Accepting request 1076892 from home:ohollmann:branches:security:tls-tmp
- Security Fix: [CVE-2023-0465, bsc#1209878] * Invalid certificate policies in leaf certificates are silently ignored * Add openssl-CVE-2023-0465.patch - Security Fix: [CVE-2023-0466, bsc#1209873] * Certificate policy check not enabled * Add openssl-CVE-2023-0466.patch OBS-URL: https://build.opensuse.org/request/show/1076892 OBS-URL: https://build.opensuse.org/package/show/security:tls/openssl-1_1?expand=0&rev=132
This commit is contained in:
parent
ba8c5e2a55
commit
1d1d2b5e7a
@ -1,3 +1,13 @@
|
|||||||
|
-------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||||||
|
Mon Apr 3 07:40:43 UTC 2023 - Otto Hollmann <otto.hollmann@suse.com>
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
- Security Fix: [CVE-2023-0465, bsc#1209878]
|
||||||
|
* Invalid certificate policies in leaf certificates are silently ignored
|
||||||
|
* Add openssl-CVE-2023-0465.patch
|
||||||
|
- Security Fix: [CVE-2023-0466, bsc#1209873]
|
||||||
|
* Certificate policy check not enabled
|
||||||
|
* Add openssl-CVE-2023-0466.patch
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
-------------------------------------------------------------------
|
-------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||||||
Fri Mar 24 15:53:47 UTC 2023 - Otto Hollmann <otto.hollmann@suse.com>
|
Fri Mar 24 15:53:47 UTC 2023 - Otto Hollmann <otto.hollmann@suse.com>
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
@ -134,6 +134,10 @@ Patch79: openssl-1_1-Fix-AES-GCM-on-Power-8-CPUs.patch
|
|||||||
Patch80: openssl-1_1-openssl-config.patch
|
Patch80: openssl-1_1-openssl-config.patch
|
||||||
# PATCH-FIX-UPSTREAM: bsc#1209624, CVE-2023-0464 Excessive Resource Usage Verifying X.509 Policy Constraints
|
# PATCH-FIX-UPSTREAM: bsc#1209624, CVE-2023-0464 Excessive Resource Usage Verifying X.509 Policy Constraints
|
||||||
Patch81: openssl-CVE-2023-0464.patch
|
Patch81: openssl-CVE-2023-0464.patch
|
||||||
|
# PATCH-FIX-UPSTREAM: bsc#1209878, CVE-2023-0465 Invalid certificate policies in leaf certificates are silently ignored
|
||||||
|
Patch82: openssl-CVE-2023-0465.patch
|
||||||
|
# PATCH-FIX-UPSTREAM: bsc#1209873, CVE-2023-0466 Certificate policy check not enabled
|
||||||
|
Patch83: openssl-CVE-2023-0466.patch
|
||||||
BuildRequires: pkgconfig
|
BuildRequires: pkgconfig
|
||||||
BuildRequires: pkgconfig(zlib)
|
BuildRequires: pkgconfig(zlib)
|
||||||
Requires: libopenssl1_1 = %{version}-%{release}
|
Requires: libopenssl1_1 = %{version}-%{release}
|
||||||
|
221
openssl-CVE-2023-0465.patch
Normal file
221
openssl-CVE-2023-0465.patch
Normal file
@ -0,0 +1,221 @@
|
|||||||
|
From 818e2bc9d10e56659c6c68dee1c6a1fd5026f720 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
|
||||||
|
