pool/exim
SHA256
17
0
Fork 2
Code Issues Pull Requests 1 Activity

Update to version from factory which fixes CVE-2025-53881 (bsc#1246457) #2

Manually merged
dimstar_suse merged 2 commits from factory into leap-16.0 2025-12-10 10:20:54 +01:00
Conversation 9 Commits 2 Files Changed 3 +13 -6
bigironman commented 2025-12-09 16:47:23 +01:00
Owner
Copy Link

Update to version from factory which fixes CVE-2025-53881 (bsc#1246457)

Update to version from factory which fixes CVE-2025-53881 (bsc#1246457)
bigironman added 2 commits 2025-12-09 16:47:23 +01:00
- Fix potential security issue with logfile rotation CVE-2025-53881 (bsc#1246457) 0d0f71576f 
OBS-URL: https://build.opensuse.org/package/show/server:mail/exim?expand=0&rev=305
Accepting request 1311049 from server:mail aa2daa7cec 
Forwarded request #1307168 from bigironman

- Fix potential security issue with logfile rotation CVE-2025-53881 (bsc#1246457)

OBS-URL: https://build.opensuse.org/request/show/1311049
OBS-URL: https://build.opensuse.org/package/show/openSUSE:Factory/exim?expand=0&rev=88
autogits_workflow_pr_bot requested review from legaldb 2025-12-09 16:47:49 +01:00
autogits_workflow_pr_bot requested review from maintenance-release-review 2025-12-09 16:47:49 +01:00
autogits_workflow_pr_bot requested review from opensuse-review 2025-12-09 16:47:49 +01:00
maintenance-release-review commented 2025-12-09 16:47:50 +01:00
First-time contributor
Copy Link

Review by maintenance-release-review represents a group of reviewers: abergmann, amattiazzo, bfilho, cmatos, crazybyte, emanuelecappello, gsonnu, maintenance-robot, mauriziogalli, mbozicevic, mimi_vx, mschnitzer, msmeissn, pluskalm, rfrohl, slemke .

Do not use standard review interface to review on behalf of the group.
To accept the review on behalf of the group, create the following comment: @maintenance-release-review: approve.
To request changes on behalf of the group, create the following comment: @maintenance-release-review: decline followed with lines justifying the decision.
Future edits of the comments are ignored, a new comment is required to change the review state.

Review by maintenance-release-review represents a group of reviewers: abergmann, amattiazzo, bfilho, cmatos, crazybyte, emanuelecappello, gsonnu, maintenance-robot, mauriziogalli, mbozicevic, mimi_vx, mschnitzer, msmeissn, pluskalm, rfrohl, slemke . Do **not** use standard review interface to review on behalf of the group. To accept the review on behalf of the group, create the following comment: `@maintenance-release-review: approve`. To request changes on behalf of the group, create the following comment: `@maintenance-release-review: decline` followed with lines justifying the decision. Future edits of the comments are ignored, a new comment is required to change the review state.
opensuse-review commented 2025-12-09 16:49:45 +01:00
Member
Copy Link

Review by opensuse-review represents a group of reviewers: alarrosa, anag, atartamo, darix, dimstar, dmach, eroca, jdsn, jengelh, mcalabkova, mstrigl, nkrapp, oertel, RBrownSUSE, simotek, smithfarm .

Do not use standard review interface to review on behalf of the group.
To accept the review on behalf of the group, create the following comment: @opensuse-review: approve.
To request changes on behalf of the group, create the following comment: @opensuse-review: decline followed with lines justifying the decision.
Future edits of the comments are ignored, a new comment is required to change the review state.

Submitter is member of this review group, hence they are excluded from being one of the reviewers here

Review by opensuse-review represents a group of reviewers: alarrosa, anag, atartamo, darix, dimstar, dmach, eroca, jdsn, jengelh, mcalabkova, mstrigl, nkrapp, oertel, RBrownSUSE, simotek, smithfarm . Do **not** use standard review interface to review on behalf of the group. To accept the review on behalf of the group, create the following comment: `@opensuse-review: approve`. To request changes on behalf of the group, create the following comment: `@opensuse-review: decline` followed with lines justifying the decision. Future edits of the comments are ignored, a new comment is required to change the review state. Submitter is member of this review group, hence they are excluded from being one of the reviewers here
legaldb commented 2025-12-09 17:00:31 +01:00
Member
Copy Link

Legal reviewed as acceptable_by_lawyer:

Accepted because previously reviewed under the same license (476647)
Legal reviewed as [acceptable_by_lawyer](https://legaldb.suse.de/reviews/details/492767): ``` Accepted because previously reviewed under the same license (476647) ```
report.md
1.4 KiB
legaldb approved these changes 2025-12-09 17:00:31 +01:00
rfrohl commented 2025-12-09 17:59:55 +01:00
First-time contributor
Copy Link

@maintenance-release-review: approve
merge ok

@maintenance-release-review: approve merge ok
maintenance-release-review approved these changes 2025-12-09 18:08:34 +01:00
maintenance-release-review left a comment
First-time contributor
Copy Link

rfrohl approved a review on behalf of maintenance-release-review

rfrohl approved a review on behalf of maintenance-release-review
oertel commented 2025-12-09 19:22:02 +01:00
First-time contributor
Copy Link

@opensuse-review : approve

LGTM

@opensuse-review : approve LGTM
oertel commented 2025-12-09 19:22:03 +01:00
First-time contributor
Copy Link

merge ok

merge ok
opensuse-review approved these changes 2025-12-09 19:31:24 +01:00
opensuse-review left a comment
Member
Copy Link

oertel approved a review on behalf of opensuse-review

oertel approved a review on behalf of opensuse-review
dimstar_suse manually merged commit aa2daa7cec into leap-16.0 2025-12-10 10:20:54 +01:00
Sign in to join this conversation.
Reviewers
No Reviewers
legaldb
maintenance-release-review
opensuse-review
Labels
Clear labels
legaldb
Critical Priority
Critical legaldb priority
Archived
legaldb
High Priority
2
High legaldb priority
legaldb
Normal Priority
1
Normal legaldb priority
No Label
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Assignees
Clear assignees
adamm_super adrianSuSE autobuild-owner autobuild-review autogits_workflow_pr_bot bigironman dirkmueller eroca factory_bot gitea_test legaldb lkocman-factory maxlin_factory opensuse-review packagehub-review smithfarm
No Assignees
6 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: pool/exim#2
Delete Branch "factory"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?