- Security fix: [bsc#1231741, CVE-2024-9143]
* Low-level invalid GF(2^m) parameters lead to OOB memory access * Add openssl-CVE-2024-9143.patch - Security fix: [bsc#1220262, CVE-2023-50782] * Implicit rejection in PKCS#1 v1.5 * Add openssl-CVE-2023-50782.patch * Validating the order of the public keys in the Diffie-Hellman Key Agreement Protocol, when an approved safe prime is used. * Added openssl-3-CVE-2024-41996.patch OBS-URL: https://build.opensuse.org/package/show/security:tls/openssl-3?expand=0&rev=116
This commit is contained in:
parent
e20eeb46a1
commit
aaffc1c436
@ -1,9 +1,24 @@
|
|||||||
|
-------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||||||
|
Thu Oct 17 12:32:21 UTC 2024 - Pedro Monreal <pmonreal@suse.com>
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
- Security fix: [bsc#1231741, CVE-2024-9143]
|
||||||
|
* Low-level invalid GF(2^m) parameters lead to OOB memory access
|
||||||
|
* Add openssl-CVE-2024-9143.patch
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
-------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||||||
|
Thu Oct 17 12:21:14 UTC 2024 - Pedro Monreal <pmonreal@suse.com>
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
- Security fix: [bsc#1220262, CVE-2023-50782]
|
||||||
|
* Implicit rejection in PKCS#1 v1.5
|
||||||
|
* Add openssl-CVE-2023-50782.patch
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
-------------------------------------------------------------------
|
-------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||||||
Thu Sep 19 08:05:52 UTC 2024 - Angel Yankov <angel.yankov@suse.com>
|
Thu Sep 19 08:05:52 UTC 2024 - Angel Yankov <angel.yankov@suse.com>
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
- Security fix: [bsc#1230698, CVE-2024-41996]
|
- Security fix: [bsc#1230698, CVE-2024-41996]
|
||||||
* Validating the order of the public keys in the Diffie-Hellman Key Agreement Protocol, when an approved safe prime is used
|
* Validating the order of the public keys in the Diffie-Hellman
|
||||||
* Added openssl-CVE-2024-41996.patch
|
Key Agreement Protocol, when an approved safe prime is used.
|
||||||
|
* Added openssl-3-CVE-2024-41996.patch
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
-------------------------------------------------------------------
|
-------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||||||
Thu Aug 22 15:18:03 UTC 2024 - Alexander Bergmann <abergmann@suse.com>
|
Thu Aug 22 15:18:03 UTC 2024 - Alexander Bergmann <abergmann@suse.com>
|
||||||
|
@ -167,8 +167,12 @@ Patch69: openssl-3-FIPS-PCT_rsa_keygen.patch
|
|||||||
Patch70: openssl-3-FIPS-Deny-SHA-1-sigver-in-FIPS-provider.patch
|
Patch70: openssl-3-FIPS-Deny-SHA-1-sigver-in-FIPS-provider.patch
|
||||||
# PATCH-FIX-UPSTREAM bsc#1229465 CVE-2024-6119: possible denial of service in X.509 name checks
|
# PATCH-FIX-UPSTREAM bsc#1229465 CVE-2024-6119: possible denial of service in X.509 name checks
|
||||||
Patch71: openssl-CVE-2024-6119.patch
|
Patch71: openssl-CVE-2024-6119.patch
|
||||||
# PATCH-FIX-UPSTREAM bsc#1230698 CVE-2024-41996: Validating the order of the public keys in the Diffie-Hellman Key Agreement Protocol, when an approved safe prime is used, allows remote attackers to trigger expensive server-side DHE
|
# PATCH-FIX-UPSTREAM bsc#1230698 CVE-2024-41996: Validation order of the DH public keys
|
||||||
Patch72: openssl-CVE-2024-41996.patch
|
Patch72: openssl-3-CVE-2024-41996.patch
|
||||||
|
# PATCH-FIX-UPSTREAM bsc#1220262 CVE-2023-50782: Implicit rejection in PKCS#1 v1.5
|
||||||
|