From: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
|
||||||
|
Date: Tue, 7 Mar 2023 15:22:40 +0000
|
||||||
|
Subject: [PATCH 1/5] Generate some certificates with the certificatePolicies
|
||||||
|
extension
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Related-to: CVE-2023-0465
|
||||||
|
---
|
||||||
|
CHANGES | 9 ++++++++-
|
||||||
|
NEWS | 3 +++
|
||||||
|
crypto/x509/x509_vfy.c | 11 +++++++++--
|
||||||
|
test/certs/ca-pol-cert.pem | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
|
||||||
|
test/certs/ee-cert-policies-bad.pem | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
|
||||||
|
test/certs/ee-cert-policies.pem | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
|
||||||
|
test/certs/mkcert.sh | 9 +++++++--
|
||||||
|
test/certs/setup.sh | 6 ++++++
|
||||||
|
test/recipes/25-test_verify.t | 13 ++++++++++++-
|
||||||
|
9 files changed, 104 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
|
||||||
|
create mode 100644 test/certs/ca-pol-cert.pem
|
||||||
|
create mode 100644 test/certs/ee-cert-policies-bad.pem
|
||||||
|
create mode 100644 test/certs/ee-cert-policies.pem
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
--- a/CHANGES
|
||||||
|
+++ b/CHANGES
|
||||||
|
@@ -9,12 +9,19 @@
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Changes between 1.1.1s and 1.1.1t [7 Feb 2023]
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
+ *) Fixed an issue where invalid certificate policies in leaf certificates are
|
||||||
|
+ silently ignored by OpenSSL and other certificate policy checks are skipped
|
||||||
|
+ for that certificate. A malicious CA could use this to deliberately assert
|
||||||
|
+ invalid certificate policies in order to circumvent policy checking on the
|
||||||
|
+ certificate altogether. (CVE-2023-0465)
|
||||||
|
+ [Matt Caswell]
|
||||||
|
+
|
||||||
|
*) Limited the number of nodes created in a policy tree to mitigate
|
||||||
|
against CVE-2023-0464. The default limit is set to 1000 nodes, which
|
||||||
|
should be sufficient for most installations. If required, the limit
|
||||||
|
can be adjusted by setting the OPENSSL_POLICY_TREE_NODES_MAX build
|
||||||
|
time define to a desired maximum number of nodes or zero to allow
|
||||||
|
- unlimited growth.
|
||||||
|
+ unlimited growth. (CVE-2023-0464)
|
||||||
|
[Paul Dale]
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
*) Fixed X.400 address type confusion in X.509 GeneralName.
|
||||||
|
--- a/NEWS
|
||||||
|
+++ b/NEWS
|
||||||
|
@@ -10,6 +10,9 @@
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Major changes between OpenSSL 1.1.1s and OpenSSL 1.1.1t [7 Feb 2023]
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
+ o Fixed handling of invalid certificate policies in leaf certificates
|
||||||
