pool/openQA
SHA256
18
0
Fork 4
Code Issues Pull Requests 1 Activity

Update to 5.1761296552.ae7c17aa #9

Merged
eroca merged 1 commits from os-autoinst-obs-workflow/openQA:leap-16.0 into leap-16.0 2025-11-03 10:23:35 +01:00
Conversation 68 Commits 1 Files Changed 11 +152 -15
os-autoinst-obs-workflow commented 2025-09-24 16:34:17 +02:00
Contributor
Copy Link

Automatic submission via https://github.com/os-autoinst/scripts/blob/master/os-autoinst-obs-auto-submit

Automatic submission via https://github.com/os-autoinst/scripts/blob/master/os-autoinst-obs-auto-submit
autogits_workflow_pr_bot requested review from bigironman 2025-09-24 16:34:37 +02:00
autogits_workflow_pr_bot requested review from legaldb 2025-09-24 16:34:37 +02:00
autogits_workflow_pr_bot requested review from lkocman-factory 2025-09-24 16:34:37 +02:00
autogits_workflow_pr_bot requested review from maxlin_factory 2025-09-24 16:34:37 +02:00
autogits_workflow_pr_bot requested review from smithfarm 2025-09-24 16:34:38 +02:00
legaldb commented 2025-09-24 16:46:49 +02:00
Member
Copy Link

Legal reviewed as acceptable_by_lawyer:

Accepted because previously reviewed under the same license (467255)
Legal reviewed as [acceptable_by_lawyer](https://legaldb.suse.de/reviews/details/467256): ``` Accepted because previously reviewed under the same license (467255) ```
report.md
1.0 KiB
legaldb approved these changes 2025-09-24 16:46:49 +02:00
Dismissed
os-autoinst-obs-workflow dismissed legaldb's review 2025-09-24 18:38:46 +02:00
Reason:

New commits pushed, approval review dismissed automatically according to repository settings

autogits_workflow_pr_bot requested review from legaldb 2025-09-24 18:39:04 +02:00
legaldb commented 2025-09-24 18:57:01 +02:00
Member
Copy Link

Legal reviewed as acceptable_by_lawyer:

Accepted because previously reviewed under the same license (467270)
Legal reviewed as [acceptable_by_lawyer](https://legaldb.suse.de/reviews/details/467272): ``` Accepted because previously reviewed under the same license (467270) ```
report.md
1.0 KiB
legaldb approved these changes 2025-09-24 18:57:01 +02:00
Dismissed
os-autoinst-obs-workflow dismissed legaldb's review 2025-09-25 19:23:31 +02:00
Reason:

New commits pushed, approval review dismissed automatically according to repository settings

autogits_workflow_pr_bot requested review from legaldb 2025-09-25 19:23:51 +02:00
legaldb commented 2025-09-25 19:33:58 +02:00
Member
Copy Link

Legal reviewed as acceptable_by_lawyer:

Accepted because previously reviewed under the same license (467272)
Legal reviewed as [acceptable_by_lawyer](https://legaldb.suse.de/reviews/details/467410): ``` Accepted because previously reviewed under the same license (467272) ```
report.md
1.0 KiB
legaldb approved these changes 2025-09-25 19:33:59 +02:00
Dismissed
maxlin_factory approved these changes 2025-09-26 15:10:06 +02:00
Dismissed
autogits_workflow_pr_bot requested review from autobuild-review 2025-09-26 15:10:25 +02:00
autobuild-review commented 2025-09-26 15:16:23 +02:00
Member
Copy Link

Review by autobuild-review represents a group of reviewers: atartamo, dmach, jdsn, mstrigl, darix, smithfarm, oertel, bigironman, .

Do not use standard review interface to review on behalf of the group.
To accept the review on behalf of the group, create the following comment: @autobuild-review: approve.
To request changes on behalf of the group, create the following comment: @autobuild-review: decline followed with lines justifying the decision.
Future edits of the comments are ignored, a new comment is required to change the review state.

Review by autobuild-review represents a group of reviewers: atartamo, dmach, jdsn, mstrigl, darix, smithfarm, oertel, bigironman, . Do **not** use standard review interface to review on behalf of the group. To accept the review on behalf of the group, create the following comment: `@autobuild-review: approve`. To request changes on behalf of the group, create the following comment: `@autobuild-review: decline` followed with lines justifying the decision. Future edits of the comments are ignored, a new comment is required to change the review state.
autogits_workflow_pr_bot commented 2025-09-26 16:03:38 +02:00
Member
Copy Link

Closing here because the associated Project PR has been closed.

Closing here because the associated Project PR has been closed.
eroca reopened this pull request 2025-09-26 16:03:47 +02:00
autogits_workflow_pr_bot requested review from packagehub-review 2025-09-26 16:04:18 +02:00
packagehub-review commented 2025-09-26 16:11:55 +02:00
Member
Copy Link

Review by packagehub-review represents a group of reviewers: bigironman, lkocman-factory, maxlin_factory, smithfarm .

Do not use standard review interface to review on behalf of the group.
To accept the review on behalf of the group, create the following comment: @packagehub-review: approve.
To request changes on behalf of the group, create the following comment: @packagehub-review: decline followed with lines justifying the decision.
Future edits of the comments are ignored, a new comment is required to change the review state.

