Accepting request 1080085 from devel:libraries:c_c++

- Add mpfr-4.2.0-cummulative.patch, cummulative patches for mpfr 4.2.0: * A test of the thousands separator in tsprintf.c is based on the output from the GNU C Library up to 2.36, which is incorrect. * The mpfr_ui_pow_ui function has infinite loop in case of overflow. * The tfprintf and tprintf tests may fail in locales where decimal_point has several bytes, such as ps_AF. * In particular cases that are very hard to round, mpfr_rec_sqrt may yield a stack overflow due to many small allocations in the stack, based on alloca(). - Remove tests-tsprintf.patch that's included in the above set. OBS-URL: https://build.opensuse.org/request/show/1080085 OBS-URL: https://build.opensuse.org/package/show/openSUSE:Factory/mpfr?expand=0&rev=59
2023-04-21 12:15:31 +00:00 · 2023-04-21 12:15:31 +00:00 · c96d436e84
commit c96d436e84
parent bc177d9e84 ad0e704d8b
4 changed files with 537 additions and 57 deletions
--- a/mpfr-4.2.0-cummulative.patch
+++ b/mpfr-4.2.0-cummulative.patch
@ -0,0 +1,521 @@
+diff -Naurd mpfr-4.2.0-a/PATCHES mpfr-4.2.0-b/PATCHES
+--- mpfr-4.2.0-a/PATCHES	2023-04-17 21:17:39.748645280 +0000
+++ mpfr-4.2.0-b/PATCHES	2023-04-17 21:17:39.792645218 +0000
+@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+tsprintf-thousands
+diff -Naurd mpfr-4.2.0-a/VERSION mpfr-4.2.0-b/VERSION
+--- mpfr-4.2.0-a/VERSION	2023-01-06 10:55:57.000000000 +0000
+++ mpfr-4.2.0-b/VERSION	2023-04-17 21:17:39.792645218 +0000
+@@ -1 +1 @@
+-4.2.0
+4.2.0-p1
+diff -Naurd mpfr-4.2.0-a/src/mpfr.h mpfr-4.2.0-b/src/mpfr.h
+--- mpfr-4.2.0-a/src/mpfr.h	2023-01-06 10:55:57.000000000 +0000
+++ mpfr-4.2.0-b/src/mpfr.h	2023-04-17 21:17:39.788645224 +0000
+@@ -27,7 +27,7 @@
+ #define MPFR_VERSION_MAJOR 4
+ #define MPFR_VERSION_MINOR 2
+ #define MPFR_VERSION_PATCHLEVEL 0
+-#define MPFR_VERSION_STRING "4.2.0"
+#define MPFR_VERSION_STRING "4.2.0-p1"
+ 
+ /* User macros:
+    MPFR_USE_FILE:        Define it to make MPFR define functions dealing
+diff -Naurd mpfr-4.2.0-a/src/version.c mpfr-4.2.0-b/src/version.c
+--- mpfr-4.2.0-a/src/version.c	2023-01-06 10:55:57.000000000 +0000
+++ mpfr-4.2.0-b/src/version.c	2023-04-17 21:17:39.792645218 +0000
+@@ -25,5 +25,5 @@
+ const char *
+ mpfr_get_version (void)
+ {
+-  return "4.2.0";
+  return "4.2.0-p1";
+ }
+diff -Naurd mpfr-4.2.0-a/tests/tsprintf.c mpfr-4.2.0-b/tests/tsprintf.c
+--- mpfr-4.2.0-a/tests/tsprintf.c	2023-01-05 17:09:48.000000000 +0000
+++ mpfr-4.2.0-b/tests/tsprintf.c	2023-04-17 21:17:39.784645229 +0000
+@@ -1715,7 +1715,25 @@
+   check_sprintf ("000000001,000", "%'013.4Rg", x);
+ 
+ #ifdef PRINTF_GROUPFLAG
+-  check_vsprintf ("+01,234,567  :", "%0+ -'13.10Pd:", (mpfr_prec_t) 1234567);
+  /* Do not test the thousands separator with a precision field larger
+     than the number of digits (thus needing leading zeros), such as
+     "%0+ -'13.10Pd:" (used up to MPFR 4.2.0), since the GNU libc is
+     buggy: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23432
+     We don't know about the other implementations.