|
+ (CVE-2023-0465)
|
||||||
|
+ o Limited the number of nodes created in a policy tree ([CVE-2023-0464])
|
||||||
|
o Fixed X.400 address type confusion in X.509 GeneralName (CVE-2023-0286)
|
||||||
|
o Fixed Use-after-free following BIO_new_NDEF (CVE-2023-0215)
|
||||||
|
o Fixed Double free after calling PEM_read_bio_ex (CVE-2022-4450)
|
||||||
|
--- a/crypto/x509/x509_vfy.c
|
||||||
|
+++ b/crypto/x509/x509_vfy.c
|
||||||
|
@@ -1649,18 +1649,25 @@ static int check_policy(X509_STORE_CTX *
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
/* Invalid or inconsistent extensions */
|
||||||
|
if (ret == X509_PCY_TREE_INVALID) {
|
||||||
|
- int i;
|
||||||
|
+ int i, cbcalled = 0;
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
/* Locate certificates with bad extensions and notify callback. */
|
||||||
|
- for (i = 1; i < sk_X509_num(ctx->chain); i++) {
|
||||||
|
+ for (i = 0; i < sk_X509_num(ctx->chain); i++) {
|
||||||
|
X509 *x = sk_X509_value(ctx->chain, i);
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
if (!(x->ex_flags & EXFLAG_INVALID_POLICY))
|
||||||
|
continue;
|
||||||
|
+ cbcalled = 1;
|
||||||
|
if (!verify_cb_cert(ctx, x, i,
|
||||||
|
X509_V_ERR_INVALID_POLICY_EXTENSION))
|
||||||
|
return 0;
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
+ if (!cbcalled) {
|
||||||
|
+ /* Should not be able to get here */
|
||||||
|
+ X509err(X509_F_CHECK_POLICY, ERR_R_INTERNAL_ERROR);
|
||||||
|
+ return 0;
|
||||||
|
+ }
|
||||||
|
+ /* The callback ignored the error so we return success */
|
||||||
|
return 1;
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
if (ret == X509_PCY_TREE_FAILURE) {
|
||||||
|
--- /dev/null
|
||||||
|
+++ b/test/certs/ca-pol-cert.pem
|
||||||
|
@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
|
||||||
|
+-----BEGIN CERTIFICATE-----
|
||||||
|
+MIIDFzCCAf+gAwIBAgIBAjANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQsFADASMRAwDgYDVQQDDAdSb290
|
||||||
|
+IENBMCAXDTIzMDMwODEyMjMxNloYDzIxMjMwMzA5MTIyMzE2WjANMQswCQYDVQQD
|
||||||
|
+DAJDQTCCASIwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEBBQADggEPADCCAQoCggEBAJadpD0ASxxfxsvd
|
||||||
|
+j9IxsogVzMSGLFziaYuE9KejU9+R479RifvwfBANO62sNWJ19X//9G5UjwWmkiOz
|
||||||
|
+n1k50DkYsBBA3mJzik6wjt/c58lBIlSEgAgpvDU8ht8w3t20JP9+YqXAeugqFj/W
|
||||||
|
+l9rFQtsvaWSRywjXVlp5fxuEQelNnXcJEKhsKTNExsBUZebo4/J1BWpklWzA9P0l
|
||||||
|
+YW5INvDAAwcF1nzlEf0Y6Eot03IMNyg2MTE4hehxjdgCSci8GYnFirE/ojXqqpAc
|
||||||
|
+ZGh7r2dqWgZUD1Dh+bT2vjrUzj8eTH3GdzI+oljt29102JIUaqj3yzRYkah8FLF9
|
||||||
|
+CLNNsUcCAwEAAaN7MHkwDwYDVR0TAQH/BAUwAwEB/zALBgNVHQ8EBAMCAQYwHQYD
|
||||||
|
+VR0OBBYEFLQRM/HX4l73U54gIhBPhga/H8leMB8GA1UdIwQYMBaAFI71Ja8em2uE
|
||||||
|
+PXyAmslTnE1y96NSMBkGA1UdIAQSMBAwDgYMKwYBBAGBgVy8+0cBMA0GCSqGSIb3
|
||||||
|