Review by packagehub-review represents a group of reviewers: bigironman, lkocman-factory, maxlin_factory, smithfarm . Do **not** use standard review interface to review on behalf of the group. To accept the review on behalf of the group, create the following comment: `@packagehub-review: approve`. To request changes on behalf of the group, create the following comment: `@packagehub-review: decline` followed with lines justifying the decision. Future edits of the comments are ignored, a new comment is required to change the review state.
eroca closed this pull request 2025-09-26 16:53:09 +02:00
eroca reopened this pull request 2025-09-26 16:53:11 +02:00
eroca removed review request for autobuild-review 2025-09-26 17:02:33 +02:00
packagehub-review requested review from maxlin_factory 2025-09-26 17:08:21 +02:00
os-autoinst-obs-workflow dismissed legaldb's review 2025-09-26 23:15:05 +02:00
Reason:

New commits pushed, approval review dismissed automatically according to repository settings

os-autoinst-obs-workflow dismissed maxlin_factory's review 2025-09-26 23:15:05 +02:00
Reason:

New commits pushed, approval review dismissed automatically according to repository settings

autogits_workflow_pr_bot requested review from legaldb 2025-09-26 23:15:25 +02:00
packagehub-review commented 2025-09-26 23:24:04 +02:00
Member
Copy Link

Review by packagehub-review represents a group of reviewers: bigironman, lkocman-factory, maxlin_factory, .

Do not use standard review interface to review on behalf of the group.
To accept the review on behalf of the group, create the following comment: @packagehub-review: approve.
To request changes on behalf of the group, create the following comment: @packagehub-review: decline followed with lines justifying the decision.
Future edits of the comments are ignored, a new comment is required to change the review state.

Review by packagehub-review represents a group of reviewers: bigironman, lkocman-factory, maxlin_factory, . Do **not** use standard review interface to review on behalf of the group. To accept the review on behalf of the group, create the following comment: `@packagehub-review: approve`. To request changes on behalf of the group, create the following comment: `@packagehub-review: decline` followed with lines justifying the decision. Future edits of the comments are ignored, a new comment is required to change the review state.
legaldb commented 2025-09-26 23:27:05 +02:00
Member
Copy Link

Legal reviewed as acceptable_by_lawyer:

Accepted because previously reviewed under the same license (467548)
Legal reviewed as [acceptable_by_lawyer](https://legaldb.suse.de/reviews/details/467550): ``` Accepted because previously reviewed under the same license (467548) ```
report.md
1.0 KiB
legaldb approved these changes 2025-09-26 23:27:05 +02:00
Dismissed
os-autoinst-obs-workflow dismissed legaldb's review 2025-09-29 17:15:14 +02:00
Reason:

New commits pushed, approval review dismissed automatically according to repository settings

autogits_workflow_pr_bot requested review from legaldb 2025-09-29 17:15:35 +02:00
packagehub-review commented 2025-09-29 17:20:25 +02:00
Member
Copy Link

Review by packagehub-review represents a group of reviewers: bigironman, lkocman-factory, maxlin_factory, .

Do not use standard review interface to review on behalf of the group.
To accept the review on behalf of the group, create the following comment: @packagehub-review: approve.
To request changes on behalf of the group, create the following comment: @packagehub-review: decline followed with lines justifying the decision.
Future edits of the comments are ignored, a new comment is required to change the review state.

Review by packagehub-review represents a group of reviewers: bigironman, lkocman-factory, maxlin_factory, . Do **not** use standard review interface to review on behalf of the group. To accept the review on behalf of the group, create the following comment: `@packagehub-review: approve`. To request changes on behalf of the group, create the following comment: `@packagehub-review: decline` followed with lines justifying the decision. Future edits of the comments are ignored, a new comment is required to change the review state.
legaldb commented 2025-09-29 17:34:14 +02:00
Member
Copy Link

Legal reviewed as acceptable_by_lawyer:

Accepted because previously reviewed under the same license (467917)
Legal reviewed as [acceptable_by_lawyer](https://legaldb.suse.de/reviews/details/467920): ``` Accepted because previously reviewed under the same license (467917) ```
report.md
1.0 KiB
legaldb approved these changes 2025-09-29 17:34:15 +02:00
Dismissed
os-autoinst-obs-workflow dismissed legaldb's review 2025-10-01 00:02:43 +02:00
Reason:

New commits pushed, approval review dismissed automatically according to repository settings

autogits_workflow_pr_bot requested review from legaldb 2025-10-01 00:03:03 +02:00
packagehub-review commented 2025-10-01 00:05:35 +02:00
Member
Copy Link

Review by packagehub-review represents a group of reviewers: bigironman, lkocman-factory, maxlin_factory, .

Do not use standard review interface to review on behalf of the group.
To accept the review on behalf of the group, create the following comment: @packagehub-review: approve.
To request changes on behalf of the group, create the following comment: @packagehub-review: decline followed with lines justifying the decision.
Future edits of the comments are ignored, a new comment is required to change the review state.

Review by packagehub-review represents a group of reviewers: bigironman, lkocman-factory, maxlin_factory, . Do **not** use standard review interface to review on behalf of the group. To accept the review on behalf of the group, create the following comment: `@packagehub-review: approve`. To request changes on behalf of the group, create the following comment: `@packagehub-review: decline` followed with lines justifying the decision. Future edits of the comments are ignored, a new comment is required to change the review state.
legaldb commented 2025-10-01 00:17:17 +02:00
Member
Copy Link

Legal reviewed as acceptable_by_lawyer:

Accepted because previously reviewed under the same license (468239)
Legal reviewed as [acceptable_by_lawyer](https://legaldb.suse.de/reviews/details/468241): ``` Accepted because previously reviewed under the same license (468239) ```
report.md
1.0 KiB
legaldb approved these changes 2025-10-01 00:17:17 +02:00
Dismissed
os-autoinst-obs-workflow dismissed legaldb's review 2025-10-01 22:04:13 +02:00
Reason:

New commits pushed, approval review dismissed automatically according to repository settings

autogits_workflow_pr_bot requested review from legaldb 2025-10-01 22:04:35 +02:00
packagehub-review commented 2025-10-01 22:07:08 +02:00
Member
Copy Link

Review by packagehub-review represents a group of reviewers: bigironman, lkocman-factory, maxlin_factory, .