+     This new test works fine with glibc up to 2.36, but fails with 2.37
+     (as reported by Klaus Dittrich in the MPFR mailing-list); this is
+     actually a bug introduced in glibc 2.37, not in MPFR:
+       https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30068
+     Since this bug can yield a buffer overflow (CVE-2023-25139), possibly
+     affecting MPFR users, let us rather require a fix in glibc. This bug
+     has been fixed in the 2.37 branch:
+       https://sourceware.org/git/?p=glibc.git;a=commit;h=07b9521fc6
+     If we wanted to check that and avoid a failure of the test because of
+     a buggy C library (while MPFR would be consistent with the C library),
+     we could compare the MPFR output with both the correct output and the
+     output from the C library (possibly buggy). But to do that in a clean
+     way, this would require a change in the check_vsprintf() call. */
+  check_vsprintf ("+1,234,567   :", "%0+ -'13Pd:", (mpfr_prec_t) 1234567);
+ #endif
+ 
+   mpfr_clear (x);
+diff -Naurd mpfr-4.2.0-a/PATCHES mpfr-4.2.0-b/PATCHES
+--- mpfr-4.2.0-a/PATCHES	2023-04-17 21:18:00.464616127 +0000
+++ mpfr-4.2.0-b/PATCHES	2023-04-17 21:18:00.512616059 +0000
+@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+ui_pow_ui-overflow
+diff -Naurd mpfr-4.2.0-a/VERSION mpfr-4.2.0-b/VERSION
+--- mpfr-4.2.0-a/VERSION	2023-04-17 21:17:39.792645218 +0000
+++ mpfr-4.2.0-b/VERSION	2023-04-17 21:18:00.512616059 +0000
+@@ -1 +1 @@
+-4.2.0-p1
+4.2.0-p2
+diff -Naurd mpfr-4.2.0-a/src/mpfr.h mpfr-4.2.0-b/src/mpfr.h
+--- mpfr-4.2.0-a/src/mpfr.h	2023-04-17 21:17:39.788645224 +0000
+++ mpfr-4.2.0-b/src/mpfr.h	2023-04-17 21:18:00.508616065 +0000
+@@ -27,7 +27,7 @@
+ #define MPFR_VERSION_MAJOR 4
+ #define MPFR_VERSION_MINOR 2
+ #define MPFR_VERSION_PATCHLEVEL 0
+-#define MPFR_VERSION_STRING "4.2.0-p1"
+#define MPFR_VERSION_STRING "4.2.0-p2"
+ 
+ /* User macros:
+    MPFR_USE_FILE:        Define it to make MPFR define functions dealing
+diff -Naurd mpfr-4.2.0-a/src/ui_pow_ui.c mpfr-4.2.0-b/src/ui_pow_ui.c
+--- mpfr-4.2.0-a/src/ui_pow_ui.c	2023-01-05 17:09:48.000000000 +0000
+++ mpfr-4.2.0-b/src/ui_pow_ui.c	2023-04-17 21:18:00.504616070 +0000
+@@ -23,7 +23,7 @@
+ #include "mpfr-impl.h"
+ 
+ int
+-mpfr_ui_pow_ui (mpfr_ptr x, unsigned long int y, unsigned long int n,
+mpfr_ui_pow_ui (mpfr_ptr x, unsigned long int k, unsigned long int n,
+                 mpfr_rnd_t rnd)
+ {
+   mpfr_exp_t err;
+@@ -35,22 +35,28 @@
+   MPFR_ZIV_DECL (loop);
+   MPFR_SAVE_EXPO_DECL (expo);
+ 
+  MPFR_LOG_FUNC
+    (("k=%lu n=%lu rnd=%d", k, n, rnd),
+     ("y[%Pu]=%.*Rg inexact=%d",
