pool/ghostscript-fonts
SHA256
4
0
Fork 1
Code Issues Pull Requests Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity
84007c03fe
ghostscript-fonts/ghostscript-fonts.changes

122 lines
5.1 KiB
Plaintext
Raw Normal View History

Accepting request 812875 from home:alarrosa:branches:X11:XOrg:legacy - Add a ghostscript-fonts-std-converted subpackage with fonts from ghostscript-fonts-std converted to TrueType format (boo#1169444) OBS-URL: https://build.opensuse.org/request/show/812875 OBS-URL: https://build.opensuse.org/package/show/Printing/ghostscript-fonts?expand=0&rev=20
2020-06-09 21:15:24 +02:00
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Mon Jun 8 15:09:01 UTC 2020 - Antonio Larrosa <alarrosa@suse.com>
- Add a ghostscript-fonts-std-converted subpackage with fonts from
ghostscript-fonts-std converted to TrueType format (boo#1169444)
Accepting request 780237 from home:mnhauke:branches:Printing - Add "Provides: urw-fonts" to ghostscript-fonts-std since some binary packages like the ones from grafana.com explicitly require "urw-fonts". OBS-URL: https://build.opensuse.org/request/show/780237 OBS-URL: https://build.opensuse.org/package/show/Printing/ghostscript-fonts?expand=0&rev=18
2020-02-28 16:00:08 +01:00
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Fri Feb 28 11:21:37 UTC 2020 - Martin Hauke <mardnh@gmx.de>
- Add "Provides: urw-fonts" to ghostscript-fonts-std since some
binary packages like the ones from grafana.com explicitly require
"urw-fonts".
Accepting request 560084 from home:dimstar:Factory - Revert last change: reconfigure_post_* does not know a -n parameter, which in turn results in warnings (rpm < 4.14) or errors (rpm >= 4.14). > reconfigure_fonts_post: invalid option -- 'n' > error: Unknown option n in reconfigure_fonts_post(c) From /etc/rpm/macros.fonts-config, only reconfigure_fonts_scriptlets knows a -n parameter. OBS-URL: https://build.opensuse.org/request/show/560084 OBS-URL: https://build.opensuse.org/package/show/Printing/ghostscript-fonts?expand=0&rev=16
2018-01-10 13:06:35 +01:00
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Wed Dec 27 10:54:48 UTC 2017 - dimstar@opensuse.org
- Revert last change: reconfigure_post_* does not know a -n
parameter, which in turn results in warnings (rpm < 4.14) or
errors (rpm >= 4.14).
> reconfigure_fonts_post: invalid option -- 'n'
> error: Unknown option n in reconfigure_fonts_post(c)
Accepting request 558095 from home:jsmeix:branches:Printing Call reconfigure_fonts_* -n binary_RPM_package_name (boo#1067213) OBS-URL: https://build.opensuse.org/request/show/558095 OBS-URL: https://build.opensuse.org/package/show/Printing/ghostscript-fonts?expand=0&rev=14
2017-12-18 14:24:26 +01:00
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Mon Dec 18 14:18:10 CET 2017 - jsmeix@suse.de
- Call reconfigure_fonts_* -n binary_RPM_package_name
on openSUSE Tumbleweed and Leap 15.0 and SLE15 and later
(boo#1067213).
Accepting request 531150 from home:jsmeix:branches:Printing Build ghostscript-fonts cleanly (without questionable SUSE-specific patching) OBS-URL: https://build.opensuse.org/request/show/531150 OBS-URL: https://build.opensuse.org/package/show/Printing/ghostscript-fonts?expand=0&rev=12
2017-10-04 12:41:10 +02:00
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Wed Oct 4 12:24:39 CEST 2017 - jsmeix@suse.de
- Do no longer mess around with the original fonts: Do no longer
try to "improve" the appearance of glyphs in certain fonts in
a SUSE-sepcific way. Provide the fonts as originally intended.
Now neither the SUSE-sepcific ghostscript-fonts-std-8.11.patch
nor special tools like t1ascii and t1binary from the t1utils RPM
are needed to build a RPM package that only contains fonts.
Cf. the entry below dated "Tue Mar 27 16:57:57 CEST 2012".
- Set the version is the same version as the current ghostscript package i.e. 9.06 because this ghostscript-fonts-* packages are the right ones for this Ghostscript version. OBS-URL: https://build.opensuse.org/package/show/Printing/ghostscript-fonts?expand=0&rev=10
2012-09-28 16:37:21 +02:00
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Fri Sep 28 16:35:29 CEST 2012 - jsmeix@suse.de
- Set the version is the same version as the current ghostscript
package i.e. 9.06 because this ghostscript-fonts-* packages
are the right ones for this Ghostscript version.
- Have SuSEconfig.pango stuff in RPM scriptlets only if suse_version < 1220 because since openSUSE 12.2 there is no longer SuSEconfig.pango (see the "declined" comment of OBS submitrequest 136232). OBS-URL: https://build.opensuse.org/package/show/Printing/ghostscript-fonts?expand=0&rev=9
2012-09-28 11:26:57 +02:00
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Fri Sep 28 10:46:03 CEST 2012 - jsmeix@suse.de
- Have SuSEconfig.pango stuff in RPM scriptlets only
if suse_version < 1220 because since openSUSE 12.2
there is no longer SuSEconfig.pango (see the "declined"
comment of OBS submitrequest 136232).