+DQEBCwUAA4IBAQBbE+MO9mewWIUY2kt85yhl0oZtvVxbn9K2Hty59ItwJGRNfzx7
|
||||||
|
+Ge7KgawkvNzMOXmj6qf8TpbJnf41ZLWdRyVZBVyIwrAKIVw1VxfGh8aEifHKN97H
|
||||||
|
+unZkBPcUkAhUJSiC1BOD/euaMYqOi8QwiI702Q6q1NBY1/UKnV/ZIBLecnqfj9vZ
|
||||||
|
+7T0wKxrwGYBztP4pNcxCmBoD9Dg+Dx3ZElo0WXyO4SOh/BgrsKJHKyhbuTpjrI/g
|
||||||
|
+DhcINRp6+lIzuFBtJ67+YXnAEspb3lKMk0YL/LXrCNF2scdmNfOPwHi+OKBqt69C
|
||||||
|
+9FJyWFEMxx2qm/ENE9sbOswgJRnKkaAqHBHx
|
||||||
|
+-----END CERTIFICATE-----
|
||||||
|
--- /dev/null
|
||||||
|
+++ b/test/certs/ee-cert-policies-bad.pem
|
||||||
|
@@ -0,0 +1,20 @@
|
||||||
|
+-----BEGIN CERTIFICATE-----
|
||||||
|
+MIIDTTCCAjWgAwIBAgIBAjANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQsFADANMQswCQYDVQQDDAJDQTAg
|
||||||
|
+Fw0yMzAzMDgxMjIzMzJaGA8yMTIzMDMwOTEyMjMzMlowGTEXMBUGA1UEAwwOc2Vy
|
||||||
|
+dmVyLmV4YW1wbGUwggEiMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBAQUAA4IBDwAwggEKAoIBAQCo/4lY
|
||||||
|
+YYWu3tssD9Vz++K3qBt6dWAr1H08c3a1rt6TL38kkG3JHPSKOM2fooAWVsu0LLuT
|
||||||
|
+5Rcf/w3GQ/4xNPgo2HXpo7uIgu+jcuJTYgVFTeAxl++qnRDSWA2eBp4yuxsIVl1l
|
||||||
|
+Dz9mjsI2oBH/wFk1/Ukc3RxCMwZ4rgQ4I+XndWfTlK1aqUAfrFkQ9QzBZK1KxMY1
|
||||||
|
+U7OWaoIbFYvRmavknm+UqtKW5Vf7jJFkijwkFsbSGb6CYBM7YrDtPh2zyvlr3zG5
|
||||||
|
+ep5LR2inKcc/SuIiJ7TvkGPX79ByST5brbkb1Ctvhmjd1XMSuEPJ3EEPoqNGT4tn
|
||||||
|
+iIQPYf55NB9KiR+3AgMBAAGjgakwgaYwHQYDVR0OBBYEFOeb4iqtimw6y3ZR5Y4H
|
||||||
|
+mCKX4XOiMB8GA1UdIwQYMBaAFLQRM/HX4l73U54gIhBPhga/H8leMAkGA1UdEwQC
|
||||||
|
+MAAwEwYDVR0lBAwwCgYIKwYBBQUHAwEwGQYDVR0RBBIwEIIOc2VydmVyLmV4YW1w
|
||||||
|
+bGUwKQYDVR0gBCIwIDAOBgwrBgEEAYGBXLz7RwEwDgYMKwYBBAGBgVy8+0cBMA0G
|
||||||
|
+CSqGSIb3DQEBCwUAA4IBAQArwtwNO++7kStcJeMg3ekz2D/m/8UEjTA1rknBjQiQ
|
||||||
|
+P0FK7tNeRqus9i8PxthNWk+biRayvDzaGIBV7igpDBPfXemDgmW9Adc4MKyiQDfs
|
||||||
|
+YfkHi3xJKvsK2fQmyCs2InVDaKpVAkNFcgAW8nSOhGliqIxLb0EOLoLNwaktou0N
|
||||||
|
+XQHmRzY8S7aIr8K9Qo9y/+MLar+PS4h8l6FkLLkTICiFzE4/wje5S3NckAnadRJa
|
||||||
|
+QpjwM2S6NuA+tYWuOcN//r7BSpW/AZKanYWPzHMrKlqCh+9o7sthPd72+hObG9kx
|
||||||
|
+wSGdzfStNK1I1zM5LiI08WtXCvR6AfLANTo2x1AYhSxF
|
||||||
|
+-----END CERTIFICATE-----
|
||||||
|
--- /dev/null
|
||||||
|
+++ b/test/certs/ee-cert-policies.pem
|
||||||
|
@@ -0,0 +1,20 @@
|
||||||
|
+-----BEGIN CERTIFICATE-----
|
||||||
|
+MIIDPTCCAiWgAwIBAgIBAjANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQsFADANMQswCQYDVQQDDAJDQTAg
|
||||||
|
+Fw0yMzAzMDgxMjIzMjNaGA8yMTIzMDMwOTEyMjMyM1owGTEXMBUGA1UEAwwOc2Vy
|
||||||
|
+dmVyLmV4YW1wbGUwggEiMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBAQUAA4IBDwAwggEKAoIBAQCo/4lY
|
||||||
|
+YYWu3tssD9Vz++K3qBt6dWAr1H08c3a1rt6TL38kkG3JHPSKOM2fooAWVsu0LLuT
|
||||||
|
+5Rcf/w3GQ/4xNPgo2HXpo7uIgu+jcuJTYgVFTeAxl++qnRDSWA2eBp4yuxsIVl1l
|
||||||
|
+Dz9mjsI2oBH/wFk1/Ukc3RxCMwZ4rgQ4I+XndWfTlK1aqUAfrFkQ9QzBZK1KxMY1
|
||||||
|