+      mpfr_get_prec (x), mpfr_log_prec, x, inexact));
+
+   if (MPFR_UNLIKELY (n <= 1))
+     {
+       if (n == 1)
+-        return mpfr_set_ui (x, y, rnd);     /* y^1 = y */
+        return mpfr_set_ui (x, k, rnd);     /* k^1 = k */
+       else
+-        return mpfr_set_ui (x, 1, rnd);     /* y^0 = 1 for any y */
+        return mpfr_set_ui (x, 1, rnd);     /* k^0 = 1 for any k */
+     }
+-  else if (MPFR_UNLIKELY (y <= 1))
+  else if (MPFR_UNLIKELY (k <= 1))
+     {
+-      if (y == 1)
+      if (k == 1)
+         return mpfr_set_ui (x, 1, rnd);     /* 1^n = 1 for any n > 0 */
+       else
+         return mpfr_set_ui (x, 0, rnd);     /* 0^n = 0 for any n > 0 */
+     }
+ 
+-  for (size_n = 0, m = n; m; size_n++, m >>= 1);
+  for (size_n = 0, m = n; m != 0; size_n++, m >>= 1)
+    ;
+ 
+   MPFR_SAVE_EXPO_MARK (expo);
+   prec = MPFR_PREC (x) + 3 + size_n;
+@@ -60,23 +66,55 @@
+   for (;;)
+     {
+       int i = size_n;
+      unsigned int inex_res;
+ 
+-      inexact = mpfr_set_ui (res, y, MPFR_RNDU);
+      inex_res = mpfr_set_ui (res, k, MPFR_RNDU);
+       err = 1;
+       /* now 2^(i-1) <= n < 2^i: i=1+floor(log2(n)) */
+       for (i -= 2; i >= 0; i--)
+         {
+-          inexact |= mpfr_sqr (res, res, MPFR_RNDU);
+          inex_res |= mpfr_sqr (res, res, MPFR_RNDU);
+           err++;
+           if (n & (1UL << i))
+-            inexact |= mpfr_mul_ui (res, res, y, MPFR_RNDU);
+            inex_res |= mpfr_mul_ui (res, res, k, MPFR_RNDU);
+         }
+
+      if (MPFR_UNLIKELY (MPFR_IS_INF (res)))
+        {
+          mpfr_t kf;
+          mpz_t z;
+          int size_k;
+          MPFR_BLOCK_DECL (flags);
+
+          /* Let's handle the overflow by calling mpfr_pow_z.
+             Alternatively, we could call mpfr_pow_ui; this would
+             need a bit shorter code below, but mpfr_pow_ui handles
+             the overflow by calling mpfr_pow_z, so that calling
+             mpfr_pow_z directly should be a bit more efficient. */
+
+          MPFR_ZIV_FREE (loop);
+          mpfr_clear (res);
+          for (size_k = 0, m = k; m != 0; size_k++, m >>= 1)
+            ;
+          mpfr_init2 (kf, size_k);
+          inexact = mpfr_set_ui (kf, k, MPFR_RNDN);
+          MPFR_ASSERTD (inexact == 0);
+          mpz_init (z);
+          mpz_set_ui (z, n);
+          MPFR_BLOCK (flags, inexact = mpfr_pow_z (x, kf, z, rnd););
+          mpz_clear (z);
+          mpfr_clear (kf);
+          MPFR_SAVE_EXPO_UPDATE_FLAGS (expo, flags);
+          goto end;
+        }
+
+       /* since the loop is executed floor(log2(n)) times,
+          we have err = 1+floor(log2(n)).
