.0 from 8e44287d58 to cde05937d9 2026-01-26 21:33:53 +01:00 Compare
autogits_workflow_pr_bot requested review from legaldb 2026-01-26 21:34:34 +01:00
eroca force-pushed new-in-leap-16.0 from cde05937d9 to f0e517b74f 2026-01-26 21:38:06 +01:00 Compare
eroca commented 2026-01-26 21:41:41 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@rfrohl: should be ok now, without the offending files.

@rfrohl: should be ok now, without the offending files.
🎉 1
maintenance-release-review commented 2026-01-26 21:43:02 +01:00
First-time contributor
Copy Link

Review by maintenance-release-review represents a group of reviewers: abergmann, amattiazzo, bfilho, cmatos, crazybyte, emanuelecappello, gsonnu, maintenance-robot, mauriziogalli, mbozicevic, mimi_vx, mschnitzer, msmeissn, pluskalm, rfrohl, slemke .

Do not use standard review interface to review on behalf of the group.
To accept the review on behalf of the group, create the following comment: @maintenance-release-review: approve.
To request changes on behalf of the group, create the following comment: @maintenance-release-review: decline followed with lines justifying the decision.
Future edits of the comments are ignored, a new comment is required to change the review state.

Review by maintenance-release-review represents a group of reviewers: abergmann, amattiazzo, bfilho, cmatos, crazybyte, emanuelecappello, gsonnu, maintenance-robot, mauriziogalli, mbozicevic, mimi_vx, mschnitzer, msmeissn, pluskalm, rfrohl, slemke . Do **not** use standard review interface to review on behalf of the group. To accept the review on behalf of the group, create the following comment: `@maintenance-release-review: approve`. To request changes on behalf of the group, create the following comment: `@maintenance-release-review: decline` followed with lines justifying the decision. Future edits of the comments are ignored, a new comment is required to change the review state.
opensuse-review commented 2026-01-26 21:44:12 +01:00
Member
Copy Link

Review by opensuse-review represents a group of reviewers: alarrosa, anag, atartamo, bigironman, darix, dimstar, dmach, jdsn, jengelh, mcalabkova, mstrigl, nkrapp, oertel, RBrownSUSE, simotek, smithfarm .

Do not use standard review interface to review on behalf of the group.
To accept the review on behalf of the group, create the following comment: @opensuse-review: approve.
To request changes on behalf of the group, create the following comment: @opensuse-review: decline followed with lines justifying the decision.
Future edits of the comments are ignored, a new comment is required to change the review state.

Submitter is member of this review group, hence they are excluded from being one of the reviewers here

Review by opensuse-review represents a group of reviewers: alarrosa, anag, atartamo, bigironman, darix, dimstar, dmach, jdsn, jengelh, mcalabkova, mstrigl, nkrapp, oertel, RBrownSUSE, simotek, smithfarm . Do **not** use standard review interface to review on behalf of the group. To accept the review on behalf of the group, create the following comment: `@opensuse-review: approve`. To request changes on behalf of the group, create the following comment: `@opensuse-review: decline` followed with lines justifying the decision. Future edits of the comments are ignored, a new comment is required to change the review state. Submitter is member of this review group, hence they are excluded from being one of the reviewers here
legaldb commented 2026-01-26 21:55:57 +01:00
Member
Copy Link

Legal reviewed as acceptable:

Accepted because of no significant difference (501450)
Legal reviewed as [acceptable](https://legaldb.suse.de/reviews/details/501453): ``` Accepted because of no significant difference (501450) ```
report.md
4.5 KiB
legaldb approved these changes 2026-01-26 21:55:58 +01:00
Dismissed
rfrohl commented 2026-01-27 09:59:18 +01:00
First-time contributor
Copy Link

Thanks

Thanks
oertel commented 2026-01-27 17:50:48 +01:00
First-time contributor
Copy Link

@opensuse-review : approve

LGTM

@opensuse-review : approve LGTM
oertel commented 2026-01-27 17:50:49 +01:00
First-time contributor
Copy Link

merge ok

merge ok
opensuse-review approved these changes 2026-01-27 17:55:20 +01:00
Dismissed
opensuse-review left a comment
Member
Copy Link

oertel approved a review on behalf of opensuse-review

oertel approved a review on behalf of opensuse-review
rfrohl commented 2026-02-06 20:27:10 +01:00
First-time contributor
Copy Link

@eroca Could you update the PR according to that comment next week: products/PackageHub#357 (comment)

@eroca Could you update the PR according to that comment next week: https://src.opensuse.org/products/PackageHub/pulls/357#issuecomment-85748
eroca force-pushed new-in-leap-16.0 from f0e517b74f to d81ae2d923 2026-02-07 13:27:06 +01:00 Compare
eroca dismissed legaldb's review 2026-02-07 13:27:06 +01:00
Reason:

New commits pushed, approval review dismissed automatically according to repository settings

eroca dismissed opensuse-review's review 2026-02-07 13:27:06 +01:00
Reason:

New commits pushed, approval review dismissed automatically according to repository settings

autogits_workflow_pr_bot requested review from legaldb 2026-02-07 13:27:34 +01:00
autogits_workflow_pr_bot requested review from opensuse-review 2026-02-07 13:27:34 +01:00
jengelh manually merged commit d81ae2d923 into leap-16.0 2026-02-07 13:29:53 +01:00
eroca commented 2026-02-07 13:34:12 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@rfrohl: replaced with PR #3

@rfrohl: replaced with PR #3
👍 1
Sign in to join this conversation.
Reviewers
No Reviewers
maintenance-release-review
legaldb
opensuse-review
Labels
Clear labels
legaldb
Critical Priority
Critical legaldb priority
Archived
legaldb
High Priority
2
High legaldb priority
legaldb
Normal Priority
1
Normal legaldb priority
No Label
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Assignees
Clear assignees
adamm_super adrianSuSE autobuild-owner autobuild-review autogits_workflow_pr_bot bigironman dirkmueller eroca factory_bot gitea_test legaldb lkocman-factory maxlin_factory opensuse-review packagehub-review smithfarm
No Assignees
6 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: pool/doomsday#1
Delete Branch "new-in-leap-16.0"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?