pool/neovim
SHA256
17
0
Fork 2
Code Issues Pull Requests 1 Activity

update header #1

Open
rrahl0 wants to merge 1 commits from rrahl0/neovim:leap-16.0 into leap-16.0
pull from: rrahl0/neovim:leap-16.0
merge into: pool:leap-16.0
Conversation 8 Commits 1 Files Changed 2 +6 -1
rrahl0 commented 2026-02-03 13:53:12 +01:00
First-time contributor
Copy Link
No description provided.
rrahl0 added 1 commit 2026-02-03 13:53:13 +01:00
update header d018c84566
autogits_workflow_pr_bot requested review from legaldb 2026-02-03 13:53:51 +01:00
autogits_workflow_pr_bot requested review from maintenance-release-review 2026-02-03 13:53:51 +01:00
autogits_workflow_pr_bot requested review from opensuse-review 2026-02-03 13:53:51 +01:00
maintenance-release-review commented 2026-02-03 14:00:47 +01:00
First-time contributor
Copy Link

Review by maintenance-release-review represents a group of reviewers: abergmann, amattiazzo, bfilho, cmatos, crazybyte, emanuelecappello, gsonnu, maintenance-robot, mauriziogalli, mbozicevic, mimi_vx, mschnitzer, msmeissn, pluskalm, rfrohl, slemke .

Do not use standard review interface to review on behalf of the group.
To accept the review on behalf of the group, create the following comment: @maintenance-release-review: approve.
To request changes on behalf of the group, create the following comment: @maintenance-release-review: decline followed with lines justifying the decision.
Future edits of the comments are ignored, a new comment is required to change the review state.

Review by maintenance-release-review represents a group of reviewers: abergmann, amattiazzo, bfilho, cmatos, crazybyte, emanuelecappello, gsonnu, maintenance-robot, mauriziogalli, mbozicevic, mimi_vx, mschnitzer, msmeissn, pluskalm, rfrohl, slemke . Do **not** use standard review interface to review on behalf of the group. To accept the review on behalf of the group, create the following comment: `@maintenance-release-review: approve`. To request changes on behalf of the group, create the following comment: `@maintenance-release-review: decline` followed with lines justifying the decision. Future edits of the comments are ignored, a new comment is required to change the review state.
opensuse-review commented 2026-02-03 14:02:54 +01:00
Member
Copy Link

Review by opensuse-review represents a group of reviewers: alarrosa, anag, atartamo, bigironman, darix, dimstar, dmach, eroca, jdsn, jengelh, mcalabkova, mstrigl, nkrapp, oertel, RBrownSUSE, simotek, smithfarm .

Do not use standard review interface to review on behalf of the group.
To accept the review on behalf of the group, create the following comment: @opensuse-review: approve.
To request changes on behalf of the group, create the following comment: @opensuse-review: decline followed with lines justifying the decision.
Future edits of the comments are ignored, a new comment is required to change the review state.

Review by opensuse-review represents a group of reviewers: alarrosa, anag, atartamo, bigironman, darix, dimstar, dmach, eroca, jdsn, jengelh, mcalabkova, mstrigl, nkrapp, oertel, RBrownSUSE, simotek, smithfarm . Do **not** use standard review interface to review on behalf of the group. To accept the review on behalf of the group, create the following comment: `@opensuse-review: approve`. To request changes on behalf of the group, create the following comment: `@opensuse-review: decline` followed with lines justifying the decision. Future edits of the comments are ignored, a new comment is required to change the review state.
legaldb commented 2026-02-03 14:07:51 +01:00
Member
Copy Link

Legal reviewed as acceptable:

Accepted because previously reviewed under the same license (472135)
Legal reviewed as [acceptable](https://legaldb.suse.de/reviews/details/502925): ``` Accepted because previously reviewed under the same license (472135) ```
report.md
2.2 KiB
legaldb approved these changes 2026-02-03 14:07:51 +01:00
rfrohl commented 2026-02-03 18:19:26 +01:00
First-time contributor
Copy Link

@rrahl0 Can you double check if this is correct:

# Copyright (c) specCURRENT_YEAR SUSE LLC and contributors

I would expect CURRENT_YEAR to be replaced

@rrahl0 Can you double check if this is correct: ``` # Copyright (c) specCURRENT_YEAR SUSE LLC and contributors ``` I would expect `CURRENT_YEAR` to be replaced
rfrohl commented 2026-02-03 18:19:36 +01:00
First-time contributor
Copy Link

@maintenance-release-review: decline

@maintenance-release-review: decline
maintenance-release-review requested changes 2026-02-03 18:22:49 +01:00
maintenance-release-review left a comment
First-time contributor
Copy Link

rfrohl requested changes on behalf of maintenance-release-review. See #1 (comment)

rfrohl requested changes on behalf of maintenance-release-review. See https://src.opensuse.org/pool/neovim/pulls/1#issuecomment-87334
rrahl0 commented 2026-02-04 07:16:55 +01:00
Author
First-time contributor
Copy Link

@rfrohl yes, this is correct. it's just a macro which gets replaced, when the spec file gets created.

@rfrohl yes, this is correct. it's just a macro which gets replaced, when the spec file gets created.
This pull request can be merged automatically.
You are not authorized to merge this pull request.
View command line instructions

Checkout

From your project repository, check out a new branch and test the changes.
git fetch -u leap-16.0:rrahl0-leap-16.0
git checkout rrahl0-leap-16.0
Sign in to join this conversation.
Reviewers
No Reviewers
opensuse-review
legaldb
maintenance-release-review
Labels
Clear labels
legaldb
Critical Priority
Critical legaldb priority
Archived
legaldb
High Priority
2
High legaldb priority
legaldb
Normal Priority
1
Normal legaldb priority
No Label
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Assignees
Clear assignees
adamm_super adrianSuSE autobuild-owner autobuild-review autogits_workflow_pr_bot bigironman dirkmueller eroca factory_bot gitea_test legaldb lkocman-factory maxlin_factory opensuse-review packagehub-review smithfarm
No Assignees
5 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: pool/neovim#1
Delete Branch "rrahl0/neovim:leap-16.0"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?