+          Since prec >= MPFR_PREC(x) + 4 + floor(log2(n)), prec > err */
+       err = prec - err;
+ 
+-      if (MPFR_LIKELY (inexact == 0
+      MPFR_LOG_VAR (res);
+      if (MPFR_LIKELY (!inex_res
+                        || MPFR_CAN_ROUND (res, err, MPFR_PREC (x), rnd)))
+         break;
+ 
+@@ -90,6 +128,7 @@
+ 
+   mpfr_clear (res);
+ 
+ end:
+   MPFR_SAVE_EXPO_FREE (expo);
+   return mpfr_check_range (x, inexact, rnd);
+ }
+diff -Naurd mpfr-4.2.0-a/src/version.c mpfr-4.2.0-b/src/version.c
+--- mpfr-4.2.0-a/src/version.c	2023-04-17 21:17:39.792645218 +0000
+++ mpfr-4.2.0-b/src/version.c	2023-04-17 21:18:00.512616059 +0000
+@@ -25,5 +25,5 @@
+ const char *
+ mpfr_get_version (void)
+ {
+-  return "4.2.0-p1";
+  return "4.2.0-p2";
+ }
+diff -Naurd mpfr-4.2.0-a/tests/tlog10.c mpfr-4.2.0-b/tests/tlog10.c
+--- mpfr-4.2.0-a/tests/tlog10.c	2023-01-05 17:09:48.000000000 +0000
+++ mpfr-4.2.0-b/tests/tlog10.c	2023-04-17 21:18:00.504616070 +0000
+@@ -49,6 +49,60 @@
+ #define TEST_RANDOM_POS 8
+ #include "tgeneric.c"
+ 
+/* On 2023-02-13, one gets an infinite loop in mpfr_log10 on both
+   32-bit and 64-bit hosts when the precision is not large enough
+   (precision 12 and below). */
+static void
+bug20230213 (void)
+{
+  mpfr_exp_t old_emin, old_emax, e;
+  mpfr_t t, x, y0, y1, y2;
+  int prec;
+
+  old_emin = mpfr_get_emin ();
+  old_emax = mpfr_get_emax ();
+
+  set_emin (MPFR_EMIN_MIN);
+  set_emax (MPFR_EMAX_MAX);
+  e = mpfr_get_emax () - 1;
+
+  /* The precisions of t and y0 should be large enough to avoid
+     a hard-to-round case for the target precisions. */
+  mpfr_inits2 (64, t, y0, (mpfr_ptr) 0);
+  mpfr_set_exp_t (y0, e, MPFR_RNDN);
+  mpfr_log_ui (t, 10, MPFR_RNDN);
+  mpfr_div (y0, y0, t, MPFR_RNDN);
+  mpfr_log_ui (t, 2, MPFR_RNDN);
+  mpfr_mul (y0, y0, t, MPFR_RNDN);
+
+  for (prec = 16; prec >= MPFR_PREC_MIN; prec--)
+    {
+      mpfr_inits2 (prec, x, y1, y2, (mpfr_ptr) 0);
+      mpfr_set (y1, y0, MPFR_RNDN);
+
+      mpfr_set_ui_2exp (x, 1, e, MPFR_RNDN);
+      mpfr_log10 (y2, x, MPFR_RNDN);
+      MPFR_ASSERTN (MPFR_IS_PURE_FP (y2));
+      MPFR_ASSERTN (MPFR_IS_POS (y2));
+
+      if (! mpfr_equal_p (y1, y2))
+        {
+          printf ("Error in bug20230213.\n");
+          printf ("Expected ");
+          mpfr_dump (y1);
+          printf ("Got      ");
+          mpfr_dump (y2);
+          exit (1);
+        }
+      mpfr_clears (x, y1, y2, (mpfr_ptr) 0);
+    }
+
+  mpfr_clears (t, y0, (mpfr_ptr) 0);
+
+  set_emin (old_emin);
+  set_emax (old_emax);
+}
+
+ int
+ main (int argc, char *argv[])
+ {
+@@ -112,6 +166,8 @@
+   mpfr_clear (x);
+   mpfr_clear (y);
+ 
+  bug20230213 ();
+
+   data_check ("data/log10", mpfr_log10, "mpfr_log10");
+ 
+   tests_end_mpfr ();
+diff -Naurd mpfr-4.2.0-a/tests/tui_pow.c mpfr-4.2.0-b/tests/tui_pow.c
+--- mpfr-4.2.0-a/tests/tui_pow.c	2023-01-05 17:09:48.000000000 +0000
+++ mpfr-4.2.0-b/tests/tui_pow.c	2023-04-17 21:18:00.504616070 +0000
+@@ -142,6 +142,37 @@