Do not use standard review interface to review on behalf of the group.
To accept the review on behalf of the group, create the following comment: @packagehub-review: approve.
To request changes on behalf of the group, create the following comment: @packagehub-review: decline followed with lines justifying the decision.
Future edits of the comments are ignored, a new comment is required to change the review state.

Review by packagehub-review represents a group of reviewers: bigironman, lkocman-factory, maxlin_factory, . Do **not** use standard review interface to review on behalf of the group. To accept the review on behalf of the group, create the following comment: `@packagehub-review: approve`. To request changes on behalf of the group, create the following comment: `@packagehub-review: decline` followed with lines justifying the decision. Future edits of the comments are ignored, a new comment is required to change the review state.
legaldb commented 2025-10-01 22:19:07 +02:00
Member
Copy Link

Legal reviewed as acceptable_by_lawyer:

Accepted because previously reviewed under the same license (468370)
Legal reviewed as [acceptable_by_lawyer](https://legaldb.suse.de/reviews/details/468371): ``` Accepted because previously reviewed under the same license (468370) ```
report.md
1.0 KiB
legaldb approved these changes 2025-10-01 22:19:07 +02:00
Dismissed
os-autoinst-obs-workflow dismissed legaldb's review 2025-10-02 20:15:14 +02:00
Reason:

New commits pushed, approval review dismissed automatically according to repository settings

autogits_workflow_pr_bot requested review from legaldb 2025-10-02 20:15:34 +02:00
packagehub-review commented 2025-10-02 20:17:43 +02:00
Member
Copy Link

Review by packagehub-review represents a group of reviewers: lkocman-factory, maxlin_factory, , .

Do not use standard review interface to review on behalf of the group.
To accept the review on behalf of the group, create the following comment: @packagehub-review: approve.
To request changes on behalf of the group, create the following comment: @packagehub-review: decline followed with lines justifying the decision.
Future edits of the comments are ignored, a new comment is required to change the review state.

Review by packagehub-review represents a group of reviewers: lkocman-factory, maxlin_factory, , . Do **not** use standard review interface to review on behalf of the group. To accept the review on behalf of the group, create the following comment: `@packagehub-review: approve`. To request changes on behalf of the group, create the following comment: `@packagehub-review: decline` followed with lines justifying the decision. Future edits of the comments are ignored, a new comment is required to change the review state.
legaldb commented 2025-10-02 20:32:28 +02:00
Member
Copy Link

Legal reviewed as acceptable_by_lawyer:

Accepted because previously reviewed under the same license (475109)
Legal reviewed as [acceptable_by_lawyer](https://legaldb.suse.de/reviews/details/475110): ``` Accepted because previously reviewed under the same license (475109) ```
report.md
1.0 KiB
legaldb approved these changes 2025-10-02 20:32:28 +02:00
Dismissed
os-autoinst-obs-workflow dismissed legaldb's review 2025-10-03 19:48:05 +02:00
Reason:

New commits pushed, approval review dismissed automatically according to repository settings

autogits_workflow_pr_bot requested review from legaldb 2025-10-03 19:48:27 +02:00
packagehub-review commented 2025-10-03 19:53:43 +02:00
Member
Copy Link

Review by packagehub-review represents a group of reviewers: lkocman-factory, maxlin_factory, , .

Do not use standard review interface to review on behalf of the group.
To accept the review on behalf of the group, create the following comment: @packagehub-review: approve.
To request changes on behalf of the group, create the following comment: @packagehub-review: decline followed with lines justifying the decision.
Future edits of the comments are ignored, a new comment is required to change the review state.

Review by packagehub-review represents a group of reviewers: lkocman-factory, maxlin_factory, , . Do **not** use standard review interface to review on behalf of the group. To accept the review on behalf of the group, create the following comment: `@packagehub-review: approve`. To request changes on behalf of the group, create the following comment: `@packagehub-review: decline` followed with lines justifying the decision. Future edits of the comments are ignored, a new comment is required to change the review state.
legaldb commented 2025-10-03 20:05:32 +02:00
Member
Copy Link

Legal reviewed as acceptable_by_lawyer:

Accepted because previously reviewed under the same license (475235)
Legal reviewed as [acceptable_by_lawyer](https://legaldb.suse.de/reviews/details/475237): ``` Accepted because previously reviewed under the same license (475235) ```
report.md
1.0 KiB
legaldb approved these changes 2025-10-03 20:05:33 +02:00
Dismissed
os-autoinst-obs-workflow dismissed legaldb's review 2025-10-05 17:14:23 +02:00
Reason:

New commits pushed, approval review dismissed automatically according to repository settings

autogits_workflow_pr_bot requested review from legaldb 2025-10-05 17:14:45 +02:00
packagehub-review commented 2025-10-05 17:23:53 +02:00
Member
Copy Link

Review by packagehub-review represents a group of reviewers: lkocman-factory, maxlin_factory, , .

Do not use standard review interface to review on behalf of the group.
To accept the review on behalf of the group, create the following comment: @packagehub-review: approve.
To request changes on behalf of the group, create the following comment: @packagehub-review: decline followed with lines justifying the decision.
Future edits of the comments are ignored, a new comment is required to change the review state.