Accepting request 136231 from home:jsmeix:branches:Printing avoid an issue with /usr/sbin/Check in SLE11 SLE_11_SP1 SLE_11_SP2 to make it build again there OBS-URL: https://build.opensuse.org/request/show/136231 OBS-URL: https://build.opensuse.org/package/show/Printing/ghostscript-fonts?expand=0&rev=7
2012-09-27 14:53:40 +02:00
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Thu Sep 27 13:22:44 CEST 2012 - jsmeix@suse.de
- Using an absolute path as source in symbolic link in spec file
to avoid an issue with /usr/sbin/Check in SLE11, SLE_11_SP1,
and SLE_11_SP2 that would wrongly convert a relative path
../ghostscript/fonts into a ../ghostscript/fonts.gz file.
Afterwards /usr/lib/rpm/brp-symlink converts it to a relative
path so that the binary RPM gets the intended symbolic link
/usr/share/fonts/ghostscript -> ../ghostscript/fonts
Add explanatory comment regarding absolute path as source in symbolic link to avoid an issue with /usr/sbin/Check in SLE11, SLE_11_SP1, and SLE_11_SP2 to spec file and fixed spelling in the matching entry in changes file. OBS-URL: https://build.opensuse.org/package/show/Printing/ghostscript-fonts?expand=0&rev=8
2012-09-28 10:28:26 +02:00
(bnc#778879).
Accepting request 136231 from home:jsmeix:branches:Printing avoid an issue with /usr/sbin/Check in SLE11 SLE_11_SP1 SLE_11_SP2 to make it build again there OBS-URL: https://build.opensuse.org/request/show/136231 OBS-URL: https://build.opensuse.org/package/show/Printing/ghostscript-fonts?expand=0&rev=7
2012-09-27 14:53:40 +02:00
Accepting request 136090 from home:jsmeix:branches:Printing fixed bnc#778879 OBS-URL: https://build.opensuse.org/request/show/136090 OBS-URL: https://build.opensuse.org/package/show/Printing/ghostscript-fonts?expand=0&rev=6
2012-09-26 15:43:08 +02:00
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Wed Sep 26 10:09:22 CEST 2012 - jsmeix@suse.de
- Provide a link /usr/share/fonts/ghostscript which points to
/usr/share/ghostscript/fonts (the directory where Ghostscript
expects its fonts) to make the Ghostscript fonts also appear
in the directory /usr/share/fonts/ where applications
search for fonts (bnc#778879).
Accepting request 135891 from home:jsmeix:branches:Printing fixed that it builds again everywhere and not only in openSUSE_Factory since the last careless change OBS-URL: https://build.opensuse.org/request/show/135891 OBS-URL: https://build.opensuse.org/package/show/Printing/ghostscript-fonts?expand=0&rev=5
2012-09-25 15:58:30 +02:00
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Tue Sep 25 14:58:06 CEST 2012 - jsmeix@suse.de
- Fix the negligent changes done by the below "prepare spec file
for dropping SuSEconfig.fonts" so that it builds again for
all released openSUSE versions (up to 12.2) because only
if suse_version > 1220 one can BuildRequire fontpackages-devel
which provides the RPM macros like reconfigure_fonts_post,
reconfigure_fonts_postun, and reconfigure_fonts_posttrans.
Accepting request 130134 from home:pgajdos - prepare spec file for dropping SuSEconfig.fonts (openFATE#313536) OBS-URL: https://build.opensuse.org/request/show/130134 OBS-URL: https://build.opensuse.org/package/show/Printing/ghostscript-fonts?expand=0&rev=3
2012-08-09 17:13:31 +02:00
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Mon Aug 6 16:40:38 UTC 2012 - pgajdos@suse.com
- prepare spec file for dropping SuSEconfig.fonts (openFATE#313536)
Accepting request 111578 from home:jsmeix New cleaned up separated ghostscript-fonts package (bnc#735824) OBS-URL: https://build.opensuse.org/request/show/111578 OBS-URL: https://build.opensuse.org/package/show/Printing/ghostscript-fonts?expand=0&rev=1
2012-03-28 15:16:37 +02:00
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Wed Mar 28 10:40:34 CEST 2012 - jsmeix@suse.de
- Have the version the same as the current ghostscript package
(currently Ghostscript version 9.05). This versioning scheme
makes sense because this ghostscript-fonts-* packages are the
right ones for this Ghostscript version (see bnc#735824).
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Tue Mar 27 16:57:57 CEST 2012 - jsmeix@suse.de
- ghostscript-fonts-std-8.11.patch is made by mfabian@suse.de
see https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=suse36778
(bnc#51778).
It changes weight of "Nimbus Roman No9 L:style=Medium Italic"
and "Nimbus Roman No9 L:style=Medium" back to "Bold" instead
of "Medium".
ghostscript-fonts-std-8.11.patch must be listed as SourceNNN
because it is applied via an explicit patch call in install
section but the SUSE internal check_if_valid_source_dir tool
could abort with fatal error because it thinks this patch
is not applied
(see https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=649207#c17).
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Tue Mar 27 12:19:14 CEST 2012 - jsmeix@suse.de
- Initial ghostscript-fonts package.
Reference in New Issue Copy Permalink