+   mpfr_clear (t);
+ }
+ 
+static void
+huge (void)
+{
+  mpfr_exp_t old_emin, old_emax;
+  mpfr_t x;
+
+  old_emin = mpfr_get_emin ();
+  old_emax = mpfr_get_emax ();
+
+  set_emin (MPFR_EMIN_MIN);
+  set_emax (MPFR_EMAX_MAX);
+
+  mpfr_init2 (x, 8);
+
+  /* The purpose of this test is more to check that mpfr_ui_pow_ui
+     terminates (without taking much memory) rather than checking
+     the value of x. On 2023-02-13, the +Inf case was not handled
+     in the Ziv iteration, yielding an infinite loop, affecting
+     mpfr_log10 in particular. See
+       commit 90de094f0d9c309daca707aa227470d810866616
+  */
+  mpfr_ui_pow_ui (x, 5, ULONG_MAX, MPFR_RNDN);
+  if (MPFR_EMAX_MAX <= ULONG_MAX)  /* true with default _MPFR_EXP_FORMAT */
+    MPFR_ASSERTN (MPFR_IS_INF (x));
+
+  mpfr_clear (x);
+
+  set_emin (old_emin);
+  set_emax (old_emax);
+}
+
+ int
+ main (int argc, char *argv[])
+ {
+@@ -180,6 +211,7 @@
+     }
+ 
+   test1 ();
+  huge ();
+ 
+   {
+   mpfr_t z, t;
+diff -Naurd mpfr-4.2.0-a/PATCHES mpfr-4.2.0-b/PATCHES
+--- mpfr-4.2.0-a/PATCHES	2023-04-17 21:18:26.860579184 +0000
+++ mpfr-4.2.0-b/PATCHES	2023-04-17 21:18:26.904579122 +0000
+@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+multibyte-decimal_point
+diff -Naurd mpfr-4.2.0-a/VERSION mpfr-4.2.0-b/VERSION
+--- mpfr-4.2.0-a/VERSION	2023-04-17 21:18:00.512616059 +0000
+++ mpfr-4.2.0-b/VERSION	2023-04-17 21:18:26.904579122 +0000
+@@ -1 +1 @@
+-4.2.0-p2
+4.2.0-p3
+diff -Naurd mpfr-4.2.0-a/src/mpfr.h mpfr-4.2.0-b/src/mpfr.h
+--- mpfr-4.2.0-a/src/mpfr.h	2023-04-17 21:18:00.508616065 +0000
+++ mpfr-4.2.0-b/src/mpfr.h	2023-04-17 21:18:26.900579128 +0000
+@@ -27,7 +27,7 @@
+ #define MPFR_VERSION_MAJOR 4
+ #define MPFR_VERSION_MINOR 2
+ #define MPFR_VERSION_PATCHLEVEL 0
+-#define MPFR_VERSION_STRING "4.2.0-p2"
+#define MPFR_VERSION_STRING "4.2.0-p3"
+ 
+ /* User macros:
+    MPFR_USE_FILE:        Define it to make MPFR define functions dealing
+diff -Naurd mpfr-4.2.0-a/src/version.c mpfr-4.2.0-b/src/version.c
+--- mpfr-4.2.0-a/src/version.c	2023-04-17 21:18:00.512616059 +0000
+++ mpfr-4.2.0-b/src/version.c	2023-04-17 21:18:26.904579122 +0000
+@@ -25,5 +25,5 @@
+ const char *
+ mpfr_get_version (void)
+ {
+-  return "4.2.0-p2";
+  return "4.2.0-p3";
+ }
+diff -Naurd mpfr-4.2.0-a/tests/tfprintf.c mpfr-4.2.0-b/tests/tfprintf.c
+--- mpfr-4.2.0-a/tests/tfprintf.c	2023-01-05 17:09:48.000000000 +0000
+++ mpfr-4.2.0-b/tests/tfprintf.c	2023-04-17 21:18:26.896579133 +0000
+@@ -61,6 +61,12 @@
+       exit (1);                                                         \
+     }
+ 
+#if MPFR_LCONV_DPTS
+#define DPLEN ((int) strlen (localeconv()->decimal_point))
+#else
+#define DPLEN 1
+#endif
+
+ /* limit for random precision in random() */
+ const int prec_max_printf = 5000;
+ 
+@@ -195,12 +201,12 @@
+                   lo, &ulo);
+   check_length (2, ulo, 36, lu);
+   check_vfprintf (fout, "a. %hi, b. %*f, c. %Re%hn", ush, 3, f, mpfr, &ush);
+-  check_length (3, ush, 46, hu);