Review by packagehub-review represents a group of reviewers: lkocman-factory, maxlin_factory, , . Do **not** use standard review interface to review on behalf of the group. To accept the review on behalf of the group, create the following comment: `@packagehub-review: approve`. To request changes on behalf of the group, create the following comment: `@packagehub-review: decline` followed with lines justifying the decision. Future edits of the comments are ignored, a new comment is required to change the review state.
legaldb commented 2025-10-05 17:31:14 +02:00
Member
Copy Link

Legal review in progress.

Legal review [in progress](https://legaldb.suse.de/reviews/details/475294).
report.md
399 B
packagehub-review commented 2025-10-07 13:33:13 +02:00
Member
Copy Link

Review by packagehub-review represents a group of reviewers: lkocman-factory, maxlin_factory, , .

Do not use standard review interface to review on behalf of the group.
To accept the review on behalf of the group, create the following comment: @packagehub-review: approve.
To request changes on behalf of the group, create the following comment: @packagehub-review: decline followed with lines justifying the decision.
Future edits of the comments are ignored, a new comment is required to change the review state.

Review by packagehub-review represents a group of reviewers: lkocman-factory, maxlin_factory, , . Do **not** use standard review interface to review on behalf of the group. To accept the review on behalf of the group, create the following comment: `@packagehub-review: approve`. To request changes on behalf of the group, create the following comment: `@packagehub-review: decline` followed with lines justifying the decision. Future edits of the comments are ignored, a new comment is required to change the review state.
legaldb commented 2025-10-07 13:37:37 +02:00
Member
Copy Link

Legal reviewed as acceptable_by_lawyer:

Accepted because previously reviewed under the same license (475360)
Legal reviewed as [acceptable_by_lawyer](https://legaldb.suse.de/reviews/details/475580): ``` Accepted because previously reviewed under the same license (475360) ```
report.md
1.0 KiB
legaldb approved these changes 2025-10-07 13:37:37 +02:00
Dismissed
os-autoinst-obs-workflow dismissed legaldb's review 2025-10-08 12:23:00 +02:00
Reason:

New commits pushed, approval review dismissed automatically according to repository settings

autogits_workflow_pr_bot requested review from legaldb 2025-10-08 12:23:22 +02:00
packagehub-review commented 2025-10-08 12:28:58 +02:00
Member
Copy Link

Review by packagehub-review represents a group of reviewers: lkocman-factory, maxlin_factory, , .

Do not use standard review interface to review on behalf of the group.
To accept the review on behalf of the group, create the following comment: @packagehub-review: approve.
To request changes on behalf of the group, create the following comment: @packagehub-review: decline followed with lines justifying the decision.
Future edits of the comments are ignored, a new comment is required to change the review state.

Review by packagehub-review represents a group of reviewers: lkocman-factory, maxlin_factory, , . Do **not** use standard review interface to review on behalf of the group. To accept the review on behalf of the group, create the following comment: `@packagehub-review: approve`. To request changes on behalf of the group, create the following comment: `@packagehub-review: decline` followed with lines justifying the decision. Future edits of the comments are ignored, a new comment is required to change the review state.
legaldb commented 2025-10-08 12:40:17 +02:00
Member
Copy Link

Legal reviewed as acceptable_by_lawyer:

Accepted because previously reviewed under the same license (475747)
Legal reviewed as [acceptable_by_lawyer](https://legaldb.suse.de/reviews/details/475749): ``` Accepted because previously reviewed under the same license (475747) ```
report.md
1.0 KiB
legaldb approved these changes 2025-10-08 12:40:17 +02:00
Dismissed
os-autoinst-obs-workflow dismissed legaldb's review 2025-10-11 08:36:23 +02:00
Reason:

New commits pushed, approval review dismissed automatically according to repository settings

autogits_workflow_pr_bot requested review from legaldb 2025-10-11 08:36:44 +02:00
autogits_workflow_pr_bot requested review from maintenance-release-review 2025-10-11 08:36:44 +02:00
autogits_workflow_pr_bot requested review from opensuse-review 2025-10-11 08:36:45 +02:00
opensuse-review commented 2025-10-11 08:38:34 +02:00
Member
Copy Link

Review by opensuse-review represents a group of reviewers: alarrosa, anag, atartamo, bigironman, darix, dimstar, dmach, eroca, jdsn, jengelh, mcalabkova, mstrigl, nkrapp, oertel, RBrownSUSE, simotek, smithfarm .

Do not use standard review interface to review on behalf of the group.
To accept the review on behalf of the group, create the following comment: @opensuse-review: approve.
To request changes on behalf of the group, create the following comment: @opensuse-review: decline followed with lines justifying the decision.
Future edits of the comments are ignored, a new comment is required to change the review state.

Review by opensuse-review represents a group of reviewers: alarrosa, anag, atartamo, bigironman, darix, dimstar, dmach, eroca, jdsn, jengelh, mcalabkova, mstrigl, nkrapp, oertel, RBrownSUSE, simotek, smithfarm . Do **not** use standard review interface to review on behalf of the group. To accept the review on behalf of the group, create the following comment: `@opensuse-review: approve`. To request changes on behalf of the group, create the following comment: `@opensuse-review: decline` followed with lines justifying the decision. Future edits of the comments are ignored, a new comment is required to change the review state.
maintenance-release-review commented 2025-10-11 08:38:35 +02:00
First-time contributor
Copy Link

Review by maintenance-release-review represents a group of reviewers: abergmann, amattiazzo, bfilho, cmatos, crazybyte, emanuelecappello, gsonnu, maintenance-robot, mauriziogalli, mbozicevic, mimi_vx, mschnitzer, msmeissn, pluskalm, rfrohl, slemke .

