pool/linux-npu-driver
SHA256
16
0
Fork 1
generated from pool/new_package
Code Issues Pull Requests 1 Activity

For Submission to PackageHub 16.1 #1

Open
Jeffreycheung wants to merge 1 commits from Jeffreycheung/linux-npu-driver:leap-16.1 into leap-16.1
pull from: Jeffreycheung/linux-npu-driver:leap-16.1
merge into: pool:leap-16.1
Conversation 6 Commits 1 Files Changed 5 +158
Jeffreycheung commented 2026-01-27 09:52:49 +01:00
First-time contributor
Copy Link

The linux-npu-driver are requested to add to SLE16.1 ( jsc#PED-13880, jsc#PED-13856, jsc#PED-14030 ).

Same as SLE16.0, still no resource to handle and support in 16.1, however the package was finally landed to Leap 16.0, so it would be best to push the package to PackageHub 16.1.

The linux-npu-driver are requested to add to SLE16.1 ( jsc#PED-13880, jsc#PED-13856, jsc#PED-14030 ). Same as SLE16.0, still no resource to handle and support in 16.1, however the package was finally landed to Leap 16.0, so it would be best to push the package to PackageHub 16.1.
Jeffreycheung added 1 commit 2026-01-27 09:52:50 +01:00
For Submission to PackageHub 16.1 3dd37a3f52 
The linux-npu-driver are requested to add to SLE16.1 ( jsc#PED-13880, jsc#PED-13856, jsc#PED-14030 ).

Same as SLE16.0, still no resource to handle and support in 16.1, however the package was finally landed to Leap 16.0, so it would be best to push the package to PackageHub 16.1.
Jeffreycheung commented 2026-01-27 10:00:06 +01:00
Author
First-time contributor
Copy Link

Hi @eroca , can you please take a look if this is OK to submit to pool first, if yes can you pull in the list of reviewers, the goal is to submit to PH16.1.

Hi @eroca , can you please take a look if this is OK to submit to pool first, if yes can you pull in the list of reviewers, the goal is to submit to PH16.1.
autogits_workflow_pr_bot requested review from legaldb 2026-01-27 10:20:15 +01:00
autogits_workflow_pr_bot requested review from packagehub-review 2026-01-27 10:20:15 +01:00
eroca commented 2026-01-27 10:20:35 +01:00
Owner
Copy Link

@Jeffreycheung: looks good, let me lend a hand and forward it to PH: products/PackageHub#361

@Jeffreycheung: looks good, let me lend a hand and forward it to PH: https://src.opensuse.org/products/PackageHub/pulls/361
packagehub-review requested review from bigironman 2026-01-27 10:23:56 +01:00
packagehub-review requested review from lkocman-factory 2026-01-27 10:23:56 +01:00
packagehub-review requested review from maxlin_factory 2026-01-27 10:23:56 +01:00
packagehub-review requested review from smithfarm 2026-01-27 10:23:56 +01:00
packagehub-review commented 2026-01-27 10:23:56 +01:00
Member
Copy Link

Review by packagehub-review represents a group of reviewers: bigironman, lkocman-factory, maxlin_factory, smithfarm .

Do not use standard review interface to review on behalf of the group.
To accept the review on behalf of the group, create the following comment: @packagehub-review: approve.
To request changes on behalf of the group, create the following comment: @packagehub-review: decline followed with lines justifying the decision.
Future edits of the comments are ignored, a new comment is required to change the review state.

Review by packagehub-review represents a group of reviewers: bigironman, lkocman-factory, maxlin_factory, smithfarm . Do **not** use standard review interface to review on behalf of the group. To accept the review on behalf of the group, create the following comment: `@packagehub-review: approve`. To request changes on behalf of the group, create the following comment: `@packagehub-review: decline` followed with lines justifying the decision. Future edits of the comments are ignored, a new comment is required to change the review state.
legaldb commented 2026-01-27 10:40:01 +01:00
Member
Copy Link

Legal review in progress.

Legal review [in progress](https://legaldb.suse.de/reviews/details/501481).
report.md
3.9 KiB
eroca commented 2026-01-27 14:18:35 +01:00
Owner
Copy Link

@Jeffreycheung: build fails on aarch64 https://build.opensuse.org/project/show/openSUSE:Backports:SLE-16.1:PullRequest:361

@Jeffreycheung: build fails on aarch64 https://build.opensuse.org/project/show/openSUSE:Backports:SLE-16.1:PullRequest:361
Jeffreycheung commented 2026-01-27 14:31:09 +01:00
Author
First-time contributor
Copy Link

@Jeffreycheung: build fails on aarch64 https://build.opensuse.org/project/show/openSUSE:Backports:SLE-16.1:PullRequest:361

Hi @eroca , this is Intel NPU driver specific for the integrated NPUs found on Intel's Meteor Lake, Lunar Lake, Arrow Lake, and Panther Lake platforms.

So, please remove the aarch64 platform :)

> @Jeffreycheung: build fails on aarch64 https://build.opensuse.org/project/show/openSUSE:Backports:SLE-16.1:PullRequest:361 Hi @eroca , this is Intel NPU driver specific for the integrated NPUs found on Intel's Meteor Lake, Lunar Lake, Arrow Lake, and Panther Lake platforms. So, please remove the aarch64 platform :)
This pull request has official review requests.
You are not authorized to merge this pull request.
View command line instructions

Checkout

From your project repository, check out a new branch and test the changes.
git fetch -u leap-16.1:Jeffreycheung-leap-16.1
git checkout Jeffreycheung-leap-16.1
Sign in to join this conversation.
Reviewers
No Reviewers
legaldb
packagehub-review
bigironman
lkocman-factory
maxlin_factory
smithfarm
Labels
Clear labels
legaldb
Critical Priority
Critical legaldb priority
Archived
legaldb
High Priority
2
High legaldb priority
legaldb
Normal Priority
1
Normal legaldb priority
No Label
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Assignees
Clear assignees
adamm_super adrianSuSE autobuild-owner autobuild-review autogits_workflow_pr_bot bigironman dirkmueller eroca factory_bot gitea_test legaldb lkocman-factory maxlin_factory opensuse-review packagehub-review smithfarm
No Assignees
4 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: pool/linux-npu-driver#1
Delete Branch "Jeffreycheung/linux-npu-driver:leap-16.1"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?