Patch73: openssl-CVE-2023-50782.patch
|
||||||
|
# PATCH-FIX-UPSTREAM bsc#1231741 CVE-2024-9143: low-level invalid GF(2^m) parameters lead to OOB memory access
|
||||||
|
Patch74: openssl-CVE-2024-9143.patch
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
BuildRequires: pkgconfig
|
BuildRequires: pkgconfig
|
||||||
%if 0%{?sle_version} >= 150400 || 0%{?suse_version} >= 1550
|
%if 0%{?sle_version} >= 150400 || 0%{?suse_version} >= 1550
|
||||||
|
1354
openssl-CVE-2023-50782.patch
Normal file
1354
openssl-CVE-2023-50782.patch
Normal file
File diff suppressed because it is too large
Load Diff
198
openssl-CVE-2024-9143.patch
Normal file
198
openssl-CVE-2024-9143.patch
Normal file
@ -0,0 +1,198 @@
|
|||||||
|
From fdf6723362ca51bd883295efe206cb5b1cfa5154 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
|
||||||
|
From: Viktor Dukhovni <viktor@openssl.org>
|
||||||
|
Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2024 01:02:40 +1000
|
||||||
|
Subject: [PATCH] Harden BN_GF2m_poly2arr against misuse.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
The BN_GF2m_poly2arr() function converts characteristic-2 field
|
||||||
|
(GF_{2^m}) Galois polynomials from a representation as a BIGNUM bitmask,
|
||||||
|
to a compact array with just the exponents of the non-zero terms.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
These polynomials are then used in BN_GF2m_mod_arr() to perform modular
|
||||||
|
reduction. A precondition of calling BN_GF2m_mod_arr() is that the
|
||||||
|
polynomial must have a non-zero constant term (i.e. the array has `0` as
|
||||||
|
its final element).
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Internally, callers of BN_GF2m_poly2arr() did not verify that
|
||||||
|
precondition, and binary EC curve parameters with an invalid polynomial
|
||||||
|
could lead to out of bounds memory reads and writes in BN_GF2m_mod_arr().
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
The precondition is always true for polynomials that arise from the
|
||||||
|
standard form of EC parameters for characteristic-two fields (X9.62).
|
||||||
|
See the "Finite Field Identification" section of:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
https://www.itu.int/ITU-T/formal-language/itu-t/x/x894/2018-cor1/ANSI-X9-62.html
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
The OpenSSL GF(2^m) code supports only the trinomial and pentanomial
|
||||||
|
basis X9.62 forms.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
This commit updates BN_GF2m_poly2arr() to return `0` (failure) when
|
||||||
|
the constant term is zero (i.e. the input bitmask BIGNUM is not odd).
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Additionally, the return value is made unambiguous when there is not
|
||||||
|
enough space to also pad the array with a final `-1` sentinel value.
|
||||||
|
The return value is now always the number of elements (including the
|
||||||
|
final `-1`) that would be filled when the output array is sufficiently
|
||||||
|
large. Previously the same count was returned both when the array has
|
||||||
|
just enough room for the final `-1` and when it had only enough space
|
||||||
|
for non-sentinel values.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Finally, BN_GF2m_poly2arr() is updated to reject polynomials whose
|
||||||
|
degree exceeds `OPENSSL_ECC_MAX_FIELD_BITS`, this guards against
|
||||||
|
CPU exhausition attacks via excessively large inputs.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