+  check_length (3, ush, 45 + DPLEN, hu);
+   check_vfprintf (fout, "a. %hi, b. %f, c. %#.2Rf%n", sh, d, mpfr, &i);
+-  check_length (4, i, 29, d);
+  check_length (4, i, 28 + DPLEN, d);
+   check_vfprintf (fout, "a. %R*A, b. %Fe, c. %i%zn", rnd, mpfr, mpf, sz,
+                   &sz);
+-  check_length (5, (unsigned long) sz, 34, lu); /* no format specifier "%zu" in C90 */
+  check_length (5, (unsigned long) sz, 33 + DPLEN, lu); /* no format specifier "%zu" in C90 */
+   check_vfprintf (fout, "a. %Pu, b. %c, c. %Zi%Zn", prec, ch, mpz, &mpz);
+   check_length_with_cmp (6, mpz, 17, mpz_cmp_ui (mpz, 17), Zi);
+   check_vfprintf (fout, "%% a. %#.0RNg, b. %Qx%Rn, c. %p", mpfr, mpq, &mpfr,
+@@ -224,7 +230,7 @@
+ 
+ #ifdef PRINTF_L
+   check_vfprintf (fout, "a. %RA, b. %Lf, c. %QX%zn", mpfr, ld, mpq, &sz);
+-  check_length (9, (unsigned long) sz, 30, lu); /* no format specifier "%zu" in C90 */
+  check_length (9, (unsigned long) sz, 29 + DPLEN, lu); /* no format specifier "%zu" in C90 */
+ #endif
+ 
+ #ifndef NPRINTF_HH
+diff -Naurd mpfr-4.2.0-a/tests/tprintf.c mpfr-4.2.0-b/tests/tprintf.c
+--- mpfr-4.2.0-a/tests/tprintf.c	2023-01-05 17:09:48.000000000 +0000
+++ mpfr-4.2.0-b/tests/tprintf.c	2023-04-17 21:18:26.896579133 +0000
+@@ -68,6 +68,12 @@
+       exit (1);                                                         \
+     }
+ 
+#if MPFR_LCONV_DPTS
+#define DPLEN ((int) strlen (localeconv()->decimal_point))
+#else
+#define DPLEN 1
+#endif
+
+ /* limit for random precision in random() */
+ const int prec_max_printf = 5000;
+ /* boolean: is stdout redirected to a file ? */
+@@ -316,11 +322,11 @@
+   check_vprintf ("a. %c, b. %Rb, c. %u, d. %li%ln", i, mpfr, i, lo, &ulo);
+   check_length (2, ulo, 36, lu);
+   check_vprintf ("a. %hi, b. %*f, c. %Re%hn", ush, 3, f, mpfr, &ush);
+-  check_length (3, ush, 46, hu);
+  check_length (3, ush, 45 + DPLEN, hu);
+   check_vprintf ("a. %hi, b. %f, c. %#.2Rf%n", sh, d, mpfr, &i);
+-  check_length (4, i, 29, d);
+  check_length (4, i, 28 + DPLEN, d);
+   check_vprintf ("a. %R*A, b. %Fe, c. %i%zn", rnd, mpfr, mpf, sz, &sz);
+-  check_length (5, (unsigned long) sz, 34, lu); /* no format specifier '%zu' in C90 */
+  check_length (5, (unsigned long) sz, 33 + DPLEN, lu); /* no format specifier '%zu' in C90 */
+   check_vprintf ("a. %Pu, b. %c, c. %RUG, d. %Zi%Zn", prec, ch, mpfr, mpz, &mpz);
+   check_length_with_cmp (6, mpz, 24, mpz_cmp_ui (mpz, 24), Zi);
+   check_vprintf ("%% a. %#.0RNg, b. %Qx%Rn c. %p",
+@@ -344,7 +350,7 @@
+ 
+ #ifdef PRINTF_L
+   check_vprintf ("a. %RA, b. %Lf, c. %QX%zn", mpfr, ld, mpq, &sz);
+-  check_length (9, (unsigned long) sz, 30, lu); /* no format specifier '%zu' in C90 */
+  check_length (9, (unsigned long) sz, 29 + DPLEN, lu); /* no format specifier '%zu' in C90 */
+ #endif
+ 
+ #ifndef NPRINTF_HH
+diff -Naurd mpfr-4.2.0-a/PATCHES mpfr-4.2.0-b/PATCHES
+--- mpfr-4.2.0-a/PATCHES	2023-04-17 21:19:01.988530337 +0000
+++ mpfr-4.2.0-b/PATCHES	2023-04-17 21:19:02.032530276 +0000
