gdb/gdb-testsuite-fix-gdb.guile-scm-type.exp-with-gcc-4.8.patch
Tom de Vries 67695ab596 - Patches added (backports from trunk):
* gdb-testsuite-add-gdb.opt-break-on-_exit.exp.patch
  * gdb-tdep-rs6000-don-t-skip-system-call-in-skip_prologue.patch
  * gdb-testsuite-fix-stepi-test-cases-with-unix-m32-fpie-pie.patch
  * gdb-testsuite-fix-assembly-comments-in-gdb.dwarf2-clang-debug-names.exp.tcl.patch
  * gdb-doc-fix-print-inferior-events-default.patch
  * gdb-testsuite-fix-gdb.guile-scm-type.exp-with-gcc-4.8.patch
  * gdb-testsuite-add-gdb.arch-ppc64-break-on-_exit.exp.patch
  * gdb-testsuite-don-t-error-when-trying-to-unset-last_spawn_tty_name.patch
  * gdb-exp-improve-error-reading-variable-message.patch
  * fix-gdb.base-sigstep.exp-test-for-ppc.patch
  * gdb-testsuite-fix-regexp-in-gdb.base-foll-vfork.exp.patch
- Patches added (backports from ml):
  * gdb-testsuite-disable-inferior-output-in-gdb.base-foll-vfork.exp.patch
- Maintenance script qa.sh:
  - Add -m32/-pie to known clean configs.
  - Add kfail for PR28467.

OBS-URL: https://build.opensuse.org/package/show/devel:gcc/gdb?expand=0&rev=303
2021-11-15 14:37:03 +00:00

72 lines
2.5 KiB
Diff

[gdb/testsuite] Fix gdb.guile/scm-type.exp with gcc 4.8
With gcc 7.5.0, I get:
...
(gdb) guile (print (type-range (field-type (type-field (value-type \
(value-dereference f)) "items"))))^M
= (0 0)^M
(gdb) PASS: gdb.guile/scm-type.exp: lang_cpp: test_range: \
on flexible array member: $cmd
...
but with gcc 4.8.5, I get instead:
...
(gdb) guile (print (type-range (field-type (type-field (value-type \
(value-dereference f)) "items"))))^M
= (0 -1)^M
(gdb) FAIL: gdb.guile/scm-type.exp: lang_cpp: test_range: \
on flexible array member: $cmd
...
There's a difference in debug info. With gcc 4.8.5, we have:
...
<2><224>: Abbrev Number: 15 (DW_TAG_member)
<225> DW_AT_name : items
<22b> DW_AT_type : <0x231>
<1><231>: Abbrev Number: 4 (DW_TAG_array_type)
<232> DW_AT_type : <0x105>
<2><23a>: Abbrev Number: 16 (DW_TAG_subrange_type)
<23b> DW_AT_type : <0x11a>
<23f> DW_AT_upper_bound : 0xffffffffffffffff
...
and with gcc 7.5.0, we have instead:
...
<2><89f>: Abbrev Number: 12 (DW_TAG_member)
<8a0> DW_AT_name : items
<8a6> DW_AT_type : <0x8ac>
<1><8ac>: Abbrev Number: 17 (DW_TAG_array_type)
<8ad> DW_AT_type : <0x29d>
<2><8b5>: Abbrev Number: 41 (DW_TAG_subrange_type)
<2><8b6>: Abbrev Number: 0
...
As mentioned in commit 858c8f2c1b9 "gdb/testsuite: adjust
gdb.python/flexible-array-member.exp expected pattern":
...
Ideally, GDB would present a consistent and documented value for an
array member declared with size 0, regardless of how the debug info
looks like.
...
As in gdb.python/flexible-array-member.exp, change the test to accept the two
values.
Tested on x86_64-linux.
---
gdb/testsuite/gdb.guile/scm-type.exp | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.guile/scm-type.exp b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.guile/scm-type.exp
index ccde98ca224..e5eaab365cc 100644
--- a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.guile/scm-type.exp
+++ b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.guile/scm-type.exp
@@ -267,7 +267,7 @@ proc test_range {} {
gdb_scm_test_silent_cmd "guile (define f (history-ref 0))" \
"get value (f) from history"
gdb_test "guile (print (type-range (field-type (type-field (value-type (value-dereference f)) \"items\"))))" \
- "= \\(0 0\\)"
+ "= \\(0 (0|-1)\\)"
gdb_test "guile (print (value-subscript (value-field (value-dereference f) \"items\") 0))" \
"= 111"
gdb_test "guile (print (value-subscript (value-field (value-dereference f) \"items\") 1))" \