Do not use standard review interface to review on behalf of the group.
To accept the review on behalf of the group, create the following comment: @maintenance-release-review: approve.
To request changes on behalf of the group, create the following comment: @maintenance-release-review: decline followed with lines justifying the decision.
Future edits of the comments are ignored, a new comment is required to change the review state.

Review by maintenance-release-review represents a group of reviewers: abergmann, amattiazzo, bfilho, cmatos, crazybyte, emanuelecappello, gsonnu, maintenance-robot, mauriziogalli, mbozicevic, mimi_vx, mschnitzer, msmeissn, pluskalm, rfrohl, slemke . Do **not** use standard review interface to review on behalf of the group. To accept the review on behalf of the group, create the following comment: `@maintenance-release-review: approve`. To request changes on behalf of the group, create the following comment: `@maintenance-release-review: decline` followed with lines justifying the decision. Future edits of the comments are ignored, a new comment is required to change the review state.
opensuse-review commented 2025-10-12 07:35:50 +02:00
Member
Copy Link

Review by opensuse-review represents a group of reviewers: alarrosa, anag, atartamo, bigironman, darix, dimstar, dmach, eroca, jdsn, jengelh, mcalabkova, mstrigl, nkrapp, oertel, RBrownSUSE, simotek, smithfarm .

Do not use standard review interface to review on behalf of the group.
To accept the review on behalf of the group, create the following comment: @opensuse-review: approve.
To request changes on behalf of the group, create the following comment: @opensuse-review: decline followed with lines justifying the decision.
Future edits of the comments are ignored, a new comment is required to change the review state.

Review by opensuse-review represents a group of reviewers: alarrosa, anag, atartamo, bigironman, darix, dimstar, dmach, eroca, jdsn, jengelh, mcalabkova, mstrigl, nkrapp, oertel, RBrownSUSE, simotek, smithfarm . Do **not** use standard review interface to review on behalf of the group. To accept the review on behalf of the group, create the following comment: `@opensuse-review: approve`. To request changes on behalf of the group, create the following comment: `@opensuse-review: decline` followed with lines justifying the decision. Future edits of the comments are ignored, a new comment is required to change the review state.
maintenance-release-review commented 2025-10-12 07:35:50 +02:00
First-time contributor
Copy Link

Review by maintenance-release-review represents a group of reviewers: abergmann, amattiazzo, bfilho, cmatos, crazybyte, emanuelecappello, gsonnu, maintenance-robot, mauriziogalli, mbozicevic, mimi_vx, mschnitzer, msmeissn, pluskalm, rfrohl, slemke .

Do not use standard review interface to review on behalf of the group.
To accept the review on behalf of the group, create the following comment: @maintenance-release-review: approve.
To request changes on behalf of the group, create the following comment: @maintenance-release-review: decline followed with lines justifying the decision.
Future edits of the comments are ignored, a new comment is required to change the review state.

Review by maintenance-release-review represents a group of reviewers: abergmann, amattiazzo, bfilho, cmatos, crazybyte, emanuelecappello, gsonnu, maintenance-robot, mauriziogalli, mbozicevic, mimi_vx, mschnitzer, msmeissn, pluskalm, rfrohl, slemke . Do **not** use standard review interface to review on behalf of the group. To accept the review on behalf of the group, create the following comment: `@maintenance-release-review: approve`. To request changes on behalf of the group, create the following comment: `@maintenance-release-review: decline` followed with lines justifying the decision. Future edits of the comments are ignored, a new comment is required to change the review state.
rfrohl commented 2025-10-17 13:03:48 +02:00
First-time contributor
Copy Link

@maintenance-release-review: approve

@maintenance-release-review: approve
maintenance-release-review approved these changes 2025-10-17 13:04:59 +02:00
Dismissed
maintenance-release-review left a comment
First-time contributor
Copy Link

rfrohl approved a review on behalf of maintenance-release-review

rfrohl approved a review on behalf of maintenance-release-review
os-autoinst-obs-workflow dismissed maintenance-release-review's review 2025-10-19 18:22:16 +02:00
Reason:

New commits pushed, approval review dismissed automatically according to repository settings

autogits_workflow_pr_bot requested review from maintenance-release-review 2025-10-19 18:22:36 +02:00
opensuse-review commented 2025-10-19 18:26:53 +02:00
Member
Copy Link

Review by opensuse-review represents a group of reviewers: alarrosa, anag, atartamo, bigironman, darix, dimstar, dmach, eroca, jdsn, jengelh, mcalabkova, mstrigl, nkrapp, oertel, RBrownSUSE, simotek, smithfarm .

Do not use standard review interface to review on behalf of the group.
To accept the review on behalf of the group, create the following comment: @opensuse-review: approve.
To request changes on behalf of the group, create the following comment: @opensuse-review: decline followed with lines justifying the decision.
Future edits of the comments are ignored, a new comment is required to change the review state.