+U7OWaoIbFYvRmavknm+UqtKW5Vf7jJFkijwkFsbSGb6CYBM7YrDtPh2zyvlr3zG5
|
||||||
|
+ep5LR2inKcc/SuIiJ7TvkGPX79ByST5brbkb1Ctvhmjd1XMSuEPJ3EEPoqNGT4tn
|
||||||
|
+iIQPYf55NB9KiR+3AgMBAAGjgZkwgZYwHQYDVR0OBBYEFOeb4iqtimw6y3ZR5Y4H
|
||||||
|
+mCKX4XOiMB8GA1UdIwQYMBaAFLQRM/HX4l73U54gIhBPhga/H8leMAkGA1UdEwQC
|
||||||
|
+MAAwEwYDVR0lBAwwCgYIKwYBBQUHAwEwGQYDVR0RBBIwEIIOc2VydmVyLmV4YW1w
|
||||||
|
+bGUwGQYDVR0gBBIwEDAOBgwrBgEEAYGBXLz7RwEwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQELBQADggEB
|
||||||
|
+AGbWslmAAdMX3+5ChcnFrX+NqDGoyhb3PTgWdtlQB5qtWdIt4rSxN50OcQxFTX0D
|
||||||
|
+QOBabSzR0DDKrgfBe4waL19WsdEvR9GyO4M7ASze/A3IEZue9C9k0n7Vq8zDaAZl
|
||||||
|
+CiR/Zqo9nAOuhKHMgmC/NjUlX7STv5pJVgc4SH8VEKmSRZDmNihaOalUtK5X8/Oa
|
||||||
|
+dawKxsZcaP5IKnOEPPKjtVNJxBu5CXywJHsO0GcoDEnEx1/NLdFoJ6WFw8NuTyDK
|
||||||
|
+NGLq2MHEdyKaigHQlptEs9bXyu9McJjzbx0uXj3BenRULASreccFej0L1RU6jDlk
|
||||||
|
+D3brBn24UISaFRZoB7jsjok=
|
||||||
|
+-----END CERTIFICATE-----
|
||||||
|
--- a/test/certs/mkcert.sh
|
||||||
|
+++ b/test/certs/mkcert.sh
|
||||||
|
@@ -117,11 +117,12 @@ genca() {
|
||||||
|
local OPTIND=1
|
||||||
|
local purpose=
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
- while getopts p: o
|
||||||
|
+ while getopts p:c: o
|
||||||
|
do
|
||||||
|
case $o in
|
||||||
|
p) purpose="$OPTARG";;
|
||||||
|
- *) echo "Usage: $0 genca [-p EKU] cn keyname certname cakeyname cacertname" >&2
|
||||||
|
+ c) certpol="$OPTARG";;
|
||||||
|
+ *) echo "Usage: $0 genca [-p EKU][-c policyoid] cn keyname certname cakeyname cacertname" >&2
|
||||||
|
return 1;;
|
||||||
|
esac
|
||||||
|
done
|
||||||
|
@@ -142,6 +143,10 @@ genca() {
|
||||||
|
if [ -n "$NC" ]; then
|
||||||
|
exts=$(printf "%s\nnameConstraints = %s\n" "$exts" "$NC")
|
||||||
|
fi
|
||||||
|
+ if [ -n "$certpol" ]; then
|
||||||
|
+ exts=$(printf "%s\ncertificatePolicies = %s\n" "$exts" "$certpol")
|
||||||
|
+ fi
|
||||||
|
+
|
||||||
|
csr=$(req "$key" "CN = $cn") || return 1
|
||||||
|
echo "$csr" |
|
||||||
|
cert "$cert" "$exts" -CA "${cacert}.pem" -CAkey "${cakey}.pem" \
|
||||||
|
--- a/test/certs/setup.sh
|
||||||
|
+++ b/test/certs/setup.sh
|
||||||
|
@@ -405,3 +405,9 @@ OPENSSL_SIGALG=ED448 OPENSSL_KEYALG=ed44
|
||||||
|
root-ed448-key root-ed448-cert
|
||||||
|
OPENSSL_SIGALG=ED448 OPENSSL_KEYALG=ed448 ./mkcert.sh genee ed448 \
|
||||||
|
server-ed448-key server-ed448-cert root-ed448-key root-ed448-cert
|
||||||
|
+
|
||||||
|
+# certificatePolicies extension
|
||||||
|
+./mkcert.sh genca -c "1.3.6.1.4.1.16604.998855.1" "CA" ca-key ca-pol-cert root-key root-cert
|
||||||
|
+./mkcert.sh geneeextra server.example ee-key ee-cert-policies ca-key ca-cert "certificatePolicies=1.3.6.1.4.1.16604.998855.1"
|
||||||
|
+# We can create a cert with a duplicate policy oid - but its actually invalid!