The above issues do not arise in processing X.509 certificates. These
|
||||||
|
generally have EC keys from "named curves", and RFC5840 (Section 2.1.1)
|
||||||
|
disallows explicit EC parameters. The TLS code in OpenSSL enforces this
|
||||||
|
constraint only after the certificate is decoded, but, even if explicit
|
||||||
|
parameters are specified, they are in X9.62 form, which cannot represent
|
||||||
|
problem values as noted above.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Initially reported as oss-fuzz issue 71623.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
A closely related issue was earlier reported in
|
||||||
|
<https://github.com/openssl/openssl/issues/19826>.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Severity: Low, CVE-2024-9143
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
|
||||||
|
Reviewed-by: Bernd Edlinger <bernd.edlinger@hotmail.de>
|
||||||
|
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <ppzgs1@gmail.com>
|
||||||
|
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
|
||||||
|
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/25639)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
(cherry picked from commit 8e008cb8b23ec7dc75c45a66eeed09c815b11cd2)
|
||||||
|
---
|
||||||
|
crypto/bn/bn_gf2m.c | 28 +++++++++++++++-------
|
||||||
|
test/ec_internal_test.c | 51 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
|
||||||
|
2 files changed, 71 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
diff --git a/crypto/bn/bn_gf2m.c b/crypto/bn/bn_gf2m.c
|
||||||
|
index c811ae82d6b15..bcc66613cc14d 100644
|
||||||
|
--- a/crypto/bn/bn_gf2m.c
|
||||||
|
+++ b/crypto/bn/bn_gf2m.c
|
||||||
|
@@ -15,6 +15,7 @@
|
||||||
|
#include "bn_local.h"
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
#ifndef OPENSSL_NO_EC2M
|
||||||
|
+# include <openssl/ec.h>
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
/*
|
||||||
|
* Maximum number of iterations before BN_GF2m_mod_solve_quad_arr should
|
||||||
|
@@ -1140,16 +1141,26 @@ int BN_GF2m_mod_solve_quad(BIGNUM *r, const BIGNUM *a, const BIGNUM *p,
|
||||||
|
/*
|
||||||
|
* Convert the bit-string representation of a polynomial ( \sum_{i=0}^n a_i *
|
||||||
|
* x^i) into an array of integers corresponding to the bits with non-zero
|
||||||
|
- * coefficient. Array is terminated with -1. Up to max elements of the array
|
||||||
|
- * will be filled. Return value is total number of array elements that would
|
||||||
|
- * be filled if array was large enough.
|
||||||
|
+ * coefficient. The array is intended to be suitable for use with
|
||||||
|
+ * `BN_GF2m_mod_arr()`, and so the constant term of the polynomial must not be
|
||||||
|
+ * zero. This translates to a requirement that the input BIGNUM `a` is odd.
|
||||||
|
+ *
|
||||||
|
+ * Given sufficient room, the array is terminated with -1. Up to max elements
|
||||||
|
+ * of the array will be filled.
|
||||||
|
+ *
|
||||||
|
+ * The return value is total number of array elements that would be filled if
|
||||||
|
+ * array was large enough, including the terminating `-1`. It is `0` when `a`
|
||||||
|
+ * is not odd or the constant term is zero contrary to requirement.
|
||||||
|
+ *
|
||||||
|
+ * The return value is also `0` when the leading exponent exceeds
|
||||||
|
+ * `OPENSSL_ECC_MAX_FIELD_BITS`, this guards against CPU exhaustion attacks,
|
||||||
|
*/
|
||||||
|
int BN_GF2m_poly2arr(const BIGNUM *a, int p[], int max)
|
||||||
|
{
|
||||||
|
int i, j, k = 0;
|
||||||
|
BN_ULONG mask;
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
