pool/neovim
SHA256
17
0
Fork 2
Code Issues Pull Requests Activity

update header #1

Manually merged
rrahl0 merged 1 commits from rrahl0/neovim:leap-16.0 into leap-16.0 2026-02-17 17:38:21 +01:00
Conversation 14 Commits 1 Files Changed 2 +6 -1
rrahl0 commented 2026-02-03 13:53:12 +01:00
Contributor
Copy Link
No description provided.
rrahl0 added 1 commit 2026-02-03 13:53:13 +01:00
update header d018c84566
autogits_workflow_pr_bot requested review from legaldb 2026-02-03 13:53:51 +01:00
autogits_workflow_pr_bot requested review from maintenance-release-review 2026-02-03 13:53:51 +01:00
autogits_workflow_pr_bot requested review from opensuse-review 2026-02-03 13:53:51 +01:00
maintenance-release-review commented 2026-02-03 14:00:47 +01:00
First-time contributor
Copy Link

Review by maintenance-release-review represents a group of reviewers: abergmann, amattiazzo, bfilho, cmatos, crazybyte, emanuelecappello, gsonnu, maintenance-robot, mauriziogalli, mbozicevic, mimi_vx, mschnitzer, msmeissn, pluskalm, rfrohl, slemke .

Do not use standard review interface to review on behalf of the group.
To accept the review on behalf of the group, create the following comment: @maintenance-release-review: approve.
To request changes on behalf of the group, create the following comment: @maintenance-release-review: decline followed with lines justifying the decision.
Future edits of the comments are ignored, a new comment is required to change the review state.

Review by maintenance-release-review represents a group of reviewers: abergmann, amattiazzo, bfilho, cmatos, crazybyte, emanuelecappello, gsonnu, maintenance-robot, mauriziogalli, mbozicevic, mimi_vx, mschnitzer, msmeissn, pluskalm, rfrohl, slemke . Do **not** use standard review interface to review on behalf of the group. To accept the review on behalf of the group, create the following comment: `@maintenance-release-review: approve`. To request changes on behalf of the group, create the following comment: `@maintenance-release-review: decline` followed with lines justifying the decision. Future edits of the comments are ignored, a new comment is required to change the review state.
opensuse-review commented 2026-02-03 14:02:54 +01:00
Member
Copy Link

Review by opensuse-review represents a group of reviewers: alarrosa, anag, atartamo, bigironman, darix, dimstar, dmach, eroca, jdsn, jengelh, mcalabkova, mstrigl, nkrapp, oertel, RBrownSUSE, simotek, smithfarm .

Do not use standard review interface to review on behalf of the group.
To accept the review on behalf of the group, create the following comment: @opensuse-review: approve.
To request changes on behalf of the group, create the following comment: @opensuse-review: decline followed with lines justifying the decision.
Future edits of the comments are ignored, a new comment is required to change the review state.

Review by opensuse-review represents a group of reviewers: alarrosa, anag, atartamo, bigironman, darix, dimstar, dmach, eroca, jdsn, jengelh, mcalabkova, mstrigl, nkrapp, oertel, RBrownSUSE, simotek, smithfarm . Do **not** use standard review interface to review on behalf of the group. To accept the review on behalf of the group, create the following comment: `@opensuse-review: approve`. To request changes on behalf of the group, create the following comment: `@opensuse-review: decline` followed with lines justifying the decision. Future edits of the comments are ignored, a new comment is required to change the review state.
legaldb commented 2026-02-03 14:07:51 +01:00
Member
Copy Link

Legal reviewed as acceptable:

Accepted because previously reviewed under the same license (472135)
Legal reviewed as [acceptable](https://legaldb.suse.de/reviews/details/502925): ``` Accepted because previously reviewed under the same license (472135) ```
report.md
2.2 KiB
legaldb approved these changes 2026-02-03 14:07:51 +01:00
rfrohl commented 2026-02-03 18:19:26 +01:00
First-time contributor
Copy Link

@rrahl0 Can you double check if this is correct:

# Copyright (c) specCURRENT_YEAR SUSE LLC and contributors

I would expect CURRENT_YEAR to be replaced

@rrahl0 Can you double check if this is correct: ``` # Copyright (c) specCURRENT_YEAR SUSE LLC and contributors ``` I would expect `CURRENT_YEAR` to be replaced
rfrohl commented 2026-02-03 18:19:36 +01:00
First-time contributor
Copy Link

@maintenance-release-review: decline

@maintenance-release-review: decline
maintenance-release-review requested changes 2026-02-03 18:22:49 +01:00
Dismissed
maintenance-release-review left a comment
First-time contributor
Copy Link

rfrohl requested changes on behalf of maintenance-release-review. See #1 (comment)

rfrohl requested changes on behalf of maintenance-release-review. See https://src.opensuse.org/pool/neovim/pulls/1#issuecomment-87334
rrahl0 commented 2026-02-04 07:16:55 +01:00
Author
Contributor
Copy Link

@rfrohl yes, this is correct. it's just a macro which gets replaced, when the spec file gets created.

@rfrohl yes, this is correct. it's just a macro which gets replaced, when the spec file gets created.
autogits_obs_staging_bot commented 2026-02-17 11:53:08 +01:00
First-time contributor
Copy Link

Build successful, for more information go in https://build.opensuse.org/project/show/openSUSE:Backports:SLE-16.0:PullRequest:451.

Build successful, for more information go in https://build.opensuse.org/project/show/openSUSE:Backports:SLE-16.0:PullRequest:451.
eroca commented 2026-02-17 17:23:29 +01:00
Owner
Copy Link

@opensuse-review : approve

LGTM

@opensuse-review : approve LGTM
eroca commented 2026-02-17 17:23:30 +01:00
Owner
Copy Link

merge ok

merge ok
opensuse-review approved these changes 2026-02-17 17:26:31 +01:00
opensuse-review left a comment
Member
Copy Link

eroca approved a review on behalf of opensuse-review

eroca approved a review on behalf of opensuse-review
rfrohl commented 2026-02-17 17:28:16 +01:00
First-time contributor
Copy Link

@maintenance-release-review: approve

@maintenance-release-review: approve
maintenance-release-review approved these changes 2026-02-17 17:33:12 +01:00
maintenance-release-review left a comment
First-time contributor
Copy Link

rfrohl approved a review on behalf of maintenance-release-review

rfrohl approved a review on behalf of maintenance-release-review
rrahl0 manually merged commit d018c84566 into leap-16.0 2026-02-17 17:38:21 +01:00
Sign in to join this conversation.
Reviewers
No Reviewers
legaldb
opensuse-review
maintenance-release-review
Labels
Clear labels
legaldb
Critical Priority
Critical legaldb priority
Archived
legaldb
High Priority
2
High legaldb priority
legaldb
Normal Priority
1
Normal legaldb priority
No Label
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Assignees
Clear assignees
adamm_super adrianSuSE autobuild-owner autobuild-review autogits_workflow_pr_bot bigironman dirkmueller eroca factory_bot gitea_test legaldb lkocman-factory maxlin_factory opensuse-review packagehub-review smithfarm
No Assignees
7 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: pool/neovim#1
Delete Branch "rrahl0/neovim:leap-16.0"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?