Review by opensuse-review represents a group of reviewers: alarrosa, anag, atartamo, bigironman, darix, dimstar, dmach, eroca, jdsn, jengelh, mcalabkova, mstrigl, nkrapp, oertel, RBrownSUSE, simotek, smithfarm . Do **not** use standard review interface to review on behalf of the group. To accept the review on behalf of the group, create the following comment: `@opensuse-review: approve`. To request changes on behalf of the group, create the following comment: `@opensuse-review: decline` followed with lines justifying the decision. Future edits of the comments are ignored, a new comment is required to change the review state.
maintenance-release-review commented 2025-10-19 18:28:03 +02:00
First-time contributor
Copy Link

Review by maintenance-release-review represents a group of reviewers: abergmann, amattiazzo, bfilho, cmatos, crazybyte, emanuelecappello, gsonnu, maintenance-robot, mauriziogalli, mbozicevic, mimi_vx, mschnitzer, msmeissn, pluskalm, rfrohl, slemke .

Do not use standard review interface to review on behalf of the group.
To accept the review on behalf of the group, create the following comment: @maintenance-release-review: approve.
To request changes on behalf of the group, create the following comment: @maintenance-release-review: decline followed with lines justifying the decision.
Future edits of the comments are ignored, a new comment is required to change the review state.

Review by maintenance-release-review represents a group of reviewers: abergmann, amattiazzo, bfilho, cmatos, crazybyte, emanuelecappello, gsonnu, maintenance-robot, mauriziogalli, mbozicevic, mimi_vx, mschnitzer, msmeissn, pluskalm, rfrohl, slemke . Do **not** use standard review interface to review on behalf of the group. To accept the review on behalf of the group, create the following comment: `@maintenance-release-review: approve`. To request changes on behalf of the group, create the following comment: `@maintenance-release-review: decline` followed with lines justifying the decision. Future edits of the comments are ignored, a new comment is required to change the review state.
msmeissn commented 2025-10-20 09:50:33 +02:00
First-time contributor
Copy Link

@maintenance-release-review: approve

@maintenance-release-review: approve
maintenance-release-review approved these changes 2025-10-20 09:57:11 +02:00
Dismissed
maintenance-release-review left a comment
First-time contributor
Copy Link

msmeissn approved a review on behalf of maintenance-release-review

msmeissn approved a review on behalf of maintenance-release-review
os-autoinst-obs-workflow dismissed maintenance-release-review's review 2025-10-22 02:52:23 +02:00
Reason:

New commits pushed, approval review dismissed automatically according to repository settings

autogits_workflow_pr_bot requested review from maintenance-release-review 2025-10-22 02:52:44 +02:00
maintenance-release-review commented 2025-10-22 02:55:04 +02:00
First-time contributor
Copy Link

Review by maintenance-release-review represents a group of reviewers: abergmann, amattiazzo, bfilho, cmatos, crazybyte, emanuelecappello, gsonnu, maintenance-robot, mauriziogalli, mbozicevic, mimi_vx, mschnitzer, msmeissn, pluskalm, rfrohl, slemke .

Do not use standard review interface to review on behalf of the group.
To accept the review on behalf of the group, create the following comment: @maintenance-release-review: approve.
To request changes on behalf of the group, create the following comment: @maintenance-release-review: decline followed with lines justifying the decision.
Future edits of the comments are ignored, a new comment is required to change the review state.

Review by maintenance-release-review represents a group of reviewers: abergmann, amattiazzo, bfilho, cmatos, crazybyte, emanuelecappello, gsonnu, maintenance-robot, mauriziogalli, mbozicevic, mimi_vx, mschnitzer, msmeissn, pluskalm, rfrohl, slemke . Do **not** use standard review interface to review on behalf of the group. To accept the review on behalf of the group, create the following comment: `@maintenance-release-review: approve`. To request changes on behalf of the group, create the following comment: `@maintenance-release-review: decline` followed with lines justifying the decision. Future edits of the comments are ignored, a new comment is required to change the review state.
opensuse-review commented 2025-10-22 02:57:56 +02:00
Member
Copy Link

Review by opensuse-review represents a group of reviewers: alarrosa, anag, atartamo, bigironman, darix, dimstar, dmach, eroca, jdsn, jengelh, mcalabkova, mstrigl, nkrapp, oertel, RBrownSUSE, simotek, smithfarm .

Do not use standard review interface to review on behalf of the group.
To accept the review on behalf of the group, create the following comment: @opensuse-review: approve.
To request changes on behalf of the group, create the following comment: @opensuse-review: decline followed with lines justifying the decision.
Future edits of the comments are ignored, a new comment is required to change the review state.

Review by opensuse-review represents a group of reviewers: alarrosa, anag, atartamo, bigironman, darix, dimstar, dmach, eroca, jdsn, jengelh, mcalabkova, mstrigl, nkrapp, oertel, RBrownSUSE, simotek, smithfarm . Do **not** use standard review interface to review on behalf of the group. To accept the review on behalf of the group, create the following comment: `@opensuse-review: approve`. To request changes on behalf of the group, create the following comment: `@opensuse-review: decline` followed with lines justifying the decision. Future edits of the comments are ignored, a new comment is required to change the review state.
rfrohl commented 2025-10-22 10:43:43 +02:00
First-time contributor
Copy Link

@maintenance-release-review: approve

@maintenance-release-review: approve
maintenance-release-review approved these changes 2025-10-22 10:51:09 +02:00
Dismissed
maintenance-release-review left a comment
First-time contributor
Copy Link

rfrohl approved a review on behalf of maintenance-release-review

rfrohl approved a review on behalf of maintenance-release-review
eroca commented 2025-10-23 11:40:46 +02:00
Owner
Copy Link

@opensuse-review: approve

@opensuse-review: approve
opensuse-review approved these changes 2025-10-23 11:47:28 +02:00
Dismissed
opensuse-review left a comment
Member
Copy Link

eroca approved a review on behalf of opensuse-review

eroca approved a review on behalf of opensuse-review
os-autoinst-obs-workflow dismissed maintenance-release-review's review 2025-10-24 12:40:50 +02:00
Reason:

New commits pushed, approval review dismissed automatically according to repository settings

os-autoinst-obs-workflow dismissed opensuse-review's review 2025-10-24 12:40:51 +02:00
Reason:

New commits pushed, approval review dismissed automatically according to repository settings

autogits_workflow_pr_bot requested review from maintenance-release-review 2025-10-24 12:41:10 +02:00
autogits_workflow_pr_bot requested review from opensuse-review 2025-10-24 12:41:10 +02:00
maintenance-release-review commented 2025-10-24 12:42:45 +02:00
First-time contributor
Copy Link

Review by maintenance-release-review represents a group of reviewers: abergmann, amattiazzo, bfilho, cmatos, crazybyte, emanuelecappello, gsonnu, maintenance-robot, mauriziogalli, mbozicevic, mimi_vx, mschnitzer, msmeissn, pluskalm, rfrohl, slemke .

Do not use standard review interface to review on behalf of the group.
To accept the review on behalf of the group, create the following comment: @maintenance-release-review: approve.
To request changes on behalf of the group, create the following comment: @maintenance-release-review: decline followed with lines justifying the decision.
Future edits of the comments are ignored, a new comment is required to change the review state.

Review by maintenance-release-review represents a group of reviewers: abergmann, amattiazzo, bfilho, cmatos, crazybyte, emanuelecappello, gsonnu, maintenance-robot, mauriziogalli, mbozicevic, mimi_vx, mschnitzer, msmeissn, pluskalm, rfrohl, slemke . Do **not** use standard review interface to review on behalf of the group. To accept the review on behalf of the group, create the following comment: `@maintenance-release-review: approve`. To request changes on behalf of the group, create the following comment: `@maintenance-release-review: decline` followed with lines justifying the decision. Future edits of the comments are ignored, a new comment is required to change the review state.
opensuse-review commented 2025-10-24 12:44:50 +02:00
Member
Copy Link

Review by opensuse-review represents a group of reviewers: alarrosa, anag, atartamo, bigironman, darix, dimstar, dmach, eroca, jdsn, jengelh, mcalabkova, mstrigl, nkrapp, oertel, RBrownSUSE, simotek, smithfarm .

Do not use standard review interface to review on behalf of the group.
To accept the review on behalf of the group, create the following comment: @opensuse-review: approve.
To request changes on behalf of the group, create the following comment: @opensuse-review: decline followed with lines justifying the decision.
Future edits of the comments are ignored, a new comment is required to change the review state.

Review by opensuse-review represents a group of reviewers: alarrosa, anag, atartamo, bigironman, darix, dimstar, dmach, eroca, jdsn, jengelh, mcalabkova, mstrigl, nkrapp, oertel, RBrownSUSE, simotek, smithfarm . Do **not** use standard review interface to review on behalf of the group. To accept the review on behalf of the group, create the following comment: `@opensuse-review: approve`. To request changes on behalf of the group, create the following comment: `@opensuse-review: decline` followed with lines justifying the decision. Future edits of the comments are ignored, a new comment is required to change the review state.
rfrohl commented 2025-10-24 13:38:09 +02:00
First-time contributor
Copy Link

@maintenance-release-review: approve

@maintenance-release-review: approve
maintenance-release-review approved these changes 2025-10-24 13:43:36 +02:00
Dismissed
maintenance-release-review left a comment
First-time contributor
Copy Link

rfrohl approved a review on behalf of maintenance-release-review

rfrohl approved a review on behalf of maintenance-release-review
oertel commented 2025-10-24 16:37:25 +02:00
First-time contributor
Copy Link

@opensuse-review : approve

LGTM

@opensuse-review : approve LGTM
opensuse-review approved these changes 2025-10-24 16:46:26 +02:00
Dismissed
opensuse-review left a comment
Member
Copy Link

oertel approved a review on behalf of opensuse-review

oertel approved a review on behalf of opensuse-review
os-autoinst-obs-workflow added 1 commit 2025-10-24 18:53:22 +02:00
Update to 5.1761296552.ae7c17aa d4fcc3820c 
5.1761296552.ae7c17aa
5.1761296552.ae7c17aa
5.1761296552.ae7c17aa
5.1761296552.ae7c17aa
os-autoinst-obs-workflow dismissed maintenance-release-review's review 2025-10-24 18:53:23 +02:00
Reason:

New commits pushed, approval review dismissed automatically according to repository settings

os-autoinst-obs-workflow dismissed opensuse-review's review 2025-10-24 18:53:23 +02:00
Reason:

New commits pushed, approval review dismissed automatically according to repository settings

autogits_workflow_pr_bot requested review from maintenance-release-review 2025-10-24 18:53:42 +02:00
autogits_workflow_pr_bot requested review from opensuse-review 2025-10-24 18:53:42 +02:00
maintenance-release-review commented 2025-10-24 18:56:55 +02:00
First-time contributor
Copy Link

Review by maintenance-release-review represents a group of reviewers: abergmann, amattiazzo, bfilho, cmatos, crazybyte, emanuelecappello, gsonnu, maintenance-robot, mauriziogalli, mbozicevic, mimi_vx, mschnitzer, msmeissn, pluskalm, rfrohl, slemke .

Do not use standard review interface to review on behalf of the group.
To accept the review on behalf of the group, create the following comment: @maintenance-release-review: approve.
To request changes on behalf of the group, create the following comment: @maintenance-release-review: decline followed with lines justifying the decision.
Future edits of the comments are ignored, a new comment is required to change the review state.