- if (BN_is_zero(a))
|
||||||
|
+ if (!BN_is_odd(a))
|
||||||
|
return 0;
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
for (i = a->top - 1; i >= 0; i--) {
|
||||||
|
@@ -1167,12 +1178,13 @@ int BN_GF2m_poly2arr(const BIGNUM *a, int p[], int max)
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
- if (k < max) {
|
||||||
|
+ if (k > 0 && p[0] > OPENSSL_ECC_MAX_FIELD_BITS)
|
||||||
|
+ return 0;
|
||||||
|
+
|
||||||
|
+ if (k < max)
|
||||||
|
p[k] = -1;
|
||||||
|
- k++;
|
||||||
|
- }
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
- return k;
|
||||||
|
+ return k + 1;
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
/*
|
||||||
|
diff --git a/test/ec_internal_test.c b/test/ec_internal_test.c
|
||||||
|
index 8c2cd05631696..02cfd4e9d8858 100644
|
||||||
|
--- a/test/ec_internal_test.c
|
||||||
|
+++ b/test/ec_internal_test.c
|
||||||
|
@@ -155,6 +155,56 @@ static int field_tests_ecp_mont(void)
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
#ifndef OPENSSL_NO_EC2M
|
||||||
|
+/* Test that decoding of invalid GF2m field parameters fails. */
|
||||||
|
+static int ec2m_field_sanity(void)
|
||||||
|
+{
|
||||||
|
+ int ret = 0;
|
||||||
|
+ BN_CTX *ctx = BN_CTX_new();
|
||||||
|
+ BIGNUM *p, *a, *b;
|
||||||
|
+ EC_GROUP *group1 = NULL, *group2 = NULL, *group3 = NULL;
|
||||||
|
+
|
||||||
|
+ TEST_info("Testing GF2m hardening\n");
|
||||||
|
+
|
||||||
|
+ BN_CTX_start(ctx);
|
||||||
|
+ p = BN_CTX_get(ctx);
|
||||||
|
+ a = BN_CTX_get(ctx);
|
||||||
|
+ if (!TEST_ptr(b = BN_CTX_get(ctx))
|
||||||
|
+ || !TEST_true(BN_one(a))
|
||||||
|
+ || !TEST_true(BN_one(b)))
|
||||||
|
+ goto out;
|
||||||
|
+
|
||||||
|
+ /* Even pentanomial value should be rejected */
|
||||||
|
+ if (!TEST_true(BN_set_word(p, 0xf2)))
|
||||||
|
+ goto out;
|
||||||
|
+ if (!TEST_ptr_null(group1 = EC_GROUP_new_curve_GF2m(p, a, b, ctx)))
|
||||||
|
+ TEST_error("Zero constant term accepted in GF2m polynomial");
|
||||||
|
+
|
||||||
|
+ /* Odd hexanomial should also be rejected */
|
||||||
|
+ if (!TEST_true(BN_set_word(p, 0xf3)))
|
||||||
|
+ goto out;
|
||||||
|
+ if (!TEST_ptr_null(group2 = EC_GROUP_new_curve_GF2m(p, a, b, ctx)))
|
||||||
|
+ TEST_error("Hexanomial accepted as GF2m polynomial");
|
||||||
|
+
|
||||||
|
+ /* Excessive polynomial degree should also be rejected */
|
||||||
|
+ if (!TEST_true(BN_set_word(p, 0x71))
|
||||||
|
+ || !TEST_true(BN_set_bit(p, OPENSSL_ECC_MAX_FIELD_BITS + 1)))
|
||||||
|
+ goto out;
|
||||||
|
+ if (!TEST_ptr_null(group3 = EC_GROUP_new_curve_GF2m(p, a, b, ctx)))
|
||||||
|
+ TEST_error("GF2m polynomial degree > %d accepted",
|
||||||
|
+ OPENSSL_ECC_MAX_FIELD_BITS);
|
||||||
|
+
|
||||||
|
+ ret = group1 == NULL && group2 == NULL && group3 == NULL;
|
||||||
|
+
|
||||||
|
+ out:
|
||||||
|
+ EC_GROUP_free(group1);
|
||||||
|
+ EC_GROUP_free(group2);
|
||||||
|
+ EC_GROUP_free(group3);
|
||||||
|
+ BN_CTX_end(ctx);
|
||||||
|
+ BN_CTX_free(ctx);
|
||||||
|
+
|
||||||
|
+ return ret;
|
||||||
|
+}
|
||||||
|
+
|
||||||
|
/* test EC_GF2m_simple_method directly */
|
||||||
|
static int field_tests_ec2_simple(void)
|
||||||
|
{
|
||||||
|
@@ -443,6 +493,7 @@ int setup_tests(void)
|
||||||
|
ADD_TEST(field_tests_ecp_simple);
|
||||||
|
ADD_TEST(field_tests_ecp_mont);
|
||||||
|
#ifndef OPENSSL_NO_EC2M
|
||||||
|
+ ADD_TEST(ec2m_field_sanity);
|
||||||
|
ADD_TEST(field_tests_ec2_simple);
|
||||||
|
#endif
|
||||||
|
ADD_ALL_TESTS(field_tests_default, crv_len);
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user