gcc7/gcc7-aarch64-untyped_call.patch
Richard Biener aac8915c8c - Add gcc7-aarch64-bsc1214052.patch to fix -fstack-protector issues
with variable length stack allocations on aarch64.
  Fixes CVE-2023-4039.  [bsc#1214052]
- Add gcc7-aarch64-untyped_call.patch to fix issue with __builtin_apply
- Add gcc7-lra-elim.patch to fix internal compiler error when forming
  paired loads and stores on aarch64.

OBS-URL: https://build.opensuse.org/package/show/devel:gcc/gcc7?expand=0&rev=240
2023-09-12 17:52:19 +00:00

64 lines
2.3 KiB
Diff

From 6787268a289bdbc32920b13b4697eaf756f9f7e0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Richard Sandiford <richard.sandiford@arm.com>
Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2023 16:15:10 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] aarch64: Fix return register handling in untyped_call
To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
While working on another patch, I hit a problem with the aarch64
expansion of untyped_call. The expander emits the usual:
(set (mem ...) (reg resN))
instructions to store the result registers to memory, but it didn't
say in RTL where those resN results came from. This eventually led
to a failure of gcc.dg/torture/stackalign/builtin-return-2.c,
via regrename.
This patch turns the untyped call from a plain call to a call_value,
to represent that the call returns (or might return) a useful value.
The patch also uses a PARALLEL return rtx to represent all the possible
return registers.
gcc/
* config/aarch64/aarch64.md (untyped_call): Emit a call_value
rather than a call. List each possible destination register
in the call pattern.
---
gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.md | 20 +++++++++++++++++++-
1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.md b/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.md
index 90f9ee658c5..97d27677985 100644
--- a/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.md
+++ b/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.md
@@ -934,7 +934,25 @@
{
int i;
- emit_call_insn (gen_call (operands[0], const0_rtx, NULL));
+ /* Generate a PARALLEL that contains all of the register results.
+ The offsets are somewhat arbitrary, since we don't know the
+ actual return type. The main thing we need to avoid is having
+ overlapping byte ranges, since those might give the impression
+ that two registers are known to have data in common. */
+ rtvec rets = rtvec_alloc (XVECLEN (operands[2], 0));
+ unsigned HOST_WIDE_INT offset = 0;
+ for (i = 0; i < XVECLEN (operands[2], 0); i++)
+ {
+ rtx reg = SET_SRC (XVECEXP (operands[2], 0, i));
+ gcc_assert (REG_P (reg));
+ rtx offset_rtx = gen_int_mode (offset, Pmode);
+ rtx piece = gen_rtx_EXPR_LIST (VOIDmode, reg, offset_rtx);
+ RTVEC_ELT (rets, i) = piece;
+ offset += GET_MODE_SIZE (GET_MODE (reg));
+ }
+ rtx ret = gen_rtx_PARALLEL (VOIDmode, rets);
+
+ emit_call_insn (gen_call_value (ret, operands[0], const0_rtx, NULL));
for (i = 0; i < XVECLEN (operands[2], 0); i++)
{
--
2.35.3