Review by maintenance-release-review represents a group of reviewers: abergmann, amattiazzo, bfilho, cmatos, crazybyte, emanuelecappello, gsonnu, maintenance-robot, mauriziogalli, mbozicevic, mimi_vx, mschnitzer, msmeissn, pluskalm, rfrohl, slemke . Do **not** use standard review interface to review on behalf of the group. To accept the review on behalf of the group, create the following comment: `@maintenance-release-review: approve`. To request changes on behalf of the group, create the following comment: `@maintenance-release-review: decline` followed with lines justifying the decision. Future edits of the comments are ignored, a new comment is required to change the review state.
opensuse-review commented 2025-10-24 18:57:02 +02:00
Member
Copy Link

Review by opensuse-review represents a group of reviewers: alarrosa, anag, atartamo, bigironman, darix, dimstar, dmach, eroca, jdsn, jengelh, mcalabkova, mstrigl, nkrapp, oertel, RBrownSUSE, simotek, smithfarm .

Do not use standard review interface to review on behalf of the group.
To accept the review on behalf of the group, create the following comment: @opensuse-review: approve.
To request changes on behalf of the group, create the following comment: @opensuse-review: decline followed with lines justifying the decision.
Future edits of the comments are ignored, a new comment is required to change the review state.

Review by opensuse-review represents a group of reviewers: alarrosa, anag, atartamo, bigironman, darix, dimstar, dmach, eroca, jdsn, jengelh, mcalabkova, mstrigl, nkrapp, oertel, RBrownSUSE, simotek, smithfarm . Do **not** use standard review interface to review on behalf of the group. To accept the review on behalf of the group, create the following comment: `@opensuse-review: approve`. To request changes on behalf of the group, create the following comment: `@opensuse-review: decline` followed with lines justifying the decision. Future edits of the comments are ignored, a new comment is required to change the review state.
rfrohl commented 2025-10-25 20:30:08 +02:00
First-time contributor
Copy Link

@maintenance-release-review: approve

@maintenance-release-review: approve
maintenance-release-review approved these changes 2025-10-25 20:35:23 +02:00
maintenance-release-review left a comment
First-time contributor
Copy Link

rfrohl approved a review on behalf of maintenance-release-review

rfrohl approved a review on behalf of maintenance-release-review
eroca commented 2025-10-27 15:06:25 +01:00
Owner
Copy Link

@opensuse-review : approve

LGTM

@opensuse-review : approve LGTM
eroca removed review request for packagehub-review 2025-10-27 15:06:39 +01:00
eroca removed review request for lkocman-factory 2025-10-27 15:06:41 +01:00
eroca removed review request for bigironman 2025-10-27 15:06:43 +01:00
eroca removed review request for smithfarm 2025-10-27 15:06:45 +01:00
eroca removed review request for maxlin_factory 2025-10-27 15:06:47 +01:00
eroca removed review request for legaldb 2025-10-27 15:07:11 +01:00
eroca requested review from legaldb 2025-10-27 15:07:16 +01:00
opensuse-review approved these changes 2025-10-27 15:10:35 +01:00
opensuse-review left a comment
Member
Copy Link

eroca approved a review on behalf of opensuse-review

eroca approved a review on behalf of opensuse-review
legaldb commented 2025-10-27 15:15:59 +01:00
Member
Copy Link

Legal reviewed as acceptable_by_lawyer:

Accepted because previously reviewed under the same license (482142)
Legal reviewed as [acceptable_by_lawyer](https://legaldb.suse.de/reviews/details/482598): ``` Accepted because previously reviewed under the same license (482142) ```
report.md
1.0 KiB
legaldb approved these changes 2025-10-27 15:15:59 +01:00
eroca approved these changes 2025-11-03 09:51:27 +01:00
eroca changed title from Update to 5.1758711845.e5c02221 5.1758711845.e5c02221 5.1758711845.e5c02221 5.1758711845.e5c02221 5.1758711845.e5c02221 to Update to 5.1758711845.e5c022215.1758711845.e5c022215.1758711845.e5c022215.1758711845.e5c022215.1758711845.e5c02221 2025-11-03 10:13:59 +01:00
eroca changed title from Update to 5.1758711845.e5c022215.1758711845.e5c022215.1758711845.e5c022215.1758711845.e5c022215.1758711845.e5c02221 to Update to 5.1761296552.ae7c17aa 2025-11-03 10:15:00 +01:00
autogits_workflow_pr_bot commented 2025-11-03 10:15:26 +01:00
Member
Copy Link

Closing here because the associated Project PR has been closed.

Closing here because the associated Project PR has been closed.
eroca reopened this pull request 2025-11-03 10:15:33 +01:00
eroca merged commit d4fcc3820c into leap-16.0 2025-11-03 10:23:35 +01:00
Sign in to join this conversation.
Reviewers
No Reviewers
maintenance-release-review
opensuse-review
legaldb
eroca
Labels
Clear labels
legaldb
Critical Priority
Critical legaldb priority
Archived
legaldb
High Priority
2
High legaldb priority
legaldb
Normal Priority
1
Normal legaldb priority
No Label
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Assignees
Clear assignees
adamm_super adrianSuSE autobuild-owner autobuild-review autogits_workflow_pr_bot bigironman dirkmueller eroca factory_bot gitea_test legaldb lkocman-factory maxlin_factory opensuse-review packagehub-review smithfarm
No Assignees
12 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: pool/openQA#9
Delete Branch "os-autoinst-obs-workflow/openQA:leap-16.0"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?