fc4d8845bb
* gdb-container-rh-pkg.patch
- Patches added (bsc#1207712):
* gdb-testsuite-add-gdb.suse-debranding.exp.patch
- Patches added (test-case fix):
* gdb-testsuite-fix-gdb.dwarf2-dw2-dir-file-name.exp-w.patch
- Patches added (fedora patch fixup):
* fixup-gdb-test-dw2-aranges.patch
- Patches added (master backports):
* gdb-testsuite-add-xfail-in-gdb.arch-i386-pkru.exp.patch
* gdb-testsuite-add-xfail-in-gdb.python-py-record-btra.patch
* gdb-testsuite-factor-out-proc-linux_kernel_version.patch
* gdb-testsuite-fix-gdb.base-infoline-reloc-main-from-.patch
* gdb-testsuite-fix-gdb.base-nested-subp-2-3-.exp-with.patch
* gdb-testsuite-fix-gdb.threads-schedlock.exp-on-fast-.patch
* gdb-testsuite-handle-missing-.note.gnu-stack.patch
* gdb-testsuite-simplify-gdb.arch-amd64-disp-step-avx..patch
* gdb-testsuite-fix-gdb.threads-schedlock.exp-for-gcc-.patch
* gdb-testsuite-add-xfail-case-in-gdb.python-py-record.patch
* add-elfcompress_zstd.patch
* binutils-gdb-support-zstd-compressed-debug-section.patch
* fix-gdb-build-elf-support-check-lzstd.patch
- Patches removed (dropped by fedora):
* gdb-test-ivy-bridge.patch
- Disable "BuildRequires: %{gcc}-fortran" for SLE-11.
- Maintenance script qa-local.sh:
* Add SLE-11 to configs.
* Build with --no-verify.
- Maintenance script qa.sh:
* Add -sle11.
OBS-URL: https://build.opensuse.org/package/show/devel:gcc/gdb?expand=0&rev=347
69 lines
1.9 KiB
Diff
69 lines
1.9 KiB
Diff
From f168a48adf97a36c88c65a075b42e6b7083063df Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
|
|
From: Tom de Vries <tdevries@suse.de>
|
|
Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2023 11:16:02 +0100
|
|
Subject: [PATCH] [gdb/testsuite] Fix gdb.threads/schedlock.exp for gcc 4.8.5
|
|
|
|
Since commit 9af467b8240 ("[gdb/testsuite] Fix gdb.threads/schedlock.exp on
|
|
fast cpu"), the test-case fails for gcc 4.8.5.
|
|
|
|
The problem is that for gcc 4.8.5, the commit turned a two-line loop:
|
|
...
|
|
(gdb) next
|
|
78 while (*myp > 0)
|
|
(gdb) next
|
|
81 MAYBE_CALL_SOME_FUNCTION(); (*myp) ++;
|
|
(gdb) next
|
|
78 while (*myp > 0)
|
|
...
|
|
into a three-line loop:
|
|
...
|
|
(gdb) next
|
|
83 MAYBE_CALL_SOME_FUNCTION(); (*myp) ++;
|
|
(gdb) next
|
|
84 cnt++;
|
|
(gdb) next
|
|
85 }
|
|
(gdb) next
|
|
83 MAYBE_CALL_SOME_FUNCTION(); (*myp) ++;
|
|
(gdb)
|
|
...
|
|
and the test-case doesn't expect this.
|
|
|
|
Fix this by reverting back to the original loop shape as much as possible by:
|
|
- removing the cnt++ line
|
|
- replacing "while (1)" with "while (one)", where one is a volatile variable
|
|
set to 1.
|
|
|
|
Tested on x86_64-linux, using compilers:
|
|
- gcc 4.8.5, 7.5.0, 12.2.1
|
|
- clang 4.0.1, 13.0.1
|
|
---
|
|
gdb/testsuite/gdb.threads/schedlock.c | 5 ++---
|
|
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
|
|
|
|
diff --git a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.threads/schedlock.c b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.threads/schedlock.c
|
|
index 9859885b1a3..af3ca3e4c87 100644
|
|
--- a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.threads/schedlock.c
|
|
+++ b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.threads/schedlock.c
|
|
@@ -75,13 +75,12 @@ volatile int call_function = 0;
|
|
void *thread_function(void *arg) {
|
|
int my_number = (long) arg;
|
|
unsigned long long int *myp = (unsigned long long int *) &args[my_number];
|
|
- volatile unsigned int cnt = 0;
|
|
+ volatile unsigned int one = 1;
|
|
|
|
- while (1)
|
|
+ while (one)
|
|
{
|
|
/* schedlock.exp: main loop. */
|
|
MAYBE_CALL_SOME_FUNCTION(); (*myp) ++;
|
|
- cnt++;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
pthread_exit(NULL);
|
|
|
|
base-commit: 4d69e6ec1a8ddd008f34af363dab73c014823074
|
|
--
|
|
2.35.3
|
|
|