|
||||||
|
+./mkcert.sh geneeextra server.example ee-key ee-cert-policies-bad ca-key ca-cert "certificatePolicies=1.3.6.1.4.1.16604.998855.1,1.3.6.1.4.1.16604.998855.1"
|
||||||
|
--- a/test/recipes/25-test_verify.t
|
||||||
|
+++ b/test/recipes/25-test_verify.t
|
||||||
|
@@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ sub verify {
|
||||||
|
run(app([@args]));
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
-plan tests => 146;
|
||||||
|
+plan tests => 148;
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
# Canonical success
|
||||||
|
ok(verify("ee-cert", "sslserver", ["root-cert"], ["ca-cert"]),
|
||||||
|
@@ -409,3 +409,14 @@ SKIP: {
|
||||||
|
"ED25519 signature");
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
+
|
||||||
|
+# Certificate Policies
|
||||||
|
+ok(verify("ee-cert-policies", "sslserver", ["root-cert"], ["ca-pol-cert"],
|
||||||
|
+ "-policy_check", "-policy", "1.3.6.1.4.1.16604.998855.1",
|
||||||
|
+ "-explicit_policy"),
|
||||||
|
+ "Certificate policy");
|
||||||
|
+
|
||||||
|
+ok(!verify("ee-cert-policies-bad", "sslserver", ["root-cert"], ["ca-pol-cert"],
|
||||||
|
+ "-policy_check", "-policy", "1.3.6.1.4.1.16604.998855.1",
|
||||||
|
+ "-explicit_policy"),
|
||||||
|
+ "Bad certificate policy");
|
63
openssl-CVE-2023-0466.patch
Normal file
63
openssl-CVE-2023-0466.patch
Normal file
@ -0,0 +1,63 @@
|
|||||||
|
From bccf26f7c3b921be8946bfdd1b2de48fea96f90d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
|
||||||
|
From: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
|
||||||
|
Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2023 16:15:47 +0100
|
||||||
|
Subject: [PATCH] Fix documentation of X509_VERIFY_PARAM_add0_policy()
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
The function was incorrectly documented as enabling policy checking.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Fixes: CVE-2023-0466
|
||||||
|
---
|
||||||
|
CHANGES | 5 +++++
|
||||||
|
NEWS | 1 +
|
||||||
|
doc/man3/X509_VERIFY_PARAM_set_flags.pod | 9 +++++++--
|
||||||
|
3 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
--- a/CHANGES
|
||||||
|
+++ b/CHANGES
|
||||||
|
@@ -9,6 +9,11 @@
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Changes between 1.1.1s and 1.1.1t [7 Feb 2023]
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
+ *) Corrected documentation of X509_VERIFY_PARAM_add0_policy() to mention
|
||||||
|
+ that it does not enable policy checking. Thanks to
|
||||||
|
+ David Benjamin for discovering this issue. (CVE-2023-0466)
|
||||||
|
+ [Tomas Mraz]
|
||||||
|
+
|
||||||
|
*) Fixed an issue where invalid certificate policies in leaf certificates are
|
||||||
|
silently ignored by OpenSSL and other certificate policy checks are skipped
|
||||||
|
for that certificate. A malicious CA could use this to deliberately assert
|
||||||
|
--- a/NEWS
|
||||||
|
+++ b/NEWS
|
||||||
|
@@ -10,6 +10,7 @@
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Major changes between OpenSSL 1.1.1s and OpenSSL 1.1.1t [7 Feb 2023]
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
+ o Fixed documentation of X509_VERIFY_PARAM_add0_policy() (CVE-2023-0466)
|
||||||
|
o Fixed handling of invalid certificate policies in leaf certificates
|
||||||
|
(CVE-2023-0465)
|
||||||
|
o Limited the number of nodes created in a policy tree ([CVE-2023-0464])
|
||||||
|
--- a/doc/man3/X509_VERIFY_PARAM_set_flags.pod
|
||||||
|
+++ b/doc/man3/X509_VERIFY_PARAM_set_flags.pod
|
||||||
|
@@ -92,8 +92,9 @@ B<trust>.
|
||||||
|
X509_VERIFY_PARAM_set_time() sets the verification time in B<param> to
|
||||||
|
B<t>. Normally the current time is used.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
-X509_VERIFY_PARAM_add0_policy() enables policy checking (it is disabled
|
||||||
|
-by default) and adds B<policy> to the acceptable policy set.
|
||||||
|
+X509_VERIFY_PARAM_add0_policy() adds B<policy> to the acceptable policy set.
|
||||||
|
+Contrary to preexisting documentation of this function it does not enable
|
||||||
|
+policy checking.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
X509_VERIFY_PARAM_set1_policies() enables policy checking (it is disabled
|
||||||
|
by default) and sets the acceptable policy set to B<policies>. Any existing
|
||||||
|
@@ -377,6 +378,10 @@ and has no effect.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
The X509_VERIFY_PARAM_get_hostflags() function was added in OpenSSL 1.1.0i.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
+The function X509_VERIFY_PARAM_add0_policy() was historically documented as
|
||||||
|
+enabling policy checking however the implementation has never done this.
|
||||||
|
+The documentation was changed to align with the implementation.
|
||||||
|
+
|
||||||
|
=head1 COPYRIGHT
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Copyright 2009-2020 The OpenSSL Project Authors. All Rights Reserved.
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user