+@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+rec_sqrt-zivloop
+diff -Naurd mpfr-4.2.0-a/VERSION mpfr-4.2.0-b/VERSION
+--- mpfr-4.2.0-a/VERSION	2023-04-17 21:18:26.904579122 +0000
+++ mpfr-4.2.0-b/VERSION	2023-04-17 21:19:02.032530276 +0000
+@@ -1 +1 @@
+-4.2.0-p3
+4.2.0-p4
+diff -Naurd mpfr-4.2.0-a/src/mpfr.h mpfr-4.2.0-b/src/mpfr.h
+--- mpfr-4.2.0-a/src/mpfr.h	2023-04-17 21:18:26.900579128 +0000
+++ mpfr-4.2.0-b/src/mpfr.h	2023-04-17 21:19:02.032530276 +0000
+@@ -27,7 +27,7 @@
+ #define MPFR_VERSION_MAJOR 4
+ #define MPFR_VERSION_MINOR 2
+ #define MPFR_VERSION_PATCHLEVEL 0
+-#define MPFR_VERSION_STRING "4.2.0-p3"
+#define MPFR_VERSION_STRING "4.2.0-p4"
+ 
+ /* User macros:
+    MPFR_USE_FILE:        Define it to make MPFR define functions dealing
+diff -Naurd mpfr-4.2.0-a/src/rec_sqrt.c mpfr-4.2.0-b/src/rec_sqrt.c
+--- mpfr-4.2.0-a/src/rec_sqrt.c	2023-01-05 17:09:48.000000000 +0000
+++ mpfr-4.2.0-b/src/rec_sqrt.c	2023-04-17 21:19:02.024530287 +0000
+@@ -463,6 +463,7 @@
+   int s, cy, inex;
+   mpfr_limb_ptr x;
+   MPFR_TMP_DECL(marker);
+  MPFR_ZIV_DECL (loop);
+ 
+   MPFR_LOG_FUNC
+     (("x[%Pu]=%.*Rg rnd=%d", mpfr_get_prec (u), mpfr_log_prec, u, rnd_mode),
+@@ -530,6 +531,7 @@
+   wp = rp + 11;
+   if (wp < rn * GMP_NUMB_BITS)
+     wp = rn * GMP_NUMB_BITS;
+  MPFR_ZIV_INIT (loop, wp);
+   for (;;)
+     {
+       MPFR_TMP_MARK (marker);
+@@ -561,8 +563,9 @@
+         }
+       MPFR_TMP_FREE(marker);
+ 
+-      wp += GMP_NUMB_BITS;
+      MPFR_ZIV_NEXT (loop, wp);
+     }
+  MPFR_ZIV_FREE (loop);
+   cy = mpfr_round_raw (MPFR_MANT(r), x, wp, 0, rp, rnd_mode, &inex);
+   MPFR_EXP(r) = - (MPFR_EXP(u) - 1 - s) / 2;
+   if (MPFR_UNLIKELY(cy != 0))
+diff -Naurd mpfr-4.2.0-a/src/version.c mpfr-4.2.0-b/src/version.c
+--- mpfr-4.2.0-a/src/version.c	2023-04-17 21:18:26.904579122 +0000
+++ mpfr-4.2.0-b/src/version.c	2023-04-17 21:19:02.032530276 +0000
+@@ -25,5 +25,5 @@
+ const char *
+ mpfr_get_version (void)
+ {
+-  return "4.2.0-p3";
+  return "4.2.0-p4";
+ }
+diff -Naurd mpfr-4.2.0-a/tests/trec_sqrt.c mpfr-4.2.0-b/tests/trec_sqrt.c
+--- mpfr-4.2.0-a/tests/trec_sqrt.c	2023-01-05 17:09:48.000000000 +0000
+++ mpfr-4.2.0-b/tests/trec_sqrt.c	2023-04-17 21:19:02.028530282 +0000
+@@ -242,6 +242,8 @@
+   data_check ("data/rec_sqrt", mpfr_rec_sqrt, "mpfr_rec_sqrt");
+   bad_cases (mpfr_rec_sqrt, pm2, "mpfr_rec_sqrt", 0, -256, 255, 4, 128,
+              800, 50);
+  bad_cases (mpfr_rec_sqrt, pm2, "mpfr_rec_sqrt", 0, -256, 255, 9999, 9999,
+             120000, 1);
+ 
+  end:
+   tests_end_mpfr ();
--- a/mpfr.changes
+++ b/mpfr.changes
@ -1,3 +1,18 @@
+-------------------------------------------------------------------
+Tue Apr 18 08:13:21 UTC 2023 - Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.com>
+
+- Add mpfr-4.2.0-cummulative.patch, cummulative patches for
+  mpfr 4.2.0:
+  * A test of the thousands separator in tsprintf.c is based on the
+    output from the GNU C Library up to 2.36, which is incorrect.
+  * The mpfr_ui_pow_ui function has infinite loop in case of overflow.
+  * The tfprintf and tprintf tests may fail in locales where decimal_point
+    has several bytes, such as ps_AF.
+  * In particular cases that are very hard to round, mpfr_rec_sqrt may yield
+    a stack overflow due to many small allocations in the stack, based on
+    alloca().
+- Remove tests-tsprintf.patch that's included in the above set.
+
 -------------------------------------------------------------------
 Tue Jan 31 15:58:22 UTC 2023 - Andreas Schwab <schwab@suse.de>

--- a/mpfr.spec
+++ b/mpfr.spec
@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ Source0:        https://www.mpfr.org/mpfr-%{version}/mpfr-%{version}.tar.xz
 Source1:        https://www.mpfr.org/mpfr-%{version}/mpfr-%{version}.tar.xz.asc
 Source2:        %{name}.keyring
 Source3:        baselibs.conf
-Patch0:         tests-tsprintf.patch
+Patch0:         mpfr-4.2.0-cummulative.patch
 BuildRequires:  gmp-devel
 BuildRequires:  pkgconfig

--- a/tests-tsprintf.patch
+++ b/tests-tsprintf.patch
@ -1,56 +0,0 @@
-From 5172494c09718ffcb7ef1f19b3b211e3bce8781a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
-From: Vincent Lefevre <vincent@vinc17.net>
-Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2023 17:05:17 +0100
-Subject: [PATCH] [tests/tsprintf.c] Modified a buggy test of the thousands
- separator.
-
-The test
-
-  check_vsprintf ("+01,234,567  :", "%0+ -'13.10Pd:", (mpfr_prec_t) 1234567);
-
-is based on the output from glibc up to 2.36, which is incorrect:
-
-  https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23432
-
-The GNU C Library has apparently been partially fixed in its Git
-repository for the future 2.37, since a tsprintf failure has been
-reported (this is a bug in this test, not in the MPFR library):
-
-  https://sympa.inria.fr/sympa/arc/mpfr/2023-01/msg00001.html
-
-So, modified the test to avoid the particular case of leading zeros
-due to the precision field larger than the number of digits. This
-case has already been tested without the thousands separator (where
-there are no issues with the C libraries), so that we do not miss
-much testing. Added a comment explaining the issue and a possible
-solution for future testing of this particular case (if need be).
---
- tests/tsprintf.c | 12 +++++++++++-
- 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
-
-diff --git a/tests/tsprintf.c b/tests/tsprintf.c
-index c68b2ba71..c0182503b 100644
--- a/tests/tsprintf.c
-+++ b/tests/tsprintf.c
-@@ -1719,7 +1719,17 @@ test_locale (void)
-   check_sprintf ("000000001,000", "%'013.4Rg", x);
- 
- #ifdef PRINTF_GROUPFLAG
-  check_vsprintf ("+01,234,567  :", "%0+ -'13.10Pd:", (mpfr_prec_t) 1234567);
-+  /* Do not test the thousands separator with a precision field larger
-+     than the number of digits (thus needing leading zeros), such as
-+     "%0+ -'13.10Pd:" (used up to MPFR 4.2.0), since the GNU libc is
-+     buggy: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23432
-+     We don't know about the other implementations.
-+     If we wanted to check that and avoid a failure of the test because of
-+     a buggy C library (while MPFR would be consistent with the C library),
-+     we could compare the MPFR output with both the correct output and the
-+     output from the C library (possibly buggy). But to do that in a clean
-+     way, this would require a change in the check_vsprintf() call. */
-+  check_vsprintf ("+1,234,567   :", "%0+ -'13Pd:", (mpfr_prec_t) 1234567);
- #endif
- 
-   mpfr_clear (x);
-- 
-2.39.1
-